Multi-Stack Adaptive Power Allocation Method Considering Fuel Cell Aging
-
摘要:
为延长多堆燃料电池系统（multi-stack fuel cell system，MFCS）使用寿命，保证运行过程中各电堆总体退化性能逐渐趋于一致，针对大功率质子交换膜燃料电池（proton exchange membrane fuel cell, PEMFC）系统，提出了一种考虑电堆老化的MFCS自适应功率分配方法. 在MFCS运行过程中，由于燃料电池输出功率会随不同运行条件而动态变化，导致每个电堆老化程度通常不一致，因此提出量化指标电压退化程度（voltage degradation degree，VDD）来表征燃料电池在运行过程中电堆的老化程度；还采用燃料电池半经验模型来模拟老化对电堆性能的影响；最后，通过RT-LAB搭建硬件在环（hardware-in-the-loop，HIL）测试平台，与原有的功率分配方法做比较. 结果表明：该方法能协调各燃料电池出力，减缓电堆老化速率；相较于平均功率分配方法和链式功率分配方法在MFCS的氢耗量上分别降低了13.59%和8.04%.
Abstract:In order to extend the service life of the multi-stack fuel cell system (MFCS) and ensure that the overall degradation performance of each stack during operation gradually tends to be consistent, an MFCS adaptive power allocation method is proposed for the high-power proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system, which can take into account the aging of the stack. During the MFCS operation, the fuel cell output power dynamically changes according to different operating conditions, which causes the aging degree of each stack to be generally inconsistent. Therefore, the voltage degradation degree (VDD) is introduced to characterize the aging degree of the fuel cell stack during operation. In addition, a semi-empirical fuel cell model is also used to simulate the effect of aging on stack performance. Finally, a hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) test platform is built on RT-LAB. The proposed method is compared with the average and chain power allocation methods. The results show that the proposed method can coordinate the output of each fuel cell to slow down the aging rate of the stack, and reduce the hydrogen consumption of MFCS by 13.59% and 8.04% respectively.
-
图 3 实测极化曲线和模型仿真曲线对比
Figure 3. Comparison of measured polarization curve and model simulation curve
图 4 PEMFC测试前到测试结束后的极化曲线
Figure 4. Polarization curves of PEMFC stack before and after testing
图 9 平均功率分配下各电堆单片VDD
Figure 9. Single-chip voltage degradation degree of each stack for average power allocation
图 11 链式功率分配下各电堆单片VDD
Figure 11. Single-chip voltage degradation degree of each stack for chain power allocation
图 13 自适应功率分配下各电堆单片VDD
Figure 13. Single-chip voltage degradation degree of each stack for adaptive power allocation
表 1 PEMFC参数
Table 1. PEMFC parameters
参数 额定功率/kW 电压范
围/V额定电流/A 电池单
体数/个氢气压力/MPa 冷却液
温度/℃取值 110 480 ~ 660 238 670 0.8 50 ~ 75 
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 3种分配方法VDD比较
Table 3. Comparison of VDD of three allocation methods
μV 电堆 自适应分配 链式分配 平均分配 FC1 0.93 1.09 0.95 FC2 0.90 0.91 0.95 FC3 0.85 0.81 0.95
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 3种分配方法的氢耗比较
Table 4. Comparison of hydrogen consumption of three allocation methods
g 功率分配方法 自适应 链式 平均 氢耗量 850.89 911.51 984.78
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 陈维荣,钱清泉,李奇. 燃料电池混合动力列车的研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2009,44(1): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2009.01.001CHEN Weirong, QIAN Qingquan, LI Qi. Investigation status and development trend of hybrid power train based on fuel cell[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 44(1): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2009.01.001 [2] 陈维荣,张国瑞,孟翔,等. 燃料电池混合动力有轨电车动力性分析与设计[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2017,52(1): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.01.001CHEN Weirong, ZHANG Guorui, MENG Xiang, et al. Dynamic performance analysis and design of fuel cell hybrid locomotive[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 52(1): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.01.001 [3] 李曦,曹广益,朱新坚. 质子交换膜燃料电池电堆温度特性的模糊建模[J]. 上海交通大学学报,2005,39(增刊1): 187-188.LI Xi, CAO Guangyi, ZHU Xinjian. Fuzzy modeling for PEMFC stack temperature characteristic[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2005, 39(S1): 187-188. [4] 朱选才,徐德鸿,吴屏,等. 燃料电池发电装置能量管理控制系统设计[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2008,28(11): 101-106. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2008.11.018ZHU Xuancai, XU Dehong, WU Ping, et al. Design of energy management control in fuel cell power system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(11): 101-106. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2008.11.018 [5] 王玲,李欣然,马亚辉,等. 燃料电池发电系统的机电动态模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2011,31(22): 40-47.WANG Ling, LI Xinran, MA Yahui, et al. Dynamic model of fuel cell power generating system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2011, 31(22): 40-47. [6] LIU J X, LUO W S, YANG X Z, et al. Robust model-based fault diagnosis for PEM fuel cell air-feed system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, 63(5): 3261-3270. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2016.2535118 [7] XIE C G, XU X Y, BUJLO P, et al. Fuel cell and lithium iron phosphate battery hybrid powertrain with an ultracapacitor bank using direct parallel structure[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 279: 487-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.029 [8] 朱亚男,李奇,黄文强,等. 基于功率自适应分配的多堆燃料电池系统效率协调优化控制[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2019,39(6): 1714-1722, 1868.ZHU Yanan, LI Qi, HUANG Wenqiang, et al. Efficiency coordination and optimization control method of multi-stack fuel cell systems based on power adaptive allocation[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(6): 1714-1722, 1868. [9] 卫东,郑东,褚磊民. 空冷型质子交换膜燃料电池堆最优性能输出控制[J]. 化工学报,2010,61(5): 1293-1300.WEI Dong, ZHENG Dong, CHU Leimin. Output control of optimal performance for air-cooling PEMFC stack[J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61(5): 1293-1300. [10] KELOUWANI S, ADEGNON K, AGBOSSOU K, et al. Online system identification and adaptive control for PEM fuel cell maximum efficiency tracking[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2012, 27(3): 580-592. doi: 10.1109/TEC.2012.2194496 [11] CHEN H C, PEI P C, SONG M C. Lifetime prediction and the economic lifetime of Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cells[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 142: 154-163. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.062 [12] 吴红飞,孙凯,邢岩. 新能源发电串联分布式高能效变换系统[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2012,32(33): 1-6, 168.WU Hongfei, SUN Kai, XING Yan. Distributed high efficiency renewable power systems with modules in series connection[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2012, 32(33): 1-6, 168. [13] HUA Z G, ZHENG Z X, GAO F, et al. Challenges of the remaining useful life prediction for proton exchange membrane fuel cells[C]//45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. Lisbon: IEEE, 2019: 6382-6387. [14] MARX N, CARDOZO J, BOULON L, et al. Comparison of the series and parallel architectures for hybrid multi-stack fuel cell－battery systems[C]//2015 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference. Montreal: IEEE, 2015: 1-6. [15] 尹良震,李奇,洪志湖,等. PEMFC发电系统FFRLS在线辨识和实时最优温度广义预测控制方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2017,37(11): 3223-3235, 3378.YIN Liangzhen, LI Qi, HONG Zhihu, et al. FFRLS online identification and real-time optimal temperature generalized predictive control method of PEMFC power generation system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017, 37(11): 3223-3235, 3378. [16] 吴宇,皇甫宜耿,张琳,等. 大扰动Buck-Boost变换器的鲁棒高阶滑模控制[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2015,35(7): 1740-1748.WU YU, HUANGFU Yigeng, ZHANG Lin, et al. A robust high order sliding mode for buck-boost converters with large disturbances[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(7): 1740-1748. [17] LIU H, CHEN J, HISSEL D, et al. Remaining useful life estimation for proton exchange membrane fuel cells using a hybrid method[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 237: 910-919. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.023 [18] LI Q, WANG T H, DAI C H, et al. Power management strategy based on adaptive droop control for a fuel cell-battery-supercapacitor hybrid tramway[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2018, 67(7): 5658-5670. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2017.2715178 [19] 翁元明,林瑞,唐文超,等. 燃料电池堆单片电压一致性研究进展[J]. 电源技术,2015,39(1): 199-202. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-087X.2015.01.064WENG Yuanming, LIN Rui, TANG Wenchao, et al. Development of individual cell voltage uniformity of fuel cell stack[J]. Chinese Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 39(1): 199-202. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-087X.2015.01.064 [20] MACIAS FERNANDEZ A, KANDIDAYENI M, BOULON L, et al. An adaptive state machine based energy management strategy for a multi-stack fuel cell hybrid electric vehicle[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2020, 69(1): 220-234. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2019.2950558 [21] WANG M H, YAU H T, WANG T Y. Extension sliding mode controller for maximum power point tracking of hydrogen fuel cells[J]. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013, 2013: 1-8. [22] PEI P C, CHEN H C. Main factors affecting the lifetime of proton exchange membrane fuel cells in vehicle applications:a review[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 125: 60-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.048 [23] HUA Z G, ZHENG Z X, PÉRA M C, et al. Remaining useful life prediction of PEMFC systems based on the multi-input echo state network[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 265: 114791.1-114791.13. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114791 [24] 戴朝华,史青,陈维荣,等. 质子交换膜燃料电池单体电压均衡性研究综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2016,36(5): 1289-1302.DAI Chaohua, SHI Qing, CHEN Weirong, et al. A review of the single cell voltage uniformity in proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(5): 1289-1302. [25] PEI P C, CHANG Q F, TANG T. A quick evaluating method for automotive fuel cell lifetime[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(14): 3829-3836. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.04.048 [26] TOQUICA CARDENAS D C, MARX N, BOULON L, et al. Degraded mode operation of multi-stack fuel cell systems[C]//2014 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference Coimbra. [S.l.]: IEEE, 2014: 1-6. -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 449
- HTML全文浏览量: 194
- PDF下载量: 52
- 被引次数: 0