• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

概率密度演化方程数值求解改进及边坡稳定性分析

刘浪,  赵一飞,  宋郁 民

刘浪, 赵一飞, 宋郁 民. 概率密度演化方程数值求解改进及边坡稳定性分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250470
引用本文: 刘浪, 赵一飞, 宋郁 民. 概率密度演化方程数值求解改进及边坡稳定性分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250470
LIU Lang, ZHAO Yifei, SONG Yumin. Improvement in Numerical Solution of Probability Density Evolution Equation and Slope Stability Analysis[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250470
Citation: LIU Lang, ZHAO Yifei, SONG Yumin. Improvement in Numerical Solution of Probability Density Evolution Equation and Slope Stability Analysis[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250470

概率密度演化方程数值求解改进及边坡稳定性分析

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250470
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(52578556,51708069);重庆市自然科学基金项目(cstc2018jcyjA2535)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘浪(1985—),女,教授,博士,研究方向为随机荷载与结构可靠度,E-mail:yilupaolai2008@163.com

Improvement in Numerical Solution of Probability Density Evolution Equation and Slope Stability Analysis

  • 摘要:

    为提升概率密度演化方法在高维结构随机响应分析中的计算精度与效率问题,提出基于总变差不增(TVD)格式的Van Leer通量限制器及超球体均匀选点方法. 首先,针对差分求解的TVD格式,分析Roe-Sweby通量限制器的不足,选取Van Leer通量限制器对数值求解精度进行优化,利用数值算例验证该方法的有效性;其次,基于现有数学证明结论,提出N维标准正态分布在超球体内与超立方体内的概率计算和量化证明超球体高维空间选点方法,进一步提出超球体-好格子选点法,实现超球体内生成均匀点集及概率计算;最后,以某在建高边坡工程为依托,建立边坡稳定性概率密度演化方程,采用本文改进方法对边坡稳定系数进行计算. 研究结果表明:在正常服役工况和降雨工况下,与10 000次蒙特卡洛模拟结果相比,边坡稳定系数的概率积分点最小误差分别为0.4%和0.2%,最大误差分别为2.9%和4.2%;在解决复杂高维结构随机问题时,本文提出的概率密度演化方程数值求解改进方法具有良好的计算精度和计算效率.

     

  • 图 1  差分求解精度比较

    Figure 1.  Comparison of difference solution accuracy

    图 2  积分近似求解示意

    Figure 2.  Approximate solution of integration

    图 3  边坡BP-11剖面

    Figure 3.  Profile of slop BP-11

    图 4  边坡有限元模型

    Figure 4.  Finite element model of slop

    图 5  正常工况PDEM与MCS对比

    Figure 5.  Comparison of PDEM and MCS for normal conditions

    图 6  正常工况下最危险滑动面位置

    Figure 6.  Severest sliding surface for normal conditions

    图 7  降雨工况PDEM与MCS对比

    Figure 7.  Comparison of PDEM and MCS for rainfall conditions

    表  1  不同风化层性能参数

    Table  1.   Material properties of various weathered layers

    边坡结构 γ/kN c/kPa $\varphi $/(°)
    风化情况 平均值 变异
    系数
    平均值 变异
    系数
    平均值 变异
    系数
    土状强风化 19.5 0.22 30 0.21 35 0.09
    中等风化 27.0 0.01 2000 0.10 40 0.05
    微风化 27.0 0.01 3500 0.06 42 0.03
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  正常工况下各概率积分点

    Table  2.   Probability integral points for normal conditions

    方法0.010.050.100.200.500.800.900.950.99
    MCS1.7091.8691.9542.0572.2542.4522.5552.6402.801
    Van Leer1.6851.8321.9232.0382.2452.4642.5922.6932.887
    相差率/%1.4041.9841.5960.9270.4080.4931.4171.9842.986
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  降雨工况下各概率积分点

    Table  3.   Probability integral points for rainfall conditions

    积分值0.00010.0010.010.020.050.10.50.900.99
    MCS1.2461.3791.6111.6671.7551.8352.1442.4872.832
    Van Leer1.2481.3751.5421.6051.7051.7992.1392.5202.865
    相差率/%0.2460.2664.2773.6762.8411.9580.2431.3351.157
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 李杰, 陈建兵. 随机结构动力反应分析的概率密度演化方法[J]. 力学学报, 2003, 35(4): 437-442. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.2003.04.008

    Li Jie, Chen Jianbing. Probability density evolution method for analysis of stochastic structural dynamic response[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2003, 35(4): 437-442. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.2003.04.008
    [2] 陈建兵, 李杰. 概率密度演化理论的基本原理与若干进展[J]. 力学与实践, 2026, 48(2): 203-216. doi: 10.6052/1000-0879-25-313

    Chen Jianbing, Li Jie. The fundamental principle and recent advances of the probability density evolution theory[J]. Mechanics in Engineering, 2026, 48(2): 203-216. doi: 10.6052/1000-0879-25-313
    [3] Zhou H, Fan X P, Liu Y F. Dynamic reliability analysis of the existing bridges based on probability density evolution method[J]. Structures, 2023, 57105245.
    [4] Xu L, Zhai W M, Gao J M. A probabilistic model for track random irregularities in vehicle/track coupled dynamics[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2017, 51145-158.
    [5] 余志武, 张鹏, 丁叁叁. 轨道梁参数随机的磁悬浮列车-轨道梁系统概率密度演化分析[J]. 铁道学报, 2023, 45(12): 138-147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2023.12.015

    Yu Zhiwu, Zhang Peng, Ding Sansan. Probability density evolution analysis of maglev train-guideway system with random guideway parameters[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2023, 45(12): 138-147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2023.12.015
    [6] Zai D Z, Pang R, Xu B, et al. Slope system stability reliability analysis with multi-parameters using generalized probability density evolution method[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2021, 80(11): 8419-8431. doi: 10.1007/s10064-021-02399-9
    [7] Li J, Chen J B, Fan W L. The equivalent extreme-value event and evaluation of the structural system reliability[J]. Structural Safety, 2007, 29(2): 112-131. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.03.002
    [8] Chen J B, Li J. Strategy for selecting representative points via tangent spheres in the probability density evolution method[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2008, 74(13): 1988-2014. doi: 10.1002/nme.2246
    [9] 朱志辉, 刘禹兵, 高雪萌, 等. 概率密度演化方程差分格式的计算精度及初值条件改进[J]. 工程力学, 2022, 39(11): 13-21. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2021.06.0477

    Zhu Zhihui, Liu Yubing, Gao Xuemeng, et al. The calculation precision of probability density evolution equation difference scheme and the improvement of initial condition[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39(11): 13-21. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2021.06.0477
    [10] 石晟, 杜东升, 王曙光, 等. 概率密度演化方程TVD格式的自适应时间步长技术及其初值条件改进[J]. 力学学报, 2019, 51(4): 1223-1234. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-18-446

    Shi Sheng, Du Dongsheng, Wang Shuguang, et al. Non-uniform time step tvd scheme for probability density evolution function with improvement of initial condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2019, 51(4): 1223-1234. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-18-446
    [11] Papadopoulos V, Kalogeris I. A Galerkin-based formulation of the probability density evolution method for general stochastic finite element systems[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2016, 57(5): 701-716. doi: 10.1007/s00466-015-1256-9
    [12] 陈建兵, 李杰. 基于概率空间剖分的结构非线性随机反应分析[J]. 华中科技大学学报(城市科学版), 2008(4): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0985.2008.04.001

    Chen Jianbing, Li Jie. Stochastic nonlinear response analysis of structures based on partition of probability-assigned space[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2008(4): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0985.2008.04.001
    [13] 陈建兵, 李杰. 随机结构反应概率密度演化分析的切球选点法[J]. 振动工程学报, 2006, 19(1): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4523.2006.01.001

    Chen Jianbing, Li Jie. Strategy of selecting points via sphere of contact in probability density evolution method for response analysis of stochastic structures[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2006, 19(1): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4523.2006.01.001
    [14] 陈建兵, 李杰. 结构随机响应概率密度演化分析的数论选点法[J]. 力学学报, 2006, 38(1): 134-140. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.2006.01.019

    Chen Jianbing, Li Jie. Strategy of selecting points via number theoretical method in probability density evolution analysis of stochastic response of structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2006, 38(1): 134-140. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.2006.01.019
    [15] Li J, Chen J B. The number theoretical method in response analysis of nonlinear stochastic structures[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2007, 39(6): 693-708. doi: 10.1007/s00466-006-0054-9
    [16] 陈建兵, 张圣涵. 非均布随机参数结构非线性响应的概率密度演化[J]. 力学学报, 2014, 46(1): 136-144.

    Chen Jianbing, Zhang Shenghan. Probability density evolution analysis of nonlinear response of structures with non-uniform random parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2014, 46(1): 136-144.
    [17] Gao K, Liu G, Tang W. High-dimensional reliability analysis based on the improved number-theoretical method[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2022, 107: 151-164. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2022.02.030
    [18] 唐树江. 几类高精度高分辨率格式的构造与应用[D]. 湘潭: 湘潭大学, 2019.
    [19] Li J, Chen J B. Stochastic Dynamics of Structures[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
    [20] 赵一飞, 刘浪. 广义概率密度演化方程差分解法的计算精度比较与改进[J]. 南昌大学学报(工科版), 2025, 47(1): 38-43, 48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0456.2025.01.005

    Zhao Yifei, Liu Lang. Comparison and improvement of the calculation accuracy of the difference decomposition method of the generalized probability density evolution equation[J]. Journal of Nanchang University (Engineering & Technology), 2025, 47(1): 38-43, 48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0456.2025.01.005
    [21] 高凯. 基于概率密度演化方法的斜拉索多幅级非线性疲劳可靠度评估[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2021.
    [22] Barthe F, Guedon O, Mendelson S, et al. A Probabilistic approach to the geometry of the $ l_{p}^{n} $-Ball[J]. Ann. Probability, 2005, 33: 480-513.
    [23] 杨兵, 杨斐, 盘友峰, 等. 考虑土层倾角影响的层状堆积体基覆型边坡动力失稳研究[J/OL]. 西南交通大学学报, 2025-11-06. | https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFD&filename=XNJT20251105001.
    [24] GB 50330—2013 建筑边坡工程技术规范[S].
    [25] 张继周, 缪林昌. 岩土参数概率分布类型及其选择标准[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(增刊2): 3526-3532. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.z2.034

    Zhang Jizhou, Miao Linchang. Types and selection criteria of probability distribution of rock and soil parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(S2): 3526-3532. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.z2.034
    [26] 朱淳, 龚逸非, 宋盛渊, 等. 滑坡多源监测技术及预警模型研究进展与展望[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2025, 60(6): 1373-1389. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230547

    Zhu Chun, Gong Yifei, Song Shengyuan, et al. Progress and prospects of landslide multi-source monitoring technology and early warning model[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2025, 60(6): 1373-1389. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230547
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  35
  • HTML全文浏览量:  58
  • PDF下载量:  11
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-09-15
  • 修回日期:  2026-01-22
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-10-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回