• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
ZHOU Wenliang, LI Peng, TIAN Junli, DENG Lianbo. Optimization of Train Timetable for Intercity Railway Based on Coordinated Operation of Multi-periodic Trains[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4): 831-839. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170153
Citation: CAO Licong, ZHOU Yuzhe, MA Donghua, LIU Feicheng, ZHANG Jianjing. Large Shaking Table Test on Seismic Response of Site with Tilted Interlayer[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(5): 953-961. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170748

Large Shaking Table Test on Seismic Response of Site with Tilted Interlayer

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170748
  • Received Date: 23 Oct 2017
  • Rev Recd Date: 15 Mar 2018
  • Available Online: 23 Feb 2019
  • Publish Date: 01 Oct 2019
  • To investigate the dynamic response of a complex site with a tilted interlayer and provide a potential reinforcement for the site, a large-scale shaking table model test was done to study the acceleration, strain and displacement responses of the site. The effects of the interlayer on the stability of the site are discussed based on an analysis of the Fourier spectrum and response spectrum under the El Centro seismic wave. Furthermore, the critical acceleration and stability factor of the site are obtained through a pseudo-static analysis. Experimental results show that the interlayer obviously weakens the peak acceleration of the seismic wave and that the degree of impairing effects intensifies with the seismic peak acceleration increasing. There is a feature of ‘magnitude saturation’ for the acceleration amplification coefficient (AAC) of the position of bedrock. The peak strain of the interlayer is greater than those of the other layers. When the input earthquake amplitude is larger than 0.33g, there is another peak strain in the cover layer which is located at a platform corner and the strain curve presents a form is ‘W’. The interlayer can also weaken to some extent the amplitude of the Fourier spectrum at about 20 Hz. The predominant periods of theresponse spectra measured from different cross sections of the same soil layer are similar, but obviously different between different soil layers. The predominant period of the interlayer (0.31 s) is greater than those of the bedrock layer (0.19 s) and the cover layer (0.21 s). According to the pseudo-static analysis, when the peak acceleration of the seismic wave loaded is 0.33g, the site stability factor is 3.16, and the critical acceleration of the potential slip area is 1.42g.

     

  • 杨福荣. 三峡库区万州港望天咀码头场地稳定性评价[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2012
    智晶子. 重庆武隆机场场地稳定性研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2011
    吴野. 贵州毕节机场环境地质条件及场地稳定性评价[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2010
    邓学晶. 城市垃圾填埋场振动台模型试验与地震稳定性分析方法研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2007
    武小菲,王鹰,叶唐进,等. G318林芝—波密段斜坡地震动力响应及失稳机理[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2017,52(3): 571-577.

    WU Xiaofei, WANG Ying, YE Tangjin, et al. Seismic dgmamic response and instability mechanism of slopes in Nying—Bome seetion of G318 high way, Tibet[J]. Journal of Soutwest Jiaotong university, 2017, 52(3): 571-577.
    黄润秋,李果,巨能攀. 层状岩体斜坡强震动力响应的振动台试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(5): 865-876. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2013.05.003

    HUANG Runqiu, LI Guo, JU Nengpan. Shaking table test on strong earthquake response of stratified rock slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(5): 865-876. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2013.05.003
    张建经,韩鹏飞. 重力式挡墙基于位移的抗震设计方法研究——大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2012,34(3): 417-423.

    ZHANG Jianjing, HAN Pengfei. Displacement-based aseismic design method for gravity retaining walls—large scale shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(3): 417-423.
    董金玉,杨国香,伍法权,等. 地震作用下顺层岩质边坡动力响应和破坏模式大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2011,32(10): 2977-2988. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.10.014

    DONG Jinyu, YANG Guoxiang, WU Faquan, et al. The large-scale shaking table test study of dynamic response and failure mode of bedding rock slope under earthquake[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(10): 2977-2988. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.10.014
    刘汉香, 许强, 徐鸿彪, 等. 斜坡动力变形破坏特征的振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(2): 334-339

    LIU Hanxiang, XU Qiang, XU Hongbiao, et al. Shaking table model test on slope dynamic deformation and failure[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(2): 334-339
    文畅平,杨果林. 地震作用下挡土墙位移模式的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(7): 1502-1512.

    WEN Changping, YANG Guolin. Large-scale shaking table tests study of seismic displacement mode of retaining structures under earthquake loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(7): 1502-1512.
    中国地震局. 中国地震动参数区划图: GB18306—2015[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015
    徐挺. 相似方法及其应用[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1995: 40-47
    王志佳,张建经,闫孔明,等. 考虑动本构关系相似的模型土设计及相似判定体系研究[J]. 岩土力学,2015,36(5): 1328-1332,1338.

    WANG Zhijia, ZHANG Jianjing, YAN Kongming, et al. Model soil design considering similitude of dynamic constitutive model and evaluation of similarity level[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(5): 1328-1332,1338.
    WANG Z J, FAN G, HAN J, et al. Reference strain γ in hyperbolic modeling of dynamic shear modulus of soils[C]//IACGE 2013: Challenges and Recent Advances in Geotechnical and Seismic Research and Practices: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering. Chengdu: American Society of Civil Engineers. 2015: 271-278
    MARTIN P P, SEED H B. One-dimensional dynamic ground response analyses[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1982, 108(7): 935-952.
    张建经, 曹礼聪, 王志佳. 一种振动台试验中测量土体分层应变的应变带: CN105758363A[P]. 2016-07-13
    铁道第一勘察设计院. 铁路路基设计规范: TB1001—2005[S]. 2版. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2005
  • Relative Articles

    [1]HU Lu, LE Shitong, ZHU Juanxiu. Electric Truck Route Planning Considering Multiple Charging Pile Queues and Time Windows[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230084
    [2]WANG Zhijian, LIU Shijie, ZHOU Jinyao, SUN Jian. Multimodal Public Transportation Route Planning Considering Personalized Travel Demand[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(6): 1319-1325, 1333. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210633
    [3]GAO Hao, ZHANG Yadong, GUO Jin, LI Kehong. Two-Stage Optimization Method of Train Energy-Efficient Operation Based on Dynamic Programming[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(5): 946-954. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20191208
    [4]ZHOU Yan, CHEN Hong, ZHANG Yeting, HUANG Yueying, ZHANG Pengcheng, YANG Weijun. Multi-objective Indoor Path Planning Method with Dynamic Environment Awareness[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(3): 611-618, 632. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180098
    [5]ZHU Qing, WANG Yeping, ZHANG Junxiao, CHEN Chongtai, CAO Zhenyu. Integrated Navigation Grid Model and Its Applications in Smart Tourism Routing[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(1): 195-201. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.01.027
    [6]LIN Feng. Optimal Intermodal Transport Path Planning Based on Martins Algorithm[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 28(3): 543-549. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.03.025
    [7]ZHU Jun, WANG Jinhong, HU Ya, PENG Zilong, ZHANG Ali. Combinational Modeling Method of Virtual High-Speed Railway Scene Based on Entity-Relationship Conceptual Model[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 27(2): 317-322. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.02.020
    [8]ZHANG Junfeng, YAO Zhihong. LOD Algorithm of Terrain Based on Conservative Screen Error and Isolated Division of Quad-tree[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(4): 666-671,677. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.04.012
    [9]ZHAO Dan, SHAO Chunfu, YUE Hao. Modeling the Dynamic Impacts of Multi-modal Guidance Information on Commuters' Trip Chain[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(2): 368-375. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.02.027
    [10]XIAO Renxin, LI Tao, QIN Ying, ZOU Gan. Markov Decision Process for the Energy Management of Parallel Hybrid Vehicles[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 25(6): 982-988. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.06.012
    [11]MENG Linghang, XU Xiaohao, LI Shanmei, GENG Zengxian. Dynamic Reroute Planning under Uncertain Severe Convective Weather[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 25(4): 686-691. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.04.024
    [12]ZHONG Hui-Ling, ZHANG Meng, SHI Yong-Jiang, CAI Wen-Hua. Efficient Route Plan Algorithm Based on Multi-level Road Network Strategy[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(4): 645-650. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.04.019
    [13]YIN Guisheng, CHEN Huaiyou, 2, ZHANG Jing, LI Jianjun. Progressive LOD Terrain Rendering Algorithm Based on Nine Palaces[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(3): 411-417. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [14]WANG Yanjun, HU Minghua, SU Wei. Dynamic Taxiway Routing Algorithm Based on Conflict Avoidance[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 22(6): 933-939.
    [15]ZHANG Ming, HAN Songchen. Dynamic Sector Plan Based on Variable Precision Rough Set Theory[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 22(3): 410-414.
    [16]MOU Qifeng, WANG Ciguang. Fast Optimization of Final Approach Sequence of Aircrafts[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(3): 404-408.
    [17]CHENXiao-shan, LAIXi-de, LIUXiao-bing. Development of Computer Simulation System for Overhauling of Hydroelectric Generating Unit[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(2): 234-238.
    [18]LI Gang-jun, CHEN Yong. Virtual Reality System for Robotics Application[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(1): 115-118.
    [19]Ding Guofu, WangJinnuo. Research of Data Transformation and Fusion in Virtual Environment[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1999, 12(3): 310-314.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 郭锐,曾美玲,李富龙,邱国鹏,陈立龙. 采用边缘检测的游戏智能导航网格生成方法. 三明学院学报. 2024(03): 25-35 .
    2. 卢国菊,史文芳. 基于Dijkstra-ACO混合算法的煤矿井下应急逃生路径动态规划. 工矿自动化. 2024(10): 147-151+178 .
    3. 任伟建,郭奕志,张海阔,康朝海. 虚拟场景下改进的A*算法及应用. 计算机仿真. 2023(12): 277-282 .
    4. 赵一智,郑加柱. 室内导航研究现状与发展难点. 现代测绘. 2022(02): 5-9 .
    5. 史学强,张玉涛,陈晓坤,张园勃,林国铖. 横向声波扰动下池火火焰失稳特性. 西南交通大学学报. 2022(06): 1293-1302 . 本站查看
    6. 胡玉珠. 基于室内火灾的应急逃生指示产品设计研究. 消防界(电子版). 2022(24): 13-15 .

    Other cited types(12)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 41.6 %FULLTEXT: 41.6 %META: 57.0 %META: 57.0 %PDF: 1.4 %PDF: 1.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.8 %其他: 3.8 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 1.0 %上海: 1.0 %临汾: 0.7 %临汾: 0.7 %北京: 2.6 %北京: 2.6 %十堰: 0.5 %十堰: 0.5 %南京: 0.2 %南京: 0.2 %台州: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %合肥市: 0.2 %合肥市: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.5 %唐山: 0.5 %唐山: 0.5 %张家口: 3.4 %张家口: 3.4 %成都: 1.0 %成都: 1.0 %杭州: 1.2 %杭州: 1.2 %池州: 0.7 %池州: 0.7 %漯河: 0.5 %漯河: 0.5 %甘孜藏族自治州: 0.7 %甘孜藏族自治州: 0.7 %芒廷维尤: 9.9 %芒廷维尤: 9.9 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %西宁: 68.8 %西宁: 68.8 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %镇江: 0.5 %镇江: 0.5 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %其他[]上海临汾北京十堰南京台州合肥市哥伦布唐山张家口成都杭州池州漯河甘孜藏族自治州芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁邯郸郑州镇江长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(12)  / Tables(4)

    Article views(579) PDF downloads(10) Cited by(18)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return