Citation: | ZHANG Jingke, ZHU Tao, WANG Xiaorui, XIAO Shoune, YANG Guangwu, YANG Bing. Comprehensive Evaluation Model for One-Dimensional Crash Energy Management of Trains[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(6): 1329-1336. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200034 |
In order to configure and evaluate the train collision energy scheme more scientifically and comprehensively, the maximum average acceleration, maximum instantaneous acceleration and energy utilization rate of trains were taken as evaluation indexes, and a more reasonable comprehensive weight coefficient was derived by using the subjective and objective index weights obtained by the order relation analysis and entropy method. A comprehensive evaluation model of train one-dimensional collision energy management was obtained by fusing weight information and evaluation index information with nonlinear weighted synthesis method, then 15 energy allocation schemes of a certain type of train were comprehensively evaluated by using this model. The results indicate that the comprehensive evaluation results are consistent with that of the change range of all indexes, and it has better applicability and reliability. Scheme 4 is the optimal scheme, in which the maximum instantaneous acceleration index decreases by 14.03%, but the maximum average acceleration index and energy utilization rate index increase by 4.92% and 19.44% compared with scheme 8 respectively. These results both reflect the importance of the maximum average acceleration index, which has the greatest impact on safety, and comprehensively considers the energy utilization rate index related to economy.
[1] |
JACOBSEN K, TYRELL D. Impact test of a crash-energy management passenger rail car[C]//2004 ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference. Baltimore: ASME, 2004: 19-26.
|
[2] |
TYRELL D, JACOBSEN K, PARENT D. Preparations for a train-to-train impact test of crash-energy management passenger rail equipment[C]//2005 Joint Rail Conference. Pueblo: ASME, 2005: 107- 116.
|
[3] |
CAROLAN M, MUHLANGER M, PERLMAN B, et al. Occupied volume integrity testing: elastic test results and analyses[C]//ASME 2011 Rail Transportation Division Fall Technical Conference. Minneapolis: ASME, 2011: 47-57.
|
[4] |
CAROLAN M, PERLMAN B, TYRELL D. Crippling test of a budd pioneer passenger car[C]//ASME 2012 Joint Rail Conference. Philadelphia: ASME, 2012: 225-235.
|
[5] |
WALDECK H. ICE动力车碰撞仿真[J]. 电力牵引快报,1996(4): 26-32.
WALDECK H. ICE power car crash simulation[J]. Electric Traction Report, 1996(4): 26-32.
|
[6] |
TYRELL D,张钟浩. 机车抗碰撞能力改进研究[J]. 国外内燃机车,2002(3): 23-31.
TYRELL D, ZHANG Zhonghao. Research on improvement of anti-collision ability of locomotive[J]. Foreign Diesel Locomotive, 2002(3): 23-31.
|
[7] |
Rail Track PLC. Structural requirements for railway vehicle: GM/RT—2100[S]. London: Safety and Standards Directo Rate, 1994.
|
[8] |
LU G. Energy absorption requirement for crashworthy vehicles[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2002, 216(1): 31-39.
|
[9] |
杨宝柱,肖守讷,杨超. 能量吸收方案对列车碰撞响应的影响[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2018(3): 54-57.
YANG Baozhu, XIAO Shoune, YANG Chao. The effect of energy absorbing schemes on train crash responses[J]. Urban Mass Transit, 2018(3): 54-57.
|
[10] |
袁成标. 基于列车碰撞动力学的纵向碰撞建模及能量管理研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2018.
|
[11] |
郭亚军. 综合评价理论、方法及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007: 16-17, 45-47, 73.
|
[12] |
王文华,黄仁乐,皱保平,等. 基于序关系分析法的配电网风险评估方法[J]. 计算机与数字工程,2018,46(8): 1516-1519,1552. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9722.2018.08.007
WANG Wenhua, HUANG Renle, ZHOU Baoping, et al. Based on-sequence relation analysis risk assessment method of distribution network[J]. Computer and Digital Engineering, 2018, 46(8): 1516-1519,1552. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9722.2018.08.007
|
[13] |
李航,李根,张帅阳,等. 基于序关系分析法的车辆主动悬架控制器仿真研究[J]. 中国工程机械学报,2018,16(3): 231-236.
LI Hang, LI Gen, ZHANG Shuaiyang, et al. Simulation research on vehicle active suspension controller based on the order relation analysis method[J]. Chinese Journal of Construction Machinery, 2018, 16(3): 231-236.
|
[14] |
梁东,李远富,樊敏. 基于区间数距离的铁路线路方案决策模型与方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2019,54(4): 823-830.
LIANG Dong , LI Yuanfu , FAN Min. Decision making model and method based on distance measure between interval numbers in railway location[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4): 823-830.
|
[15] |
徐健,杜贞栋,林洪孝,等. 基于序关系分析法的节水型社会评价指标权重的确定[J]. 水电能源科学,2014,32(10): 132-134.
XU Jian, DU Zhendong, LIN Hongxiao, et al. Confirmation of index weight of water-saving social construction based on order relation analysis method[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2014, 32(10): 132-134.
|
[16] |
高瑾瑾,郑源,李涧鸣. 基于改进序关系分析法的抽水蓄能电站经济效益综合评价[J]. 长江科学院院报,2018,35(4): 137-142. doi: 10.11988/ckyyb.20161372
GAO Jinjin, ZHENG Yuan, LI Jianming. Comprehensive evaluation of economic benefits of pumped storage power plants by improved order relation analysis method[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2018, 35(4): 137-142. doi: 10.11988/ckyyb.20161372
|
[17] |
梁晨. 子午线轮胎综合接地性能评价体系与方法研究[D]. 南京: 江苏大学, 2013.
|
[18] |
余建英, 何旭宏. 数据统计分析与SPSS应用[M]. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2003: 87.
|
[19] |
王学军,郭亚军,兰天. 构造一致性判断矩阵的序关系分析法[J]. 东北大学学报,2006,27(1): 115-118.
WANG Xuejun, GUO Yajun, LAN Tian. Rank correlation analysis of formation of consistent judgment matrix[J]. Journal of Northeastern University, 2006, 27(1): 115-118.
|
[20] |
刘祎. 多功能包装机设计质量综合评价系统研究[D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2016.
|