基于制动特征自学习的磁浮列车强化学习制动控制

刘鸿恩; 胡闽胜; 胡海林

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230517

基于制动特征自学习的磁浮列车强化学习制动控制

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230517

刘鸿恩^{1, 2, 3,},
胡闽胜^{1, 2},
胡海林^{1, 2, ,}

1.
江西理工大学永磁磁浮技术与轨道交通研究院，江西赣州 341000
2.
江西省磁悬浮技术重点实验室，江西赣州 341000
3.
北京全路通信信号研究设计院集团有限公司，北京 100073

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（52262050）；江西省自然科学基金（20224BAB202025）

详细信息

作者简介:
刘鸿恩（1987—），男，讲师，博士，研究方向为轨道交通系统建模与优化控制， E-mail：len3610@126.com

通讯作者:
胡海林（1984—），男，副教授，博士，研究方向为磁浮列车牵引驱动系统控制策略， E-mail：huhailin@jxust.Edu.cn

中图分类号: U283.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 443
- HTML全文浏览量: 160
- PDF下载量: 80
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-10-09
- 修回日期: 2024-02-16
- 网络出版日期: 2024-04-20
- 刊出日期: 2024-03-02

Reinforcement Learning Braking Control of Maglev Trains Based on Self-Learning of Hybrid Braking Features

LIU Hongen^{1, 2, 3
,},
HU Minsheng^{1, 2},
HU Hailin^{1, 2
, ,}

1.
Institute of Permanent Magnetic Levitation Technology and Rail Transportation, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Maglev Technology of Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou 341000, China
3.
CRSC Research & Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100073, China

摘要

摘要:
精准、平稳停车是磁浮列车自动驾驶制动控制的重要目标. 中低速磁浮列车停站制动过程受到电-液混合制动状态强耦合等影响，基于制动特性机理模型的传统制动控制方法难以保障磁浮列车的停车精度和舒适性. 本文提出一种基于混合制动特征自学习的磁浮列车强化学习制动控制方法. 首先，采用长短期记忆网络建立磁浮列车混合制动特征模型，结合磁浮列车运行环境和状态数据进行动态制动特征自学习；然后，根据动态特征学习结果更新强化学习的奖励函数与学习策略，提出基于深度强化学习的列车制动优化控制方法；最后，采用中低速磁浮列车现场运行数据开展仿真实验. 实验结果表明：本文所提出的制动控制方法较传统方法的舒适性和停车精度分别提高41.18%和22%，证明了本文建模与制动优化控制方法的有效性.
- 磁浮列车 /
- 制动控制 /
- 多目标优化控制 /
- 强化学习 /
- 制动特征自学习
Abstract:
Accurate and smooth parking is an essential goal for automatic driving braking control of maglev trains. The strong coupling of the electro-hydraulic hybrid braking state affects the medium and low-speed maglev trains during the stopping braking process, and the traditional braking control method based on the theoretical model of braking features makes it difficult to guarantee the parking accuracy and comfort of the maglev train. This paper proposed a reinforcement learning braking control method for maglev trains based on self-learning of hybrid braking features. First, a long short-term memory (LSTM) network was used to establish a hybrid braking feature model for maglev trains, and the self-learning of dynamic braking features was performed based on the operating environment and status data of maglev trains. Then, the reward function and learning strategy of reinforcement learning were updated according to the learning results of dynamic features, and a train braking optimization control method based on deep reinforcement learning was proposed. Finally, simulation experiments were carried out by using on-site operation data of medium and low-speed maglev trains. The experimental results show that the braking control method proposed in this paper improves comfort and parking accuracy by 41.18% and 22%, respectively, compared with the traditional method. It proves the effectiveness of the modeling and braking optimization control method in this paper.
- maglev train /
- braking control /
- multi-objective optimal control /
- reinforcement learning /
- self-learning of braking features

HTML全文

图 1 中低速磁浮列车电-液混合制动控制原理

Figure 1. Principle of electro-hydraulic hybrid braking control of medium and low-speed maglev trains

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 磁浮列车混合制动动态特性

Figure 2. Dynamic features of hybrid braking of maglev train

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 基于LSTM的磁浮列车制动模型

Figure 3. Braking model of maglev train based on LSTM

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 BFS-DQN框图

Figure 4. Framework of BFS-DQN

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 强化学习制动优化控制算法流程

Figure 5. Flowchart of optimization control algorithm for reinforcement learning braking

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 奖励函数变化曲线

Figure 6. Change curves of reward function

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 加速度收敛情况

Figure 7. Acceleration convergence condition

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 停车误差收敛情况（DQN和BFS-DQN分别取停车误差的绝对值和绝对值负值）

Figure 8. Convergence of parking errors (DQN and BFS-DQN take the absolute value and negative value of absolute value of parking error, respectively)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 制动曲线对比

Figure 9. Braking curves comparison

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 加速度变化情况

Figure 10. Acceleration changes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 停车误差对比

Figure 11. Comparison of parking errors

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 仿真列车参数

Table 1. Simulation train parameters

参数类别	参数特性
列车质量/t	75
线路最高限速/（km·h⁻¹）	80
编组数量	3
最大常用制动力/kN	74.23
最大常用减速度/（m·s⁻²）	0.96
线路最大坡度/‰	51.01

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 算法主要训练参数

Table 2. Main training parameters for algorithm

参数	BFS-DQN	DQN
LSTM 迭代次数/次	500
LSTM 学习率	0.001
LSTM 样本批量	50
单次训练最大步数/步	80	80
训练最大次数/次	20000	20000
Q 网络学习率	0.001	0.001
Q 网络更新频率	100	100
样本大小	32	32
经验池容量	2000	2000
折扣因子	0.96	0.96
贪婪率初始值	0.9	0.9
贪婪率最终值	0.1	0.1

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 算法训练结果

Table 3. Training results for algorithm

训练结果	BFS-DQN	DQN
平均奖励值	33.5	27.8
平均状态转移次数/次	70	72
平均停车误差/m	0.10	0.15
平均加速度变化/（cm·s⁻³）	10.84	11.78
平均制动时间/s	14.0	14.4

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 算法性能

Table 4. Algorithm performance

制动控制策略	RMSE	SD
BFS-DQN	0.099048	0.070652
DQN	0.142815	0.110446
传统 ATO	0.276103	0.140018

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 停车误差分布情况

Table 5. Distribution of parking errors 次

停车误差/m	BFS-DQN	DQN	ATO
$ x \lt - 0.5 $	0	0	3
$ - 0.5 \leqslant x \leqslant - 0.3 $	0	2	3
$ - 0.3 \lt x \leqslant 0 $	18	19	16
$0 \lt x \leqslant 0.3$	32	29	20
$ 0.3 \lt x \leqslant 0.5 $	0	0	6
$ x \gt 0.5 $	0	0	2

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(22)

[1]	邓自刚,刘宗鑫,李海涛,等. 磁悬浮列车发展现状与展望[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2022,57(3): 455-474,530. DENG Zigang, LIU Zongxin, LI Haitao, et al. Development status and prospect of maglev train[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(3): 455-474,530.
[2]	吴萌岭,马天和,田春,等. 列车制动技术发展趋势探讨[J]. 中国铁道科学,2019,40(1): 134-144. WU Mengling, MA Tianhe, TIAN Chun, et al. Discussion on development trend of train braking technology[J]. China Railway Science, 2019, 40(1): 134-144.
[3]	李中奇,邢月霜. 动车组进站过程精准停车控制方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报,2021,33(1): 149-158. LI Zhongqi, XING Yueshuang. Research on precision parking control method for EMU inbound process[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(1): 149-158.
[4]	周嘉俊,吴萌岭,刘宇康,等. 基于改进史密斯预估器的列车制动减速度控制研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2020,48(11): 1657-1667. ZHOU Jiajun, WU Mengling, LIU Yukang, et al. Train braking deceleration control based on improved Smith estimator[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2020, 48(11): 1657-1667.
[5]	马天和,吴萌岭,田春. 城轨列车减速度反馈制动力闭环控制方法[J]. 仪器仪表学报,2021,42(4): 197-205. MA Tianhe, WU Mengling, TIAN Chun. Deceleration-feedback braking force closed-loop control method for urban rail train[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2021, 42(4): 197-205.
[6]	崔俊锋,王长远,王琦,等. 中低速磁浮列车制动过程的时滞补偿预测控制[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2024,21(2):735-747. CUI Junfeng, WANG Changyuan, WANG QI, et al. Time-delay compensation predictive control for braking process of medium-low speed maglev train[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering,2024,21(2):735-747.
[7]	YIN J T, SU S, XUN J, et al. Data-driven approaches for modeling train control models: comparison and case studies[J]. ISA Transactions, 2020, 98: 349-363. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.08.024
[8]	LI Z, TANG T, GAO C H. Long short-term memory neural network applied to train dynamic model and speed prediction[J]. Algorithms, 2019, 12(8): 173.1-173.21.
[9]	YIN J T, NING C H, TANG T. Data-driven models for train control dynamics in high-speed railways[J]. Information Sciences:an International Journal, 2022, 600: 377-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.04.004
[10]	LIU H E, YANG L J, YANG H. Cooperative optimal control of the following operation of high-speed trains[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(10): 17744-17755. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3163971
[11]	LIU H E, YANG H, WANG D H. Robust speed prediction of high-speed trains based on improved echo state networks[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2021, 33(7): 2351-2367. doi: 10.1007/s00521-020-05096-y
[12]	JIANG S Y, GAO H J, WANG X H, et al. Deep reinforcement learning based multi-level dynamic reconfiguration for urban distribution network: a cloud-edge collaboration architecture[J]. Global Energy Interconnection, 2023, 6(1): 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gloei.2023.02.001
[13]	QI X W, LUO Y D, WU G Y, et al. Deep reinforcement learning enabled self-learning control for energy efficient driving[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2019, 99: 67-81. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.12.018
[14]	YANG Y, LI J T, PENG L L. Multi-robot path planning based on a deep reinforcement learning DQN algorithm[J]. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology, 2020, 5(3): 177-183. doi: 10.1049/trit.2020.0024
[15]	张淼,张琦,刘文韬,等. 一种基于策略梯度强化学习的列车智能控制方法[J]. 铁道学报,2020,42(1): 69-75. ZHANG Miao, ZHANG Qi, LIU Wentao, et al. A policy-based reinforcement learning algorithm for intelligent train control[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2020, 42(1): 69-75.
[16]	高豪,张亚东,郭进,等. 基于动态规划的列车节能运行两阶段优化方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2020,55(5): 946-954. GAO Hao, ZHANG Yadong, GUO Jin, et al. Two-stage optimization method of train energy-efficient operation based on dynamic programming[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(5): 946-954.
[17]	蒋灵明,倪少权. 基于多智体强化学习的高效率货物列车运行动态调整方法[J]. 铁道学报,2023,45(8): 27-35. JIANG Lingming, NI Shaoquan. High-efficiency freight train rescheduling enabled by multi-agent reinforcement learning[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2023, 45(8): 27-35.
[18]	SHANG M Y, ZHOU Y H, FUJITA H. Deep reinforcement learning with reference system to handle constraints for energy-efficient train control[J]. Information Sciences, 2021, 570: 708-721. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.04.088
[19]	LIU W T, SU S, TANG T, et al. A DQN-based intelligent control method for heavy haul trains on long steep downhill section[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 129(10): 103249.1-103249.21 .
[20]	WANG H N, LIU N, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Deep reinforcement learning: a survey[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2020, 21(12): 1726-1744.
[21]	Wang Y, Chardonnet J R, Merienne F. Speed profile optimization for enhanced passenger comfort: An optimal control approach[C]//2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). [S.l.]: IEEE, 2018: 723-728.
[22]	万里鹏,兰旭光,张翰博,等. 深度强化学习理论及其应用综述[J]. 模式识别与人工智能,2019,32(1): 67-81. WAN Lipeng, LAN Xuguang, ZHANG Hanbo, et al. A review of deep reinforcement learning theory and application[J]. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2019, 32(1): 67-81.