• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

基于有向图的传统村落建筑群火灾蔓延风险分析

张健 宋志刚

张健, 宋志刚. 基于有向图的传统村落建筑群火灾蔓延风险分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2022, 57(2): 447-454. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210188
引用本文: 张健, 宋志刚. 基于有向图的传统村落建筑群火灾蔓延风险分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2022, 57(2): 447-454. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210188
ZHANG Jian, SONG Zhigang. Directed Graph Based Risk Analysis of Fire Spread in Buildings in Chinese Traditional Villages[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(2): 447-454. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210188
Citation: ZHANG Jian, SONG Zhigang. Directed Graph Based Risk Analysis of Fire Spread in Buildings in Chinese Traditional Villages[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(2): 447-454. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210188

基于有向图的传统村落建筑群火灾蔓延风险分析

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210188
基金项目: 云南省重点研发计划(202003AC100001)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张健(1987—),男,博士研究生,研究方向为工程抗震、建筑火灾,E-mail:Jian_zhang@kmust.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    宋志刚(1974—),男,教授,博士,研究方向为工程振动、建筑火灾,E-mail:zhigang-s@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TU366;N949

Directed Graph Based Risk Analysis of Fire Spread in Buildings in Chinese Traditional Villages

  • 摘要:

    在传统村落开发保护过程中,建筑消防改造及建筑布局改变等会导致火灾风险发生变化. 火灾蔓延模拟工作量大、成本高及基础资料获取困难. 为克服这些难点,首先,将单体建筑视为有向图的节点、建筑间的火灾蔓延关系视为节点间的边,通过火灾蔓延模拟判断节点周边局部蔓延路径,并建立有向图的邻接矩阵,利用有向图遍历算法确定特定火灾场景下的蔓延范围,给出考虑多场景建筑群火灾蔓延的损失期望;然后,通过增删节点或边修正有向图邻接矩阵,反映建筑改造、增建或树木对建筑群火灾蔓延关系的变化,重新应用节点遍历算法确定变化后的建筑群火灾蔓延风险;最后,以某一传统村落为例验证方法的有效性. 研究结果表明:本文方法可快速计算动态变化的建筑群火灾蔓延风险,减少火灾蔓延再模拟的工作量;在火灾蔓延防控上,对危险性较高的6个节点进行消防加强改造,可使建筑群火灾蔓延的最大损失及损失期望分别降低61.9%、52.1%;在建筑规划或管理上,应避免新增建筑、树木等可燃物位于建筑密集区域或连通多个建筑密集区域的“桥节点”处.

     

  • 图 1  不同火灾蔓延场景的有向图

    Figure 1.  Directed graphs of different fire spread scenarios

    图 2  建筑布局及编号

    Figure 2.  Building layout and numbering

    图 3  各单体建筑面积

    Figure 3.  Areas of single buildings

    图 4  多场景建筑群火灾蔓延有向图

    Figure 4.  Directed graphs of multiple fire spread scenarios

    图 5  不同火灾蔓延场景的损失

    Figure 5.  Losses for different fire spread scenarios

    图 6  不同火灾蔓延场景的损失期望

    Figure 6.  Loss expectation for different fire spread scenarios

    图 7  删除节点vi后建筑群火灾蔓延损失期望

    Figure 7.  Loss expectation of fire spread in buildings after deleting node vi

    图 8  删除节点vi的相连边后建筑群火灾蔓延损失期望降低率

    Figure 8.  Reduction rate in loss expectation of fire spread in buildings after deleting edges connecting node vi

    图 9  增建建筑位置

    Figure 9.  Locations of added buildings

    图 10  增加节点后建筑群火灾场景蔓延情况

    Figure 10.  Scenario of fire spread in buildings after adding nodes

    表  1  改造不同节点数量后建筑群火灾蔓延风险

    Table  1.   Fire spread risk for different numbers of nodes involved in fire preventions

    改造
    节点/个
    改造节点编号有向图
    边/条
    L(i)max/m2R /m2ΔRi /%
    140121107448122.9
    240,1811397342432.1
    340,18,3010790236841.0
    440,18,30,6110272433746.0
    540,18,30,61,389668431649.4
    640,18,30,61,38,209268429952.1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  增加不同节点数量后建筑群火灾蔓延风险

    Table  2.   Fire spread risk of buildings for adding different numbers of nodes

    增加节点/个增加节
    点编号
    有向图边数
    /条
    L max(i)/m2R/m2ΔR + i /%
    11071351 87375220.5
    2107,1081392 87596053.8
    3107,108,1091455 3111 829193.1
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 冯骥才. 传统村落的困境与出路——兼谈传统村落是另一类文化遗产[J]. 民间文化论坛,2013(1): 7-12.
    [2] 高楠,邬超,白凯,等. 中国传统村落空间分异及影响因素[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,48(4): 97-107.

    GAO Nan, WU Chao, BAI Kai, et al. Spatial differentiation and influencing factors of Chinese traditional villages[J]. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(4): 97-107.
    [3] 《中国火灾大典》编辑委员会. 中国火灾大典[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1997.
    [4] International Organization for Standardization. Fire safety engineering—guidance on fire risk assessment: ISO/PDTS 16732 —2005[S]. Geneva: ISO Office, 2005
    [5] 范维澄, 孙金华, 陆守香, 等. 火灾风险评估方法学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004
    [6] 保野健治郎,高井広行,难波义郎. ロジスティック曲線による建物火災の延焼速度式に関する基礎的研究[J]. 日本建筑学会论文报告集,1982(311): 137-144.

    YASUNO K, TAKAI H, NAMBA Y. A basic study on fire spread formula of houses used by logistic curve[J]. Transactions of the Architectural Institute of Japan, 1982(311): 137-144.
    [7] 黄维章,张锁春,雷光耀,等. 城市火灾蔓延的数学模型和计算机模拟[J]. 计算物理,1993,10(1): 9-19.

    HUANG Weizhang, ZHANG Suochun, LEI Guangyao, et al. A mathematical model of an urban fire-spread and computer simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Computation Physics, 1993, 10(1): 9-19.
    [8] NISHINO T, TANAKA T, HOKUGO A. An evaluation method for the urban post-earthquake fire risk considering multiple scenarios of fire spread and evacuation[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2012, 54: 167-180. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.06.002
    [9] OHGAI A, GOHNAI Y, WATANABE K. Cellular automata modeling of fire spread in built-up areas—a tool to aid community-based planning for disaster mitigation[J]. Computers,Environment and Urban Systems, 2007, 31(4): 441-460. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2006.10.001
    [10] 孟晓静,杨立中,李健. 基于元胞自动机的城市区域火蔓延概率模型探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2008,18(2): 28-33,176. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2008.02.005

    MENG Xiaojing, YANG Lizhong, LI Jian. Probability model of urban district fire spread based on cellular automata[J]. China Safety Science Journal (CSSJ), 2008, 18(2): 28-33,176. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2008.02.005
    [11] 柳春光,王碧君,潘建伟. 基于元胞自动机的城市地震次生火灾蔓延模型[J]. 自然灾害学报,2010,19(1): 152-157.

    LIU Chunguang, WANG Bijun, PAN Jianwei. Urban post-earthquake fire spread model based on cellular automata[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2010, 19(1): 152-157.
    [12] HIMOTO K, TANAKA T. Development and validation of a physics-based urban fire spread model[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2008, 43(7): 477-494. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2007.12.008
    [13] ZHAO S J, XIONG L Y, REN A Z. A spatial–temporal stochastic simulation of fire outbreaks following earthquake based on GIS[J]. Journal of Fire Sciences, 2006, 24(4): 313-339. doi: 10.1177/0734904106060786
    [14] 赵思健,任爱珠,熊利亚. 城市地震次生火灾研究综述[J]. 自然灾害学报,2006,15(2): 57-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4574.2006.02.010

    ZHAO Sijian, REN Aizhu, XIONG Liya. Review of studies on urban post-earthquake fires[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2006, 15(2): 57-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4574.2006.02.010
    [15] 张健,宋志刚,李全旺,等. 木结构建筑群火灾蔓延危险建筑的识别及防火改造效果评价[J]. 工程力学,2020,37(4): 60-69.

    ZHANG Jian, SONG Zhigang, LI Quanwang, et al. Identification and fire protection evaluation of critical buildings to prevent fire spread in densely built wood building areas[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37(4): 60-69.
    [16] HIMOTO K, TANAKA T. A physically-based model for urban fire spread[J]. Fire Safety Science, 2003, 7: 129-140. doi: 10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.7-129
    [17] 卓新建, 苏永美. 图论及其应用[M]. 北京: 北京邮电大学出版社, 2018.
    [18] 郭世泽, 陆哲明. 复杂网络基础理论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012.
    [19] Technical Committee on Exposure Fire Protection. Standard for doors and other opening protective: NFPA80A[S]. Quincy, Massachusetts: National Fire Protection Association, 2017.
    [20] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 自动喷水灭火系统设计规范: GB 50084—2017[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2017.
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  179
  • HTML全文浏览量:  121
  • PDF下载量:  8
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-03-15
  • 修回日期:  2021-12-01
  • 刊出日期:  2021-12-16

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回