Fatigue Life Assessment of Metro Carbody Based on Submodel Method

LI Xinkang; WANG Suqin; LIU Chaotao; ZHANG Jia; CHEN Yifei

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200301

Volume 57 Issue 2

Jul. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University > 2022 > 57(2): 295-300, 330.

LI Xinkang, WANG Suqin, LIU Chaotao, ZHANG Jia, CHEN Yifei. Fatigue Life Assessment of Metro Carbody Based on Submodel Method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(2): 295-300, 330. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200301

Citation:

LI Xinkang, WANG Suqin, LIU Chaotao, ZHANG Jia, CHEN Yifei. Fatigue Life Assessment of Metro Carbody Based on Submodel Method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(2): 295-300, 330. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200301

Citation:

PDF( 10745 KB)

Fatigue Life Assessment of Metro Carbody Based on Submodel Method

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200301

1.
CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266111, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China

Received Date: 26 May 2020
Rev Recd Date: 09 Sep 2020

Available Online: 30 Sep 2020

Publish Date: 30 Sep 2020

Abstract

Abstract

The carbody is an important load-bearing component of metro vehicles. In view of the high comprehensive difficulty of the full-scale carbody fatigue test, on the basis of the characteristics of the end underframe model including the most severely stressed structures in the carbody (e.g., the draft, bolster and buffer), adoption of a fatigue test method using an end underframe submodel is proposed instead of the full-scale carbody. Finite element models of the end underframe and the full-size carbody are established, and the fatigue loads are determined according to the EN 12663 standard. The end underframe model and the stress distribution at key positions of the full-scale carbody are made consistent by setting reasonable boundary conditions. The stress at key positions of the end underframe is measured in a test, and a comparison is made with simulation results to verify the accuracy of the finite element model. The nominal stress method and the S-N curve specified by Eurocode 9 are then used to calculate the fatigue damage to the carbody and underframe welding seams. The results show that the three positions of maximum damage for the end underframe are consistent with the full-scale carbody, and the damage to the end underframe at the same position is greater than the damage to the carbody. Therefore, the fatigue life evaluation of the full-scale carbody using the submodel method readily obtains conservative results, and it is feasible to use the submodel method to evaluate the fatigue life of a metro carbody.
- full-scale carbody,
- end underframe submodel,
- fatigue testing,
- finite element,
- damage

FullText(HTML)

References(12)

References

[1]	王生华. 上海轨道交通1号线列车车体裂纹原因分析及解决措施[J]. 铁道车辆,2018,56(3): 41-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7602.2018.03.016 WANG Shenghua. Analysis of causes to cracking in carbodies of trains for Shanghai rail traffic No. 1 line and measures for solution[J]. Rolling Stock, 2018, 56(3): 41-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7602.2018.03.016
[2]	胡杰鑫,谢里阳,喻海洋,等. 基于验证模型的枕梁疲劳寿命预测虚拟实验[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2019,54(1): 106-112. HU Jiexin, XIE Liyang, YU Haiyang, et al. Virtual experiments to predict bolster fatigue lifetime based on FEM model validated by static tests[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(1): 106-112.
[3]	王玉伟. 基于实测载荷的CRH2型动车组车体枕梁疲劳强度研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2015.
[4]	李珊珊. CRH2046动车枕梁结构剩余寿命预测及补强方案分析[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 2015.
[5]	臧伟锋,陈安,董登科. 机身壁板内压载荷试验研究[J]. 航空工程进展,2018,9(1): 69-76. ZANG Weifeng, CHEN An, DONG Dengke, et al. Test research on fuselage panel subjected to internal pressure load[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2018, 9(1): 69-76.
[6]	魏亚龙. 高速列车车体气密疲劳强度试验台气密载荷加载特性的仿真分析[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2012.
[7]	GUTIÉRREZ-CARVAJAL R, BETANCUR GIRALDO G, BARBOSA J, et al. Full scale fatigue testing performed to the bolster beam of a railway vehicle[J]. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 2016, 12(1): 253-261.
[8]	European Committee for Standardization. Railway applications—structural requirements of railway vehicle bodies, part 1: Locomotives and passenger rolling stock (and alternative method for freight wagons): EN 12663-1: 2010 + A1: 2014[S]. British: BSI Group, 2014.
[9]	Committee on Urban Rail Rolling Stock. Recommendation on the design for strength of urban rail rolling stock according to BOStrab: VDV 152-2016[S]. Germany: Verband Deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen, 2016.
[10]	Forschungskuratorium Maschinenbau. Analytical strength assessment of components : made of steel, cast iron and aluminum materials in mechanical engineering: FKM Guideline[S]. Frankfurt am Main: VDMA-Verl, 2013.
[11]	李凡松. 服役环境下动车组车体振动与疲劳研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2018.
[12]	European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 9: Design of aluminium structures, part 1-3: structures susceptible to fatigue: EN 1999-1-3-2007+A1: 2011[S]. British: BSI Group, 2011.

Relative Articles

[1]	LIU Xiaochun, JIN Cheng, YU Zhiwu, HE Chen, YANG Yiyi. Fatigue Testing of CRTS Ⅲ Ballastless Slab Track Structures under Transverse Bending[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(1): 23-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.01.003
[2]	WANG Fei, QIAN Yongjiu, XU Jinyu, LI Zhiwu. Analysis of Dynamic Damage Constitutive Model for Concrete Exposed to High Temperature[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(6): 1075-1081. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.006
[3]	GAO Qing, . THE DAMAGE-COUPLED TIME-DEPENDENT MULTIAXIAL THEORETICAL MODEL: II. THE ENGINEERING APPLICABILITY OF FINITE ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 25(2): 230-235. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.02.010
[4]	WEI Xing, JIANG Shi-Zhong. Fatigue Performance of Anchorage Zone for Long-Span Single Pylon Cable-Stayed Bridge[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(6): 940-945. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.06.009
[5]	LI Ruiping, ZHOU Ning, MEI Guiming, ZHANG Weihua. Finite Element Model for Catenary in Initial Equilibrium State[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 22(5): 732-737.
[6]	REN Weiping, QIANG Shizhong, WEI Xing, WANG Chunhan. Fatigue Test of Tensile Anchor Plates in Cable-Beam Anchorage Zones for Zhanjiang Gulf Bridge[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(1): 49-54.
[7]	XU Jiang, LI Shuchun, LIU Yanbao, LI Kegang. Damage Constitutive Model of Rock Based on Drucker-Prager Criterion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(3): 278-282.
[8]	LI Jun, LI Xiaozhen, REN Weiping, QIANG Shizhong. Fatigue Test of Connection between Floor Beams and Monolithic Joints[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006, 19(3): 371-375.
[9]	MAOJian-qiang. Finite Element Method for Tunnel with Prefabricated Lining[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(4): 423-427.
[10]	ZHANG Xue-ling, XU Yan-shen. Data Exchange Between CAD and Finite Element Models in Modular Design[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(5): 584-587.
[11]	LIUChang-hong, CHENQiu. ANew Solution to Structural Fuzzy Finite Element Equations Based onMonosource Fuzziness[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(1): 84-87.
[12]	DAI Zhen-yu, GAO Qinq, CAIJie. Mesomechanics Analysis of Fatigue Damages[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(6): 575-577.

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

1.	于春洋，程亚军，刘春艳，薛宁鑫，姜春龙，廉帅，王家兴. 牵引与制动工况下城市轨道交通车辆结构强度分析方法. 城市轨道交通研究. 2025(02): 72-76 .
2.	李晓峰，刘书奇，韩新利，张岱霖. 基于频域法的B型地铁车体焊接结构振动疲劳研究. 大连交通大学学报. 2025(01): 32-38 .
3.	范晓达，朱涛，张弛，王超，肖守讷，阳光武. 机车车体枕梁关键含缺陷结构疲劳寿命评估. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 1644-1653 .
4.	文孝霞，熊耀淦，杜子学，吴辰思. 基于虚拟迭代法的跨座式单轨车辆车体疲劳分析. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(10): 130-136 .
5.	杨帆. 超大直径泥水盾构刀盘安装焊缝疲劳寿命预测. 中国工程机械学报. 2024(06): 784-789 .
6.	申天亮，公禹豪，左亮，朱涛，王超. 地铁车辆车体动应力谱外推及寿命评估. 铁道车辆. 2023(03): 83-88 .
7.	邓奇. 城市轨道交通车辆铆接车体寿命评估探究. 城市轨道交通研究. 2023(S1): 31-36 .
8.	孔佳麟，宗志祥. 地铁车辆铝合金车体服役寿命评估方法研究. 城市轨道交通研究. 2023(S1): 46-50 .
9.	丁杰，蒋莉，徐庆怡. 基于HyperMesh的动车组车体结构强度仿真. 机电工程技术. 2023(07): 268-271+276 .
10.	申天亮，左亮，朱涛，王超，肖守讷，阳光武，张兵. 基于全生命周期的地铁车辆铝合金车体服役寿命评估. 电力机车与城轨车辆. 2023(06): 101-106 .

Other cited types(10)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(10) / Tables(2)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(767) PDF downloads(47)