• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
PEI Xiangjun, LI Tiantao, HUANG Runqiu, WANG Shuang. Structural Features and Evolutionary History of Qiaojia Pull-Apart Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(2): 278-286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170206
Citation: PEI Xiangjun, LI Tiantao, HUANG Runqiu, WANG Shuang. Structural Features and Evolutionary History of Qiaojia Pull-Apart Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(2): 278-286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170206

Structural Features and Evolutionary History of Qiaojia Pull-Apart Basin

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170206
  • Received Date: 22 Mar 2017
  • Rev Recd Date: 24 Jul 2017
  • Available Online: 27 Sep 2017
  • Publish Date: 01 Apr 2019
  • In order to explore the features, formation and evolution process of the Qiaojia Basin, detailed field investigation was carried out. Firstly, based on the investigation, the basic geological background conditions of the study area and the sedimentary characteristics of the basin surface were mastered. Further, the borehole survey was carried out on the central area of the basin, and the internal structural characteristics of the basin were obtained. Combing with the regional geological background and the structural characteristics, the formation and evolution process of the basin was analyzed. The results show that the Qiaojia Basin is a typical pull-apart basin, which is mainly controlled by the Xiaojiang Fault. The internal structure of the basin mainly includes five stratigraphic sequences: the alluvial layer of the ancient river, the hydrostatic sedimentary layers, the debris flow alluvium, and the river terraces. It is first discovered that a large-scale damming event occurred 3 km from the downstream boundary of the basin about 30 000 years ago. It is presumed that the basin formed during the late Tertiary period, and later experienced the effects of pull-apart process, damming process, debris flow events, and alluvial events. Through rigorous analysis and research, the evolution process of the basin was divided into 6 stages: regional dislocation, local pull-apart rifting, rift lake deposition, barrier lake deposition, barrier lake breaking, and uneven lifting.

     

  • BURCHFIEL B C, HODGES K V, ROYDEN L H. Geology of panamint valley-saline valley pull-apart system,California:palinspastic evidence for low-angle geometry of a neogene range-bounding fault[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 1987, 92(B10): 10422-10426. doi: 10.1029/JB092iB10p10422
    KEN M, BONORA M. Analog models of restraining stepovers in strike-slip fault systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85(2): 233-260.
    朱志澄, 韦必则, 张旺生. 构造地质学[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1999: 195-197
    王义天,李继亮. 走滑断层作用的相关构造[J]. 地质科技情报,1999,18(3): 30-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.1999.03.007
    王虎,冉勇康,李彦宝,等. 则木河断裂上古地震破裂与小型三角状拉分盆地演化[J]. 中国科学:地球科学,2013(7): 1106-1114.

    WANG Hu, RAN Yongkang, LI Yanbao, et al. Paleoseismic ruptures and evolution of a small triangular pull-apart basin on the Zemuhe fault[J]. Science China:Earth Sciences, 2013(7): 1106-1114.
    HURWITZ S, GARFUNKEL Z, BEN-GAI Y, et al. The tectonic framework of a complex pull-apart basin:seismic reflection observations in the sea of Galilee,Dead Sea transform[J]. Tectonophysics, 2002, 359(3): 289-306.
    周建波,程日辉,刘建辉. 郯庐断裂中段管帅拉分盆地的确定及其构造意义[J]. 地质科学,2005,40(4): 486-498. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2005.04.004

    ZHOU Jianbo, CHENG Rihui, LIU Jianhui. Determination of Guanshuai pull-apart basin along the middle sector of Tan-Lu fault and its tectonic implications[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2005, 40(4): 486-498. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2005.04.004
    陈杰,史正涛,苏怀,等. 巧家盆地黄土的粒度特征及其成因分析[J]. 云南地理环境研究,2009,21(3): 46-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7852.2009.03.010

    CHEN Jie, SHI Zhengtao, SU Huai, et al. Analysis on loess’s grain size features and cause of formation in Qiaojia basin[J]. Yunnan Geographic Environment Research, 2009, 21(3): 46-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7852.2009.03.010
    朱创业. 云南巧家-石屏盆地早震旦世充填序列及构造演化[J]. 成都地质学院学报,1990,17(3): 76-83.

    ZHU Chuangye. The sequences of filling and tectonic evolution of Qiaojia shiping basin,Yunnan during early Sinian[J]. Journal Of Chengdu College Of Geology, 1990, 17(3): 76-83.
    YASUTAKA I,MASAYOSHI T,MASAYOSHI T,et al. Newly-generated Daliangshan fault zone-shortcutting on the central section of Xianshuihe-Xiaojiang fault system[J]. Science China:Earth Sciences,2008,51(9): 1248-1258.
    四川省地质矿产局. 中华人民共和国地质图说明书1: 50000(巧家幅G-48-38-B)[M]. 出版地不详: 攀西地质印刷厂, 1995: 5-25
    王绍晋,龙晓帆,余庆坤. 昆明地区现代构造应力场分析[J]. 地震研究,2005,28(2): 178-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2005.02.014

    WANG Shaojin, LONG Xiaofan, YU Qingkun. Analysis on recent tectonic stress field in the Yunnan region[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 2005, 28(2): 178-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2005.02.014
    荆振杰,杜义,谢富仁. 昆明周边地区活动断层滑动与现代构造应力场[J]. 地震学报,2008,30(3): 230-239. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2008.03.002

    JING Zhenjie, DU Yi, XIE Furen. Contemporary tectonic stress in Kunming basin and surrounding regions deduced from fault slip in version[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2008, 30(3): 230-239. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2008.03.002
    林向东,徐平,武敏捷,等. 小江断裂中段及邻区构造应力场分布特征[J]. 中国地震,2010,26(2): 192-200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2010.02.007

    LIN Xiangdong, XU Ping, WU Minjie, et al. Inversion of stress field in middle section of the Xiaojiang fault and its adjacent area[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2010, 26(2): 192-200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2010.02.007
    俞维贤,刘玉权,何蔚. 云南小江断裂带现今地壳形变特征与地震[J]. 地震地质,1997,19(1): 17-21.

    YU Weixian, LIU Yuquan, HE Wei. Characters of recent crustal deformation and earthquakes on the Xiaojiang Fault zong in Yunnan province[J]. Seismology and Geology, 1997, 19(1): 17-21.
    王阎昭,王恩宁,沈正康,等. 基于GPS资料约束反演川滇地区主要断裂带现今活动速率[J]. 中国科学D辑,2008,51(9): 1267-1283.

    WANG Yanzhao, WANG Enning, SHEN Zhengkang, et al. GPS-constrained inversion of present-day slip rates along major faults of the Sichuan-Yunnan region,China[J]. Science in China (D), 2008, 51(9): 1267-1283.
    钱晓东,秦嘉政. 小江断裂带及周边地区强震危险性分析[J]. 地震研究,2008,31(4): 354-362. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2008.04.010

    QIAN Xiaodong, QIN Jiazhen. Study on Recent Tectonic Stress Field in Yunnan Region[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2008, 31(4): 354-362. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2008.04.010
    国家地震局震害防御司. 中国历史强震目录[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1995: 24-32
    任治坤. 则木河断裂带古地震研究[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地震预测研究所, 2007
    闻学泽. 四川西部鲜水河—安宁河—则木河断裂带的地震破裂分段特征[J]. 地震地质,2000,22(3): 239-249. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2000.03.005

    WEN Xueze. Character of rupture segmentation of the Xianshuihe – Anninghe – Zemuhe fault zone,western Sichuan[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2000, 22(3): 239-249. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2000.03.005
    徐锡伟,张培震,闻学泽,等. 川西及其邻近地区活动构造特征与强震复发模型[J]. 地震地质,2005,27(3): 446-461. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2005.03.010

    XU Xiwei, ZHANG Peizhen, WEN Xueze, et al. Features of active tectonics and recurrence behaviors of strong earthquakes in the western Sichuan province and its adjacent regions[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2005, 27(3): 446-461. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2005.03.010
    张崇立,任金卫. 则木河断裂的现今活动方式及其地形变鉴别标志探讨[J]. 地震地质,1995,17(4): 427-431.

    ZHANG Chongli, REN Jinwei. Recent movement pattern along the Zemuhe fault and deformation indicators for its identification[J]. Seismology and Geology, 1995, 17(4): 427-431.
    KONG P, GRANGER D E, WU F Y, et al. Cosmogenic nuclide burial ages and provenance of the Xigeda paleo-lake:implications for evolution of the middle Yangtze River[J]. Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 2009, 278(1/2): 131-141.
    RAHE B, FERRILL D A, MORRIS A P. Physical analog modeling of pull-apart basin evolution[J]. Tectonophysics, 1998, 285(1): 21-40.
    BLAIR T C, BILODEAU W L. Development of tectonic cyclothems in rift,pull-apart,and foreland basins:Sedimentary response to episodic tectonism[J]. Geology, 1988, 16(6): 517-520. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016<0517:DOTCIR>2.3.CO;2
    HEMPTON M R, NEHER K. Experimental fracture,strain and subsidence patterns over en échelon strike-slip faults:implications for the structural evolution of pull-apart basins[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 1986, 8(6): 597-605. doi: 10.1016/0191-8141(86)90066-0
    BARKA A, AKYÜZ H S, COHEN H A, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Niksar and Tasova-Erbaa pull-apart basins,north anatolian fault zone:their significance for the motion of the Anatolian block[J]. Tectonophysics, 2000, 322(3/4): 243-264.
    CEMEN I, WRIGHT L A, DRAKE R E, et al. Cenozoic sedimentation and sequence of deformational events at southeastern end of the furnace creek strike-slip fault zone, Death Valley region, California[M]. [S.l.]: Strike-Slip Deformation and Basin Formation, 1985: 127-141
    姜波,徐嘉炜. 一个中生代的拉分盆地——宁芜盆地的形成演化[J]. 地质科学,1989,14(4): 314-322.

    JIANG Bo, XU Jiawei. Formation and evolution of the ningwu basin as a mesozoic pull-apart basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 1989, 14(4): 314-322.
    刘国生,朱光,王道轩,等. 郯庐断裂带张八岭隆起段走滑运动与合肥盆地的沉积响应[J]. 沉积学报,2002,20(2): 267-273. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2002.02.014

    LIU Guosheng, ZHU Guang, WANG Daoxuan, et al. Strike-slip movement on the Zhangbaling uplift segment of the Tan-Lu Fault and the depositional response in the Hefei Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002, 20(2): 267-273. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2002.02.014
  • Relative Articles

    [1]SU Qinghua, HONG Nan, HU Zhongbo. Fixed Point Evolution Algorithm[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2025, 60(1): 175-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220079
    [2]DENG Ronggui, ZHONG Zhibin, WANG Wenpo, WANG Yuanyuan, ZHANG Jin, LIU Yuancheng. Characteristics and Significance of New Geological Tectonic Activities in Niba Mountain Fault Zone[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(6): 1457-1468. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220376
    [3]SHAO Jiang, ZHU Baolong, LI Tao. Stress Characteristics of Tunnel Lining Structures Under Landslides with Different Angles of Sliding Zone[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(6): 1214-1221, 1231. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200054
    [4]ZHENG Da, TANG Jingsong. Slope Toppling Deformation and Development Characteristics of Bending Belts by Centrifugal Model Test[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(6): 1232-1240. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200319
    [5]ZHANG Cong, YAO Lingkan, HUANG Yidan, SU Yue. Overtopping Failure of Moraine Dams under Action of Earthquake-Induced Resonant Water Surges[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(3): 564-571. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20190454
    [6]ZHAO Haixin, YAO Lingkan, HUANG Yidan, SU Yue. Hydrodynamic Pressures Study of Barrier Lake under Coaction of Earthquake and Clastic Flow Landslide[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(3): 558-563. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20190323
    [7]XU Rui, D. Sarah·Stamps, HUANG Shengmu. GPS Derived Evolution of Strain Rate in Sichuan Region[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(2): 344-350. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.02.017
    [8]LIANG Jingxuan, HU Xiewen, HAN Mei, FANG Li, WU Jianli, YE Zhenghui. Deformation and Failure Mechanism of Large Ancient Landslide Induced by Wenchuan Earthquake in Front of Zipingpu Hydraulic Dam[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(6): 1154-1162. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.06.015
    [9]PENG Liuliu, HUANG Guoqing, MA Cunming, SU Yanwen. Decoupling of Evolutionary Power Spectral Density and Its Engineering Applications[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 28(2): 319-324,330. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.02.017
    [10]ZHANG Jing, LEI Hang. Algorithm for Computing Reliability Evolution of Internetware[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 27(2): 310-316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.02.019
    [11]CHEN Xiaoqing, ZHAO Wanyu, GAOQuan, JIAShitao, ZHU Xinghua. Experimental Investigation and Design of Artificial Structures Controlling Dam-Break Floods[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(2): 228-234. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.02.009
    [12]HU Xiewen, LÜ, Xiaoping, HUANG Runqiu, REN Xiaoming, WANG Xuerui, LIU Juan. Analyses of River-Blocking and Breaking Mode of "9·24" Debris Flow near Tangjiashan Barrier Dam[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 22(3): 312-320,326.
    [13]ZHAO Yue, DU Wen, CHEN Shuang. Evolving Model for Scale-Free Network Based on Travel Choice[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(4): 531-534.
    [14]JIANG Kejin, ZHANG Dianye, LIU Fanxiao. Combined Evolution of Self-organization and Hetero-organization of Urban Traffic System[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(5): 605-609.
    [15]MAO Min. Self-Organized Evolutionary Mechanism of Transportation Corridor[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(5): 631-635.
    [16]WANG Chen, LIUHao-wu, XUQiang. Modified Mesri s Creep Model for Soils in Sliding Zone of Xietan Landslide in the Three Gorges[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(1): 15-19.
    [17]WANGJian-xiu, YANGLi-zhong, HEJing. The Coupling Interaction of Groundwater-Soil-Rock Mass in Karst Collapse Evolution[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(3): 314-317.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 台梓含,向芳,程万强,王运生,黄恒旭,宋良,周宇航. 巧家盆地第四纪洪积物沉积阶段及其对小江断裂带北段活动性的指示. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(03): 418-427 .
    2. 程万强,王运生,宋良,李正友,周宇航,台梓含. 金沙江巧家莲塘-龙井湾槽谷成因分析. 人民长江. 2023(05): 149-155 .
    3. 程万强,台梓含,向芳,黄恒旭,周宇航,宋良,李正友. 巧家盆地河流沉积与重矿物特征对金沙江贯通的指示. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(01): 84-93+103 .
    4. 杨坤美,向芳,台梓含,王运生,由文智,喻显涛. 巧家盆地第四纪孢粉特征及其古气候意义. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(03): 324-337 .
    5. 王祖东,尹欣欣,梁坤,陈晓龙,蒲举. 2020年云南巧家M 5.0地震重定位及地质构造探索. 地球物理学进展. 2022(04): 1500-1511 .
    6. 段佳鑫,董有浦,吴可,汝鑫,张东越,王丹. 滇中河网特征及其对断层活动的响应. 大地构造与成矿学. 2021(02): 296-307 .
    7. 刘芬良,高红山,李宗盟,潘保田,苏怀. 金沙江巧家—蒙姑段的阶地发育与河谷地貌演化. 地理学报. 2020(05): 1095-1105 .
    8. 吴微微. 安宁河—则木河断裂带及周边地区断层交会部位的应力分布特征. 地震研究. 2020(04): 601-609+767 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-070510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 44.7 %FULLTEXT: 44.7 %META: 53.6 %META: 53.6 %PDF: 1.7 %PDF: 1.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.0 %其他: 7.0 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 0.2 %上海: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %临沂: 0.2 %临沂: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.8 %乌鲁木齐: 0.8 %儋州: 0.2 %儋州: 0.2 %北京: 2.6 %北京: 2.6 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南通: 0.5 %南通: 0.5 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %唐山: 0.5 %唐山: 0.5 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %张家口: 4.1 %张家口: 4.1 %成都: 1.5 %成都: 1.5 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %昭通: 0.6 %昭通: 0.6 %晋中: 0.5 %晋中: 0.5 %普洱: 0.2 %普洱: 0.2 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %武汉: 2.1 %武汉: 2.1 %池州: 0.8 %池州: 0.8 %洛杉矶: 0.2 %洛杉矶: 0.2 %漯河: 1.1 %漯河: 1.1 %盐城: 0.2 %盐城: 0.2 %石家庄: 1.4 %石家庄: 1.4 %芒廷维尤: 33.0 %芒廷维尤: 33.0 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 32.7 %西宁: 32.7 %诺沃克: 0.2 %诺沃克: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %镇江: 0.2 %镇江: 0.2 %长沙: 2.7 %长沙: 2.7 %阳泉: 0.3 %阳泉: 0.3 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %韶关: 0.3 %韶关: 0.3 %其他其他[]上海东莞临汾临沂乌鲁木齐儋州北京十堰南通台州合肥呼和浩特哥伦布唐山天津宁波张家口成都扬州昆明昭通晋中普洱杭州武汉池州洛杉矶漯河盐城石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥衡水衢州西宁诺沃克贵阳邯郸郑州镇江长沙阳泉青岛韶关

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)

    Article views(683) PDF downloads(11) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return