• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
TANG Zhihui, CHENG Jie, FANG Zhengnan. Causal Mechanism of Difference between Experienced and Novice Drivers in Hazard Perception Based on Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(3): 532-538. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.022
Citation: LU Daiyue, XU Guowen, WANG Shimin. Effects of Material Damage and Structural Characteristics on Tunnel Shield During Loading and Unloading[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(6): 1104-1112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.010

Effects of Material Damage and Structural Characteristics on Tunnel Shield During Loading and Unloading

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.010
  • Received Date: 29 Nov 2015
  • Publish Date: 25 Dec 2017
  • To study the effects of material damage and structural characteristics in a tunnel shield during loading and unloading, we conducted an investigation using a plastic-damage constitutive model for the concrete material, nonlinear contact theory, Python's secondary development, and a unidirectional compression spring around the shield circle, which represented the ground reaction force. A Two-dimensional (2D) discontinuous segment-joint model along with a three-dimensional (3D) precision discontinuous segment-joint model were built to simulate the tunnel shield's structural distortion and internal forces when exposed to varying material damage conditions during both loading and unloading. These conditions were explored using three different soil-condition scenarios. The influence of bolt abnormality on the structure is discussed, with graphs showing the corresponding soil radial displacement, the joint stretching value, material stress, and the damage factor for both the loading and unloading condition. Graphs for the joint stretching value and bolt stress levels are presented for two kinds of abnormalities:pre-tightening force loss and corrosion depth. The results show that the deformation index for the macro-structure given three kinds of soil conditions are 510, 340, and 170 kPa, which are considered safe values for loading and unloading. Regarding material stress level to avoid extensive damage, the safe values for loading and unloading are 340, 170, and 170 kPa. The influence of bolt preload loss on the structure is primarily controlled by the opening of the dome joint. The influence of bolt corrosion on the structure is primarily controlled by the stress level of the bolt. The safety limit for the corrosion depth is 6 mm.

     

  • 何川,封坤,方勇. 盾构法修建地铁隧道的技术现状与展望[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2015,50(1):97-109. HE Chuan, FENG Kun, FANG Yong. Review and prospects on constructing technologies of metro tunnels using shield tunnelling method[J]. Journal of Southewest Jiaotong University, 2015, 50(1):97-109.
    曾东洋,何川. 地铁盾构隧道管片接头抗弯刚度的数值计算[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2004,39(6):744-748. ZENG Dongyang,HE Chuan. Numerical simulation of segment joint bending stiffness of metro shield tunnel[J]. Journal of Southewest Jiaotong University,2004,39(6):744-748.
    苏宗贤,何川. 荷载-结构模式的壳-弹簧-接触模型[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2007,42(3):288-292. SU Zongxian,HE Chuan. Shell-spring-contact model for load and structure interaction[J]. Journal of Southewest Jiaotong University, 2007, 42(3):288-292.
    郭瑞,何川,封坤,等. 大断面水下盾构隧道管片接头抗弯刚度及其对管片内力影响研究[J]. 中国铁道科学,2013,34(5):46-53. GUO Rui,HE Chuan,FENG Kun,et al. Bending stiffness of segment joint and its effects on segment internal force for underwater shield tunnel with large cross-section[J]. China Railway Science, 2013, 34(5):46-53.
    彭志勇,刘维宁,丁德云. 大直径盾构隧道分块型K管片接触面力学性能的试验研究[J]. 中国铁道科学,2013,34(5):39-45. PENG Zhiyong, LIU Weining, DING Deyun. Experimental study on the mechanical properties of the interface on partitioned key segment of large-diameter shield tunnel[J]. China Railway Science, 2013, 34(5):39-45.
    SHARMA J S, HEFNY A M, ZHAO J, et al. Effect of large excavation on deformation of adjacent MRT tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16:93-98.
    DOLEŽLOVA' M. Tunnel complex unloaded by a deep excavation[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2001, 28:469-493.
    王如路,张冬梅. 超载作用下软土盾构隧道横向变形机理及控制指标研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2013,35(6):1092-1101. WANG Rulu, ZHANG Dongmei. Mechanism of transverse deformation and assessment index for shield tunnels in soft clay under surface surcharge[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(6):1092-1101.
    上海市城乡建设和交通委员会. DGJ08-11-2010地基基础设计规范[S]. 上海:上海市建筑建材业市场管理总站,2010.
    李杰,吴建营,陈建兵. 混凝土随机损伤力学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2013:55-79.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB50010-2010混凝土结构设计规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社.2010
    BIRTEL V, MARK P. Parameterised finite element modelling of RC beam shear failure[C]//2006 ABAQUS User's Conference. Taipei:[s.n.], 2006:95-108.
    陆新征,叶列平. 建筑抗震弹塑性分析[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009:105-471.
    庄晓莹,张雪健,朱合华. 盾构管片接头破坏的弹塑性-损伤三维有限元模型研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2015,37(10):1826-1834. ZHUANG Xiaoying, ZHANG Xuejian, ZHU Hehua. 3-D finite element model for destruction process of segment joints of shield tunnel using elastoplastic and damage constitutive methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(10):1826-1834.
    小泉纯. 盾构隧道管片设计——从容许应力设计法到极限状态设计法[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012:17-25.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Weilie, YAN Qixiang, ZHANG Chuan, YANG Kai, JIA Ding. Cracking Behavior of Segmental Lining in Subways Under Adverse Jacking Force During Shield Tunneling[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(5): 1073-1082. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220235
    [2]YANG Chengyong, MA Wenhui, FEI Teng, HAN Xueguo, CHENG Lin. Analysis of Longitudinal Deformation of Shield Tunnel Structures with Consideration of Axial Force and Shear Effect[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(1): 139-147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200134
    [3]YE Fei, QIN Nan, LIANG Xing, HAN Xingbo, HAN Xin. Microscopic Model Analysis of Shield Tunnel Backfill Grouting Based on Displacement Effect[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(2): 339-345. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200344
    [4]YANG Cheng, LIAO Weilong, SONG Tongwei, GENG Ping, FANG Yong. Bond-Slip of Connecting Bolts Between Tunnel Segments and Metro Station Portal Ring Beam[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(4): 876-885. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200703
    [5]GENG Ping, YANG Qi, HE Yue, HE Chuan, GUO Xiangyu. Shaking Table Test and Numerical Simulation of Shield Tunnel Connecting Cross Passage[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(6): 1215-1223. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180982
    [6]XIE Hongming, HE Chuan, FENG Kun, LIANG Minfei, LI Ce, AL-SEBAEAI Maged. Unidirectional Vibration Waterproof Test of Ring Joint of Shield Tunnel under the Action of Earthquake[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 713-718. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180456
    [7]GENG Ping, WANG Qi, GUO Xiangyu, HE Chuan, LU Shujun, XIAO Mingqing. Force Characteristics of Longitudinal Joints of Shield Tunnel under Seismic Action[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 704-712. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180634
    [8]WANG Mingnian, HUANG Haibin, TANG Yuan, WANG Chuang, LIU Dagang. Influence of Shield Construction on Pressure Fluctuation of Segment Grout[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(3): 461-467, 586. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170199
    [9]YAN Qixiang, LI Binjia, CHEN Hang, ZHANG Weilie, DENG Zhixin. Failure and Parametric Analysis of Shield Tunnel Bolts under Impact Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(1): 23-31, 38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20160637
    [10]WANG Jun, LIN Guojin, TANG Xie, HE Chuan. Face Stability Analysis of Shield Tunnel in Sandy Ground Using 3D DEM[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(2): 312-321. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.02.013
    [11]LU Daiyue, HE Chuan, WANG Shimin. Crack Propagation Law of Segment Tendon under Jacking Forces[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(1): 75-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.01.011
    [12]ZHENG Yuchao, SHI Bowen, SUN Keguo, YANG Tianchun, LI Hui. Impact of Partition Method in Pit Construction Adjacent to Existing Metro Shield Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(5): 910-918. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.05.010
    [13]FANG Yong, HE Chuan, QI Chun, ZHANG Ming. Structural Internal Force of Shield Tunnel in Expansive Soil Underlying Sandy Pebble Layer[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 27(3): 386-392. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.03.003
    [14]WEI Kai, ZHAI Wanming, XIAO Junhua. Influence of Track Regularity and Soil Dynamic Characteristics on Vibration of Subway Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(6): 989-995. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.06.004
    [15]YE Fei, LIU Yanpeng, GOU Changfei, ZHANG Jinlong, ZHOU Zhuo. Capillary Penetration Diffusion Model for Backfill Grouting of Shield Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(3): 428-434. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.006
    [16]YUAN Xiao-Hui, HAN Ru-Wang, ZHONG Xiao-Chun. Pressure Distribution Model of Simultaneous Backfill Grouting of Shield Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(1): 18-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.01.003
    [17]GENG Ping, HE Chuan, YAN Qixiang. Analysis of Longitudinal Seismic Response of Shield Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(3): 283-287.
    [18]LIWei, HE Chuan, ZHANG Zhi-qiang. M odelTest ofConstructing Shield Tunnel under Large Underground Structure[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2005, 18(4): 478-483.
    [19]ZENG Dong-yang, HE Chuan. Numerical Simulation of Segment Joint Bending Stiffness of Metro Shield Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(6): 744-748.
    [20]CAOXin一wen, CAIying, SUjian. ModelTestS加dyofDynamiePerformancesof theSubgradeRelnforcedwithGeocellandGeonet[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(4): 350-354.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 李超. 超大直径盾构混凝土预制管片抗裂性能影响因素及防治措施. 交通世界. 2023(26): 161-163+167 .
    2. 高扬. 建筑物拆除对下方轨道交通盾构隧道安全风险研究. 中国高新科技. 2022(04): 103-105 .
    3. 魏纲,张书鸣. 地面堆载对临近地铁盾构隧道影响的研究综述. 低温建筑技术. 2021(01): 92-97 .
    4. 丁智,张霄,梁发云,程丁捷,王刘祺. 软土基坑开挖对邻近既有隧道影响研究及展望. 中国公路学报. 2021(03): 50-70 .
    5. 覃智泽,韦向高,许显龙. 荷载对盾构隧道管片力学性能影响的模拟分析. 混凝土与水泥制品. 2021(11): 51-54 .
    6. 殷剑光,金浩,宫全美,周顺华. 环向螺栓锈蚀对盾构隧道承载性能的影响. 地下空间与工程学报. 2020(02): 508-515 .
    7. 晏启祥,李彬嘉,陈行,张伟列,邓志鑫. 撞击荷载作用下盾构隧道接头螺栓失效及参数分析. 西南交通大学学报. 2019(01): 23-31+38 . 本站查看
    8. 叶宇航,柳献,刘震,张维熙,杨志豪,朱瑶宏. 类矩形盾构隧道衬砌结构设计模型研究. 西南交通大学学报. 2019(06): 1187-1195 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(8)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 28.8 %FULLTEXT: 28.8 %META: 71.2 %META: 71.2 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.0 %其他: 2.0 %上海: 2.6 %上海: 2.6 %临汾: 0.6 %临汾: 0.6 %佛山: 0.6 %佛山: 0.6 %北京: 2.3 %北京: 2.3 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.6 %哥伦布: 0.6 %大连: 0.6 %大连: 0.6 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %张家口: 3.2 %张家口: 3.2 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %池州: 1.2 %池州: 1.2 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 8.6 %芒廷维尤: 8.6 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 71.5 %西宁: 71.5 %西雅图: 0.3 %西雅图: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %其他上海临汾佛山北京南通哥伦布大连天津张家口成都扬州昆明杭州武汉池州温州漯河芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁西雅图郑州重庆长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views(595) PDF downloads(25) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return