短弧长积分法与平均加速度法的比较分析

黄强; 范东明

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.010

短弧长积分法与平均加速度法的比较分析

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.010

黄强,
范东明

基金项目:

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(SWJTU12BR012)

计量
- 文章访问数: 835
- HTML全文浏览量: 64
- PDF下载量: 354
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-06-07
- 刊出日期: 2013-06-25

Comparison of Short Arc Integral Approach and Average Acceleration Approach in Gravity Field Recovery

摘要

摘要: 为比较短弧长积分法和平均加速度法在卫星重力反演中的效果,用Fortran程序语言分别基于短弧长积分法和平均加速度法编写了2套计算程序,对GOCE(重力场和静态海洋环流探测)卫星精密科学轨道进行了反演计算,得到了2组90阶次的重力场模型Model_Arc(短弧长积分法)和Model_Acc(平均加速度法).结果表明:Model_Acc大地水准面阶误差最大在80阶仅4 cm,而Model_Arc在90阶处达到10 cm;2个模型总体上都比用CHAMP和GRACE卫星的轨道数据反演的模型精度高,Model_Acc在80阶次以前比GO_CONS_GCF_2_TIM_R3精度高,但平均加速度法耗时比短弧长积分法长.
- 短弧长积分法 /
- 平均加速度法 /
- 重力反演 /
- GOCE(重力场和静态海洋环流探测)
Abstract: In order to compare the short arc integral approach with the average acceleration approach, two Fortran programs were compiled respectively. Two 90 degrees and orders gravity field models, Model_Arc (for the short arc integral approach) and Model_Acc (for the average acceleration approach), were recovered based on the programs and GOCE (gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation explorer) orbits. The results show that the maximal geoid error is respectively 4 cm at 80 degrees to the Model_Acc and 10 cm at 90 degrees to the Model_arc, the precisions of the Model_Acc and Model_Arc are higher than those of the models based on CHAMP (challenging mini-satellite payload) and GRACE (gravity recovery and climate experiment) orbits. The superiority of the Model_Acc over model GO_CONS_GCF_2_TIM_R3 is accuracy before 80 degrees, while the superiority of the Model_Arc over the Model_Acc is consumed time.
- short arc integral approach /
- average acceleration approach /
- gravity recovery /
- GOCE (gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation explorer)

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

游为. 应用低轨卫星数据反演地球重力场模型的理论和方法[D]. 成都:西南交通大学地球科学与环境工程学院,2011.

赵齐乐,郭靖,柳响林,等. 利用星载GPS历元差分计算的平均加速度反演地球重力场[J]. 武汉大学学报:信息科学版,2009,34(10): 1168-1171.ZHAO Qile, GUO Jing, LIU Xianglin, et al. Gravity field modeling on the basis of satellite accelerations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2009, 34(10): 1168- 1171.

LIU Xianglin. Global gravity field recovery from satellite-to-satellite tracking data with the acceleration approach[D]. Delft: Institute of Earth Observation and Space Systems, Delft University of Technology, 2008.

徐天河,杨元喜. 利用CHAMP卫星几何法轨道恢复地球重力场模型[J]. 地球物理学报,2005,48(2): 288-293.XU Tianhe, YANG Yuanxi. CHAMP gravity field recovery using kinematic orbits[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2005, 48(2): 288-293.

游为,范东明,黄强. 卫星重力反演的短弧长积分法研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2011,54(11): 2745-2752.YOU Wei, FAN Dongming, HUANG Qiang. Analysis of short-arc integral approach to recover the earth's gravitational field[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2011, 54(11): 2745-2752.

赵齐乐,施闯,柳响林,等. 重力卫星的星载GPS精密定轨[J]. 武汉大学学报:信息科学版,2008,33(8): 810-814.ZHAO Qile, SHI Chuang, LIU Xianglin, et al. Determination of precise orbit using onboard GPS data for gravity modeling oriented satellites[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2008, 33(8): 810-814.

YI Weiyong. The earth's gravity field from GOCE[D]. Munich: Institute of Astrometry and Physic Geodesy, Technical University Munich, 2011.

VISSER P N A M, Van den IJSSEL J, KOOP R, et al. Exploring gravity field determination from orbit perturbations of the European gravity mission GOCE[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2001, 75(2/3): 89-98.

JEKELI C. The determination of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking[J]. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 1999, 75(2): 85-101.

XU Peiliang. Position and velocity perturbations for the determination of geopotential from space geodetic measurements[J]. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2008, 100(3): 231-249.

REIGBER C, SCHMIDT R, FLECHTNER F, et al. An earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE: EIGEN-GRACE02S[J]. Journal of Geodynamics, 2005, 30(1): 1-10.

ROWLANDS D D, RAY R D, CHINN D S, et al. Short-arc analysis of intersatellite tracking data in a gravity mapping mission[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2002, 76(6/7): 307-316.

TAPLEY B, RIES J, BETTADPUR S, et al. GGM02: an improved earth gravity field model from GRACE[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2005, 79(8): 467-478.

PRANGE L, JGGI A, DACH R, et al. AIUB-CHAMP02S: the influence of GNSS model changes on gravity field recovery using spaceborne GPS[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2010, 45(2): 215-224.

钟波. 基于GOCE卫星重力测量技术确定地球重力场的研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学测绘学院,2010.

施引文献

附加材料(0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 835
HTML全文浏览量: 64
PDF下载量: 354
被引次数: 0

短弧长积分法与平均加速度法的比较分析

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.010

计量

出版历程

Comparison of Short Arc Integral Approach and Average Acceleration Approach in Gravity Field Recovery

计量

出版历程

目录