• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
JIN Shoujie, LI Kunpeng, ZHAN Dong, WAN Yongsheng, ZHONG Wei, FENG Chao. Safety Assessment Method of Collector Shoe-Rail Relationship in Urban Rail Transits[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(5): 1029-1034. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200075
Citation: JIN Shoujie, LI Kunpeng, ZHAN Dong, WAN Yongsheng, ZHONG Wei, FENG Chao. Safety Assessment Method of Collector Shoe-Rail Relationship in Urban Rail Transits[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(5): 1029-1034. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200075

Safety Assessment Method of Collector Shoe-Rail Relationship in Urban Rail Transits

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200075
  • Received Date: 07 Mar 2020
  • Rev Recd Date: 06 Apr 2020
  • Available Online: 19 Jun 2021
  • Publish Date: 15 Oct 2021
  • In order to realize the safety assessment of the relationship between the collector shoe and contact rail before the initial operation of urban rail transits, the laser imaging, ultraviolet photoelectric sensing, and fiber bragg grating strain sensor are used to measure the dynamic geometric parameters of the contact rail, arcing and dynamic contact force of the collector shoe-rail, and hard spots of the collector shoe. According to the characteristics of each test parameter, their evaluation standards are determined. Four parameters, which are contact rail operation height, contact rail offset, arcing rate and dynamic contact of the collector shoe-rail, are selected to establishe the evaluation function of contact rail quality index through Topsis evaluation method; then based on the above-mentioned evaluation standards and evaluation functions, a set of safety evaluation methods are proposed for the collector shoe-rail relationship before the initial operation of urban rail transits. The inspect device for the collector shoe-rail relationship is used to collect the data of the Zhenlongxi−Yuancun section on Guangzhou Metro Line 21. The results reveal that for the entire line, the deviation between the dynamic geometric parameters and their design values does not exceed ± 5 mm, maximum arcing time lasts 53 ms, maximum arcing rate is 0.025%, maximum and minimum average contact force is 135.6 N and 119.8 N respectively, maximum hard spot is 29.8 g, and the quality index score is bigger than 92.89 points.

     

  • 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 城市轨道交通初期运营前安全评估管理暂行办法: 交运规[2019]1号[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国交通运输部, 2019.
    BSI. Railway applications-current collection systems- requirements for and validation of measurements of the dynamic interaction between pantograph and overhead contact line: EN50317−2002[S]. Brussels: CENELEC, 2002.
    BSI. Railway applications-current collection systems-technical criteria for the interaction between pantograph and overhead line (to achieve free access): EN50367−2012[S]. Brussels: CENELEC, 2012.
    中华人民共和国铁道部. 轨道交通受流系统受电弓与接触网相互作用准则: TB/T 3271—2011[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2011.
    中华人民共和国铁道部. 高速铁路工程动态验收技术规范: TB 10761—2013[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2013.
    中华人民共和国交通运输部. 城市轨道交通初期运营前安全评估技术规范 第1部分: 地铁和轻轨[Z]. 北京: 中华人民共和国交通运输部办公厅, 2019.
    国家铁路局. 高速铁路设计规范: TB 10621—2014[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2015.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 城市轨道交通接触轨供电系统技术规范: CJJ/T 198—2013[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.
    上海申通地铁 集团有限公司. 120 km/h接触轨设计规范及施工验收标准[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2010.
    唐崇伟,陈唐龙. 基于面阵相机的接触轨几何参数检测系统[J]. 电气化铁道,2012,23(3): 42-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-936X.2012.03.014

    TANG Chongwei, CHEN Tanglong. Array camera based detection system for detection of geometric parameters of contact rail[J]. Electric Railway, 2012, 23(3): 42-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-936X.2012.03.014
    占栋,陈唐龙,于龙,等. 基于线阵相机的接触轨几何参数动态检测系统[J]. 电气化铁道,2012,23(1): 41-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-936X.2012.01.014

    ZHAN Dong, CHEN Tanglong, YU Long, et al. Linear camera based dynamic detection system for geometrical parameters of contact rail[J]. Electric Railway, 2012, 23(1): 41-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-936X.2012.01.014
    冯超. 接触轨几何参数高精度动态测量方法研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2014.
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 轨道交通 受流系统 受电弓与接触网动态相互作用测量的要求和验证: GB/T 32592—2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
    王淼,王田农. 青岛地铁13号线车辆受流器动态性能测试[J]. 电力机车与城轨车辆,2020,43(3): 76-79.

    WANG Miao, WANG Tiannong. Dynamic performance test of current collector for Qingdao metro line 13 vehicle[J]. Electric Locomotives & Mass Transit Vehicles, 2020, 43(3): 76-79.
    陈晓亮. 靴轨受流在线监测系统研究及在广州五号线的应用[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2018.
    陈祥. 接触轨端部弯头——集电拉弧的产生及其影响[J]. 科技风,2016(14): 6-7.
    王秋实,李鲲鹏,刘兰,等. 接触轨定位点施工精度对靴轨关系影响的仿真研究[J]. 电气化铁道,2020,31(1): 60-63.

    WANG Qiushi, LI Kunpeng, LIU Lan, et al. Study on simulation of collector shoe-rail interaction affected by construction accuracy of third rail location point[J]. Electric Railway, 2020, 31(1): 60-63.
    中国铁路总公司. 供电系统专业管理评价办法: 运供设备函[2016] 283号[S]. 北京: 中国铁路总公司, 2016.
    张玉峰. 第三轨参数检测及评价系统研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2006.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHAO Weihua, CAO Yang. Influence of Nose Rail Reconstruction Profile Parameters Based on B-Spline Curve[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(2): 264-272. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220693
    [2]ZHOU Ning, WANG Jundong, LIU Yueping, YANG Xuan, LI Yan, WU Zaixin, ZHANG Weihua. Image Processing Based Method for Measuring Contact Force in Pantograph-Catenary System[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(1): 1-8, 57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210509
    [3]XU Jingmang, ZHENG Zhaoguang, LAI Jun, YANG Huaizhi, YAN Zheng, QIAN Yao, WANG Ping. Influence of Track Parameters on Wheel/Rail Contact Behavior of High-Speed Turnout[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(5): 990-999. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210449
    [4]GUAN Jinfa, TIAN Zhijun, ZHANG Xuewu. Influence of Catenary Stitch Wire Parameters on Dynamic Performance Between Pantograph and Catenary[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(3): 659-665. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20190326
    [5]LIU Jian, YANG Qiaoyan, BAI Xue, SONG Kai, LUO Chengjie, SA Yongfang. Parameters Quantification of Forchheimer Equation and Critical Point of Transition from Darcian to Non-Darcian Flow[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(1): 218-224. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180756
    [6]TAN Mengying, ZOU Dong, LI Ruiping, LI Yan, ZHOU Ning, MEI Guiming, ZHANG Weihua, HUANG Guanhua. New Contact Force Measuring Method for Overhead Catenary Systems Based on Strain[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(6): 1208-1215. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.023
    [7]LI Qiuze, WANG Wenjing, CHEN Liang, SUN Shouguang. Fatigue Pitting Failure Analysis of Tooth Surface of Spiral Bevel Gear for EMU Train[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(6): 1206-1213. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.06.022
    [8]QIU Yanjun, DING Haibo, ZHANG Tianyang, YANG Enhui. Acoustic Performance of Asphalt Concrete Underlayment for High-Speed Railway Substructures[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(2): 381-387. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.02.017
    [9]XIAO Hong, GAO Liang, HOU Bowen. 3D Discrete Element Analysis of Selection of Sleeper Types on High-Speed Railway Bridge[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 28(5): 811-816. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.05.007
    [10]LI Nan, HAN Ying. Influence of Geometric Parameter Design on Performance of Capacitive Proximity Sensors[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 27(2): 330-336. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.02.022
    [11]XU Jin, PENG Qiyuan, LUO Qing, SHAO Yiming. Effect of Geometric Features of Simple Curves on Steering Behavior of Passenger Car[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(4): 678-687. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.04.014
    [12]YANG Gang, LI Fu. Sliding Mode Semi-active Control for High-Speed Pantograph[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(1): 10-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.01.002
    [13]CAO Yang, WANG Ping, ZHAO Weihua. Design Method for Rigid Frog Based on Wheel/Rail Contact Parameters[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 25(4): 605-610,617. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.04.011
    [14]WANG Xuemei, NI Wenbo. Measurement Foundation of Railway Track Geometrical Parameters Based on Strapdown Inertial Technique[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 25(3): 355-360. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.03.001
    [15]LEI Bing, WANG Qingyuan, LIU Yingqing. Simulation of Flashover Conditions in Passenger Vehicles[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(2): 182-186.
    [16]HAN Baomin, YANG Yuanxi. Kinematic Orbit Determination of Low-Earth Orbiters Based on GPS Precise Point Positioning Technique[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(1): 75-79.
    [17]MA Guozhong, MI Wenyong, LIU Xiaodong. Multi-level Fuzzy Evaluation Method for Civil Aviation System Safety[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(1): 104-109.
    [18]WANG Jue, LI Zhi. Algorithm for Wheel Rail Contact Geometry[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(2): 132-137.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 周煜东,伍道乐,谢利勤. 第三轨受流器动态特性试验研究. 电力机车与城轨车辆. 2023(04): 85-88+108 .
    2. 郭雪,张井玉,尹昱淞,卢波. 城市轨道交通车载轨道动态几何检测研究. 新型工业化. 2022(04): 128-132 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-07051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 34.5 %FULLTEXT: 34.5 %META: 59.4 %META: 59.4 %PDF: 6.1 %PDF: 6.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.0 %其他: 8.0 %上海: 1.5 %上海: 1.5 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %东营: 0.3 %东营: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %北京: 3.6 %北京: 3.6 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 0.8 %南京: 0.8 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.5 %天津: 1.2 %天津: 1.2 %安康: 0.5 %安康: 0.5 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %张家口: 3.0 %张家口: 3.0 %成都: 9.5 %成都: 9.5 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %池州: 0.5 %池州: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %漯河: 2.1 %漯河: 2.1 %澳门: 0.2 %澳门: 0.2 %石家庄: 3.9 %石家庄: 3.9 %绵阳: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 14.2 %芒廷维尤: 14.2 %芜湖: 0.5 %芜湖: 0.5 %芝加哥: 1.1 %芝加哥: 1.1 %菏泽: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.3 %西宁: 37.1 %西宁: 37.1 %许昌: 0.3 %许昌: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %运城: 1.1 %运城: 1.1 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %金华: 0.3 %金华: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %长沙: 0.9 %长沙: 0.9 %长治: 0.6 %长治: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %鹤岗: 0.6 %鹤岗: 0.6 %黄冈: 0.3 %黄冈: 0.3 %其他上海东莞东营临汾北京十堰南京南昌南通哈尔滨哥伦布天津安康宣城广州张家口成都扬州朝阳杭州池州沈阳洛阳济南深圳漯河澳门石家庄绵阳芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥菏泽衡阳西宁许昌贵阳运城郑州重庆金华镇江长沙长治青岛鹤岗黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(6)

    Article views(651) PDF downloads(40) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return