• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

闸瓦偏磨对车轮踏面热疲劳裂纹扩展行为的影响

李志强,  申旭文,  韩辰,  程士蓬,  杨智勇

李志强, 申旭文, 韩辰, 程士蓬, 杨智勇. 闸瓦偏磨对车轮踏面热疲劳裂纹扩展行为的影响[J]. 西南交通大学学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250427
引用本文: 李志强, 申旭文, 韩辰, 程士蓬, 杨智勇. 闸瓦偏磨对车轮踏面热疲劳裂纹扩展行为的影响[J]. 西南交通大学学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250427
LI Zhiqiang, SHEN Xuwen, HAN Chen, CHENG Shipeng, YANG Zhiyong. Effect of Eccentric Wear of Brake Shoe on Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of Wheel Treads[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250427
Citation: LI Zhiqiang, SHEN Xuwen, HAN Chen, CHENG Shipeng, YANG Zhiyong. Effect of Eccentric Wear of Brake Shoe on Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of Wheel Treads[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250427

闸瓦偏磨对车轮踏面热疲劳裂纹扩展行为的影响

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250427
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李志强(1987—),男,副教授,博士,研究方向为车辆结构可靠性设计,E-mail:lizhq@bjtu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: U270.35

Effect of Eccentric Wear of Brake Shoe on Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of Wheel Treads

  • 摘要:

    闸瓦横向偏磨是一种货运列车常见且关键的制动故障,会使得车轮出现热损伤. 为研究闸瓦横向偏磨对货运列车车轮热疲劳裂纹扩展的影响机制,支撑车轮状态修与安全预警,首先,通过材料试验获取ZL-C车轮在不同温度下的力学性能参数及疲劳裂纹扩展参数;其次,建立考虑热-机耦合的车轮有限元模型,仿真计算不同闸瓦偏磨程度紧急制动工况下的温度场与应力场;最后,基于断裂力学理论构建热疲劳裂纹扩展寿命预测模型,分析裂纹的扩展路径与寿命. 结果表明:闸瓦偏磨会导致车轮紧急制动过程中出现显著制动温升,并产生较大的循环周向应力,两者共同作用导致车轮轮辋倒角处“刻度状”裂纹的萌生;热疲劳裂纹主要沿车轮轴向扩展,沿径向方向扩展较慢,随着裂纹尺寸的增加,热疲劳裂纹的深长比不断减小;在闸瓦偏磨的影响下,热裂纹的扩展寿命大幅下降,在闸瓦偏磨25 mm的紧急制动工况下,当裂纹扩展至50.0 mm时发生失稳断裂,与未发生闸瓦偏磨相比,闸瓦偏磨25 mm时热疲劳裂纹从0.2 mm扩展至50.0 mm的扩展寿命降低了90.1%. 对于出现热疲劳裂纹的车轮,要进一步加强监测,避免因裂纹失稳扩展导致的车轮提前失效.

     

  • 图 1  车轮材料微观组织

    Figure 1.  Microstructure of wheel material

    图 2  拉伸试样尺寸

    Figure 2.  Tensile specimen size

    图 3  车轮材料不同温度下力学性能

    Figure 3.  Mechanical properties of wheel materials at different temperatures

    图 4  断裂韧度试验试样尺寸

    Figure 4.  Schematic diagram and physical diagram of specimen size for fracture toughness test

    图 5  裂纹扩展速率试验试样尺寸

    Figure 5.  Schematic diagram and physical diagram of specimen size for crack propagation rate test

    图 6  不同试样疲劳裂纹扩展的a-N曲线

    Figure 6.  a-N curves of fatigue crack propagation in different specimens

    图 7  疲劳裂纹扩展速率da/dN-ΔK曲线

    Figure 7.  da/dN-ΔK curves of fatigue crack propagation rate

    图 8  闸瓦横向偏磨示意

    Figure 8.  Transverse eccentric wear of brake shoes

    图 9  车轮制动热负荷仿真分析模型

    Figure 9.  Simulation analysis model of thermal load of wheel braking

    图 10  应力分析边界条件

    Figure 10.  Boundary conditions for stress analysis

    图 11  节点选取位置示意

    Figure 11.  Node selection location

    图 12  不同偏磨程度下轮辋倒角处温度-时间历程曲线

    Figure 12.  Temperature–time history curves at rim chamfers under different degrees of eccentric wear

    图 13  不同偏磨程度下轮辋倒角处应力-时间曲线

    Figure 13.  Stress–time curves at rim chamfers under different degrees of eccentric wear

    图 14  不同偏磨程度下轮辋倒角处不同方向应力-时间曲线

    Figure 14.  Stress–time curves in different directions at rim chamfer under different degrees of eccentric wear

    图 15  车轮断裂面形貌及初始裂纹形状

    Figure 15.  Wheel fracture surface morphology and initial crack shape

    图 16  车轮裂纹扩展仿真的网格模型

    Figure 16.  Mesh models for wheel crack propagation simulation

    图 17  裂纹扩展仿真流程

    Figure 17.  Crack propagation simulation progress

    图 18  初始裂纹应力强度因子

    Figure 18.  Initial crack stress intensity factor

    图 19  不同闸瓦偏磨工况下热疲劳裂纹应力强度因子分布

    Figure 19.  Distribution of stress intensity factors of thermal fatigue cracks under different conditions of eccentric wear of brake shoe

    图 20  不同闸瓦偏磨工况下热疲劳裂纹扩展路径

    Figure 20.  Thermal fatigue crack propagation path under different conditions of eccentric wear of brake shoe

    图 21  热疲劳裂纹长度随制动次数的变化

    Figure 21.  Change in thermal fatigue crack length with number of braking cycles

    表  1  铸钢车轮材料主要化学成分(质量分数%)

    Table  1.   Main chemical composition of cast steel wheel material (mass fraction %)

    元素 C Si Mn P S Cr Mo Ni
    含量 0.67~0.77 ≥0.15 ≤1.2 ≤0.03 ≤0.04 ≤0.25 ≤0.1 ≤0.25
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  断裂韧度测试结果

    Table  2.   Fracture toughness test results $\sqrt{\text{MPa}{{•}}\text{m}} $

    试样材料 韧度
    1#试样 46.5
    2#试样 45.7
    平均值 46.1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  疲劳裂纹扩展速率测试条件

    Table  3.   Fatigue crack propagation rate test conditions

    试验
    温度/℃
    试验
    频率/Hz
    切口
    长度/mm
    载荷比 最大
    载荷/kN
    20 25 11.98 0.1 9
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 李金良, 肖楠, 谢基龙. 重载货车车轮踏面制动辐板热应力分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2012, 48(12): 133-138. doi: 10.3901/JME.2012.12.133

    Li Jinliang, Xiao Nan, Xie Jilong. Thermal stress analysis of the heavy-haul freight car’s wheel web plate under the wheel tread braking[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 48(12): 133-138. doi: 10.3901/JME.2012.12.133
    [2] 马帅, 刘秀波, 任松斌, 等. 朔黄重载铁路曲线钢轨侧磨预测研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(18): 118-125. doi: 10.3901/JME.2021.18.118

    Ma Shuai, Liu Xiubo, Ren Songbin, et al. Research on side wear prediction of curve rail in Shuohuang heavy haul railway[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 57(18): 118-125. doi: 10.3901/JME.2021.18.118
    [3] 石江, 宋宗莹, 王坤. 重载铁路长大坡道列车失控可能性及避难线设置研究[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 2024, 46(11): 205-212. doi: 10.16668/j.cnki.issn.1003-1421.2024.11.24

    Shi Jiang, Song Zongying, Wang Kun. Possibility of runaway trains and necessity of setting refuge sidings for long descent ramps of heavy haul railways[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 2024, 46(11): 205-212. doi: 10.16668/j.cnki.issn.1003-1421.2024.11.24
    [4] 侯耐. 重载货车车轮踏面制动热负荷研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2011.
    [5] 祁亚运, 张文谦, 贺星, 等. 制动工况下重载货车车辆动力学响应分析[J/OL]. 西南交通大学学报, 2025-02-26.
    [6] 周高伟, 高飞, 段军军. 超长大坡道持续制动条件下列车车轮踏面温度分布的试验研究[J/OL]. 西南交通大学学报, 2024-09-14. | https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspxdbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFD&filename=XNJT2024091300A.
    [7] 李志强, 郑轶男, 张晓康, 等. 制动工况对高速列车制动盘残余应力及翘曲变形的影响[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2025, 60(5): 1278-1286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230691

    Li Zhiqiang, Zheng Yinan, Zhang Xiaokang, et al. Influence of braking conditions on residual stress and warping deformation of brake discs of high-speed trains[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2025, 60(5): 1278-1286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230691
    [8] Caprioli S, Vernersson T, Handa K, et al. Thermal cracking of railway wheels: Towards experimental validation[J]. Tribology International, 2016, 94: 409-420. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.09.042
    [9] 刘旭, 张开林, 姚远. 热负荷对机车车轮疲劳强度影响研究[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2013, 33(2): 26-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2013.02.07

    Liu Xu, Zhang Kailin, Yao Yuan. Effects of thermal load on the fatigue strength of locomotive wheels[J]. Railway Locomotive & Car, 2013, 33(2): 26-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2013.02.07
    [10] Handa K, Kimura Y, Mishima Y. Surface cracks initiation on carbon steel railway wheels under concurrent load of continuous rolling contact and cyclic frictional heat[J]. Wear, 2010, 268(1/2): 50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.06.029
    [11] 张萌. 北京地铁车辆车轮常见失效类型及其对策[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2013, 33(3): 81-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2013.03.19

    Zhang Meng. Co mmon failure types and its countermeasures of the wheel for Beijing metro vehicles[J]. Railway Locomotive & Car, 2013, 33(3): 81-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2013.03.19
    [12] 李秋兰. 地铁车轮踏面横向裂纹微观实验分析[J]. 实验科学与技术, 2016, 14(4): 78-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4550.2016.04.021

    Li Qiulan. Microscopic experiment analysis on transversal cracks of subway wheel tread[J]. Experiment Science and Technology, 2016, 14(4): 78-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4550.2016.04.021
    [13] 张斌, 付秀琴. 铁路车轮、轮箍踏面剥离的类型及形成机理[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2001, 22(2): 73-78. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2001.02.011

    Zhang Bin, Fu Xiuqin. Type and formation mechanism of railway wheel and tire tread spall[J]. China Railway Science, 2001, 22(2): 73-78. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2001.02.011
    [14] 张斌. 铁路车轮轮箍踏面制动剥离研究[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2001, 21(2): 9-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2001.02.003

    Zhang Bin. Investigation on the braking spalling in railway wheels and tyre tread[J]. Railway Locomotive & Car, 2001, 21(2): 9-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2001.02.003
    [15] 半田和行, 彭惠民. 用试验再现踏面热裂纹及其萌生条件[J]. 国外铁道车辆, 2013, 50(5): 41-46.

    Ban Tian Hexing, Peng Huimin. Experimental reproduction and generation conditions of wheel tread thermal cracks[J]. Foreign Rolling Stock, 2013, 50(5): 41-46.
    [16] 陈逊. 考虑踏面制动温升的地铁车轮表面裂纹扩展研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2018.
    [17] 应之丁, 李小宁, 林建平, 等. 列车车轮踏面制动温度循环试验与温度场仿真分析[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2010, 31(3): 70-75.

    Ying Zhiding, Li Xiaoning, Lin Jianping, et al. The temperature cycle test of wheel tread braking for freight trains and the simulation analysis of the temperature field[J]. China Railway Science, 2010, 31(3): 70-75.
    [18] Kwon S J, Seo J W, Jun H K, et al. Observation for crack generatdion of wheel tread regarding to brake cycle[J]. Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering, 2017, 34(12): 847-852. doi: 10.7736/KSPE.2017.34.12.847
    [19] Kwon S J, Seo J W, Kim M S. Evaluation of residual stress for freight car wheel due to wear and brake application[J]. Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering, 2016, 33(7): 529-534. doi: 10.7736/KSPE.2016.33.7.529
    [20] 卢碧红, 徐超, 郭宏远. C80型铁路货车制动装置运用性能预测[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2021, 21(6): 289-297. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.06.023

    Lu Bihong, Xu Chao, Guo Hongyuan. Operation performance prediction of C80 railway freight car braking device[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(6): 289-297. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.06.023
    [21] 包辰铭. 重载列车踏面制动车轮温度场分析及制动故障诊断研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2020.
    [22] 张关震. 车轮踏面裂纹分析[J]. 铁路技术创新, 2016(2): 74-77. doi: 10.19550/j.issn.1672-061x.2016.02.023

    Zhang Guanzhen. Analysis of crack on wheel tread[J]. Railway Technical Innovation, 2016(2): 74-77. doi: 10.19550/j.issn.1672-061x.2016.02.023
    [23] GB/T 228.1—2021 金属材料 拉伸试验 第1部分: 室温试验方法[S].
    [24] GB/T 228.2—2015 金属材料 拉伸试验 第2部分: 高温试验方法[S].
    [25] GB/T 4161—2007 金属材料 平面应变断裂韧度KIC试验方法[S].
    [26] GB/T 6398—2017 金属材料 疲劳试验 疲劳裂纹扩展方法[S].
    [27] 李兰, 蔡园武, 郭刚. 轮轨滚动接触和制动热负荷耦合作用对重载车轮踏面裂纹萌生寿命的影响[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2019, 40(3): 89-96.

    Li Lan, Cai Yuanwu, Guo Gang. Coupling effect of wheel-rail rolling contact and braking thermal load on crack initiation life of heavy haul wheel tread[J]. China Railway Science, 2019, 40(3): 89-96.
    [28] 朱衡. 高速重载列车踏面制动过程热—机械—组织耦合仿真[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2019.
    [29] 王钰博. 高速重载列车踏面制动过程仿真及踏面疲劳寿命预测[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2021.
    [30] 苗晓雨, 秦胜, 熊芯, 等. 基于图谱表分析的铁路货车发展需求探讨[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2021, 41(3): 90-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2021.03.17

    Miao Xiaoyu, Qin Sheng, Xiong Xin, et al. Discussion on development demand of railway freight cars based on spectrum analysis[J]. Railway Locomotive & Car, 2021, 41(3): 90-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2021.03.17
    [31] Paris P, Erdogan F. A critical analysis of crack propagation laws[J]. Journal of Basic Engineering, 1963, 85(4): 528-533. doi: 10.1115/1.3656900
  • 加载中
图(21) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-08-23
  • 修回日期:  2026-01-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-10-17

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回