• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
SU Qi-Wang, SUN Yu-Peng, ZHAO Shi-Chun. Seismic Evaluation Method of Multi-storey Masonry Buildings Based on Earthquake Damage[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(1): 30-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.01.005
Citation: ZHOU Ning, ZOU Huan, ZOU Dong, TAN Mengying, ZHANG Weihua. Investigation on the Applicability of Pantograph and Catenary Model Urban Railway System[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(2): 408-415,423. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.02.026

Investigation on the Applicability of Pantograph and Catenary Model Urban Railway System

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.02.026
  • Received Date: 30 Dec 2015
  • Publish Date: 25 Apr 2017
  • In order to analyze the applicability of pantographs and catneary models to the urban railway system, the pantograph was modeled as a lumped parameter system with two or three degrees of freedom and a multi-rigid model, while the rigid catenary was simplified as a beam model and a spring model with different stiffnesses. Combining different pantographs and catenary models, the dynamics simulation of the coupled system model was conducted to obtain the dynamic performance of the pantograph-catenary system. The results show that at low speeds, different catenary models with the same pantograph show a little difference in current collection, and the standard deviation of contact force is less than 10 N. With the increase of speed, the difference of models become evident, and the standard deviation of contact force varies beyond 80 N. When the natural frequency and mode shape of pantograph and catenary that match the span-pass frequency exhibit a discrepancy between different models, there appears a critical speed where current collection performance of models changes dramatically. By comparing the simulation and experimental results, it is indicated that the three-lumped-mass model of pantograph is more applicable than the other kinds of models, because it takes into account the elasticity of pantograph upper frame.

     

  • WU T X, BRENNAN M J. Basic analytical study of pantograph-catenary system dynamics[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1998, 30(6): 443-456.
    梅桂明,张卫华. 刚性悬挂接触网动力学研究[J]. 铁道学报,2003,25(2): 24-29. MEI Guiming, ZHANG Weihua. Study on dynamics of rigid suspension catenary[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2003, 25(2): 24-29.
    ZHANG W H, LIU Y, MEI G M. Evaluation of the coupled dynamical response of a pantograph-catenary system contact force and stresses[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2006, 44(8): 645-658.
    刘志刚,宋洋,韩烨,等. 高速铁路接触网研究进展[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2016,51(3): 495-519. LIU Zhigang, SONG Yang, HAN Ye, et al. Advances of research on high-speed railway catenary[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 51(3): 495-519.
    刘志刚,宋洋,刘煜铖. 电气化高速铁路接触网微风振动特性[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2015,50(1): 1-6. LIU Zhigang, SONG Yang, LIU Yucheng. Aeolian vibration characteristics of electrified high-speed railway catenary[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 50(1): 1-6.
    李丰良,李敏,唐建湘. 受电弓的建模与参数测试[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版,2006,37(1): 194-199. LI Fengliang, LI Min, TANG Jianxiang. Establishment of the pantographs mechanical models and measurement of their parameters[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2006, 37(1): 194-199.
    周宁,张卫华,王冬. 受电弓等效模型参数识别及动态性能测试[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2011,46(3): 398-403. ZHOU Ning, ZHANG Weihua, WANG Dong. Lumped mass model for dynamic performance simulation of pantograph[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 46(3): 398-403.
    ZHOU Ning, ZHANG Weihua, LI Ruiping. Dynamic performance of a pantograph-catenary system with the consideration of the appearance characteristics of contact surfaces[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A: Applied Physics Engineering, 2011, 12(12): 913-920.
    ZHANG Weihua, SHEN Zhiyun, ZENG Jing. Study on dynamics of coupledsystems in high-speed trains[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle MechanicsandMobility, 2013, 51(7): 966-1016.
    ZHOU N, ZHANGW H. Investigation on dynamic performance and parameter optimization design of pantograph and catenary system[J]. Finite Element in Analysis and Design, 2011, 47(3): 288-295.
    梅桂明,张卫华. 受电弓/接触网系统动力学模型及特性[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2002,2(1): 20-25. MEI Guiming, ZHANG Weihua. Dynamics model and behavior of pantograph/catenary system[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2002, 2(1): 20-25.
    BRUNI S, AMBROSIO J, CARNICERO A, et al. The results of the pantograph-catenary interaction benchmark[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 2015, 53(3): 1-9.
    ZHOU N, L Q, YANG Y, et al. Statement of methods vehicle system dynamics[J]. International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 2015, 53(3): 380-391.
    VAN O V, MASSAT J P, LAURENT C, et al. Introduction of variability in pantograph-catenary dynamic simulations[J]. International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 2014, 52(10): 1254-1269.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Yue, LIU Wenjun, CAI Jing, ZHAO Fupeng. Development and Prediction of Ruts in Airport Asphalt Pavement Based on Full-Scale Test[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(6): 1378-1384. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210606
    [2]SHAO Guoxia, SU Qian, CHEN Shangyong, BAI Hao, WANG Wubin. Experimental Research on Deformation Characteristics of Piled Raft Foundation under Flexible Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(1): 30-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.01.005
    [3]CAO Wenzhao, ZHENG Junjie, ZHOU Yanjun, WU Wenbiao, JIANG Jinguo. Experimental Investigation of Deformation and Geogrid-Soil Interface Behavior of Triaxial Geogrid[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(5): 840-846. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.05.004
    [4]LIU Junzhong, WENG Xingzhong, ZHANG Jun, LI Xianpeng, JI Dongming, GUO Lei. Model Experiment of Fatigue Deformation Characteristic of Emergency Soil Airfield Pavement[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 27(3): 412-418. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.03.007
    [5]HUANG Da, JIN Huahui, WU Xiongwei. Plate Load Test Investigation of Dynamic Compaction Effect of Gravel Soil[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(3): 435-440,454. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.007
    [6]CHEN Guangwei, LIU Liping, SU Kai, TANG Wen, CHEN Rongsheng. Rutting Model Considering Shear Behavior of Asphalt Pavement[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(4): 672-677. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.04.013
    [7]LIANG Lei, GU Qiangkang, LIU Guodong, ZHANG Renyi, JIANG Le. Using ADAMS to Assess Dynamic Load of Pavement during Aircraft Landing[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 25(3): 502-508. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.03.024
    [8]HU Qi-Jun, WEN Hua, GONG Cheng, WANG Tian-Heng. Model Test of Water Content Control of Saturated Over-Wet Soil[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(4): 558-563. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.04.006
    [9]LIAO Haiping, 2, LIU Qiyue. Shakedown Limit Analysis for Plastic Deformation Failure of Gears[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(5): 676-680. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [10]XIAO Dongsheng, HUANG Dingfa, CHEN Weifeng, PENG Jinchuan. Prediction Model for Buried Personnel Probabilty in Earthquake[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 22(4): 574-579.
    [11]ZHOU Wen, LIU Xueyi. FEM Simulation of Straightening Tongue Rail of High-Speed Turnout[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(1): 82-85,95.
    [12]JIA Chong, ZHANG Xiyan. Plastic Deformation Mechanism of Nanocrystalline Nickel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(4): 544-548.
    [13]LOU Yi-hong, PENG Jun-sheng. Analysis of Pile-Subsoil Interaction with Sand-Box Model Test and Calculation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(2): 164-168.
    [14]CAOXin一wen, CAIying, SUjian. ModelTestS加dyofDynamiePerformancesof theSubgradeRelnforcedwithGeocellandGeonet[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(4): 350-354.
    [15]CAOXin-wen, LUO Qiang, XUEShuang-gang. Model Test of the Effects of Geocells and Geonets on Subgrade Strengthening under Static Loads[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(3): 322-326.
    [16]Liu Qiyue, JinXueyan, WangXiaqiu. Study on the Relationship between Plastic Deformation and Shakedown Status of Wheel and Rail[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1999, 12(5): 508-511.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 孔祥松,许壮壮,胡经尧,窦浩宇,方杰,王栓. 基于相似试验的土压力盒便捷标定方法. 矿业研究与开发. 2021(09): 56-60 .
    2. 陈正磊,王润堂,许巍,蔡良才,孙岩. 含缺陷铝蜂窝道面板弯曲和疲劳特性. 南京航空航天大学学报. 2020(01): 53-60 .
    3. 陈东方,王润唐,许巍,蔡良才. 带缺陷的蜂窝铝道面板平压疲劳特性试验研究. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(11): 2687-2694 .
    4. 尹紫红,赵丰年,高雪,蒋良潍,苏谦. 多量程土压力盒标定工装及试验研究. 西南交通大学学报. 2018(06): 1211-1219 . 本站查看
    5. 尹紫红,杨邦强,杨建中,邵寅旭. 沪通铁路土压力盒标定工装设计及试验研究. 铁道标准设计. 2017(06): 44-49 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 33.7 %FULLTEXT: 33.7 %META: 66.3 %META: 66.3 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.0 %其他: 2.0 %九江: 0.7 %九江: 0.7 %北京: 1.6 %北京: 1.6 %哥伦布: 0.7 %哥伦布: 0.7 %张家口: 3.6 %张家口: 3.6 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %格兰特县: 0.3 %格兰特县: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %池州: 1.3 %池州: 1.3 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 21.3 %芒廷维尤: 21.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %西宁: 64.6 %西宁: 64.6 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %其他九江北京哥伦布张家口成都杭州格兰特县武汉池州漯河芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views(635) PDF downloads(136) Cited by(11)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return