• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
LIAO Xiandong, HU Xiang, ZHANG Shiqian, LIU Yanan, XUE Weichen. Numerical Simulation of Interior Connections of Precast Concrete Frame with Post-Tensioned Tendons[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(6): 1287-1296. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180704
Citation: LIAO Xiandong, HU Xiang, ZHANG Shiqian, LIU Yanan, XUE Weichen. Numerical Simulation of Interior Connections of Precast Concrete Frame with Post-Tensioned Tendons[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(6): 1287-1296. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180704

Numerical Simulation of Interior Connections of Precast Concrete Frame with Post-Tensioned Tendons

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180704
  • Received Date: 21 Sep 2018
  • Rev Recd Date: 28 Nov 2018
  • Available Online: 08 May 2020
  • Publish Date: 15 Dec 2020
  • In order to solve the problem that bond-slip of new and old concrete interfaces and treatment of shear reinforcement bars are challenges for finite element analysis of precast concrete frame joints, different methods in ABAQUS available for simulating the behavior of new and old concrete interfaces were deeply discussed. A new constitutive relation which combines bond-slip between new and old concrete interfaces with shear-slip model of shear reinforcement bar was introduced, and nonlinear finite element models (FEM) were carried out. The calculated results were agreed well with the experimental results of full-scale model test. And then an analysis of parameters was performed, which focused on influences of axial compression ratio, concrete strength, effective stress of prestressed tendon and bonded construction of prestressed tendons (full bond, partial bond and unbonded). The results show that bearing capacity increases by 11% with axial compression ratio increases from 0.2 to 0.4. However, the bearing capacity does not increase significantly when the axial pressure ratio increases from 0.4 to 0.6. Bearing capacity increases with the increasing of concrete strength and effective stress of prestressed tendons. Three types of bonding construction of the prestressed tendons have no obvious influence on the bearing capacity of the connections, but increasing the unbonded length of prestressed tendons may delay the connections yield.

     

  • BLAKCY R W G, PARK R. Seismic resistance of prestressed concrete beam-column assemblies[J]. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 1971, 68(9): 677-692.
    廖显东. 预制预应力混凝土框架结构体系研究与应用进展[J]. 建筑结构,2015,45(22): 65-70.

    LIAO Xiandong. Progress of studies and applications of precast prestressed concrete frame structural systems[J]. Building Structure, 2015, 45(22): 65-70.
    姚睿,刘航,李晨光. 预制预应力装配式框架节点抗震性能有限元分析[J]. 建筑技术开发,2010,37(6): 2-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-523X.2010.06.002

    YAO Rui, LIU Hang, LI Chenguang. Finite element analysis on seismic behaviors of precast beam-column joint assembled with post-tensioning[J]. Building Technique Development, 2010, 37(6): 2-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-523X.2010.06.002
    种迅,孟少平,张林振. 后张预应力预制混凝土框架节点抗震性能数值模拟与理论分析[J]. 工程力学,2013,30(5): 153-159.

    CHONG Xun, MENG Shaoping, ZHANG Linzhen. Numeriacal and theoretical analysis on seismic performance of post-tensioned prestressed concrete beam-column assemblages[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(5): 153-159.
    魏余特,邓思华,李晨光,等. 基于Marc的预制预应力混凝土框架节点有限元分析[J]. 土木建筑工程信息技术,2017,9(5): 71-74.

    WEI Yute, DENG Sihua, LI Chenguang, et al. Marc-based finite element analysis of the precast prestressed fabricated concrete frame connections[J]. Journal of Information Technology in Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2017, 9(5): 71-74.
    谢娇艳,丁建国. 预制装配整体式框架节点的抗震性能仿真研究[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造,2017,39(5): 34-40.

    XIE Jiaoyan, DING Jianguo. Study on seismic behavior simulation of the precast assembled integral frame joint[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2017, 39(5): 34-40.
    SEIBLE F, LATHAM C T. Analysis and design models for structural concrete bridge deck overlays[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1990, 116(10): 2711-2727. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:10(2711)
    赵洁,聂建国. 钢板-混凝土组合加固钢筋混凝土梁的非线性有限元分析[J]. 计算力学学报,2009,26(6): 906-912.

    ZHAO Jie, NIE Jianguo. Nonlinear finite element analysis of RC beams strengthed usin steel plate-concrete conposite technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2009, 26(6): 906-912.
    陆铁坚,王鹏皓,杨诗龙,等. 预制装配整体式混凝土剪力墙结构墙板节点非线性有限元分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2015,12(2): 342-347. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7029.2015.02.019

    LU Tiejian, WANG Penghao, YANG Shilong, et al. Nonlinear finite element analysis of wall slab joints of precast concrete shear wall structures[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2015, 12(2): 342-347. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7029.2015.02.019
    聂建国,王宇航,樊健生,等. 钢-混凝土组合梁加宽混凝土旧桥技术中组合横梁界面受力性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2012,45(3): 99-109.

    NIE Jianguo, WANG Yuhang, FAN Jiansheng, et al. Mechnical behavior of the interface of composite cross beam in old concrete bridges widened with steel-concrete composite beam[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(3): 99-109.
    MOHAMAD M E, IBRAHIM I S, ABDULLAH R. Finite element modelling of interface shear strength at concrete-to-concrete bond[C]//Proceedings of the APSEC & ACEC 2015. Kuala Lumpur: APSEC & ACEC, 2015: 63-71.
    MOHAMAD M E, IBRAHIM I S, ABDULLAH R. Finite Element modeling of the interfacial behavior at surface roughness concrete without the projecting steel[J]. International Journal of Advances in Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 2017, 3(4): 125-130.
    MOHAMAD M E, IBRAHIM I S, ABDULLAH R, et al. Friction and cohesion coefficients of composite concrete-to-concrete bond[J]. Cement & Concrete Composites, 2015, 56: 1-14.
    HENDY C R, JOHNSON R P. Designer’ guide to en1994-2 Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and structures, part 2: general rules and rules for bridges[S]. London: [s.n.], 2006.
    HIBBITT M, KARLSSON J, SORENSEN R I. ABA-QUS/Standard user’s manuals[M]. Version 6.13. [S.l.]: Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp, 2013: 5-22.
    廖显东,胡翔,马荣全,等. 高轴压比装配整体式预应力混凝土框架中节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2016,37(10): 82-89.

    LIAO Xiandong, HU Xiang, MA Rongquan, et al. Experimental studies on seismic performance of monolithic precast prestressed concrete frame interior connections under high axial compression ratio[J]. Journal of Building Structure, 2016, 37(10): 82-89.
    聂建国, 王宇航. ABAQUS中混凝土本构模型用于模拟结构静力行为的比较研究[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(4): 59-67.

    NIE Jianguo, WANG Yuhang. Comparison study of constitutive model of concrete in abaqus for static analysis of structures. [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(4): 59-67.
    中华人民共和国国家标准. 混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHAO Hua, YUAN Weiguang, WEI Chengjin, LENG Donghang, CHEN Peng. Experimental Study on Seismic Performance of Concrete Frame Structures Reinforced with High-Strength Steel Bars[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250036
    [2]ZHAO Haitao, DING Jian, YANG Guo, XIANG Yu, XU Wen, CHEN Yuzhi. Experimental Investigation of Relative Humidity Response in Early-Age Concrete Under Tensile Stress[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(5): 1104-1112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220134
    [3]SUN Yongxin, LIN Pengzhen, YANG Zijiang. Calculation Method for Reinforcement Stress in Ultra-High Performance Concrete Beams Considering Bond-Slip Effect[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(5): 1058-1067. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230130
    [4]SU Qiwang, LI Yi, BU Qingtao, CHENG Quanlin, HANI Meree. Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of Fired Hollow Bricks Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frame with Horizontal Slip Layers[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(1): 223-228, 234. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200278
    [5]SONG Suidi, HUANG Bo, ZHU Bing, CHEN Kejian. Analysis of the Bearing Capacity of PBL Shear Connector[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(4): 647-654. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.04.001
    [6]FU Chuanguo, SHANG Shengqiang, WANG Yuzhuo, LI Shibo. Bending Bearing Capacity Calculation of Prestressed Steel Reinforced Concrete Beam under Fire[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(4): 625-631,658. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.04.006
    [7]YANG Rong-shan. Finite Element Analysis of Stress in Rail Joint[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(3): 314-317.
    [8]XIA Xiong, ZHOU De-pei. Design of Prestressed Anchor-Cable with Reinforced Slab for Strengthening Existing Retaining Walls[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(2): 173-177.
    [9]LIUXiao-li, ZHOU De-pei, YANG Tao. Dynamic Design Method for Friction Pile with Prestressed Cable[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2002, 15(5): 491-495.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 田亮,孟俊良,赵健,樊立龙,王宇宁,张诚至. 基于内聚力模型的混凝土断裂性能三维细观模拟. 工业建筑. 2024(09): 170-176 .
    2. 赵武超,叶继红,周知. 灌浆套筒连接装配式混凝土柱抗撞性能研究. 振动工程学报. 2023(01): 225-234 .
    3. 孙宝林,杨永清,黄胜前,高玉峰,余小华,李凯,杨成龙. 高寒地区后张PC梁孔道冻胀损伤研究. 西南交通大学学报. 2023(02): 406-413 . 本站查看
    4. 陈吉光,戴君武,杨永强. 预制混凝土梁-柱-叠合楼板节点抗震性能数值模拟分析. 地震工程与工程振动. 2023(04): 128-139 .
    5. 陈吉光,戴君武,杨永强. 基于内聚力模型的预制混凝土柱数值模拟研究. 建筑结构. 2022(S1): 1546-1550 .

    Other cited types(11)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-0705101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 36.6 %FULLTEXT: 36.6 %META: 60.9 %META: 60.9 %PDF: 2.4 %PDF: 2.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.7 %其他: 5.7 %上海: 2.2 %上海: 2.2 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %丽水: 1.2 %丽水: 1.2 %北京: 3.2 %北京: 3.2 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %大角咀: 0.2 %大角咀: 0.2 %大连: 1.6 %大连: 1.6 %天津: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %山景城: 0.4 %山景城: 0.4 %广州: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %张家口: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %德黑兰: 0.6 %德黑兰: 0.6 %成都: 1.4 %成都: 1.4 %杭州: 1.2 %杭州: 1.2 %武汉: 1.0 %武汉: 1.0 %池州: 2.6 %池州: 2.6 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %深圳: 1.0 %深圳: 1.0 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %石家庄: 2.2 %石家庄: 2.2 %芒廷维尤: 23.9 %芒廷维尤: 23.9 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %荆门: 0.2 %荆门: 0.2 %西宁: 39.9 %西宁: 39.9 %西雅图: 0.2 %西雅图: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %运城: 0.8 %运城: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %镇江: 0.2 %镇江: 0.2 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %鹰潭: 0.2 %鹰潭: 0.2 %其他上海东莞临汾丽水北京十堰南京哈尔滨大角咀大连天津宁波宣城山景城广州张家口德黑兰成都杭州武汉池州沈阳济南深圳温州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥荆门西宁西雅图贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆镇江长沙青岛鹰潭

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(12)  / Tables(1)

    Article views(785) PDF downloads(15) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return