• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

考虑尖轨变截面廓形的轮轨接触与磨耗分析

陈雨 安博洋 潘自立 莫宏愿 王平 方嘉晟 钱瑶 徐井芒

陈雨, 安博洋, 潘自立, 莫宏愿, 王平, 方嘉晟, 钱瑶, 徐井芒. 考虑尖轨变截面廓形的轮轨接触与磨耗分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2022, 57(6): 1250-1258. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210040
引用本文: 陈雨, 安博洋, 潘自立, 莫宏愿, 王平, 方嘉晟, 钱瑶, 徐井芒. 考虑尖轨变截面廓形的轮轨接触与磨耗分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2022, 57(6): 1250-1258. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210040
CHEN Yu, AN Boyang, PAN Zili, MO Hongyuan, WANG Ping, FANG Jiasheng, QIAN Yao, XU Jingmang. Analysis of Wheel-Rail Contact and Wear Considering Variable Cross-Sections of Switch Rail[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(6): 1250-1258. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210040
Citation: CHEN Yu, AN Boyang, PAN Zili, MO Hongyuan, WANG Ping, FANG Jiasheng, QIAN Yao, XU Jingmang. Analysis of Wheel-Rail Contact and Wear Considering Variable Cross-Sections of Switch Rail[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(6): 1250-1258. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210040

考虑尖轨变截面廓形的轮轨接触与磨耗分析

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210040
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(U1734207, 51978586, 51908474);四川省重点研发计划(2019YFG0460);中央高校基本科研业务费(2682020CX67);中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司科技开发计划(KNSQ202054)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈雨(1997—),女,博士研究生,研究方向轮轨关系与轮轨损伤分析,E-mail:291035338@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    安博洋(1988—),男,讲师,博士,研究方向轮轨接触动力学与伤损,E-mail:anboyang@swjtu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: U211.5

Analysis of Wheel-Rail Contact and Wear Considering Variable Cross-Sections of Switch Rail

  • 摘要:

    为研究尖轨变截面对曲尖轨轮轨接触行为和磨耗分布的影响,提出了一种适用于道岔区的三维非对称接触几何算法,该算法可计算车轮与曲尖轨间的真实法向间隙. 使用SIMPACK建立车辆-道岔多体动力学模型,获得仿真结果;利用考虑变截面的接触模型与英国谢菲尔大学提出的USFD磨耗模型计算曲尖轨磨耗. 研究结果表明:1) 以S1002CN车轮与12号道岔曲尖轨为例,轮对摇头角与尖轨变截面均会引起轮轨法向间隙沿接触斑纵向非对称分布,从而导致接触斑形状与应力沿接触斑纵向非对称分布;当摇头角为10 mrad,横移量为7.5 mm时,本文算法得到的接触斑面积比未考虑尖轨变截面和摇头角的简化算法所得结果大9.2%. 2) 以CRH3型车与12号曲尖轨道岔为研究对象,简化算法得到的最大磨耗深度为本文算法所得结果的0.75倍.

     

  • 图 1  接触点局部坐标

    Figure 1.  Wheel-rail contact coordinate system

    图 2  精确算法求解轮轨接触点示意

    Figure 2.  Schematic diagram of the exact method for determining the wheel-rail contact point

    图 3  不同横移量下的接触点位置

    Figure 3.  Positions of the contact points under different lateral displacements

    图 4  接触斑轮廓对比

    Figure 4.  Comparison of contact patch contour

    图 5  横移量为7.5 mm时接触斑内法向应力

    Figure 5.  Pressure distribution within contact patch at a lateral displacement of 7.5 mm

    图 6  尖轨磨耗量分布

    Figure 6.  Distribution of wear depth on the switch panel

    图 7  不同车轮与曲尖轨接触时的接触点纵坐标与接触斑面积

    Figure 7.  Longitudinal coordinates of the contact point and contact areas between different wheelsets and the curved switch rail

    图 8  钢轨截面磨耗深度分布

    Figure 8.  Wear depth on the switch rail cross-section

    图 9  两种算法得到的切应力分布

    Figure 9.  Distribution of tangential stress solved by the two methods

    图 10  切应力沿YcXc方向分布

    Figure 10.  Distribution of tangential stress along Yc-direction and Xc-direction

  • [1] 王平,汪鑫,王源,等. 基于高铁轨道不平顺的车轮不圆顺识别模型[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2020,55(4): 681-687,678. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180283

    WANG Ping, WANG Xin, WANG Yuan, et al. Polygonal wheel detection model based on track irregularity of high-speed railways[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 681-687,678. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180283
    [2] 蔡小培,谭希,郭亮武,等. 列车荷载下钢轨振动加速度的空间分布特征[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2018,53(3): 459-466. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.03.005

    CAI Xiaopei, TAN Xi, GUO Liangwu, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of rail vibration acceleration under train load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(3): 459-466. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.03.005
    [3] GE X, LING L, GUO L R, et al. Dynamic derailment simulation of an empty wagon passing a turnout in the through route[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2022,60(4): 1-22.
    [4] 娄平,赵晨,宫凯伦. 组合荷载作用下CRTSⅢ型板式无砟轨道层间离缝影响分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2019,16(12): 2913-2920.

    LOU Ping, ZHAO Chen, GONG Kailun. Study on the influence of connection damage for CRTS Ⅲ slab ballastless track under combined loads[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2019, 16(12): 2913-2920.
    [5] AN B Y, MA D L, WANG P, et al. Assessing the fast non-Hertzian methods based on the simulation of wheel-rail rolling contact and wear distribution[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2020, 234(5): 524-537. doi: 10.1177/0954409719848592
    [6] LIU B B, BRUNI S, VOLLEBREGT E. A non-Hertzian method for solving wheel-rail normal contact problem taking into account the effect of yaw[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2016, 54(9): 1226-1246. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1196823
    [7] SUN Y, ZHAI W M, YE Y G, et al. A simplified model for solving wheel-rail non-Hertzian normal contact problem under the influence of yaw angle[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2020(174): 105554.1-105554.13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105554
    [8] KALKER J J. Three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact[M]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1990.
    [9] 杨新文,姚一鸣,周顺华,等. 基于修正的轮轨非Hertz接触的重载铁路曲线超高对钢轨磨耗的影响分析[J]. 机械工程学报,2018,54(4): 22-29. doi: 10.3901/JME.2018.04.022

    YANG Xinwen, YAO Yiming, ZHOU Shunhua, et al. Influence of curve superelevation of heavy haul railway on rail wear based on revised wheel/rail non-hertz contact[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(4): 22-29. doi: 10.3901/JME.2018.04.022
    [10] 马晓川,王平,王健,等. 高速铁路磨耗车轮与60 N钢轨静态接触分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2018,53(4): 741-747. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.04.011

    MA Xiaochuan, WANG Ping, WANG Jian, et al. Static contact analysis of worn-wheel profiles and 60 N rail of high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(4): 741-747. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.04.011
    [11] 王平,高天赐,汪鑫,等. 基于拟合平纵断面的铁路特大桥梁线路平顺性评估[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2020,55(2): 231-237,272. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180295

    WANG Ping, GAO Tianci, WANG Xin, et al. Smoothness estimation of super-large bridges in railway line based on fitting railway plane and profile[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(2): 231-237,272. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180295
    [12] 王开文. 车轮接触点迹线及轮轨接触几何参数的计算[J]. 西南交通大学学报,1984,19(1): 89-99.

    WANG Kaiwen. The track of wheel contact points and the calculation of wheel/rail geometric contact parameters[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1984, 19(1): 89-99.
    [13] 陈嵘,方嘉晟,汪鑫,等. 车轮型面演变对高速道岔区轮轨接触行为影响分析[J]. 铁道学报,2019,41(5): 101-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2019.05.012

    CHEN Rong, FANG Jiasheng, WANG Xin, et al. Influence of wheel profile evolution on wheel-rail contact behavior in high-speed turnout area[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2019, 41(5): 101-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2019.05.012
    [14] 任尊松,孙守光. 道岔区轮轨接触几何关系研究[J]. 工程力学,2008,25(11): 223-230.

    REN Zunsong, SUN Shouguang. Study on the wheel/ rail contact geometry relation of the turnout zone[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(11): 223-230.
    [15] BRAGHIN F, LEWIS R, DWYER-JOYCE R S, et al. A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear[J]. Wear, 2006, 261(11/12): 1253-1264.
    [16] XU J M, WANG P, WANG J, et al. Numerical analysis of the effect of track parameters on the wear of turnout rails in high-speed railways[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2018, 232(3): 709-721. doi: 10.1177/0954409716685188
  • 加载中
图(10)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  325
  • HTML全文浏览量:  87
  • PDF下载量:  46
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-01-19
  • 修回日期:  2021-04-05
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-07-15
  • 刊出日期:  2021-04-08

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回