• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
LIN Pengzhen, WEI Yapeng, QIAO Yewei. Interfacial Stress and Failure Criteria of Steel Structure Coatings Under Wind-Sand Erosion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(1): 236-243. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210189
Citation: LIN Pengzhen, WEI Yapeng, QIAO Yewei. Interfacial Stress and Failure Criteria of Steel Structure Coatings Under Wind-Sand Erosion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(1): 236-243. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210189

Interfacial Stress and Failure Criteria of Steel Structure Coatings Under Wind-Sand Erosion

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210189
Funds:  Key Laboratory of Road & Bridge and Underground Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou JiaotongUniversity, Lanzhou 730070,China;2. Civil Engineering Design and Research Institute, China Railway Design Corporation, Tianjin 300308, China;3. Gansu Procince Traffic Construction Project Management Company, Lanzhou 730000, China)
  • Received Date: 16 Mar 2021
  • Rev Recd Date: 27 Jun 2021
  • Available Online: 28 Sep 2022
  • Publish Date: 06 Jul 2021
  • In order to characterize and assess the interfacial bonding strength of steel structure coatings under wind-sand erosion, expressions for calculating interfacial stresses of the steel structure coating under wind-sand erosion are established using theories of contact mechanics and interface mechanics, based on the typical sandstorm background of Northwest China. The interface crack initiation position of steel structure coating is determined by combined use of the fracture mechanics theory and finite element analysis method. The interfacial stress failure criterion considering the influence of compressive stress is established at the crack position. The results show that when the erosion angle is 30° and 60°, the maximum interfacial shear stress is located at 200 mm and 180 mm in front of the erosion point, and the maximum interfacial compressive stress is located at 100 mm and 50 mm in front of the erosion point, respectively. The interface crack in the coating initiates at the position of the maximum interfacial shear stress. In addition, the proposed interfacial stress failure criterion for coatings under wind-sand erosion is similar to the Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion. The slope depends on the erosion angle of the sand particles. When the erosion angle is 30° and 60°, the slope magnitude is −0.599 and −0.467, respectively.

     

  • [1]
    卞达,王永光,倪自丰,等. 涂层厚度对硬脆涂层结合强度的影响[J]. 计算力学学报,2016,33(1): 103-106.

    BIAN Da, WANG Yongguang, NI Zifeng, et al. Effect of the coating thickness on the bond strength for brittle coating substrate system[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2016, 33(1): 103-106.
    [2]
    BENJAMIN P, WEAVER C. Measurement of adhesion of thin films[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 1960, 254(1277): 163-176.
    [3]
    杨班权,陈光南,张坤,等. 涂层/基体材料界面结合强度测量方法的现状与展望[J]. 力学进展,2007,37(1): 67-79. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0992.2007.01.010

    YANG Banquan, CHEN Guangnan, ZHANG Kun, et al. A review on measurement methods for interfacial bonding strength between coating and substrate[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2007, 37(1): 67-79. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0992.2007.01.010
    [4]
    OLLENDORF H, SCHNEIDER D. A comparative study of adhesion test methods for hard coatings[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 1999, 113(1/2): 86-102.
    [5]
    STEINMANN P A, TARDY Y, HINTERMANN H E. Adhesion testing by the scratch test method: the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic parameters on the critical load[J]. Thin Solid Films, 1987, 154(1/2): 333-349.
    [6]
    TANG W, XU K W, WANG P, et al. Scratch behavior of multi-layered metallic thin films on Al2O3 substrates[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2004, 182(2/3): 143-148.
    [7]
    BEYDON R, BERNHART G, SEGUI Y. Measurement of metallic coatings adhesion to fibre reinforced plastic materials[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2000, 126(1): 39-47. doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00516-8
    [8]
    GUO S Q, MUMM D R, KARLSSON A M, et al. Measurement of interfacial shear mechanical properties in thermal barrier coating systems by a barb pullout method[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2005, 53(9): 1043-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.07.012
    [9]
    PERERA D Y. On adhesion and stress in organic coatings[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 1996, 28(1): 21-23. doi: 10.1016/0300-9440(95)00585-4
    [10]
    许金泉. 界面力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.
    [11]
    卓杨,许金泉. 基于分子动力学模拟结果的界面破坏准则[J]. 工程力学,2008,25(2): 46-51.

    ZHUO Yang, XU Jinquan. An interface fracture criterion based on simulation of molecular dynamics[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(2): 46-51.
    [12]
    于秦,许金泉. 薄膜涂层材料界面纯剪破坏标准试验法的开发[J]. 力学季刊,2005,26(4): 618-622. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-0053.2005.04.017

    YU Qin, XU Jinquan. Development of pure shearing destructive standard test method for coating materials[J]. Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics, 2005, 26(4): 618-622. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-0053.2005.04.017
    [13]
    郝贠洪,邢永明,杨诗婷,等. 风沙环境下钢结构涂层的冲蚀磨损力学性能研究[J]. 应用力学学报,2013,30(3): 350-355, 473. doi: 10.11776/cjam.30.03.B119

    HAO Yunhong, XING Yongming, YANG Shiting, et al. The erosion-wear mechanical properties of the coating of steel structure subject to sandstorm[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2013, 30(3): 350-355, 473. doi: 10.11776/cjam.30.03.B119
    [14]
    郝贠洪,朱敏侠,冯玉江,等. 风沙冲击作用下钢结构表面涂层与基体界面应力研究[J]. 固体力学学报,2014,35(5): 485-492. doi: 10.19636/j.cnki.cjsm42-1250/o3.2014.05.007

    HAO Yunhong, ZHU Minxia, FENG Yujiang. et al. Interface stress between steel surface coating and substrate under the sand shock[J]. Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics, 2014, 35(5): 485-492. doi: 10.19636/j.cnki.cjsm42-1250/o3.2014.05.007
    [15]
    徐启运,胡敬松. 我国西北地区沙尘暴天气时空分布特征[J]. 应用气象学报,1996,7(4): 479-482.

    XU Qiyun, HU Jingsong. Featurures of spatial and temporal distributions of the dust storms in northwest China[J]. Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorological, 1996, 7(4): 479-482.
    [16]
    赵富康,蔺鹏臻,颜维毅,等. 钢箱-混凝土组合桥梁防腐涂层的疲劳应力分析[J]. 涂料工业,2020,50(10): 7-14. doi: 10.12020/j.issn.0253-4312.2020.10.7

    ZHAO Fukang, LIN Pengzhen, YAN Weiyi. et al. Fatigue stress analysis of anti-corrosion coatings on steel box-concrete composite beam bridge[J]. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2020, 50(10): 7-14. doi: 10.12020/j.issn.0253-4312.2020.10.7
    [17]
    胡振虎. 基于内聚力模型的复合材料胶接接头界面失效机理研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018.
    [18]
    解德, 钱勤, 李长安. 断裂力学中的数值计算方法及工程应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
    [19]
    王自强, 陈少华. 高等断裂力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
    [20]
    MUTOH Y, XU J Q MIYASHITA Y, et. al. On evalution of adhesive strength in scratch test of coating materials[J]. Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2002, 68(6): 909-915.
    [21]
    李广信. 高等土力学[M]. 2版. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2016.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]WEI Yapeng. Study on Uniaxial Tensile Test and Constitutive Model of Steel Structure Coating[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230591
    [2]HOU Chao, JIN Xiaoguang, HE Jie, ZHANG Chi. Research on Damage Model of Rock Under Freeze-Thaw Cycles Based on Maximum Tensile Strain Criterion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(5): 1045-1055. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210493
    [3]YAN Huadong, GONG Weijia, JIN Hui. Effect of Casting Defects on Mechanical Properties of Steel Structures with Cast Steel Joints[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(2): 343-349, 371. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180081
    [4]YAN Zhitao, LI Jie, ZHANG Pu, YOU Yi, GONG Bo. Numerical Simulation of Direct-Current Sand Leakage Wind Tunnel Based on FLUENT[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(5): 994-1000, 1027. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180167
    [5]YE Huawen, LI Xinshun, SHUAI Chun, QU Haobo, XU Xun, WEI Xing. Fatigue Experimental Analysis of Damaged Steel Beams Strengthened with Prestressed Unbonded CFRP Plates[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(1): 129-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180297
    [6]ZHU Xiaolei, PU Minghua, ZHANG Hong, ZHAO Yong. High-Efficient Preparation of SmBiO3 Buffer Layer for Superconducting Coated Conductors[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(3): 633-638. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.03.027
    [7]PAN Yi, LI Lingjiao, YAO Yunyi, WANG Huiqin. Evaluation Methods for Post-Earthquake Damage State of Ancient Masonry Buildings[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(4): 704-713. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.04.015
    [8]WANG Dong, LIU Changwu, WANG Ding, CAO Lei, DU Xinliang,   . Failure Prediction and Post-Failure Behavior of Typical Rock under Triaxial Compression[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 25(1): 90-96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.021.01.015
    [9]FENG Kun, HE Chuan, SU Zong-Xian. Prototype Test on Failure Characteristics of Segmental Lining Structure for Nanjing Yangtze River Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(4): 564-571. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.04.007
    [10]YE Huawen, KÖ, NIG Christian, UMMENHOFER Thomas, QIANG Shizhong. Experimental Investigation of Fatigue Behavior of Tension Steel Plate Reinforced with Prestressed CFRP Laminates[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 22(6): 823-829.
    [11]CHEN Hui, GOU Guoqing, LIU Yan, TU Mingjing. Formation and Strengthening Mechanisms of Plasma Sprayed Nanostructured WC-Co Coating[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(5): 633-637.
    [12]MO Jiliang, ZHU Minhao. Tribological Properties of CrN Coatings Prepared by Physical Vapor Deposition[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(2): 280-284.
    [13]GUO Yao-huang, GUO Chun-xiang, GUO Qiang. Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Based on Similarity Degree Between Partial Orders[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006, 19(1): 1-6.
    [14]XULi, JIANGXiao-yu, QIAN Lin-mao. Experimental Investigation onM echanicalProperties of Nano-Al2O3Coating on ResinM atrix Composites[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2005, 18(3): 347-350.
    [15]ZHOUYou-long, HUANGNan, ZHANGJi-chun. Experimental Study on Explosive Technology to Prepare Hydroxyapatite Coating on Titanium[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2002, 15(1): 49-52.
    [16]LIU Chang-hong, CHEN Qiu. Optimality Criterion of the Significant Failure Modes of Engineering Structures[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(6): 620-623.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 蔺鹏臻,陈星. 基于改进Sherwood-Frost模型的钢结构重防腐涂装本构研究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2024(09): 3719-3731 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-07010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 26.6 %FULLTEXT: 26.6 %META: 66.8 %META: 66.8 %PDF: 6.6 %PDF: 6.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.5 %其他: 10.5 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %上海: 0.7 %上海: 0.7 %东莞: 0.8 %东莞: 0.8 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %兰州: 1.1 %兰州: 1.1 %包头: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %北京: 12.6 %北京: 12.6 %南京: 2.1 %南京: 2.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.6 %哥伦布: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %张家口: 3.5 %张家口: 3.5 %悉尼: 0.6 %悉尼: 0.6 %成都: 2.6 %成都: 2.6 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %揭阳: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.1 %旧金山: 0.1 %旧金山: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 0.3 %杭州: 0.3 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %池州: 0.3 %池州: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %济宁: 0.4 %济宁: 0.4 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %漯河: 1.7 %漯河: 1.7 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %石家庄: 4.2 %石家庄: 4.2 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 13.4 %芒廷维尤: 13.4 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %西宁: 31.4 %西宁: 31.4 %西安: 0.6 %西安: 0.6 %诺沃克: 0.4 %诺沃克: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.6 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %金昌: 0.1 %金昌: 0.1 %长沙: 0.8 %长沙: 0.8 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %韶关: 0.4 %韶关: 0.4 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %其他其他China上海东莞临汾乌鲁木齐保定兰州包头北京南京南宁南通台州合肥呼和浩特哥伦布嘉兴天津宣城广州张家口悉尼成都扬州揭阳旧金山朝阳杭州武汉池州沈阳济宁淮南温州漯河烟台石家庄秦皇岛绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州西宁西安诺沃克贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆金昌长沙阜新韶关香港特别行政区

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(8)

    Article views(481) PDF downloads(48) Cited by(6)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return