• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

基于FSDT的新老驾驶人危险感知差异性致因研究

唐智慧,  程杰,  方争楠

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 西南交通大学学报  > 2013 >  26(3): 532-538.
唐智慧, 程杰, 方争楠. 基于FSDT的新老驾驶人危险感知差异性致因研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2013, 26(3): 532-538. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.022
引用本文: 唐智慧, 程杰, 方争楠. 基于FSDT的新老驾驶人危险感知差异性致因研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2013, 26(3): 532-538. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.022
shu
TANG Zhihui, CHENG Jie, FANG Zhengnan. Causal Mechanism of Difference between Experienced and Novice Drivers in Hazard Perception Based on Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(3): 532-538. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.022
Citation: TANG Zhihui, CHENG Jie, FANG Zhengnan. Causal Mechanism of Difference between Experienced and Novice Drivers in Hazard Perception Based on Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(3): 532-538. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.022
shu

基于FSDT的新老驾驶人危险感知差异性致因研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.022
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51108390)

Causal Mechanism of Difference between Experienced and Novice Drivers in Hazard Perception Based on Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory

    摘要
  • 摘要: 为了降低新驾驶人的事故发生率,基于模糊信号检测理论,通过模拟仿真实验手段,设计并进行了危险感知实验和危险分级实验,在此基础上,分析了新老驾驶人危险感知差异性的原因.研究结果表明:新老驾驶人危险感知差异性是由于反应偏好不同所致,具有宽大偏好反应的驾驶人反应时距小,反应也更快,反之亦然;经过危险感知训练的新驾驶人反应偏好与反应时距之间的相关系数为0.81,未经危险感知训练新驾驶人的相关系数为0.63,经验丰富老驾驶人的相关系数为0.75;在对新驾驶人的训练中,应注重降低新驾驶人的危险阈值.

     

    Abstract: In order to reduce the rate of accidents of novice drivers, a hazard perception and rating test was designed using a driving simulator by the fuzzy signal detection theory. Through the test, causes of difference between experienced and novice drivers in hazard perception performance were analyzed. The results show that the difference between the experienced and novice drivers in hazard perception results from the difference of response bias, such that more liberal responses are associated with faster latencies and more conservative responses lead to slower latencies. The correlation coefficient between response bias and latency is 0.81 for the trained novice drivers, 0.63 for the untrained novice drivers, and 0.75 for the experienced drivers. Therefore, it is recommended to reduce the hazard threshold of the novice driver through training.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(19)
  • SAGBERG F, BJRNSKAU T. Hazard perception and driving experience among novice drivers[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2006, 38(2): 407-414.
    AVINOAM B, DAVID S, TAL O G. Age, skill, and hazard perception in driving[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42(4): 1240-1249.
    ROSENBLOOM T, SHAHAR A, ELHARAR A, et al. Risk perception of driving as a function of advanced training aimed at recognizing and handling risks in demanding driving situations[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2008, 40(2): 697-703.
    郭孜政. 驾驶行为险态辨识理论与方法[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2009.
    CRUNDALL D E, UNDERWOOD G. Effects of experience and processing demands on visual information acquisition in drivers[J]. Ergonomics, 1998, 41(4): 448-458.
    CRUNDALL D E, CHAPMAN N P, UNDERWOOD G. Eye movements and hazard perception in police pursuit and emergency response driving[J]. Psychology Application, 2003, 9(3): 163-174.
    RUNDMO T, IVERSEN H. Risk perception and driving behavior among adolescents in two Norwegian counties before and after a traffic safety campaign[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(1): 1-21.
    BENDA V H, HOYOS C G. Estimating hazards in traffic situations[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1983, 15(1): 1-9.
    WALLIS THOMAS S A, HORAWILL M S. Using fuzzy signal detection theory to determine why experienced and trained drivers respond faster than novices in a hazard perception test[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2007, 39(6): 1177-1185.
    WICKENS C D. Engineering psychology and human performance[M]. 2nd Ed. New York: Harper Collins Publishers Inc., 1992: 211-257.
    谢季坚,刘承平. 模糊数学方法及其应用[M]. 武汉:华中科技大学出版社, 2006: 23-28.
    PARASURAMAN R, MASALONIS A J, HANCOCK P A. Fuzzy signal detection theory basic postulates and formulas for analyzing human and machine performance[J]. Human Factors, 2000, 42(4): 636-659.
    GREEN D M, SWETS J A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics[M]. New York: John Wiley Sons Ltd., 1966: 33-35.
    SCIALFA C T, DESCHENES M C, FERENCE J. A hazard perception test for novice drivers[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2011, 43(1): 204-208.
    HORSWILL M S, ANSTEY K J, HATHERLY C, et al. Older drivers' insight into their hazard perception ability[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2011, 43(6): 2121-2127.
    WETTON M A, HORSWILL M S, HATHERLY C, et al. The development and validation of two complementary measures of drivers' hazard perception ability[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42(4): 1232-1239.
    SMITH S S, HORSWILL M S, CHAMBERS B, et al. Hazard perception in novice and experienced drivers: the effects of sleepiness[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2009, 41(4): 729-733.
    黄静. 高速公路隧道驾驶员注视点分布特征分析[J]. 交通科技, 2010(1): 91-93.HUANG Jing. Analysis of driver's eye-movement distribution characteristics in freeway tunnel[J]. Transportation Science Technology, 2010(1): 91-93.
    唐智慧.新老驾驶员危险感知差异性研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2012.[ZK)]
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 附加材料(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1189
  • HTML全文浏览量:  69
  • PDF下载量:  511
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-05-16
  • 刊出日期:  2013-06-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    Copyright © 2009 西南交通大学学报

    地址：四川省成都市郫都区犀安路999号西南交通大学犀浦校区《西南交通大学学报》编辑部

    电话：028-66367562传真：028-66366552Email：xbz@home.swjtu.edu.cn

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发 技术支持： info@rhhz.net