• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
Volume 56 Issue 2
Apr.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University  > 2021  >  56(2): 437-443.
HOU Suwei, TIAN Shuheng, TANG Zhiqiang, XI Jianying. Experimental Study on a New Clamping Anchor for Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Plate[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20240554
Citation: JING Chunhui, ZHI Jinyi. Influence of Sharing Tasks on Automobile Driving Safety and Software Interactive Usability[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(2): 437-443. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200002
shu

Influence of Sharing Tasks on Automobile Driving Safety and Software Interactive Usability

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200002
  • Received Date: 06 Jan 2020
  • Rev Recd Date: 15 Jul 2020
    • Available Online: 29 Sep 2020
  • Publish Date: 15 Apr 2021
    Abstract
  • In order to form a theoretical base for the optimization of car sharing software and drivers’ selection, how automobile sharing tasks and driving task affect driving safety and interactive usability is explored. Firstly, 24 experienced Chinese drivers were recruited for driving simulation tests, and driving safety and usability data such as speed, braking time, and interaction time were collected, and data were processed through paired sample t-test method. Using automobile sharing software in the scenarios of parking and driving are analyzed and compared in terms of interaction and safety performance. It is found that the operation of sharing tasks during driving can lead to the interaction time increase of 24%−87%, satisfaction decrease of 15%, and cognitive load increase of 33%−61%, but interaction errors are not affected. On the other hand, the operation of automobile sharing tasks during driving will affect driving safety, showing that in contrast to no sharing tasks, braking reaction time is increased by 45%, steering wheel adjustment times is increased by 217%−761%, adjustment angle of steering wheel is increased by 25%−66%, driving error is increased by 512%−1053%, and speed is decreased by 8%. However, driving distraction caused by automobile sharing software only affects reaction time rather than braking behavior.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(41)
  • SHABBER H, BANU W. Mobile phone accidents-experience of India[J]. Transport and Telecommunication, 2012, 13(3): 193-208. doi: 10.2478/v10244-012-0016-6
    SULLMAN M J, PRAT F, TASCI D K. A roadside study of observable driver distractions[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2015, 16(6): 552-557. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.989319
    PRAT F, PLANES M, GRAS M E, et al. An observational study of driving distractions on urban roads in Spain[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2015, 74: 8-16.
    RUMSCHLAG G, PALUMBO T, MARTIN A, et al. The effects of texting on driving performance in a driving simulator:the influence of driver age[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2015, 74: 145-149.
    CHOUDHARY P, VELAGA N R. Modelling driver distraction effects due to mobile phone use on reaction time[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2017, 77(4): 351-365.
    HE J, CHAPARRO A, NGUYEN B, et al. Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry?[C]//The 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces & Interactive Vehicular Applications. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2013: 124-130.
    ARMIN E, JOHANNES K. Between laboratory and simulator:a cognitive approach to evaluating cockpit interfaces by manipulating informatory context[J]. Cognition,Technology & Work, 2014, 16(3): 417-427.
    SHI C, LIU Y. Concurrent processing of vehicle lane keeping and speech comprehension tasks[J]. Accident Analysis Prevention, 2013, 59(10): 46-54.
    BECIC E, DELL G S, BOCK K, et al. Driving impairs talking[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2010, 17(1): 15-21.
    ALOSCO M L, GUNSTAD J. Both texting and eating are associated with impaired simulated driving performance[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2012, 13(5): 468-475. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.676697
    HAGUE M, MAZHARU O, OSCAR K, et al. Understanding the impacts of mobile phone distraction on driving performance:a systematic review[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2016, 72: 360-380.
    KIM H, SONG H. Evaluation of the safety and usability of touch gestures in operating in-vehicle information systems with visual occlusion[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2014, 45(3): 789-798. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.10.013
    国家信息中心. 产能共享呈现加速发展态势——国家信息中心发布《中国共享经济发展年度报告(2019)》[J]. 财经界,2019(10): 64-65.
    CHOI J S, KIM H S, KANG D W, et al. The effects of disruption in attention on driving performance patterns:analysis of jerk-cost function and vehicle control data[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2013, 44(4): 538-543. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.11.004
    YOUNG K L, MITSOPOULOS-RUBENS E, RUDIN-BROWN C M, et al. The effects of using a portable music player on simulated driving performance and task-sharing strategies[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2012, 43(4): 738-746. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.11.007
    BRACE C L, YOUNG K, REGIN M. Analysis of the literature:the use of mobile phones while driving[J]. Analysis, 2007, 37: 261-265.
    ENGSTROEM J, AUST M L, VISTROEM M. Effects of working memory load and repeated scenario exposure on emergency braking performance[J]. Human Factors, 2010, 52(5): 551-559. doi: 10.1177/0018720810381072
    STRAYER D L, DREWS F A. Profiles in driver distraction:effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers[J]. Human Factors, 2004, 46(4): 640-649. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.4.640.56806
    HARBLUK J, NOY Y, TRBOVICH P, et al. An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction:impacts on drivers’ visual behavior and braking performance[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2007, 39(2): 372-379. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.013
    MEHLER B, REIMER B, COUGHLIN J F. Sensitivity of physiological measures for detecting systematic variations in cognitive demand from a working memory task:an on-road study across three age groups[J]. Human Factors, 2012, 54(3): 396-412. doi: 10.1177/0018720812442086
    REIMER B, DONMEZ B, LAVALLIERE M, et al. Impact of age and cognitive demand on lane choice and changing under actual highway conditions[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2013, 52: 125-132.
    REIMER B, MEHLER B, WANG Y, et al. A field study on the impact of variations in short term memory demands on drivers’ visual attention and driving performance across three age groups[J]. Human Factors, 2012, 54(3): 454-468. doi: 10.1177/0018720812437274
    TRACTINSKY N, RAM E S, SHINAR D. To call or not to call:that is the question (while driving)[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2013, 56(4): 59-70.
    LIU Y C, OU Y K. Effects of age and the use of hands-free cellular phones on driving behavior and task performance[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2011, 12(6): 550-558. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.607197
    HAQUE M, WASHINGTON S. The impact of mobile phone distraction on the braking behaviour of young drivers:a hazard-based duration model[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2015, 50(1): 13-27.
    HAQUE M, WASHINGTON S. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 62(1): 42-53.
    CAIRD J K, JOHNSTON K A, WilLNESS C R, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of texting on driving[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 71(10): 311-318.
    MARQUEZ L, CANTILLO V, ARELLANA J. Mobile phone use while driving:a hybrid modeling approach[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2015, 78(5): 73-80.
    BERG W P, DESSECKER D J. Evidence of unconscious motor adaptation to cognitive and auditory distraction[J]. Adaptive Behavior, 2013, 21(5): 346-355. doi: 10.1177/1059712313491613
    LARRY B, NABATILAN. Effect of driving experience on visual behavior and driving performance under different driving conditions[J]. Cognition,Technology & Work, 2012, 14(4): 355-363.
    景春晖,支锦亦,杨随先,等. 车内手机交互对驾驶安全性的影响[J]. 包装工程,2019,40(16): 32-36.
    SVENSON O, PATTEN C J D. Mobile phones and driving: a review of contemporary research[J]. Cognition Technology & Work, 2005, 7(3): 182-197.
    HARRISON R, FLOOD D, DUCE D. Usability of mobile applications:literature review and rationale for a new usability model[J]. Journal of Interaction Science, 2013, 54: 44-51.
    谭浩,孙家豪,关岱松,等. 智能汽车人机交互发展趋势研究[J]. 包装工程,2019,40(20): 32-42.
    ORPHANIDES A K, NAM C S. Touchscreen interfaces in context:a systematic review of research into touchscreens across settings,populations,and implementations[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2017, 61: 116-143. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.01.013
    CHOUDHARY P, VELAGA N R. Analysis of vehicle-based lateral performance measures during distracted driving due to phone use[J]. Transportation Research Part F:Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2017, 44: 120-133. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.11.002
    NAKANO I, COFFEY B. Vertical-horizontal differences in visual space recognition of Americans and Japanese:2:00 pm (bv-305)[J]. Optometry and Vision Science, 1994, 71(S1): 71-77.
    LI R, CHEN Y, SHA C, et al. Effects of interface layout on the usability of In-Vehicle Information Systems and driving safety[J]. Displays, 2017, 49(9): 124-132.
    HART S G, STATELAND L E. Development of NASA-TLX (task load index):results of empirical and theoretical research[J]. Advances in Psychology, 1988, 52(6): 139-183.
    LUND A M. Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire[J]. Usability Interface, 2001, 8(2): 3-6.
    RADLE R, HANS-CHRISTIAN M, JENS R. Bigger is not always better: display size, performance, and task load during peephole map navigation[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2014: 4128-4136.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]LIU Yiming, ZHANG Qinghua, BU Yizhi. Experimental Study and Numerical Analysis of Shear Behavior of Studs Embedded in Engineered Cementitious Composite Bridge Decks[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2025, 60(1): 35-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220824
    [2]WEI Xing, ZHOU Linjun, LI Gang. Numerical Analysis of Seismic Energy Dissipation Performance of Corrugated Steel Plate Shear Wall with Low Yield Point[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(3): 546-554. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210305
    [3]ZHENG Jing, RAO Shaokai, ZHOU Jun, YANG Dan, SHEN Lixin, HUANG Shuhao. Fracture Analysis and Failure Mechanism of TA3 Limited Contact-Dynamic Compression Plates[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(2): 411-419. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20190182
    [4]SHAO Yongbo, ZHU Hongmei, YANG Dongping. Static Bearing Capacity Analysis of CFRP-Reinforced Short CHS Steel Tubular Columns under Axial Compression[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(1): 167-174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180527
    [5]ZHAO Jizhong, XU Xiang, DING Li, KAN Qianhua, KANG Guozheng. Finite Element Analysis of Rolling Strengthening Process for Wheel Tread of High-Speed Trains[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(6): 1337-1347. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180803
    [6]YE Huawen, LI Xinshun, SHUAI Chun, QU Haobo, XU Xun, WEI Xing. Fatigue Experimental Analysis of Damaged Steel Beams Strengthened with Prestressed Unbonded CFRP Plates[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(1): 129-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180297
    [7]WU Yanbin, HUANG Fanglin. Refined Finite Element Modeling Methodof Spatial Prestressed Steel Beam[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(6): 1082-1087. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.007
    [8]JIANG Jun, BO Qian-Hui, GOU Gong-Xie. Model Test for Local Stress Distribution in Anchorage Zones of Continuous Rigid Frame Composite Arch Bridge[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(5): 726-731. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.05.003
    [9]CHUge Ping, QIANG Shi-Zhong, HOU Su-Wei. Experimental Investigation of Wedge-Anchor Parameters for CFRP Tendons[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(4): 514-520. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [10]YE Huawen, KÖ, NIG Christian, UMMENHOFER Thomas, QIANG Shizhong. Experimental Investigation of Fatigue Behavior of Tension Steel Plate Reinforced with Prestressed CFRP Laminates[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 22(6): 823-829.
    [11]ZHOU Wen, LIU Xueyi. FEM Simulation of Straightening Tongue Rail of High-Speed Turnout[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(1): 82-85,95.
    [12]ZHANG Yuan-hai, LI Qiao. Finite Element Analysis of Shear Lag Effect of Skew Box Girder Bridges[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2005, 18(1): 64-68.
    [13]YANG Rong-shan. Finite Element Analysis of Stress in Rail Joint[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(3): 314-317.
    [14]FUHai-ying, HE Chang-rong, CHEN Qun. 2-D Finite Element Analysis of Prestressed Anchorage Sheet-Pile Wall[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(4): 389-392.
    [15]ZUO De-yuan, ZHENGAn-qi. An Elastic-Plastic Finite Element Analysis on Tunnel Structures at Cycled Temperatures[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(2): 172-175.
    [16]CHENWei-qing, ZHANG Qiang. A Model Test on the Anchorage Zones of the Second Nanjing Changjiang River Bridge[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(2): 185-189.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-0702.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 39.9 %FULLTEXT: 39.9 %META: 57.2 %META: 57.2 %PDF: 2.9 %PDF: 2.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.9 %其他: 2.9 %Seattle: 0.6 %Seattle: 0.6 %上海: 1.1 %上海: 1.1 %临汾: 0.6 %临汾: 0.6 %北京: 4.3 %北京: 4.3 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %张家口: 1.7 %张家口: 1.7 %成都: 5.2 %成都: 5.2 %扬州: 1.1 %扬州: 1.1 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %池州: 1.1 %池州: 1.1 %漯河: 1.1 %漯河: 1.1 %盐城: 0.3 %盐城: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 10.9 %芒廷维尤: 10.9 %衡水: 0.9 %衡水: 0.9 %西宁: 58.0 %西宁: 58.0 %诺沃克: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.6 %运城: 1.4 %运城: 1.4 %郑州: 2.9 %郑州: 2.9 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %长沙: 0.9 %长沙: 0.9 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %其他Seattle上海临汾北京南京天津宣城张家口成都扬州武汉池州漯河盐城福州芒廷维尤衡水西宁诺沃克贵阳运城郑州重庆长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(2)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views(465) PDF downloads(14) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 2009 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University

    Address: RM449 & 451, Administrative Building, Xipu Campus, Southwest Jiaotong University Western Hi-tech Zone, Chengdu, Sichuan 611756, P. R. China

    Tel: 028-66367562Fax: 028-66366552Email: xbz@home.swjtu.edu.cn

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  support: info@rhhz.net

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return