• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
XIE Yongliang, LYU Na. Explosion Hazard Analysis of Leaked Hydrogen in Tunnels Under Longitudinal Ventilation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(1): 81-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220222
Citation: XIE Yongliang, LYU Na. Explosion Hazard Analysis of Leaked Hydrogen in Tunnels Under Longitudinal Ventilation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(1): 81-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220222

Explosion Hazard Analysis of Leaked Hydrogen in Tunnels Under Longitudinal Ventilation

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220222
  • Received Date: 02 Apr 2022
  • Rev Recd Date: 26 Sep 2022
  • Available Online: 12 Oct 2023
  • Publish Date: 13 Oct 2022
  • In order to investigate whether longitudinal ventilation can effectively control the diffusion of leaked hydrogen in tunnels and reduce the overpressure hazards of flammable hydrogen clouds, a square tunnel with a length of 100 m was studied. The hydrogen leakage and diffusion process in the tunnel were numerically simulated by using FLUENT software. Based on the classification of damage of combustible hydrogen cloud explosion overpressure to people and buildings, the effect of longitudinal ventilation on reducing the harm of hydrogen leakage and explosion in the tunnel was analyzed. The results show that under calculated conditions, the longitudinal ventilation velocity in the case of a hydrogen jet fire in the tunnel is 6.5–8.0 m/s. Longitudinal ventilation can effectively control the leakage and diffusion of hydrogen in the tunnel, but it fails to eliminate the explosion possibility and harm of hydrogen leakage in the tunnel.

     

  • [1]
    刘群,张红林,官思发,等. 发展氢能产业的调研与思考[J]. 高科技与产业化,2020(10): 59-63.

    LIU Qun, ZHANG Honglin, GUAN Sifa, et al. Investigation and consideration on developing the hydrogen energy industry[J]. High-Technology & Commercialization, 2020(10): 59-63.
    [2]
    于蓬,王健,郑金凤,等. 氢能利用与发展综述[J]. 汽车实用技术,2019(24): 22-25. doi: 10.16638/j.cnki.1671-7988.2019.24.008

    YU Peng, WANG Jian, ZHENG Jinfeng, et al. Review on hydrogen energy utilization and development[J]. Automobile Applied Technology, 2019(24): 22-25. doi: 10.16638/j.cnki.1671-7988.2019.24.008
    [3]
    KRAUSE H, PFEIL A. Reaction products of energetic materials heated by short laser pulses[M]//Advances in Chemical Reaction Dynamics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1986: 455-458.
    [4]
    陈长坤,雷鹏,史聪灵,等. 公路隧道内氢气和丙烷爆炸数值模拟对比分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(1): 151-155.

    CHEN Changkun, LEI Peng, SHI Congling, et al. Comparative numerical simulation analysis on explosion of hydrogen and propane in highway tunnel[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(1): 151-155.
    [5]
    GROETHE M. Large-scale hydrogen deflagrations and detonations[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(13): 2125-2133. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.016
    [6]
    MUKAI S, SUZUKI J, MITSUISHI H, et al. CFD simulation of diffusion of hydrogen leakage caused by fuel cell vehicle accident in tunnel, underground parking lot and multistory parking garage[J]. JARI Research Journal, 2005, 27(9): 293-311.
    [7]
    MUKAI S, SUZUKI J, MITSUISHI H, et al. CFD simulation of diffusion of hydrogen leakage caused by fuel cell vehicle accident in tunnel, underground parking lot and multistory parking garage[C]//19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV 2005). Washington, D. C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2005: 1511-1519.
    [8]
    BIE H Y. Simulation analysis on the risk of hydrogen releases and combustion in subsea tunnels[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(11): 7617-7624. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.263
    [9]
    LAFLEUR C B, BRAN ANLEU G A, MUNA A B, et al. Hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle tunnel safety study[R]. New Mexico: Sandia National Lab, 2017.
    [10]
    BIRCH A D, BROWN D R, DODSON M G, et al. The structure and concentration decay of high pressure jets of natural gas[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1984, 36(5/6): 249-261.
    [11]
    李伟平. 富春江通航隧道火灾爆炸事故逃生疏散及结构安全性研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2009.
    [12]
    ZHANG S. Effects of equivalence ratio, thickness of rupture membrane and vent area on vented hydrogen-air deflagrations in an end-vented duct with an obstacle[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(47): 26100-26108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.057
    [13]
    王福军. 计算流体动力学分析: CFD软件原理与应用[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2004.
    [14]
    李鹏飞, 徐敏义, 王飞飞. 精通CFD工程仿真与案例实战[M]. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2011.
    [15]
    QIAN J Y. A numerical study of hydrogen leakage and diffusion in a hydrogen refueling station[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(28): 14428-14439. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.140
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Tao, YANG Yunping, MI Chun, CHEN Zhengquan, WANG Chunxiang, CHEN Longfei, ZHANG Yuchun. Maximum Temperature in Bifurcated Tunnel Based on Synergistic Effect of Longitudinal Ventilation and Air Curtain[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2025, 60(1): 103-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230157
    [2]LI Qi, ZOU Xueli, PU Yuchen, CHEN Weirong, ZHAO Shudan. Optimal Schedule of Combined Heat-Power Microgrid Based on Hydrogen Energy Storage[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(1): 9-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210348
    [3]GENG Ping, YANG Qi, HE Yue, HE Chuan, GUO Xiangyu. Shaking Table Test and Numerical Simulation of Shield Tunnel Connecting Cross Passage[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(6): 1215-1223. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180982
    [4]LIN Peng, WANG Guoyuan, SI Youliang, WANG Zhongkuan, WU Fanyu, GAO Dongli, MEI Xiujuan. Influence of Vent Location on Efficiency of Smoke Extraction in Tunnel Fire[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(5): 1055-1062, 1112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170945
    [5]YU Minggao, CHEN Jing, SU Guanfeng. Numerical Simulation of Fire-induced Smoke in Train Compartment Based on Fire Dynamics Simulation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(4): 826-834. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.04.023
    [6]WANG Weihua, LIAO Haili, LI Mingshui. Numerical Simulation of Wind-Induced Roof Snow Distributions Based on Time Variable Boundary[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(5): 851-856,967. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.05.011
    [7]WANG Zhen, LI Guhua, ZHANG Zejiang, HUANG Tao. Effect of Fire Fighting Water on Compressive Strength of Concrete in Tunnel Fire[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(2): 223-227. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.02.008
    [8]CHENG Zhi-Jiang, BARRIERE T, LIU Bao-Sheng, GELIN J C. Experiment and Numerical Simulation of Micro-injection Moulding[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(4): 635-638. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [9]LI Yingzhen, LEI Bo. Influences of Boundary Conditions on Critical Velocity in Tunnel Fire Model Test[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 22(2): 264-268.
    [10]CAO Xiaojun, ZHANG Jichun, LU Helin, GUO Jianqun. Numerical Simulation of Ground Vibration Effects in Shallow Tunneling Blasting[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006, 19(6): 680-684.
    [11]ZHANG Guang-peng, LEIBo. NeuralNetwork Online Control to Road Tunnel with LongitudinalVentilation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2005, 18(6): 765-768.
    [12]ZENG Dong-yang, HE Chuan. Numerical Simulation of Segment Joint Bending Stiffness of Metro Shield Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(6): 744-748.
    [13]WUBo, GAO Bo, LUOJian-jun. Numerical Simulation of Reinforcing Effect of Horizontal Drilling Jet-Grouting Pegs on Shenzhen Metro Tunnel between Stations[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(5): 605-608.
    [14]HUO Hong-fa, YU Qin, HUANG Xie-qing. Numerical Simulation of Dynamical Responses of Assembled Vessel to Explosion Impact Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(5): 513-516.
    [15]TONG Bing, ZHU Bing, ZHOU Ben-kuan. Numerical Simulation of Velocity Field of Flow Around Square Cylinder[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2002, 15(2): 121-124.
    [16]Zhu Bing, Guan Baoshu, ZhengDaofang. Numerical Simulation of Longitudinal Ventilation of Long Highway Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1999, 12(2): 133-137.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 李涛,杨云萍,米春,陈政全,王春翔,陈龙飞,张玉春. 基于纵向通风与空气幕协同作用下的分岔隧道最高温度. 西南交通大学学报. 2025(01): 103-110 . 本站查看
    2. 牛奕,邓联滔,刘静雨. 氢气长管拖车隧道内泄漏扩散数值模拟研究. 工业安全与环保. 2025(04): 1-4 .
    3. 刘栋,叶继红. 多工况下氢能源汽车隧道内火灾温度场研究. 消防科学与技术. 2024(03): 344-350 .
    4. 王楠,曹小平. 双联拱隧道爆炸时程分析和动力响应:以甘肃省奤盖隧道为例. 科学技术与工程. 2024(14): 6034-6042 .
    5. 崔西勇,尹峰,和贵山,郑昀,潘兴富. 某实验室乙炔泄漏扩散过程的数值模拟分析及管理措施优化. 职业卫生与应急救援. 2024(06): 788-793 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-07010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 32.7 %FULLTEXT: 32.7 %META: 59.6 %META: 59.6 %PDF: 7.7 %PDF: 7.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.5 %其他: 14.5 %其他: 0.7 %其他: 0.7 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %上海: 1.4 %上海: 1.4 %东京: 0.3 %东京: 0.3 %东京都: 0.5 %东京都: 0.5 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %伦敦: 0.4 %伦敦: 0.4 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %北京: 4.9 %北京: 4.9 %十堰: 0.5 %十堰: 0.5 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %南京: 0.8 %南京: 0.8 %南宁: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %合肥: 0.8 %合肥: 0.8 %哈尔滨: 0.5 %哈尔滨: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %大庆: 0.4 %大庆: 0.4 %大连: 0.5 %大连: 0.5 %天津: 1.5 %天津: 1.5 %太原: 0.5 %太原: 0.5 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %张家口: 2.5 %张家口: 2.5 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %德阳: 0.3 %德阳: 0.3 %悉尼: 0.1 %悉尼: 0.1 %成都: 2.3 %成都: 2.3 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %昆明: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %武汉: 1.8 %武汉: 1.8 %池州: 1.6 %池州: 1.6 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %滨州: 0.4 %滨州: 0.4 %漯河: 3.8 %漯河: 3.8 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 4.1 %石家庄: 4.1 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %纽因顿: 0.1 %纽因顿: 0.1 %胡志明: 0.3 %胡志明: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 21.4 %芒廷维尤: 21.4 %芝加哥: 0.7 %芝加哥: 0.7 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 17.1 %西宁: 17.1 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.7 %诺沃克: 0.7 %贵阳: 0.8 %贵阳: 0.8 %运城: 1.1 %运城: 1.1 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 2.1 %郑州: 2.1 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 1.9 %长沙: 1.9 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %其他其他Kao-sung上海东京东京都东莞临汾伦敦兰州北京十堰华盛顿州南京南宁南昌南通合肥哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴大庆大连天津太原宣城平顶山广州张家口徐州德阳悉尼成都扬州昆明杭州武汉池州沈阳淄博深圳温州湖州滨州漯河烟台盐城石家庄福州纽因顿胡志明芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门衢州西宁西安诺沃克贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙青岛马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(4)

    Article views(433) PDF downloads(56) Cited by(7)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return