• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

传感器性能退化与结构损伤响应异常区分研究

麻胜兰 翁柳青 姜绍飞

麻胜兰, 翁柳青, 姜绍飞. 传感器性能退化与结构损伤响应异常区分研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2013, 26(6): 1024-1030. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.06.009
引用本文: 麻胜兰, 翁柳青, 姜绍飞. 传感器性能退化与结构损伤响应异常区分研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2013, 26(6): 1024-1030. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.06.009
MA Shenglan, WENG Liuqing, JIANG Shaofei. Distinguishing between Sensor Deterioration and Structural Damage[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(6): 1024-1030. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.06.009
Citation: MA Shenglan, WENG Liuqing, JIANG Shaofei. Distinguishing between Sensor Deterioration and Structural Damage[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(6): 1024-1030. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.06.009

传感器性能退化与结构损伤响应异常区分研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.06.009
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51278127,50878057)

国家十二五科技支撑计划项目(2012BAJ14B05)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    麻胜兰(1986-),女,博士研究生,研究方向为结构健康监测与组合,电话:15005936581,E-mail:275074428@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    姜绍飞(1969-),男,教授,博士,电话:13559121678,E-mail:cejsf@163.com

Distinguishing between Sensor Deterioration and Structural Damage

  • 摘要: 针对现行结构损伤检测方法仅考虑了环境和荷载对损伤的影响,未考虑传感器因时间和环境变化导致的性能退化从而严重影响损伤诊断率的问题,考虑到传感器性能退化的局部性及结构损伤的全局性,利用最小均方差估计与广义极似然比(GLRT)理论检测结构响应异常,结合统计质量控制图的控制指标超出界限的波动样式判断异常来源,并通过简支梁数值算例验证了本文提出的方法.研究结果表明:利用广义极似然比可以有效检测响应异常,利用控制图可以辨别响应异常来源;传感器性能退化导致控制指标超出界限的波动为非平稳波动,而损伤导致控制指标在一定范围内的波动为平稳波动.

     

  • 邓扬, 丁幼亮, 李爱群. 环境条件影响下悬索桥模态频率变异性的定量评价
    吴佰建, 李兆霞, 王滢, 等. 桥梁结构动态应变监测信息的分离与提取
    [J]. 振动与冲击, 2011, 30(8): 230-236. DENG Yang, DING Youliang, LI Aiqun. Quantitative evaluation of variability in modal frequencies of a suspension bridge under environmental conditions
    LOPEZ I, NESRIN S K. A review of uncertainty in flight vehicle structural damage monitoring, diagnosis and control-challenges and opportunities
    [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(8): 230-236.
    SOHN H. Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring
    ZHOU H F, NI Y Q, KO J M. Structural damage alarming using auto-associative neural network technique: Exploration of environment-tolerant capacity and setup of alarming threshold
    [J]. 东南大学学报:自然科学版, 2008, 38(5): 767-773. WU Baijian, LI Zhaoxia, WANG Ying. Separation and extraction of bridge dynamic strain data
    HERNANDEZ-GARCIA M R, MASRI S F. Multivariate statistical analysis for detection and identification of faulty sensors using latent variable methods
    [J]. Journal of Southeast University: Natural Science Edition, 2008, 38(5): 767-773.
    ISERMANN R. Fault-diagnosis systems
    [J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2010, 46: 247-273.
    Jyrki Kullaa. Distinguishing between sensor fault, structural damage, and environmental or operational effects in structural health monitoring
    KULLAA J. Sensor validation using minimum mean square error estimation
    JIN Rongrong, XU Bin. Structural damage detection based on principal component analysis and Hotelling T2 control chart
    [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 2007, 365: 539-560.
    Feldman Michael. Analytical basic of the EMD: two harmonics decomposition
    [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2011, 25: 1508-1526.
    王祁. 传感器信息处理及应用
    [J]. Advances in Science and Technology, 2008, 56: 501-507.
    [M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006: 20-22.
    [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2011, 25: 2976-2989.
    [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2010, 24: 1444-1457.
    [C]//2010 International Conference on Circuit and Signal Processing and 2010 Second ⅡTA International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Volume 2.
    [S.l.]: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2010: 257-262.
    [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2009, 23: 2059-2071.
    [M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2012: 5-6.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1053
  • HTML全文浏览量:  74
  • PDF下载量:  513
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-12-09
  • 刊出日期:  2013-12-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回