• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
PAN Yi, LI Lingjiao, YAO Yunyi, WANG Huiqin. Evaluation Methods for Post-Earthquake Damage State of Ancient Masonry Buildings[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(4): 704-713. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.04.015
Citation: PAN Yi, LI Lingjiao, YAO Yunyi, WANG Huiqin. Evaluation Methods for Post-Earthquake Damage State of Ancient Masonry Buildings[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(4): 704-713. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.04.015

Evaluation Methods for Post-Earthquake Damage State of Ancient Masonry Buildings

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.04.015
  • Received Date: 11 Dec 2014
  • Publish Date: 25 Aug 2016
  • Evaluating the damage sate of ancient masonry buildings after earthquake involves many impact factors which are uncertain and correlated. In order to evaluate accurately the post-earthquake damage state of ancient masonry buildings, an ancient masonry building is divided into subsoil, foundation, and superstructure; and 11 indictors are selected as evaluation factors. Using membership function and analogy to build the judgment matrix, the weight coefficient vector is determined by analytic hierarchy process, and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model with two phases and three levels is built. Taking a watchtower in the Qiang village as an example, the model is applied to evaluate its damage state after Wenchuan earthquake. The results show that according to the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, the watchtower suffered moderate damage after the earthquake, with an assessment grade of B, which is consistent with the actual destruction state of the tower. This suggests that the proposed model can accurately reflects the damage state of ancient masonry buildings after earthquake, and therefore can be used as a basis to provide strengthening or maintenance measures for ancient masonry buildings damaged by earthquake.

     

  • 潘毅,唐丽娜,王慧琴,等. 芦山7.0级地震古建筑震害调查分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2014,34(1):140-146.PAN Yi, TANG Lina, WANG Huiqin, et al. Investigation and analysis of damage to ancient buildings in Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2014, 34(1):140-146.
    潘毅,王超,季晨龙,等. 汶川地震中砖石结构古建筑的震害调查与分析[J]. 四川建筑科学研究,2012,38(6):156-159.PAN Yi, WANG Chao, JI Chenlong, et a1.Seismic damage investigation and analysis of Chinese ancient masonry buildings in Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2012, 38(6):156-159.
    郭小东,马东辉,苏经宇. 结合脉动测试的砖石古塔震害预测方法[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造,2006,27(4):80-83.GUO Xiaodong, MA Donghui, SU Jingyu. Earthquake damage assessment method for historical buildings based on pulsating detection[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2006, 27(4):80-83.
    陈平,姚谦峰,赵冬. 西安大雁塔抗震能力研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,1999,20(2):46-49.CHEN Ping, YAO Qianfeng, ZHAO Dong. Research on seismic capacity of Xi'an Big Wild Goose Pagoda[J]. Journal of building structures,1999, 20(2):46-49
    陈平,赵冬,姚谦峰. 西安小雁塔抗震能力研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报,2001,31(2):64-67.CHEN Ping, ZHAN Dong,YAO Qianfeng. Research on seismic capacity of Xi'an Small Wild Goose Pagoda[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2001, 31(2):64-67.
    刘艳. 地震后砖石古建筑损坏状态评价方法研究[J]. 中国文物科学研究,2011,2(2):54-56.LIU Yan. Research on evaluation method of ancient masonry buildings damaged state after the earthquake[J]. Chinese Cultural Relics Research, 2011, 2(2):54-56.
    周乾,闫维明,杨小森,等. 汶川地震古建筑轻度震害研究[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造,2009,31(5):101-107.ZHOU Qian, YAN Weiming, YANG Xiaosen, et al. Study on slight damage of a strengthened Chinese ancient building under Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2009, 31(5):101-107.
    柏景. 川西地区藏羌高碉建筑探析[J]. 建筑历史与理论:学术研讨会论文选辑,2008,9(3):278-292.BO Jing. The analysis of the high towers building in the Tibetan and Qiang of west Sichuan[J]. Architectural History and Theory:Symposium Selections, 2008, 9(3):278-292.
    CHOU K C, YUAN J. Safety assessment of existing structures using a filtered fuzzy relation[J]. Structural Safety, 1992, 11(3):173-189.
    李铁英,魏剑伟,张善元,等. 木结构双参数地震损坏准则及应县木塔地震反应评价[J]. 建筑结构学报,2004,25(2):91-97.LI Tieying, WEI Jianwei, ZHANG Shanyuan, et al. Double-parameter seismic damage criterion on wooden structure and seismic response appraisement on Yingxian wooden tower[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2004, 25(2):91-97.
    薛建阳,张风亮,赵鸿铁,等. 古建筑木结构基于结构潜能和能量耗散准则的地震破坏评估[J]. 建筑结构学报,2012,33(8):127-134.XUE Jianyang, ZHANG Fengliang, ZHAO Hongtie, et al, Potential and energy dissipation-based seismic damage evaluation of ancient timber structure[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2012, 33(8):127-134.
    贾华. 层次分析法中权重算法的一种改进[J]. 武测科技,1995,20(3):25-30.JIA Hua. Analysis of an improved weight algorithm in hierarchy[J]. Wu Measurement Science and Technology, 1995, 20(3):25-30.
    王强. 砖木结构房屋抗震性能评价方法研究[D]. 兰州:中国地震局兰州地震研究所,2009.
    顾赫巍. 基于模糊综合评判理论的砖石古塔可靠性评价[D]. 北京:北京交通大学,2009.
    王广军. 建筑地震破坏等级的工程划分及应用[J]. 世界地震工程,1993,13(2):40-46.WANG Guangjun. Construction engineering division and the application of the earthquake damage level[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 1993, 13(2):40-46.
    四川省文物管理局. 四川汶川地震灾后文化遗产抢救保护年度工作报告[R]. 成都:四川省文物管理局,2009.
    季富政. 中国羌族建筑[M]. 成都:西南交通大学出版社,2000:244-245..
    ZHOU Z, OGOT M, SCHWARTZ L. A finite element analysis of the effects of an increasing angle on the tower of Pisa[J]. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2001, 37(11):901-911.
    刘汉阳,肖小松. 砌体结构弹性模量取值方法[J]. 河北建筑工程学院学报,1996,2(1):17-24.LIU Hanyang, XIAO Xiaosong. Masonry elastic modulus value method[J]. Journal of Hebei Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 1996, 2(1):17-24.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LIN Pengzhen, WEI Yapeng, QIAO Yewei. Interfacial Stress and Failure Criteria of Steel Structure Coatings Under Wind-Sand Erosion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(1): 236-243. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210189
    [2]ZHANG Jiangquan, GAO Hongli, XIANG Shoubing, GUO Liang, TAN Yongwen. Intelligent Evaluation Method for Ball Screw Degradation State[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(4): 813-820. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220082
    [3]ZHANG Xueqin, GAO Runming, GUO Yujun, KANG Yongqiang, LI Yuansheng, WU Guangning. Hyperspectral-Based Corona Aging Evaluation for Composite Insulators[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(2): 442-449. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20181062
    [4]LI Fangxian, YU Qijun, LUO Yunfeng, WEI Jiangxiong. Mathematical Description and Analysis on Characteristics of Pore Structure for Foam Concrete[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(6): 1205-1210. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.06.016
    [5]ZHANG Yongshuang, YAO Xin, GUO Changbao, LI Lingjing, YANG Zhihua, DU Guoliang. Regional Warning of Debris Flow Hazards after Wenchuan Earthquake in Longmenshan Region[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(5): 1014-1023. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.05.026
    [6]ZHANG Huailiang, LIU Sen, ZOU Baiwen. Assessment Method of Gear Wear Condition Based on Data Mining[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 28(4): 710-716. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.04.021
    [7]PAN Yi, WANG Chao, TANG Lina, LI Lingjiao, GENG Pengfei. Comparative Research on Flat Steel and Damper Strengthening of Straight Type of Tenon-Mortise Joints[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 27(6): 981-986,1031. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.06.008
    [8]FENG Kun, HE Chuan, SU Zong-Xian. Prototype Test on Failure Characteristics of Segmental Lining Structure for Nanjing Yangtze River Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(4): 564-571. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.04.007
    [9]FU Mao-Ming. Application of Fuzzy Comprehensive Analysis to Information Security Evaluation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(3): 389-392. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [10]JIANG Lin, 2, XIAO Jian, WANG Tao. Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy State Observer for Induction Motor[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(2): 273-277. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [11]MA Guozhong, MI Wenyong, LIU Xiaodong. Multi-level Fuzzy Evaluation Method for Civil Aviation System Safety[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(1): 104-109.
    [12]XU Rui, HUANG Dingfa, LI Chenggang, ZHOU Letao. Evaluation of GPS Baseline Quality Based on Probabilistic Characteristic of Integer Ambiguity[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(6): 739-742,747.
    [13]XIAO Jian, BAI Yifeng, YU Long. Overview of Fuzzy System Structure Identification[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006, 19(2): 135-142.
    [14]LI Zhenxin, GUO Fengzhe, QIAN Yongjiu. Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Durability of Existing Reinforced Concrete Arch Bridges[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006, 19(3): 366-370.
    [15]PEI Zheng, HUANGTian-min. Fuzzy Approach for Bi-Level Programming Problems (Ⅱ)[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2000, 13(1): 98-101.
    [16]Pu Dezhang. A New Method of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation and Its Application in Evaluating Laboratory[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1999, 12(3): 354-359.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(18)

    1. 侯涛,韦俊,吴晓琴,卢俊龙,吴义. 圣寿寺唐代砖塔地震响应和损伤分析. 苏州科技大学学报(工程技术版). 2024(01): 42-51 .
    2. 杨春艳,刘强,潘尚斌. 福建客家土楼地震灾害破坏预测评估. 盐城工学院学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 71-76 .
    3. 郑建国,徐建,钱春宇,谢启芳,王龙. 古建筑抗震与振动控制若干关键技术研究. 土木工程学报. 2023(01): 1-17 .
    4. 葛家琪,赵强,马伯涛,朱鸿钧,周萍,刘鑫刚. 砖墙(柱)-木屋架古建筑结构静力破坏机制与稳定性能指标. 建筑结构学报. 2023(08): 56-64 .
    5. 卢俊龙,周谦祥,田鹏刚,王振山,田建勃. 基于分离式建模的砖石古塔动力性能与响应分析. 计算力学学报. 2023(05): 739-748 .
    6. 白凡,杨娜,刘威,张淑慧. 环境激励下定州开元寺塔结构状态评估研究. 建筑结构学报. 2022(01): 105-115 .
    7. 卢俊龙,范金鑫,王振山,贠作义. 古砖塔子结构压剪复合受力性能分析. 工程科学学报. 2022(02): 277-288 .
    8. 白凡,杨娜,常鹏,旦增格桑,旦增卓嘎,滕东宇. 基于模糊层次法的藏式砌体劣化风险权重系数试验标定研究. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2022(02): 158-164 .
    9. 姜珊,李建博,赵慧强,肖迎九,路国运. 山西稷王山砖塔地震动力响应及损伤分析. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2022(02): 165-173 .
    10. 卢俊龙,程成,张晨,王振山,贠作义. 往复荷载作用下开洞砖塔子结构受力性能研究. 建筑结构学报. 2022(06): 176-186 .
    11. 卢俊龙,张晨,王振山,贠作义. 纠偏后古砖塔动力性能与地震损伤分析. 振动工程学报. 2021(06): 1112-1123 .
    12. 韩鑫,卢俊龙,韦俊,李传立. 西安八云塔动力性能与地震损伤机制. 应用力学学报. 2020(03): 1305-1313+1408 .
    13. 成蕾,李碧雄. 基于指标法的建筑物理脆弱性评估研究进展. 震灾防御技术. 2020(02): 260-273 .
    14. 李泉,祝林涛,宁陟,夏剑. “义兴公”商号门房安全现状与损伤分析. 中原工学院学报. 2019(01): 76-82 .
    15. 李福海,靳贺松,胡丁涵,姜沫臣,武志伟,徐公允,洪宇超,刘洋. 钢筋混凝土桥梁的耐久性评估. 安全与环境学报. 2018(05): 1653-1662 .
    16. 罗磊,汪斌. 基于GIS的震后修复建筑物空间分布格网化方法研究. 地震工程学报. 2018(06): 1362-1365 .
    17. 张娜. 恶劣气候条件下砖石结构古建筑加固方法试验研究. 科技通报. 2017(06): 147-150 .
    18. 秦本东,李泉,檀俊坤. 基于模糊层次分析法的砖石木结构古建筑安全评价. 土木工程与管理学报. 2017(05): 52-59 .

    Other cited types(17)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-0705101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 28.7 %FULLTEXT: 28.7 %META: 71.3 %META: 71.3 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.6 %其他: 4.6 %Tuen Mun San Hui: 0.3 %Tuen Mun San Hui: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %北京: 4.9 %北京: 4.9 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %咸阳: 0.3 %咸阳: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.7 %哥伦布: 0.7 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %张家口: 1.3 %张家口: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %昆明: 1.0 %昆明: 1.0 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %池州: 0.7 %池州: 0.7 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %漯河: 1.3 %漯河: 1.3 %石家庄: 2.0 %石家庄: 2.0 %芒廷维尤: 17.6 %芒廷维尤: 17.6 %芝加哥: 1.3 %芝加哥: 1.3 %衡水: 1.3 %衡水: 1.3 %西宁: 53.7 %西宁: 53.7 %西安: 1.6 %西安: 1.6 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %其他Tuen Mun San Hui兰州北京南通合肥咸阳哥伦布天津太原张家口成都扬州昆明杭州武汉池州沈阳洛阳淄博深圳温州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥衡水西宁西安郑州青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views(636) PDF downloads(175) Cited by(35)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return