基于概率论-逻辑学的隧道各方关系与风险研究

胡兰; 胡培

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.06.024

基于概率论-逻辑学的隧道各方关系与风险研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.06.024

胡兰,
胡培

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（50878185）

铁道部科技研究开发计划项目（2009G006-B）

详细信息

作者简介:
胡兰（1964-），女，博士研究生，研究方向为风险管理，E-mail：hulan_hl@sina.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 1018
- HTML全文浏览量: 64
- PDF下载量: 525
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-03-26
- 刊出日期: 2013-12-25

Relation and Risk in Owner and Contractors of Tunnel Projects Based on Probability and Logic Theories

HU Lan,
HU Pei

摘要

摘要: 基于经典概率论及逻辑学，提出了用于隧道及地下工程参建各方关系与风险概率评定方法.结合工程实例从工程参建各方的逻辑关系角度，构建了适用于隧道及地下工程风险评价的各种逻辑概率树模型.对比分析发现，或门模型中工程风险概率大于参建各方概率的最大值，与门模型中工程风险概率小于参建各方概率的最小值，而混合门模型介于参建各方概率最大值与最小值之间.故在隧道建设过程中，应调整参建各方协作关系，建立起与门模型关系，尽量避免构成或门模型关系.
- 概率论 /
- 逻辑学理论 /
- 隧道工程 /
- 风险管理
Abstract: Based on classic probability and logic theories, a probability evaluation method was presented to assess relation and risk in owner and contractors of tunnel and underground projects. By analyzing real project cases, several logic probability tree models were built from the perspective of the logic relationship between owner and contractors. By comparison, risk probability of the OR gate model was larger than the maximum probability value of owner and contractors; risk probability of AND gate model was less than the minimum probability value of owner and contractors; risk probability of hybrid gate model was between the maximum probability value and the minimum probability value of owner and contractors. Therefore, in tunnel construction, the cooperative relationship between all project parties should be adjusted to form a relation of AND gate model and avoid a relation of OR gate model.
- probability theory /
- logic theory /
- tunnel engineering /
- risk management

HTML全文

参考文献(34)

中华人民共和国铁道部. 中长期铁路网调整规划方案

上海土木工程学会. 地下及隧道工程事故和风险控制技术资料汇编

[R/OL]. (2008-11-27)

钱七虎, 戎晓力. 中国地下工程安全风险管理的现状、问题及相关建议

[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2009: 258-261.

EINSTEIN H H, VICK S G. Geological model for tunnel cost model

EINSTEIN H H. Risk and risk analysis in rock engineering

[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(4): 649-655. QIAN Qihu, RONG Xiaoli. State, issues and relevant recommendations for security risk management of china's underground engineering

ESKESEN S D, TENGBOR G P, KAMPMAN N J, et al. Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: international tunnelling association, working group No.2

[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(4): 649-655.

黄宏伟, 边亦海. 深基坑工程施工中的风险管理

黄宏伟, 彭铭, 胡群芳. 上海长江隧道工程风险评估研究

[C]//Proceedings of Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conf. San Francisco: Soc. of Min. Eng. of AIME, 1974(2): 1701-1720.

许振浩, 李术才, 李利平, 等. 基于层次分析法的岩溶隧道突水突泥风险评估

张顶立, 李兵, 房倩, 等. 基于风险系数的海底隧道纵断面确定方法

盛聚, 谢式千, 潘承毅. 概率论与数理统计

[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 1996, 2(11): 141-155.

吴铭. 模糊事故树分析及其在施工安全管理中的应用

[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2004, 19(3): 217-237.

中华人民共和国铁道部. 铁建设

The Association of British Insurers, The British Tunnelling Society. The joint code of practice for risk assessment of tunnel works in the UK

[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2005, 1(4): 611-614. HUANG Hongwei, BIAN Yihai. Risk management in the construction of deep excavation engineering

[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2005, 1(4): 611-614.

[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2009, 5(1): 182-187. HUANG Hongwei, PENG Ming, HU Qunfang. Risk assessment on Shanghai Yangtze River tunnel

[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2009, 5(1): 182-187.

[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(6): 1757-1766. XU Zhenhao, LI Shucai, LI Liping, et al. Risk assessment of water or mud inrush of karst tunnels based on analytic hierarchy process

[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(6): 1757-1766.

[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(1): 9-19. ZHANG Dingli, LI Bing, FANG Qian, et al. method for determining longitudinal section of subsea tunnel based on risk coefficient

[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(1): 9-19.

[M]. 3版. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2001: 80-88.

[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2004.

[S]. 北京:中国铁道出版社, 2007.

[S]. London: The British Tunnelling Society, 2003.

200号铁路隧道风险评估与管理暂行规定

施引文献

附加材料(0)

访问统计