Out-of-Plane Stability of Frame Hollow Brick Infilled Walls with Horizontal Slip Layers
-
摘要:
空心砖填充墙体内设置水平滑移层,能削弱墙充墙的斜撑作用,可有效减轻空心砖填充墙的破坏程度. 为研究设置水平滑移层框架空心砖填充墙体的平面外稳定性,分析了填充墙平面外破坏模式,基于设置水平滑移层框架空心砖填充墙的平面内拟静力试验,建立设置水平滑移层和未设置水平滑移层的框架空心砖填充墙的有限元模型,开展了平面外数值模拟的对比分析. 结果表明:水平滑移层会降低墙体整体性,削弱周边框架对墙体的约束作用;与未设置滑移层的普通填充墙相比,设置水平滑移层的填充墙在平面外荷载作用下的破坏程度增加,平面外位移和刚度退化速率增大,平面外开裂荷载降低43.1%,峰值荷载降低22.2%;设置水平滑移层的填充墙在不同抗震设防烈度的多遇和罕遇地震作用下,墙体平面外承载力大于按规范计算要求的平面外承载力,满足规范要求.
Abstract:The horizontal slip layer in the hollow brick infilled wall can weaken the inclined bracing effect of the wall and effectively reduce the damage degree of the hollow brick infilled wall. In order to understand the out-of-plane stability of the frame hollow brick infilled wall with horizontal slip layers, the out-of-plane failure mode of the wall was analyzed. Based on the in-plane quasi-static test of the frame hollow brick infilled wall with horizontal slip layers, the finite element models of the hollow brick infilled wall with and without horizontal slip layers were established, and the out-of-plane numerical simulation analysis was carried out. Results show that the horizontal slip layer will reduce the integrity of the wall and weaken the constraining effect of the surrounding frame on the wall. Compared with the ordinary infilled wall without slip layer, the failure degree of the infilled wall with horizontal slip layer is increased; specifically, the out-of-plane displacement and stiffness degradation rate is increased, the out-of-plane cracking load is reduced by 43.1%, and the peak load is reduced by 22.2%. Under the action of multiple and rare earthquakes with different seismic fortification intensities, the out-of-plane bearing capacity of the infilled wall with horizontal slip layers is greater than that calculated according to the code, which meets the code requirements.
-
表 1 配筋信息
Table 1. Reinforcement information of Specimens
类型 框架柱纵筋 框架梁纵筋 箍筋/mm 带滑移层墙 6 16 4 16 8@100/200 普通墙 6 16 4 16 8@100/200 表 2 试件材料信息
Table 2. Material properties of specimens
钢筋 空心砖 砂浆抗压
强度/MPa混凝土抗压
强度/MPa16 8 孔洞
率/%单位重
度/N抗压强
度/MPa屈服强
度/MPa抗拉强
度/MPa屈服强
度/MPa抗拉强
度/MPa402 515 480 602 47.85 49.60 3.50 5.62 33.50 表 3 滑移材料属性
Table 3. Material characteristics of slip layer
质量密度/(kg·m−3) 杨氏模量/MPa 泊松比 1 240.10 9.52 0.43 表 4 平面外承载力对比
Table 4. Comparison of out-of-plane bearing capacity
类型 FP/kPa FH/kPa (FP−FH)/FP/% 开裂荷载值 21.1 12.0 43.1 峰值荷载值 43.2 33.6 22.2 表 5 按规范计算的水平地震力及安全系数
Table 5. Horizontal seismic force and safety factor
类型 抗震设防烈度 规范计算的水平地震力设计值/kN 开裂安全系数(破坏安全系数) 未设滑移层填充墙 设滑移层填充墙 多遇地震 6 度 2.8 80.5(164.8) 45.8(128.2) 7 度(0.15g) 8.3 26.8(54.9) 15.3(42.7) 8 度(0.30g) 16.5 13.4(27.5) 7.6(21.4) 9 度 22.0 10.1(20.6) 5.7(16.0) 罕遇地震 6 度 19.3 11.5(23.5) 6.5(18.3) 7 度(0.15g) 49.5 4.5(9.2) 2.5(7.1) 8 度(0.30g) 82.6 2.7(5.5) 1.5(4.3) 9 度 96.3 2.3(4.7) 1.3(3.7) -
[1] 李乔, 赵世春. 汶川大地震工程震害分析[M]. 成都: 西南交通大学出版社, 2008. [2] 林坤,刘红军,TOTOEV Y. 干砌填充墙框架结构抗侧性能及简化计算[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程,2013,35(2): 21-27.LIN Kun, LIU Hongjun, TOTOEV Y. Lateral bearing capacity and simplified equations of dry-stack in-filled reinforcement concrete frame structure[J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2013, 35(2): 21-27. [3] 于敬海,徐洪茂,孙琼. 自承重填充墙平面外承载力有限元分析[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造,2013,35(4): 27-31.YU Jinghai, XU Hongmao, SUN Qiong. Nonlinear FEA on bearing capacity of out of plane of self-supporting infilled wall[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2013, 35(4): 27-31. [4] 陈章彦,邓雪松,周云,等. 阻尼填充墙平面外工作机制与受力性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2018,51(增2): 76-84.CHEN Zhangyan, DENG Xuesong, ZHOU Yun, et al. Study on out-of-plane mechanism and deformation of damped infill wall[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2018, 51(S2): 76-84. [5] 乔墩,敬登虎. 带砌体填充墙框架弹性抗侧刚度计算方法对比分析[J]. 建筑结构学报,2020,41(增1): 188-195. doi: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.S1.021QIAO Dun, JING Denghu. Comparative study on calculation methods of elastic lateral stiffness in masonry-infilled frames[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2020, 41(S1): 188-195. doi: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.S1.021 [6] 潘毅,王忠凯,曲哲,等. 尼泊尔自建RC框架结构的抗震能力分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2019,54(2): 304-312.PAN Yi, WANG Zhongkai, QU Zhe, et al. Seismic performance of owner-built RC frame structures in Nepal[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(2): 304-312. [7] 苏启旺,张言,许子宜,等. 空心砖填充墙RC框架抗震性能足尺试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2017,52(3): 532-539.SU Qiwang, ZHANG Yan, XU Ziyi, et al. Full-scale tests on seismic behavior of RC frames infilled with hollow bricks[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 52(3): 532-539. [8] 苏启旺,李义,卜庆涛,等. 带水平滑移层的空心砖填充框架抗震性能试验[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2022,57(1): 223-228,234. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200278SU Qiwang, LI Yi, BU Qingtao, et al. Experimental study on seismic behavior of fired hollow bricks infilled reinforced concrete frame with horizontal slip layers[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(1): 223-228,234. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200278 [9] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011. [10] 聂建国,王宇航. ABAQUS中混凝土本构模型用于模拟结构静力行为的比较研究[J]. 工程力学,2013,30(4): 59-67,82.NIE Jianguo, WANG Yuhang. Comparison study of constitutive model of concrete in ABAQUS for static analysis of structures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(4): 59-67,82. [11] 刘桂秋. 砌体结构基本受力性能的研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2005. [12] 金昊贵,李鸿晶,孙广俊. 地震作用下钢筋混凝土框架-填充墙相互作用分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2017,37(4): 31-41.JIN Haogui, LI Hongjing, SUN Guangjun. Analysis of interaction between reinforced concrete frame and infilled wall subject to earthquake-induced ground motion[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2017, 37(4): 31-41. [13] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 砌体结构设计规范: GB 50003—2011[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2012. [14] 周云,郭阳照,杨冠男,等. 经历平面内损伤的阻尼填充墙框架平面外受力性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2017,38(9): 94-101.ZHOU Yun, GUO Yangzhao, YANG Guannan, et al. Experimental study on out-of-plane mechanical performance of damped infill wall frame with in-plane damage[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2017, 38(9): 94-101. [15] ANGEL R, ABRAMS D P, SHAPIRO D, et al. Behavior of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills[R]. Urbana: University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana, 1994. [16] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 建筑抗震设计规范: GB 50011—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.