基于足尺试验的机场沥青道面轮辙发展与预测

李岳; 刘文俊; 蔡靖; 赵夫朋

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210606

基于足尺试验的机场沥青道面轮辙发展与预测

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210606

李岳^1,,
刘文俊¹,
蔡靖^1, ,,
赵夫朋²

1.
中国民航大学交通科学与工程学院，天津 300300
2.
滨州市交通运输事业服务中心，山东滨州 256600

基金项目: 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（3122019103）；天津市教委科研计划（2020KJ021）；天津市研究生科研创新项目（2021YJSS133）

详细信息

作者简介:
李岳（1984―），男，副教授，研究方向为机场工程与场道工程，E-mail：leoliyue@163.com

通讯作者:
蔡靖（1975―），女，教授，研究方向为机场工程与场道工程，E-mail：jcai@cauc.edu.cn

中图分类号: U416.217；V351.11
计量
- 文章访问数: 360
- HTML全文浏览量: 107
- PDF下载量: 35
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-07-27
- 修回日期: 2022-02-25
- 网络出版日期: 2023-05-13
- 刊出日期: 2022-03-05

Development and Prediction of Ruts in Airport Asphalt Pavement Based on Full-Scale Test

LI Yue^1
,,
LIU Wenjun¹,
CAI Jing^{1
, ,},
ZHAO Fupeng²

1.
School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
2.
Transportation Service Center of Binzhou, Binzhou 256600, China

摘要

摘要:
轮辙是引起沥青道面过早破坏的重要因素，飞机地面滑行渠化交通显著，由轮辙病害引起的道面平整度与舒适性问题突出. 为此，建立飞机轮组-地基-沥青道面结构体系仿真分析模型，提出适应轮组荷载特征的等效循环加载方式，依托NAPTF （National Airport Pavement Test Facility）足尺沥青道面轮辙试验，验证仿真结果的适用性与可靠性，并开展加载时间间隔与环境温度等多因素分析. 研究结果表明：考虑轮载作用横向偏移效应，轮辙总宽度达到轮组宽度的3倍，轮辙断面曲线有多处转折点与以往单一凹陷面特征明显不同；循环加载时间间隔对轮辙发展影响显著，经过150 s间隔后沥青面层回弹变形趋于稳定，可兼顾分析效率需要；前10%循环加载次数对轮辙变形的贡献超过40.4%，可基于初始轮辙建立指数型轮辙发展预测公式，对循环加载全过程拟合度高于96.4%，轮辙分析效率有明显提高.
- 道路工程 /
- 道面轮辙 /
- 沥青道面 /
- 轮辙试验 /
- 加载波形 /
- 循环加载
Abstract:
Ruts can be one of the key reasons for early damage of asphalt pavement. Due to the channelized traffic characteristics of aircraft taxiing, the evenness and comfort of airport pavement are notably affected by rut damage. In this paper, a simulation analysis model of aircraft landing gears-foundation-asphalt pavement system is established. An equivalent cyclical loading process is proposed according to the loading characteristic of landing gears. The feasibility and reliability of the simulation model are verified by the rut test result of full-scale asphalt pavement conducted by National Airport Pavement Test Facility (NAPTF). Factors such as the loading interval and environment temperature are then analyzed. The results show that due to lateral shift effect of landing gear load, the total width of the ruts reaches 3 times the width of the landing gears, and the rut section curve has many turning points, which is obviously different from those of the previous single concave surface. The cyclical loading interval has a remarkable influence on rut development. The rebound deformation of the asphalt surface course becomes stable after a loading interval of 150 s, which can meet the requirement of analysis efficiency. Since the first 10% number of cyclical loading contributes more than 40.4% of overall rut deformation, an exponential rut deformation prediction formula is derived based on initial ruts. The goodness of fit result during the whole cyclical loading process is over 96.4%, and the efficiency of rut analysis is dramatically increased.
- road engineering /
- pavement ruts /
- asphalt pavement /
- rut test /
- loading waveform /
- cyclic loading

HTML全文

图 1 CC5试验沥青道面及加载测试车

Figure 1. Asphalt pavement of CC5 test and loading vehicle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 加载路径横向分布与加载顺序

Figure 2. Translational distribution of wheel track and loading sequence

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 有限元模型体系三维视图（单位：m）

Figure 3. 3D graph of FEM model system（unit: m）

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 轮组加载等效关系

Figure 4. Equivalent relation of wheel set loading

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 飞机轮组等效加载曲线

Figure 5. Equivalent loading curve of aircraft wheel loads

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 回弹变形随加载时间间隔变化曲线

Figure 6. Variation curves of rebound deformation versus loading interval

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 轮辙横断面特征比较

Figure 7. Comparison of section characteristics of rutting deformation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 CC5试验轮辙深度增长曲线

Figure 8. Curves of rutting depth of CC5 test

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 轮辙增长率及各阶段贡献率曲线

Figure 9. Curves of rutting growth ratio and contribution rate at different stages

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 初始阶段轮辙公式拟合结果

Figure 10. Fitting formula results of rutting at initial stage

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 不同温度下的轮辙公式预测结果

Figure 11. Predication results of rutting formula under different temperatures

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 道面结构层组成

Table 1. Consisting of pavement structure

结构层	材料编号	结构层厚度/mm
结构层	材料编号	LFC1-NW	LFC2-NE
沥青混凝土面层	P-401	127.0	127.0
密级配碎石基层	P-209	203.0	203.0
碎石底基层	P-154	863.6	965.2
低强度土基	DPC	762.0	762.0
注：道面各结构层厚度由FAARFIELD软件计算.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 循环加载参数

Table 2. Parameters of accumulative loading

轮载等级/kN	累积作用次数/次
226.75	0～7920
263.03	7921～13038
294.78	13039～18612
317.51	18613～27918

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 加载测试车参数

Table 3. Parameters of loading vehicle

性能指标	参数取值
轮印宽度/cm	30.5
轮印长度/cm	53.3
机轮数量/个	6
轮胎胎压/kPa	1670
横向轮隙宽度/cm	106.5
纵向轮隙长度/cm	91.7

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 沥青混凝土面层材料参数^[25]

Table 4. Material parameters of asphalt surface course^[25]

温度/℃	瞬态模量/ MPa	泊松比	f	n	m
20	870	0.25	6.54 × 10⁻¹¹	0.937	−0.592
30	620	0.30	3.33 × 10⁻⁹	0.862	−0.587
40	554	0.35	1.45 × 10⁻⁸	0.792	−0.577
50	530	0.40	1.39 × 10⁻⁶	0.414	−0.525
注：f、n、m均为蠕变模型参数，均采用国际单位1，无量纲.

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 基层及底基层材料参数^[26]

Table 5. Material parameters of base course and subbase course^[26]

材料类型	弹性模量/MPa	泊松比
密级配碎石基层	518	0.35
碎石底基层	276	0.35

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 轮辙曲线特征点结果

Table 6. Results at feature points of rutting curve mm

特征点	断面中心距		轮辙深度
特征点	试验	仿真	试验	仿真
R₁	0.025	0	−172.4	−170.2
R₂	0.500	−0.505	−150.4	−140.4
R₃	0.899	−0.892	−121.8	−130.9
R₄	−1.125	−1.133	−101.9	−105.0

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 不同温度下公式系数

Table 7. Fomula coefficients under different temperatures

温度/℃	r	p	q	ρ
30	24.359	0.0035	24.077	0.998
40	32.832	0.0038	31.471	0.998
50	37.349	0.0052	35.033	0.997
CC5 试验	30.481	0.0033	29.570	0.998

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(29)

[1]	刘文, 凌建明, 赵鸿铎. 民用机场沥青混凝土道面设计方法综述[J]. 中国民航学院学报, 2006, 24(4): 43-47, 64. LIU Wen, LING Jianming, ZHAO Hongduo. Review and analysis of design methods for asphalt concrete airport pavement[J]. Journal of Civel Aviation University of China, 2006, 24(4): 43-47, 64.
[2]	WHITE G. State of the art: asphalt for airport pavement surfacing[J]. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 2018, 11(1): 77-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.07.008
[3]	PASINDU H R, FWA T F, ONG G P. Analytical evaluation of aircraft operational risks from runway rutting[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2015, 17(9/10): 810-817.
[4]	王海朋. 飞机多轮荷载作用下沥青道面高温变形叠加效应研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2015.
[5]	朱杰涛. 基于平整度劣化条件下机场复合道面力学性能研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2018.
[6]	叶丛. 基于HVS加速加载试验的柔性基层沥青路面车辙预估研究[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2018.
[7]	张霞,黄刚,刘昭,等. 热、光、水耦合老化条件对温拌沥青性能的影响[J]. 公路交通科技,2019,36(7): 10-19. ZHANG Xia, HUANG Gang, LIU Zhao, et al. Influence of coupled aging condition of heat, light and water on performance of warm mix asphalt[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 36(7): 10-19.
[8]	朱天明. 基于加速加载试验的沥青路面车辙发展规律研究与数值模拟[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2014.
[9]	张宏,游庆龙,马靖莲. 新一代大型飞机荷载作用下沥青道面多轮叠加效应研究[J]. 公路交通科技,2015,32(10): 1-5,13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2015.10.001 ZHANG Hong, YOU Qinglong, MA Jinglian. Multiple wheel gear load interaction effect of new generation large aircraft on airfield asphalt pavement[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 32(10): 1-5,13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2015.10.001
[10]	ABDULLAH G M S. 3D finite element modeling to predict the foamed sulfur asphalt marl soil mixes rutting behavior[J]. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2019, 10(4): 661-668. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2019.03.005
[11]	冉武平,邹益强,孔二春. 基于加速加载的SMA沥青道面轮辙特性分析[J]. 公路工程,2016,41(4): 6-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0610.2016.04.002 RAN Wuping, ZOU Yiqiang, KONG Erchun. Analysis of the SMA asphalt pavement rutting characteristics based on accelerated pavement testing[J]. Highway Engineering, 2016, 41(4): 6-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0610.2016.04.002
[12]	WANG Y, LU Y J, SI C D, et al. Finite element analysis for rutting prediction of asphalt concrete pavement under moving wheel load[J]. International Journal of Simulation Modeling, 2017, 16(2): 229-240. doi: 10.2507/IJSIMM16(2)4.374
[13]	ZHENG M L, HAN L L, WANG C T, et al. Simulation of permanent deformation in high-modulus asphalt pavement with sloped and horizontally curved alignment[J]. Applied Sciences, 2017, 7(4): 331. doi: 10.3390/app7040331
[14]	张兰峰. 连续变温沥青路面车辙变形数值模拟[J]. 公路交通科技,2018,35(2): 15-24. ZHANG Lanfeng. Numerical simulation of rutting deformation of asphalt pavement at continuous variable temperature[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 35(2): 15-24.
[15]	WANG Y J. Analysis of asphalt pavement mechanical behaviour by using a tire-pavement coupling model[J]. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 2018, 17(2): 245-256. doi: 10.2507/IJSIMM17(2)423
[16]	WANG X W, GU X Y, NI F J, et al. Rutting resistance of porous asphalt mixture under coupled conditions of high temperature and rainfall[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 174: 293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.104
[17]	KIM S M, DARABI M K, LITTLE D N, et al. Effect of the realistic tire contact pressure on the rutting performance of asphaltic concrete pavements[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(6): 2138-2146. doi: 10.1007/s12205-018-4846-1
[18]	李喜,王选仓,房娜仁,等. 基于温度与荷载实际耦合的沥青路面车辙预估[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版),2018,38(5): 67-75. LI Xi, WANG Xuancang, FANG Naren, et al. Rutting prediction of asphalt pavement based on actual coupling of temperature and load[J]. Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 38(5): 67-75.
[19]	郑秉乾,马松林,李新凯. 美国联邦航空管理局机场道面试验中心足尺试验介绍[J]. 中外公路,2009,29(3): 98-100. ZHENG Bingqian, MA Songlin, LI Xinkai. Introduction to the full-scale test at National Airport Pavement Test Facility[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2009, 29(3): 98-100.
[20]	张鑫. 基于延长寿命的跑道结构参数优化研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2018.
[21]	FAA Airport Technology Research & Development Branch. National airport pavement test facility [EB/OL]. (2020.04.12)[2021.07.16]. http://www.airporttech.tc.faa.gov/naptf.
[22]	中国民用航空局. 民用机场沥青混凝土道面设计规范: MH 5010—2017[S]. 北京: 中国民航出版社, 2017.
[23]	董倩. 基于飞机滑行刚性道面位移场的跑道承载力研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2013.
[24]	游庆龙,凌建明,袁捷,等. 适应大型飞机的沥青道面结构有限元模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2012,12(2): 18-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2012.02.003 YOU Qinglong, LING Jianming, YUAN Jie, et al. Finite element model of flexible airport pavement structure for large aircraft[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(2): 18-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2012.02.003
[25]	孙钦刚. 机场沥青道面转弯区温度场耦合作用轮辙形成规律分析[D]. 广汉: 中国民航大学, 2015.
[26]	边际. 基于混合交通分析的机场柔性基层沥青道面轮辙控制研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2008.
[27]	骆妍. 基于有限元法的沥青路面车辙分析[D]. 石家庄: 石家庄铁道大学, 2015.
[28]	中国民用航空局. 民用机场道面评价管理技术规范: MH/T 5024—2019 [S]. 北京: 中国民航出版社, 2019.
[29]	JAVILLA B, MO L T, HAO F, et al. Significance of initial rutting in prediction of rutting development and characterization of asphalt mixtures[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 153: 157-164. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.007