• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
WANG Zicheng, GUO Jin, ZHANG Yadong, SU Lina, SUN Ningxian, CHEN Mingbao. Transient Analysis of ZPW-2000 Track Circuit Based on FDTD Interface Method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(1): 196-201, 218. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180020
Citation: WANG Zicheng, GUO Jin, ZHANG Yadong, SU Lina, SUN Ningxian, CHEN Mingbao. Transient Analysis of ZPW-2000 Track Circuit Based on FDTD Interface Method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(1): 196-201, 218. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180020

Transient Analysis of ZPW-2000 Track Circuit Based on FDTD Interface Method

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180020
  • Received Date: 25 Jan 2018
  • Rev Recd Date: 28 Apr 2018
  • Available Online: 11 Jul 2018
  • Publish Date: 01 Feb 2019
  • A track circuit performs a transient process when a train enters or departs a section. Therefore, its circuit state can be judged by the transient change of signals at the receiving end. The finite-difference, time-domain (FDTD) is a common numerical solution for the transmission line. However, the structure of the ZPW-2000 track circuit is more complex than that of general ones. Thus, the direct FDTD method does not work well. Therefore, an FDTD-based transient analysis method and an alternative transient program-electromagnetic transients program (ATP-EMTP) interface model for a ZPW-2000 track circuit is introduced. The entire module is divided into two parts: transmission line and centralised parameter network. The two parts are related by a controlled current source. The transmission line is solved using FDTD, and the centralised parameter network is solved using the ATP-EMTP. The simulation results of the ZPW-2000 track circuit show that the ballast and shunt residences have great impacts on the receiving-end signals. When the ballast resistance falls to 0.6 Ω•km, the receiving-end voltage drops from 2.0 V to about 0.5 V; when the shunt resistance increases to 0.2 Ω, the residual voltage at the receiving end rises to about 1.0 V. If only the threshold comparison method is used, the state of the track circuit is indistinguishable. However, a transient mutation ccurs in the receiving-end signals when the train enters or departs. This can be used to determine the shunt state of the track circuit.

     

  • 米根锁,王彦快,王文波. 雷达图法在轨道电路分路不良预警中的应用[J]. 铁道学报,2013,35(11): 66-70 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2013.11.011

    MI Gensuo, WANG Yankuai, WANG Wenbo. Application of radar chart in poor shunting early warning for track circuit[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2013, 35(11): 66-70 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2013.11.011
    孙上鹏,赵会兵,全宏宇,等. 基于定性趋势分析的无绝缘轨道电路电气绝缘节设备故障诊断方法[J]. 中国铁道科学,2014,35(1): 105-113 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2014.01.17

    SUN Shangpeng, ZHAO Huibing, QUAN Hongyu, et al. Equipment fault diagnosis for electrical separation joint of jointless track circuit using qualitative trend analysis[J]. China Railway Science, 2014, 35(1): 105-113 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2014.01.17
    赵斌,张友鹏,魏蕾. 轨道电路时域响应分析[J]. 铁道学报,2014,36(9): 68-72 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2014.09.13

    ZHAO Bin, ZHANG Youpeng, WEI Lei. Analysis on time responses of track circuits[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2014, 36(9): 68-72 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2014.09.13
    赵斌,张友鹏. 基于傅里叶变换结合Q-D算法的轨道电路暂态分析[J]. 铁道学报,2015,37(11): 78-83

    ZHAO Bin, ZHANG Youpeng. Transient analysis of track circuits based on FFT & Q-D algorithm[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2015, 37(11): 78-83
    傅佳伟,王小敏,郭进. ZPW-2000轨道电路的多轮对动态分路建模研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2018,15(9): 2374-2384 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7029.2017.02.030

    FU Jiawei, WANG Xiaomin, GUO Jin. Research on dynamic multi-wheel sets shunted track circuit modeling[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2018, 15(9): 2374-2384 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7029.2017.02.030
    张友鹏,祁欢,赵斌. 轨道电路分路态检测方法研究[J]. 铁道学报,2017,39(1): 70-75 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2017.01.010

    ZHANG Youpeng, QI Huan, ZHAO Bin. Research on method for detection of shunt state of track circuits[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2017, 39(1): 70-75 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2017.01.010
    赵会兵,章宇舟,汪希时. 电容补偿式轨道电路若干问题的研究[J]. 铁道学报,1998,20(4): 77-81 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8360.1998.04.014

    ZHAO Huibing, ZHANG Yuzhou, WANG Xishi. Study on some problems of track circuit with compensating capacitors[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 1998, 20(4): 77-81 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8360.1998.04.014
    PAUL C R. Analysis of multi-conductor transmission lines[M]. New York: Wiley, 1994: 240-258
    刘少斌, 刘崧, 洪伟. 色散介质时域有限差分方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 49-67
    YUICHI T. Circuit-based FDTD method for transient analysis of mutually coupled system[C]//Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference Electronics, Circuits and Systems. Washington D C: IEEE, 2008: 101-104
    RACHIDI F, NUCCI C A, IANOZ M. Transient analysis of multi-conductor lines above a lossy ground[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1999, 14(1): 294-302 doi: 10.1109/61.736741
    PAOLONE M, NUCCI C A, PETRACHE E, et al. Mitigation of lightning-induced over-voltages in medium voltage distribution lines by means of periodical grounding of shielding wires and of surge arresters:Modeling and experimental validation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2004, 19(1): 423-431 doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2003.820196
    Leuven EMTP Center. ATP/EMTP rule book[M]. Leuven: Belgium, 1987: 128-154
  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Zicheng, ZHANG Yadong, GUO Jin, SU Lina, YANG Jing, SONG Ci, LI Kehong. Fault Diagnosis for Track Circuit Based on Interval Type-2 Neural-Fuzzy System[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(1): 190-196. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180983
    [2]YANG Shiwu, CHEN Bingjun, CHEN Haikang, CUI Yong, TANG Qiankun. Suppression Solutions to Transient Traction Current Interference in Neutral Zone for Track Circuit[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(6): 1332-1341. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180692
    [3]ZHOU Qizhong, XIE Yongle. Fault Diagnosis Method for Analog Circuits Based on Matrix Perturbation Analysis[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(2): 369-378. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.02.022
    [4]PENG Kaibei, JIA Ruiqing. Security of Finite State Machines in Sequential Circuits[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(2): 424-428. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.02.028
    [5]HUA Zexi, CHEN Xiangdong. Solution to Track Section Occupation Using Multi-sensor[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 28(2): 208-217. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.02.002
    [6]WANG Changhong, QU Yaobin, LU Zhijun, AN Hao, XIA Hongwei, MA Guangcheng. Trajectory Optimization Method for Spacecraft Orbit Transfer with Finite Thrust[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(2): 390-394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.02.030
    [7]CHEN Linglu, ZHOU Haijing, LI Hanyu, FU Haijun, LIAO Cheng. Cartesian Mesh Generator for Parallel Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(4): 776-782. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.04.028
    [8]ZHANG Youpeng,  , ZHAO Bin, TIAN Mingxing. Transmittal Signal Frequency of Centre-Fed Ballastless Track Circuit[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 25(1): 7-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.021.01.002
    [9]ZHAO Lin-Hai, MU Jian-Cheng. Fault Diagnosis Method for Jointless Track Circuit Based on AOK-TFR[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(1): 84-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.01.013
    [10]HAO Zhen-Hai, YANG Xin-Yong, HUANG Ku-Guo. Recognition Technology of Dynamic Magnetic Interference Based on Differential Magnetic Compasses[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(3): 445-450. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [11]LUO Zhen, ZHAI Wanming, YAN Hua, YAO Li. Finite Element Analysis on Stresses in Slab Track Structures on Soil Subgrade[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(6): 711-714,725.
    [12]LI Rong, WANG Jinnuo. Pre-Process Interface Technique for High Level Process Planning[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(6): 701-705.
    [13]ZUO De-yuan, CHENDa-peng. Finite Deformation Analysis with Hybrid/Mixed Finite Element Method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(3): 327-331.
    [14]LIUAi-rong, PAN Yi-su, ZHOUBen-kuan. Finite Element Analysis for Shape Memory Alloys[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(2): 157-151.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 赵斌,安逸,王东. 基于分数阶传输线模型的轨道电路暂态分析. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(10): 181-188 .
    2. 赵斌,陈磊,欧静宁,王东,于光昊. 考虑高频损耗的ZPW-2000A轨道电路暂态响应分析. 中国铁道科学. 2023(01): 186-193 .
    3. 杨璟,郑启明,姚新文,陈光武,王小敏. 基于深度网络的轨道电路暂态特征多补偿电容故障定位. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2023(07): 2653-2663 .
    4. 李建国,康耀军,马尚鹏. ZPW2000系列移频信号谐波干扰处理方法研究. 电子测量与仪器学报. 2022(03): 184-193 .
    5. 杨世武,陈炳均,陈海康,崔勇,唐乾坤. 轨道电路对分相区暂态牵引电流干扰的抑制方法. 西南交通大学学报. 2019(06): 1332-1341 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(8)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04051015
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 49.5 %FULLTEXT: 49.5 %META: 48.6 %META: 48.6 %PDF: 1.9 %PDF: 1.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.0 %其他: 2.0 %China: 1.7 %China: 1.7 %Kennedy Town: 0.3 %Kennedy Town: 0.3 %上海: 1.7 %上海: 1.7 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %内江: 0.2 %内江: 0.2 %北京: 17.1 %北京: 17.1 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %吉安: 0.3 %吉安: 0.3 %名古屋: 0.3 %名古屋: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %太原: 1.5 %太原: 1.5 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %张家口: 1.7 %张家口: 1.7 %成都: 2.0 %成都: 2.0 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %池州: 0.7 %池州: 0.7 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %漯河: 0.5 %漯河: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 10.5 %芒廷维尤: 10.5 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %西宁: 51.5 %西宁: 51.5 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 1.9 %郑州: 1.9 %镇江: 0.5 %镇江: 0.5 %长沙: 0.8 %长沙: 0.8 %青岛: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %其他ChinaKennedy Town上海东莞临汾兰州内江北京南昌吉安名古屋哥伦布唐山太原廊坊张家口成都扬州池州洛阳温州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤苏州西宁贵阳邯郸郑州镇江长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(1)

    Article views(506) PDF downloads(14) Cited by(13)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return