• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
CHEN Minwu, TIAN Hang, SONG Yalin, CHEN Ling. Reliability Optimization of Co-phase Power Supply Device Based on Frequency Conversion Control Strategy[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(1): 9-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180668
Citation: YANG Shunqi, QIAN Huaming, ZHONG Zeqi, XU Guohua, HUANG Hongzhong. Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis of LS-FA-211001 Suction Anchor Under Cyclic Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230185

Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis of LS-FA-211001 Suction Anchor Under Cyclic Load

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230185
  • Received Date: 22 Apr 2023
  • Rev Recd Date: 05 Jan 2024
  • Available Online: 09 Jul 2024
  • To effectively evaluate the reliability level of the LS-FA-211001 suction anchor during application, the cumulative effect of external loads was considered, and a time-dependent reliability model was established under cyclic loads. The time-dependent reliability analysis of the suction anchor was carried out based on the quantified uncertainty data. The Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) method was adopted to verify the reliability of the suction anchor. The results show that the life of LS-FA-211001 suction anchor can reach 100 times even in harsh exploratory points under the reliability of being over 95%. At the same time, under different cycles of load, the error of the time-dependent reliability model of the suction anchor established in this paper is less than 2.15% compared with the reliability results evaluated by the MCS method, which verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method.

     

  • [1]
    王胤,朱兴运,杨庆. 考虑砂土渗透性变化的吸力锚沉贯及土塞特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2019,41(1): 184-190.

    WANG Yin, ZHU Xingyun, YANG Qing. Installation of suction caissons and formation of soil plug considering variation of permeability of sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(1): 184-190.
    [2]
    霍知亮. 黏土地基中桶形基础模型试验及工作机理研究[D]. 天津:天津大学,2015.
    [3]
    王胤,杨涵,庞子毅,等. 基于CFD-DEM流固耦合方法的吸力锚基础负压沉贯数值模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报,2023,45(2): 384-393,444. doi: 10.11779/CJGE20211512

    WANG Yin, YANG Han, PANG Ziyi, et al. Numerical simulation of negative pressure penetration of suction anchor foundation based on CFD-DEM fluid solid coupling method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(2): 384-393,444. doi: 10.11779/CJGE20211512
    [4]
    闫宏生,苑恒,李怀亮,等. 大抓力锚和吸力锚在CALM型单点系泊系统中的应用[J]. 中国海洋平台,2022,37(4): 31-36,42.

    YAN Hongsheng, YUAN Heng, LI Huailiang, et al. Application of fluke anchor and suction anchor in CALM single-point mooring system[J]. China Offshore Platform, 2022, 37(4): 31-36,42.
    [5]
    RICE S O. Mathematical analysis of random noise[J]. The Bell System Technical Journal, 1944, 23(3): 282-332. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1944.tb00874.x
    [6]
    CRANDALL S H, CHANDIRAMANI K L, COOK R G. Some first-passage problems in random vibration[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1966, 33(3): 532-538. doi: 10.1115/1.3625118
    [7]
    ANDRIEU-RENAUD C, SUDRET B, LEMAIRE M. The PHI2 method: a way to compute time-variant reliability[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2004, 84(1): 75-86.
    [8]
    SINGH A, MOURELATOS Z P. On the time-dependent reliability of non-monotonic, non-repairable systems[J]. SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, 2010, 3(1): 425-444. doi: 10.4271/2010-01-0696
    [9]
    HU Z, DU X P. A sampling approach to extreme value distribution for time-dependent reliability analysis[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2013, 135(7): 071003.1-071003.8.
    [10]
    HU Z, DU X P. Time-dependent reliability analysis with joint upcrossing rates[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013, 48(5): 893-907. doi: 10.1007/s00158-013-0937-2
    [11]
    JIANG C, HUANG X P, HAN X, et al. A time-variant reliability analysis method based on stochastic process discretization[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2014, 136(9): 091009.1-091009.11.
    [12]
    LI C Y, ZHANG Y M. Time-variant reliability assessment and its sensitivity analysis of cutting tool under invariant machining condition based on gamma process[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012, 2012: 676923.1-676923.19.
    [13]
    CAZUGUEL M, RENAUD C, COGNARD J Y. Time-variant reliability of nonlinear structures: application to a representative part of a plate floor[J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2006, 22(1): 101-118. doi: 10.1002/qre.750
    [14]
    KOPUSTINSKAS V, AUGUTIS J, RIMKEVIČIUS S. Dynamic reliability and risk assessment of the accident localization system of the Ignalina NPP RBMK-1500 reactor[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2005, 87(1): 77-87.
    [15]
    张德权,韩旭,姜潮,等. 时变可靠性的区间PHI2分析方法[J]. 中国科学:物理学 力学 天文学,2015,45(5):41-53.

    ZHANG D Q, HAN X, JIANG C, et al. The interval PHI2 analysis method for time-dependent reliability[J]. Sci Sin-Phys Mech Astron, 2015, 45(5):41-53.
    [16]
    TIAN L, NOORE A. Dynamic software reliability prediction: an approach based on support vector machines[J]. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 2005, 12: 309-321. doi: 10.1142/S0218539305001847
    [17]
    BECKER G, CAMARINOPOULOS L, KABRANIS D. Dynamic reliability under random shocks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2002, 77(3): 239-251.
    [18]
    STREICHER H, RACKWITZ R. Time-variant reliability-oriented structural optimization and a renewal model for life-cycle costing[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 19(1/2): 171-183.
    [19]
    SUDRET B. Analytical derivation of the outcrossing rate in time-variant reliability problems[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2008, 4(5): 353-362. doi: 10.1080/15732470701270058
    [20]
    茆诗松,王静龙,濮晓龙. 高等数理统计[M]. 2版. 北京:高等教育出版社,2006:34-35.
    [21]
    钟泽棋. 基于FMECA的吸力锚系统可靠性评估[D]. 成都:电子科技大学,2023.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Min, HE Zhaoyi, ZHOU Wen, LIANG Xin. Influencing Factors of Asphalt Pavement Visibility on Rainy Days[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(6): 1286-1293. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20211079
    [2]WANG Hong, TANG Jinsong, LIU Wanxuan. Reliability Optimization Design of Vehicle Variable Stiffness Spring Assembly by Fuzzy Theory[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 27(5): 837-841. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.05.015
    [3]WANG Weihua, LIAO Haili, LI Mingshui. Numerical Simulation of Wind-Induced Roof Snow Distributions Based on Time Variable Boundary[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(5): 851-856,967. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.05.011
    [4]LIU Wei, LI Qun-Chen, TANG Bing, CHEN Min-Wu. Probabilistic Load Flow for Urban Rail Traction Power Supply Based on Monte Carlo Simulation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(4): 561-567. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [5]JIN Hui, 2, LI Jing, LI Aiqun. Checking Calculation of Fatigue Strength for Cast Steel Joints of Offshore Tour Tower under Wave Loads[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(5): 692-697. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [6]TANG Jia-Yin, ZHAO Yong-Xiang, SONG Dong-Li. Static and Dynamic Models for Reliability Calculation of Stress-Strength Interference[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(3): 384-388. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [7]CAO Jixing, CHEN Qiu, ZHANG Jiping. Simulation of SHPB Test on Concrete and Uniformity of Stresses[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(1): 67-70.
    [8]MI Caiying, LI Fu. Fatigue Strength of Bogie Frame of High-Speed Train under Spectrum Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006, 19(3): 381-385.
    [9]WAN Yi, DENG Bin, LI Huijie, TIAN Zhijun, KE Jian. Fatigue Reliability of Contact Wire[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006, 19(2): 214-217.
    [10]ZHANGXin-pei, DONGNa. Genetic Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Time-History Reliability of Aseismatic Structures[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(4): 419-422.
    [11]LIUHai-xu, PUYun. Road Network Capacity Reliability Based on Link Travel Time Reliability[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(5): 573-576.
    [12]HUO Hong-fa, YU Qin, HUANG Xie-qing. Numerical Simulation of Dynamical Responses of Assembled Vessel to Explosion Impact Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(5): 513-516.
    [13]JINHui, WANGJin-nuo. Fatigue Reliability of Notched Parts from Viewpoint of Structural System[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(3): 294-296.
    [14]SU Yan-jiang, GAO Qing, WANG Guang-qin. Fatigue Reliability Analysis Model for Structural Members under Random Stress-Time Courses[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(6): 584-587.
    [15]Tang Li, Wu Jingye. Reliability Simulation Analysis of the Dislodging Restrict Appraisal Mode[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1999, 12(1): 109-114.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 36.4 %FULLTEXT: 36.4 %META: 57.9 %META: 57.9 %PDF: 5.6 %PDF: 5.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.9 %其他: 7.9 %其他: 0.7 %其他: 0.7 %上海: 0.7 %上海: 0.7 %北京: 4.3 %北京: 4.3 %十堰: 0.7 %十堰: 0.7 %南京: 2.6 %南京: 2.6 %南昌: 1.7 %南昌: 1.7 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦比亚: 0.7 %哥伦比亚: 0.7 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.7 %嘉兴: 0.7 %多特蒙德: 0.3 %多特蒙德: 0.3 %大庆: 2.0 %大庆: 2.0 %天津: 2.6 %天津: 2.6 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %常德: 1.7 %常德: 1.7 %张家口: 4.3 %张家口: 4.3 %成都: 1.0 %成都: 1.0 %扬州: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %斯泰伦博斯: 1.0 %斯泰伦博斯: 1.0 %昆明: 1.0 %昆明: 1.0 %曼谷: 0.3 %曼谷: 0.3 %池州: 1.7 %池州: 1.7 %漯河: 1.7 %漯河: 1.7 %石家庄: 1.0 %石家庄: 1.0 %芒廷维尤: 33.3 %芒廷维尤: 33.3 %芝加哥: 1.3 %芝加哥: 1.3 %衡水: 0.7 %衡水: 0.7 %西宁: 22.4 %西宁: 22.4 %西雅图: 0.3 %西雅图: 0.3 %运城: 0.3 %运城: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %其他其他上海北京十堰南京南昌哥伦布哥伦比亚唐山嘉兴多特蒙德大庆天津太原宣城常德张家口成都扬州斯泰伦博斯昆明曼谷池州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥衡水西宁西雅图运城邯郸长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(2)

    Article views(175) PDF downloads(17) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return