Creep Characteristics of Frozen Sand-Concrete Interface Based on Ice Content
-
摘要:
保证高含冰量冻土区桩基础的长期稳定性是多年冻土区桥梁桩基础安全服役中的关键问题,为研究含冰量对冻土-混凝土接触面蠕变特性的影响,采用自行研制的大型蠕变剪切仪,在−2 ℃条件下开展含冰量为6%、12%、16%、23%、36%、60%、80%的冻结砂土与混凝土接触面蠕变试验. 试验结果表明:在恒定的剪应力作用下,除含冰量为6%试样出现加速蠕变外,其他试样仅出现衰减蠕变及稳定蠕变2个阶段;随含冰量的增大,试样黏性变形占比增大,含冰量为80%试样的黏性变形超过总变形量的80%;稳定蠕变速率受到干密度及含冰量的综合影响,含冰量为16%时稳定蠕变速率最小;Burgers黏弹性模型能较好地模拟高含冰量冻结砂土-混凝土接触面蠕变曲线;随着含冰量的增大,初始剪切模量和稳定蠕变阶段黏滞系数先增大后减小,初始蠕变阶段的渐进剪切模量呈幂函数减小,初始蠕变阶段黏滞系数呈幂函数增大.
Abstract:Ensuring the long-term stability of the pile foundation in ice-rich frozen soil areas is the key to the safe use of bridge pile foundations in permafrost areas. In order to analyze the influence of ice content on the creep characteristics of the frozen sand-concrete interface, the creep tests of the frozen sand-concrete interface with ice content of 6%, 12%, 16%, 23%, 36%, 60%, and 80% were carried out under −2 ℃ by using self-designed large-scale shear apparatus. According to the test results, except for the accelerated creep of the specimen with 6% ice content, other specimens only experience decay creep and stable creep stages under constant shear stress. With the increase in ice content, the proportion of viscous deformation in the specimen increases, and the viscous deformation in the specimen with 80% ice content exceeds 80% of the total deformation. The stable creep speed is affected comprehensively by the dry density and ice content and is the lowest when the ice content is 16%. Burgers viscoelastic model can simulate the creep curve of frozen sand-concrete interface with high ice content better. With the increase in ice content, the initial shear modulus and viscosity coefficient at the stable creep stage increase first and decrease then. The progressive shear modulus at the initial creep stage decreases exponentially, and the viscosity coefficient at the initial creep stage increases exponentially.
-
Key words:
- ice-rich frozen soil /
- frozen sand /
- interface /
- creep test /
- viscoelastic model
-
表 1 混凝土配合比
Table 1. Concrete mix proportion
kg/m3 名称 水泥 砂 碎石 水 外加剂 配合比 477 650 1107 176 5.72 表 2 蠕变试验条件
Table 2. Creep test conditions
试验温度/℃ 土样含
冰量/%质量比(干砂∶冰∶水) 干密度/
(g·cm−3)法向应力/kPa 剪切应力/kPa −2 6 100∶0∶6 1.82 150 110.4 12 100∶0∶12 1.87 16 100∶6∶10 1.75 23 100∶13∶10 1.61 36 100∶26∶10 1.47 60 100∶50∶10 1.25 80 100∶70∶10 1.05 -
[1] 程国栋. 青藏高原多年冻土区路基工程地质研究[J]. 第四纪研究,2003(2): 134-141.CHENG Guodong. Research on engineering geology of the roadbed in permafrost regions of Qinghai−Xizang Plateau[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2003(2): 134-141. [2] 马小杰,张建明,常小晓,等. 高温-高含冰量冻土蠕变试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2007,29(6): 848-852.MA Xiaojie, ZHANG Jianming, CHANG Xiaoxiao, et al. Experimental study on creep of warm and ice-rich frozen soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(6): 848-852. [3] 曲广周,张建明,程东幸. 青藏高原冻结粉质黏土直剪蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2011,32(1): 95-98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.01.015QU Guangzhou, ZHANG Jianming, CHENG Dongxing. Experimental study of direct shear Creep properties of frozen silty clay on Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(1): 95-98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.01.015 [4] 刘世伟,张建明,张虎,等. 青藏高原多年冻土长期蠕变变形试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(增1): 3245-3253.LIU Shiwei, ZHANG Jianming, ZHANG Hu, et al. Research on long-term creep test of permafrost on Qinghai–tibet plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(S1): 3245-3253. [5] 张虎,张建明,苏凯,等. 冻土原位旁压蠕变试验粘弹性模型分析[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程,2013,35(6): 22-27,39.ZHANG Hu, ZHANG Jianming, SU Kai, et al. Viscoelastic model analysis of in-situ pressuremeter creep test in permafrost[J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2013, 35(6): 22-27,39. [6] 杨岁桥,王宁宁,张虎. 高温冻土的蠕变特性试验及蠕变模型研究[J]. 冰川冻土,2020,42(3): 834-842.YANG Suiqiao, WANG Ningning, ZHANG Hu. Study on creep test and creep model of warm frozen soil[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2020, 42(3): 834-842. [7] ZHAO L Z, YANG P, ZHANG L C, et al. Cyclic direct shear behaviors of an artificial frozen soil-structure interface under constant normal stress and sub-zero temperature[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2017, 133: 70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2016.10.011 [8] ZHANG Q, ZHANG J M, WANG H L, et al. Mechanical behavior and constitutive relation of the interface between warm frozen silt and cemented soil[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2021, 30: 100624.1-100624.9. [9] HE P F, MU Y H, MA W, et al. Testing and modeling of frozen clay-concrete interface behavior based on large-scale shear tests[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2021, 12(1): 83-94. doi: 10.1016/j.accre.2020.09.010 [10] HE P F, MU Y H, YANG Z H, et al. Freeze-thaw cycling impact on the shear behavior of frozen soil-concrete interface[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2020, 173: 103024.1-103024.11. [11] SUN T C, GAO X J, LIAO Y M, et al. Experimental study on adfreezing strength at the interface between silt and concrete[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2021, 190: 103346.1-103346.11. [12] 何菲. 冻结粉土-混凝土界面非线性剪切蠕变特性研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2019. [13] 李君善. 冻结砂土与混凝土接触面的剪切蠕变特性试验研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2021. [14] 中华人民共和国建设部. 岩土工程勘察规范: GB 50021—2001[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009. [15] 温智,俞祁浩,马巍,等. 青藏粉土-玻璃钢接触面力学特性直剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2013,34(增2): 45-50.WEN Zhi, YU Qihao, MA Wei, et al. Direct shear tests for mechanical characteristics of interface between Qinghai−Tibetan silt and fiberglass reinforced plastics[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(S2): 45-50. [16] (俄)C. C. 维亚洛夫. 冻土流变学[M]. 刘建坤, 刘尧均, 徐艳(译). 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2005. [17] (俄罗斯)Л. Т. 罗曼. 冻土力学[M]. 张长庆, 张泽(译). 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.