• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
XIE Hongming, HE Chuan, FENG Kun, LIANG Minfei, LI Ce, AL-SEBAEAI Maged. Unidirectional Vibration Waterproof Test of Ring Joint of Shield Tunnel under the Action of Earthquake[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 713-718. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180456
Citation: XIE Hongming, HE Chuan, FENG Kun, LIANG Minfei, LI Ce, AL-SEBAEAI Maged. Unidirectional Vibration Waterproof Test of Ring Joint of Shield Tunnel under the Action of Earthquake[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 713-718. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180456

Unidirectional Vibration Waterproof Test of Ring Joint of Shield Tunnel under the Action of Earthquake

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180456
  • Received Date: 30 May 2018
  • Rev Recd Date: 17 Sep 2018
  • Available Online: 11 Jan 2019
  • Publish Date: 01 Aug 2020
  • In order to study the waterproof performance of the elastic sealing gasket of shield tunnel segment joint under seismic action, on the basis of the large section subsea shield tunnel—Su’ai Channel project in high-intensity seismic region, a unidirectional vibration waterproof test device for segment ring joint under the action of simulated earthquake was developed according to the waterproof index. The unidirectional vibration waterproof test under different ring joint openings was carried out, compared with the static waterproof test under the corresponding working conditions of opening and offset, the influence of openings on waterproofing performance of sealing gasket is obtained, and the corresponding indexes of the vibration and static waterproof of the gasket were put forward. The results show that when water leakage happens under the unidirectional vibration condition, the water spurts rather than slowly flows out through the sealing gasket, and the increase of the opening is more likely to reduce the gasket waterproof performance significantly than that of the offset. With the changes of ring joint openings, the hydraulic resistance value under unidirectional vibration is 0.2−1.4 MPa and the static hydraulic resistance value is 0.1−1.1 MPa. The waterproof performance of the sealing gasket is about 45%−78% of its static water resistance under unidirectional vibration.

     

  • 雷震宇,刘明. 具有随机参数的盾构管片弹性密封垫防水性能优化分析[J]. 应用数学和力学,2017,38(8): 899-910.

    LEI Zhenyu, LIU Ming. Waterproofness optimization for elastic rubber gaskets in shield tunnels with random parameters[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2017, 38(8): 899-910.
    周济民,何川,张增. 铁路隧道管片衬砌承受高水压分界值研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2011,33(10): 1583-1589.

    ZHOU Jimin, HE Chuan, ZHANG Zeng. Boundary value of high hydraulic pressure upon segment lining in railway tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(10): 1583-1589.
    SHI C, CAO C, LEI M, et al. Time-dependent performance and constitutive model of epdm rubber gasket used for tunnel segment joints[J]. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology, 2015, 50: 490-498.
    王湛. 水下盾构隧道弹性密封垫防水失效数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道建设,2015,35(11): 1164-1168. doi: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2015.11.008

    WANG Zhan. Numerical study of waterpro of failure mechanism of sealing gasket of underwater shield-bored tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2015, 35(11): 1164-1168. doi: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2015.11.008
    赵明,丁文其,彭益成,等. 高水压盾构隧道管片接缝防水可靠性试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术,2013,50(3): 87-93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2013.03.013

    ZHAO Ming, DING Wenqi, PENG Yicheng, et al. Experimental study on the reliability of shield tunnel segment joints to remain watertight under high water pressure[J]. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2013, 50(3): 87-93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2013.03.013
    拓勇飞, 舒恒, 郭小红, 等. 超高水压大直径盾构隧道管片接缝防水设计与试验研究[J].岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(增刊 1): 227-231.

    TUO Yongfei, SHU Heng, GUO Xiaohong, et al. Design and experimental study on waterproof gasket of large-diameter shield tunnel under ultra high water pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013(S1): 227-231.
    SHALABI F I. Behavior of gasketed segmental concrete tunnel lining[D]. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001.
    吴炜枫,丁文其,魏立新,等. 深层排水盾构隧道接缝防水密封垫形式试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术,2016,53(6): 190-195.

    WU Weifeng, DING Wenqi, WEI Lixin, et al. Experimental study on joint waterproofing gasket patterns for deep sewage tunnels excavated by shield machines[J]. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2016, 53(6): 190-195.
    董林伟,江玉生,杨志勇,等. 隧道管片接缝密封垫防水机理及试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2017,39(3): 469-474. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201703010

    DONG Linwei, JIANG Yusheng, YANG Zhiyong, et al. Experimental study and water-resistant mechanism of gaskets in joints of tunnel segments[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(3): 469-474. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201703010
    DING W, GONG C, MOSALAM K M, et al. Development and application of the integrated sealant test apparatus for sealing gaskets in tunnel segmental joints[J]. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology, 2017, 63: 54-68.
    谢宏明,杜彦良,何川,等. 强震作用下大断面海底盾构隧道管片环缝防水性能[J]. 中国公路学报,2017,30(8): 201-209. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.08.023

    XIE Hongming, DU Yanliang, HE Chuan, et al. Water performance of segment joints of large section subsea shield tunnel under strong earthquake[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(8): 201-209. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.08.023
    全国橡胶与橡胶制品标准化技术委员会橡胶杂品分技术委员会. 高分子防水材料, 第4部分: 盾构法隧道管片用橡胶密封垫: GB 18173. 4—2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Weilie, YAN Qixiang, ZHANG Chuan, YANG Kai, JIA Ding. Cracking Behavior of Segmental Lining in Subways Under Adverse Jacking Force During Shield Tunneling[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(5): 1073-1082. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220235
    [2]ZHONG Xiaochun, HUANG Siyuan, ZHU Weibin, CHEN Qiaosong, YOU Zhi. Analysis of Sealing Performance of Shield Tail Brush Based on Compression and Grease Escape Test[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(1): 125-132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210814
    [3]YANG Cheng, LIAO Weilong, SONG Tongwei, GENG Ping, FANG Yong. Bond-Slip of Connecting Bolts Between Tunnel Segments and Metro Station Portal Ring Beam[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(4): 876-885. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200703
    [4]LI Bingtian, QIU Wenge, QI Xingxin, DENG Zhiheng, HU Hui. Shaking Table Tests on Seismic Response of Tunnel with Longitudinal Cracking Lining[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(1): 20-27, 55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20190657
    [5]SHEN Xiang, YUAN Dajun, CAO Yutao, GAO Zhenfeng. Experiments on Material Proportions for Simulating Sandy Layer in Deep Sea[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(3): 628-634. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180285
    [6]GENG Ping, WANG Qi, GUO Xiangyu, HE Chuan, LU Shujun, XIAO Mingqing. Force Characteristics of Longitudinal Joints of Shield Tunnel under Seismic Action[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 704-712. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180634
    [7]GENG Ping, YANG Qi, HE Yue, HE Chuan, GUO Xiangyu. Shaking Table Test and Numerical Simulation of Shield Tunnel Connecting Cross Passage[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(6): 1215-1223. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180982
    [8]WANG Mingnian, HUANG Haibin, TANG Yuan, WANG Chuang, LIU Dagang. Influence of Shield Construction on Pressure Fluctuation of Segment Grout[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(3): 461-467, 586. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170199
    [9]YAN Qixiang, LI Binjia, CHEN Hang, ZHANG Weilie, DENG Zhixin. Failure and Parametric Analysis of Shield Tunnel Bolts under Impact Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(1): 23-31, 38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20160637
    [10]WANG Jun, LIN Guojin, TANG Xie, HE Chuan. Face Stability Analysis of Shield Tunnel in Sandy Ground Using 3D DEM[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(2): 312-321. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.02.013
    [11]LU Daiyue, XU Guowen, WANG Shimin. Effects of Material Damage and Structural Characteristics on Tunnel Shield During Loading and Unloading[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(6): 1104-1112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.010
    [12]ZHENG Yuchao, SHI Bowen, SUN Keguo, YANG Tianchun, LI Hui. Impact of Partition Method in Pit Construction Adjacent to Existing Metro Shield Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(5): 910-918. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.05.010
    [13]LU Daiyue, HE Chuan, WANG Shimin. Crack Propagation Law of Segment Tendon under Jacking Forces[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(1): 75-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.01.011
    [14]FANG Yong, HE Chuan, QI Chun, ZHANG Ming. Structural Internal Force of Shield Tunnel in Expansive Soil Underlying Sandy Pebble Layer[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 27(3): 386-392. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.03.003
    [15]YE Fei, LIU Yanpeng, GOU Changfei, ZHANG Jinlong, ZHOU Zhuo. Capillary Penetration Diffusion Model for Backfill Grouting of Shield Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(3): 428-434. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.006
    [16]WEI Kai, ZHAI Wanming, XIAO Junhua. Influence of Track Regularity and Soil Dynamic Characteristics on Vibration of Subway Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(6): 989-995. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.06.004
    [17]YUAN Xiao-Hui, HAN Ru-Wang, ZHONG Xiao-Chun. Pressure Distribution Model of Simultaneous Backfill Grouting of Shield Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(1): 18-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.01.003
    [18]GENG Ping, HE Chuan, YAN Qixiang. Analysis of Longitudinal Seismic Response of Shield Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(3): 283-287.
    [19]LIWei, HE Chuan, ZHANG Zhi-qiang. M odelTest ofConstructing Shield Tunnel under Large Underground Structure[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2005, 18(4): 478-483.
    [20]ZENG Dong-yang, HE Chuan. Numerical Simulation of Segment Joint Bending Stiffness of Metro Shield Tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(6): 744-748.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 秦鹏飞,王文菁,晋芳,李昂. 软土地铁车站注浆加固技术分析. 南阳理工学院学报. 2024(06): 75-81 .
    2. 张富宾,肖建庄,丁红梅,肖绪文. 装配式混凝土结构防水技术现状及发展趋势. 建筑科学与工程学报. 2022(01): 1-13 .
    3. 丁文其 ,丁浩 ,门燕青 ,马非 ,马少坤 ,王士民 ,王万平 ,王帅帅 ,王圣涛 ,王亚琼 ,王传武 ,王树英 ,王剑宏 ,王智佼 ,毛锦波 ,方勇 ,邓涛 ,叶飞 ,申志军 ,田方正 ,付艳斌 ,冯冀蒙 ,吕勇刚 ,任锐 ,刘大刚 ,刘帅 ,刘永胜 ,刘学增 ,闫治国 ,孙文昊 ,孙纬宇 ,阳军生 ,李亚隆 ,李科 ,李然 ,李鹏飞 ,杨华 ,何伟 ,闵凡路 ,汪成兵 ,汪波 ,宋天田 ,张冬梅 ,张成平 ,张杨 ,张国柱 ,张俊儒 ,张亮亮 ,张高乐 ,张稳军 ,陈文尹 ,陈建忠 ,陈枰良 ,陈健 ,林志 ,罗彦斌 ,竺维彬 ,金大龙 ,周熙俊 ,郑余朝 ,官林星 ,房倩 ,封坤 ,赵清碧 ,胡斌 ,柳献 ,禹海涛 ,钟祖良 ,贺维国 ,耿萍 ,晏启祥 ,徐平 ,凌同华 ,高攀 ,郭卫社 ,黄阜 ,黄俊 ,黄清飞 ,曹校勇 ,龚彦峰 ,龚琛杰 ,梁庆国 ,董飞 ,韩兴博 ,傅金阳 ,曾艳华 ,管晓明 ,潘勇. 中国交通隧道工程学术研究综述·2022. 中国公路学报. 2022(04): 1-40 .
    4. 鲁志鹏,马天宇,谢宏明,张忆,王士民,何川. 大直径越江盾构隧道管片新型接缝双道密封垫防水性能研究. 铁道标准设计. 2022(08): 109-116 .
    5. 肖明清,谢宏明,王士民,钟元元. 盾构隧道管片接缝防水体系演化历程与展望. 隧道建设(中英文). 2021(11): 1891-1902 .
    6. 王士民,谢宏明. 高水压盾构隧道管片接缝防水研究现状与展望. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治. 2020(02): 66-75 .
    7. 龚琛杰,丁文其,雷明锋,谢东武,施成华. 营运越江盾构隧道渗漏水病害特征及整治研究. 现代隧道技术. 2020(S1): 247-254 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-0505101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 44.4 %FULLTEXT: 44.4 %META: 52.2 %META: 52.2 %PDF: 3.4 %PDF: 3.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.0 %其他: 4.0 %Boydton: 0.4 %Boydton: 0.4 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 0.2 %上海: 0.2 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %北京: 3.2 %北京: 3.2 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.6 %哈尔滨: 0.6 %哥伦布: 1.0 %哥伦布: 1.0 %大连: 0.4 %大连: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %张家口: 2.8 %张家口: 2.8 %成都: 2.2 %成都: 2.2 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %杭州: 2.2 %杭州: 2.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %池州: 0.6 %池州: 0.6 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %湛江: 0.4 %湛江: 0.4 %漯河: 1.8 %漯河: 1.8 %白银: 0.4 %白银: 0.4 %舟山: 0.2 %舟山: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 23.7 %芒廷维尤: 23.7 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 44.1 %西宁: 44.1 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %遂宁: 1.2 %遂宁: 1.2 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %长沙: 2.0 %长沙: 2.0 %阿布奎基: 0.2 %阿布奎基: 0.2 %香港: 0.4 %香港: 0.4 %香港特别行政区: 0.2 %香港特别行政区: 0.2 %其他Boydton[]上海临汾北京十堰南京合肥哈尔滨哥伦布大连天津宁波安康宣城广州张家口成都扬州无锡昆明杭州格兰特县池州深圳湛江漯河白银舟山芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州襄阳西宁贵阳运城遂宁邯郸长沙阿布奎基香港香港特别行政区

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)

    Article views(683) PDF downloads(21) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return