• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

线性法修正HVSR的场地效应研究

陈学良 陈科霖 兰景岩 李兴哲

陈学良, 陈科霖, 兰景岩, 李兴哲. 线性法修正HVSR的场地效应研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230094
引用本文: 陈学良, 陈科霖, 兰景岩, 李兴哲. 线性法修正HVSR的场地效应研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230094
CHEN XueLiang, CHEN Kelin, LAN Jingyan, LI Xingzhe. Site Effects of Linear Method and Modified Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230094
Citation: CHEN XueLiang, CHEN Kelin, LAN Jingyan, LI Xingzhe. Site Effects of Linear Method and Modified Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230094

线性法修正HVSR的场地效应研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230094
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(2023YFC3007305,2019YFC1509403);国家自然科学基金项目(51978633,51678537);
详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈学良(1976—),男,研究员,研究方向为工程地震学、强地震动数值模拟与土动力学,Email:chenxueliang007@126.com

  • 中图分类号: P315.9

Site Effects of Linear Method and Modified Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio

  • 摘要:

    为进一步研究工程地震动场地效应的影响,基于水平垂直谱比法(HVSR)、线性反演法2种经验方法对四川强震区地震动场地效应进行对比分析. 首先,依据震级、台站、震中距离等因素挑选出汶川地震余震中由17个强震动台站捕获的233组强震动波形;其次,基于龙门山地区铰链三段式衰减模型,采用线性反演法估计S波的品质因子Qs,同时应用旋转HVSR、多向HVSR 2种方法解释了地震波传播中方位角对HVSR场地效应的影响机制;最后,分析了线性反演法与HVSR法计算的场地效应产生差异性的原因,在此基础上提出了改进的HVSR法以提高场地效应评估的准确性. 研究结果发现:该区域S波的品质因子与频率相关,且在0.4~20.0 Hz内近似等于199.2f 0.8f为频率);HVSR的结果具有优势方向,随着方位角的改变,场地效应会在某一角度突然增大,与场地土层的各向异性有关;竖向地震动的放大,即场地土层、工程基岩或中深部硬岩层耦合形成的竖向场地效应,是HVSR法与线性反演法产生差异的主要原因.

     

  • 图 1  PGA与震源距的关系

    Figure 1.  Relationships between PGA and hypocentral distance

    图 2  震中与台站的位置

    Figure 2.  Location of epicenter and stations

    图 3  强震动观测记录的处理示例

    Figure 3.  Processing of strong motion observation records

    图 4  品质因子Qs值的对比

    Figure 4.  Comparison of quality factor Qs values

    图 5  SH、SV波、H分量的对比

    Figure 5.  Comparison of SH, SV wave, and H component

    图 6  多向HVSR的结果

    Figure 6.  Results of multidirectional HVSR

    图 7  旋转HVSR的结果

    Figure 7.  Results of rotational HVSR

    图 8  HVSR与线性反演法场地效应的对比

    Figure 8.  Comparison of site effects between HVSR and linear inversion

    图 9  线性反演计算的17个台站竖向场地效应的结果

    Figure 9.  Results of vertical site effects calculated by linear inversion for 17 stations

    图 10  修正后的HVSR与线性反演法对比

    Figure 10.  Comparison of modified HVSR and linear inversion

    图 11  区域场地放大系数及场地卓越频率的空间分布

    Figure 11.  Spatial distribution of regional site amplification factors and site predominant frequencies

  • [1] KAKLAMANOS J, CABAS A, PAROLAI S, et al. Introduction to the special section on advances in site response estimation[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2021, 111(4): 1665-1676. doi: 10.1785/0120210152
    [2] LEE V W, TRIFUNAC M D. Should average shear-wave velocity in the top 30 m of soil be used to describe seismic amplification?[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(11): 1250-1258. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.05.007
    [3] BORA S S, SCHERBAUM F, KUEHN N, et al. Development of a response spectral ground-motion prediction equation (GMPE) for seismic-hazard analysis from empirical Fourier spectral and duration models[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2015, 105(4): 2192-2218. doi: 10.1785/0120140297
    [4] Y BARD P, BORA S S, HOLLENDER F, et al. Are the standard VS-kappa host-to-target adjustments the only way to get consistent hard-rock ground motion prediction?[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2020, 177(5): 2049-2068. doi: 10.1007/s00024-019-02173-9
    [5] BORCHERDT R. Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1970, 60: 29-61.
    [6] NAKAMURA Y. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface[J]. Quarterly Report of Rtri, 1989, 30(1): 25-30.
    [7] ANDREWS D J. Objective determination of source parameters and similarity of earthquakes of different size[M]//Earthquake Source Mechanics. Washington D. C.: American Geophysical Union, 2013: 259-267.
    [8] 王宏伟,任叶飞,温瑞智,等. 地震动非参数化谱反演可靠性分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2022,57(1): 182-190. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200241

    WANG Hongwei, REN Yefei, WEN Ruizhi, et al. Reliability analysis on non-parametric spectral inversion of seismic ground motion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(1): 182-190. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200241
    [9] 周影. 复杂板块构造下地震动路径衰减及震源特性研究[D]. 哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所,2021.
    [10] LERMO J, CHÁVEZ-GARCÍA F J. Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1993, 83(5): 1574-1594. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0830051574
    [11] AMERI G, OTH A, PILZ M, et al. Separation of source and site effects by generalized inversion technique using the aftershock recordings of the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 9(3): 717-739. doi: 10.1007/s10518-011-9248-4
    [12] ATKINSON B, MEREU R. The shape of ground motion attenuation curves in southeastern Canada[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1992, 82(5): 2014-2031. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0820052014
    [13] REN Y F, WEN R Z, YAMANAKA H, et al. Site effects by generalized inversion technique using strong motion recordings of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2013, 12(2): 165-184. doi: 10.1007/s11803-013-0160-6
    [14] 宋健,师黎静,党鹏飞,等. 考虑海域衰减特性的日本相模湾海底场地放大研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2021,54(12): 74-84.

    SONG Jian, SHI Lijing, DANG Pengfei, et al. Study on site amplification of strong ground motion stations considering attenuation characteristics of the sea area in the Sagami Bay area, Japan[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2021, 54(12): 74-84.
    [15] 姚鑫鑫,任叶飞,岸田忠大,等. 强震动记录的数据处理流程:去噪滤波[J]. 工程力学,2022,39(增1): 320-329.

    YAO Xinxin, REN Yefei, AN Tianzhongda, et al. The procedure of filtering the strong motion record: denoising and filtering[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39(S1): 320-329.
    [16] KONNO K, OHMACHI T. Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1998, 88(1): 228-241. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0880010228
    [17] LI J Y, ZHOU B G, RONG M S, et al. Estimation of source spectra, attenuation, and site responses from strong-motion data recorded in the 2019 Changning earthquake sequence[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2020, 110(2): 410-426. doi: 10.1785/0120190207
    [18] PAIGE C C, SAUNDERS M A. Algorithm 583: LSQR: sparse linear equations and least squares problems[J]. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 1982, 8(2): 195-209. doi: 10.1145/355993.356000
    [19] 林向东,葛洪魁,徐平,等. 近场全波形反演:芦山7.0级地震及余震矩张量解[J]. 地球物理学报,2013,56(12): 4037-4047. doi: 10.6038/cjg20131209

    LIN Xiangdong, GE Hongkui, XU Ping, et al. Near field full waveform inversion: Lushan magnitude 7.0 earthquake and its aftershock moment tensor[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(12): 4037-4047. doi: 10.6038/cjg20131209
    [20] WANG H W, REN Y F, WEN R Z. Source parameters, path attenuation and site effects from strong-motion recordings of the Wenchuan aftershocks (2008-2013) using a non-parametric generalized inversion technique[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2018, 212(2): 872-890. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggx447
    [21] 赵翠萍,陈章立,华卫,等. 中国大陆主要地震活动区中小地震震源参数研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2011,54(6): 1478-1489.

    ZHAO, Cuiping. , CHEN Zhangli, HUA Wei, et al. Study on source parameters of small to moderate earthquake in the main seismic active regions, China mainland, Chinese. Journal of Geophysics. 54(6): 1478-1489.
    [22] 任叶飞. 基于强震动记录的汶川地震场地效应研究[D]. 哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所,2014.
    [23] 李红光,冷崴. H/V谱比方法在强震记录应用中几个影响因素的初步研究[J]. 地震工程学报,2019,41(1): 169-176. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2019.01.169

    LI Hongguang, LENG Wei. Preliminary study on the influencing factors of the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio applied in strong motion[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2019, 41(1): 169-176. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2019.01.169
    [24] RONG M S, FU L Y, WANG Z M, et al. On the amplitude discrepancy of HVSR and site amplification from strong-motion observations[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2017, 107(6): 2873-2884. doi: 10.1785/0120170118
    [25] PAROLAI S. The importance of converted waves in comparing H/V and RSM site response estimates[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2004, 94(1): 304-313. doi: 10.1785/0120030013
  • 加载中
图(11)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  128
  • HTML全文浏览量:  75
  • PDF下载量:  28
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-03-14
  • 修回日期:  2023-06-09
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-07-09

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回