• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
JI Kun, WEN Ruizhi, REN Yefei, YIN Jianhua. Number of Earthquake Ground Motion Inputs for Time-History Analysis of Seismic Design Code in China[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 743-751. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180604
Citation: JI Kun, WEN Ruizhi, REN Yefei, YIN Jianhua. Number of Earthquake Ground Motion Inputs for Time-History Analysis of Seismic Design Code in China[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 743-751. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180604

Number of Earthquake Ground Motion Inputs for Time-History Analysis of Seismic Design Code in China

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180604
  • Received Date: 16 Jul 2018
  • Rev Recd Date: 08 Jan 2019
  • Available Online: 25 Feb 2019
  • Publish Date: 01 Aug 2020
  • This study aims to determine a proper input number of strong motion recordings for structural time-history analysis in China seismic design code. The cumulative probability curves of structural response under different number of records were simulated using 500 times of Monte Carlo samplings based on the assumption that the seismic demand can be represented by a lognormal distribution. Consequently, significant difference was observed in cumulative probability curves between using the maximum response of three ground motions and using the average response of seven or more ground motions: in the former, the expectation of results is much higher than the theoretical mean structural response and is significantly affected by the structural response variation; while in the latter, the expectation of results is close to the theoretical mean structural response. In addition, nonlinear time-history analysis was carried out of a 10-story typical reinforced concrete (RC) frame according to Chinese seismic code. It turns out that using three records has a significantly higher mean MIDR (maximum inter-story displacement angle) and COV (coefficients of variation) compared with other schemes using more records as input and controlling the record-to-record variation. Finally, on the basis of the response mean values of seven or more strong vibration records, an empirical correction formula using record number and structural response variation as parameters was proposed to calculate the 0.84 quantile value to guarantee the assurance rate of 84% required by seismic design code. The applicability of the empirical correction formula under the seismic code of China is verified by numerical simulation of the 10-story RC frame.

     

  • KWON O S, ELNASHAI A. The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure[J]. Engineering Structures, 2006, 28(2): 289-303. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.010
    PADGETT J E, ROCHES D. Sensitivity of seismic response and fragility to parameter uncertainty[J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(12): 1710-1718. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:12(1710)
    杨溥,李英民,赖明. 结构时程分析法输入地震波的选择控制指标[J]. 土木工程学报,2000,33(6): 33-37. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2000.06.005

    YANG Pu, LI Yingmin, LAI Ming. A new method for selecting input waves for time-history analysis[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2000, 33(6): 33-37. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2000.06.005
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震设计规范: GB 50011—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
    European Committee for Standardization (ECS). Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings[S]. Brussels: [s.n.], 2004.
    American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings: ASCE/SEI-7—10[S]. Virginia: [s.n.], 2010.
    American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Minimum design loads for buildings: ASCE/SEI-7—16[S]. Virginia: [s.n.], 2016.
    New Zealand Standard (NZS). Structural design actions—part 5: earthquake actions: NZS 1170.5—2004[S]. Wellington: [s.n.], 2004.
    BOMMER J J, ACEVEDO A B. The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 8: 43-91.
    HANCOCK J, BOMMER J J, STAFFORD P J. Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2008, 37: 1585-1607. doi: 10.1002/eqe.827
    REYES J C, KALKAN E. How many records should be used in an ASCE/SEI—7 ground motion scaling procedure?[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2012, 28: 1223-1242. doi: 10.1193/1.4000066
    BRADLEY B A. Design seismic demands from seismic response analyses:a probability-based approach[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2011, 27: 213-224. doi: 10.1193/1.3533035
    SHOME N, CORNELL C A. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures[D]. San Francisco: Stanford University, 1999.
    ASLANI H, MIRANDA E. Probability-based seismic response analysis[J]. Engineering Structures, 2005, 27: 1151-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.015
    MANDER J B, DHAKAL R P, MASHIKO N, et al. Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges[J]. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29: 2662-2672. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.015
    冀昆,温瑞智,任叶飞. 中国抗震规范强震记录选取的初选条件研究[J]. 防灾减灾与工程学报,2016,36(1): 44-49.

    JI Kun, WEN Ruizhi, REN Yefei. Study on the initial strong motion record selection criteria for Chinese seismic code[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2016, 36(1): 44-49.
    冀昆,温瑞智,任叶飞. 适用于我国抗震设计规范的天然强震记录选取[J]. 建筑结构学报,2017,38(12): 57-67.

    JI Kun, WEN Ruizhi, REN Yefei. Ground motion recordings selection for seismic design code[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2017, 38(12): 57-67.
    REINHORN A M, KUNNATH S K, VALLES R E, et al. IDARC2D version 6.1: a computer program for the inelastic damage analysis of buildings[R]. New York: US National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research(NCEER), 2006: 1-62.
    ARAUJO M, MACEDO L, MARQUES M, et al. Code-based record selection methods for seismic performance assessment of buildings[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2016, 45: 129-148. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2620
    郑史雄, 陈志强, 陈志伟, 等. 近场多脉冲地震作用下高墩桥梁地震响应分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2019, 54(5): 897-907.

    ZHENG Shixiong, CHEN Zhiqiang, CHEN Zhiwei, et al. Seismic response analysis of high-pier bridge under near-fault multiple pulse record excitation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(5): 897-907.
    方登甲, 杜永峰, 刘成清, 等. 复杂多层隔震结构近场地震动位移响应特征分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(1): 158-166.

    FANG Dengjia, DU Yongfeng, LIU Chengqing, et al. Analysis for displacement response characteristics of complex multi-layer base-Isolated structure under near-field ground motion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(1): 158-166.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]YANG Shunqi, QIAN Huaming, ZHONG Zeqi, XU Guohua, HUANG Hongzhong. Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis of LS-FA-211001 Suction Anchor Under Cyclic Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230185
    [2]WANG Hongwei, REN Yefei, WEN Ruizhi, ZHOU Ying. Reliability Analysis on Non-Parametric Spectral Inversion of Seismic Ground Motion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(1): 182-190. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200241
    [3]FANG Dengjia, DU Yongfeng, LIU Chengqing, DENG Youyi. Analysis for Displacement Response Characteristics of Complex Multi-layer Base-Isolated Structure under Near-Field Ground Motion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(1): 158-166, 192. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20181038
    [4]LI Xi, HE Lan, LI Qian, PAN Yi. Effect of Pule-Like Ground Motion on Seismic Performance of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Arch Bridge[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4): 731-740. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180855
    [5]DAI Gonglian, YANG Linghao, WEN Wangqing, ZHAO Tao. Time-History Analysis of Temperature Field of Medium-Low Maglev Guideway Girder[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(2): 227-234. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170554
    [6]GUO Yangzhao, PAN Yi, WU Ti, LI Jingwen, WANG Zichao. Analysis of LRB-DSB Three Dimensional Isolation System’s Isolating Effect[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(6): 1195-1204. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.06.015
    [7]PAN Yi, WANG Zichao, SHANG Feng, GE Qingzi, YUAN Shuang. Study on Isolated Reinforcement Scheme of Ancient Masonry Pagoda in Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(3): 540-547. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.03.015
    [8]PAN Yi, WANG Xiaoyue, XU Hu, XIE Dan. Seismic Fragility Analysis of Nepalese Brick-Timber Heritage Structures under Near-Fault Pulse-Like Ground Motions[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(6): 1156-1163. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.016
    [9]WANG Hongwei, WEN Ruizhi, REN Yefei, SONG Jindong. Rapid Rupture Direction Estimation of Kangding Earthquake Using Strong-Motion Recordings[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(6): 1138-1146. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.06.013
    [10]ZHANG Yingbin, YU Pengcheng, ZHAO Xingquan. Analytical Solutions of Earthquake Dynamic Responses of Trapezoid-Like Mountain[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 28(3): 435-441. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.03.008
    [11]WEN Ruizhi, REN Yefei, QI Wenhao, LU Tao, YANG Zhenyu, SHAN Zhendong, WANG Yunlong. Maximum Acceleration Recording from Lushan Earthquake on April 20, 2013[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(5): 783-791. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.05.001
    [12]CHEN Libo, ZHENG Kaifeng, ZHUANG Weilin, MA Hongsheng, ZHANG Jianjing. Analytical Investigation of Bridge Seismic Vulnerability in Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 25(4): 558-566. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.04.004
    [13]FAN Xuanhua, CHEN Pu, MU Wenpin. Two Precise Time-Integration Methods for Structural Dynamic Analysis[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 25(1): 109-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.021.01.018
    [14]LI Ming, 2, XIE Lili, 3, YANG Yongqiang, HU Jinjun. Potential Damage Analysis of Near-Fault Ground Motion Based on Response Spectra[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(3): 331-335. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [15]YAO Lingkan, FENG Junde, YANG Ming. Damage Analysis of Subgrade Engineering in Wenchuan Earthquake and Recommendations for Improving Seismic Design Code[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 22(3): 301-311.
    [16]WANG Bo, ZHANG Hailong, XU Feng. Seismic Time-History Response Analysis of Cable-Stayed Bridge with Local Cable Vibration[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(4): 441-446.
    [17]ZHANGXin-pei, DONGNa. Genetic Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Time-History Reliability of Aseismatic Structures[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(4): 419-422.
    [18]ZHANGXin-pei, CHEN Ying. Sensitivity Analysis of Time-History Reliability of Reinforced Concrete Frames under Frequent Earthquakes[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(3): 297-300.
    [19]CHEN Ying, ZHANG Xin-pei, ZHU Chang-chun. Time-History Reliability Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frames under Frequent Earthquakes[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(2): 169-172.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 吴玉娇,任叶飞,肖裴渊,刘也,冀昆,温瑞智. 考虑近场、中远场区域性差异的地震动工程输入适用性研究. 震灾防御技术. 2024(04): 685-697 .
    2. 雷虎军,黄江泽. 考虑桩土相互作用的车-轨-桥系统地震响应分析. 西南交通大学学报. 2021(02): 229-237 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(15)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-05051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 34.7 %FULLTEXT: 34.7 %META: 62.0 %META: 62.0 %PDF: 3.3 %PDF: 3.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.3 %其他: 5.3 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 1.8 %上海: 1.8 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %兰州: 1.2 %兰州: 1.2 %北京: 4.5 %北京: 4.5 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 2.1 %南京: 2.1 %台州: 1.2 %台州: 1.2 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 2.5 %哈尔滨: 2.5 %哥伦布: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %大连: 0.4 %大连: 0.4 %天津: 0.8 %天津: 0.8 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %张家口: 3.9 %张家口: 3.9 %成都: 1.6 %成都: 1.6 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %新乡: 0.4 %新乡: 0.4 %杭州: 2.5 %杭州: 2.5 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %池州: 1.6 %池州: 1.6 %沈阳: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.4 %淄博: 0.4 %淄博: 0.4 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %漯河: 1.6 %漯河: 1.6 %石家庄: 1.8 %石家庄: 1.8 %福州: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 7.4 %芒廷维尤: 7.4 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.6 %衢州: 0.6 %西宁: 48.3 %西宁: 48.3 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %金华: 0.2 %金华: 0.2 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %其他[]上海临汾兰州北京十堰南京台州合肥哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴大连天津宣城廊坊张家口成都扬州新乡杭州格兰特县池州沈阳洛阳淄博温州湖州漯河石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁贵阳运城郑州重庆金华长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(1)

    Article views(716) PDF downloads(21) Cited by(17)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return