• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

考虑前车状态的智能网联车交叉口行为决策

杨达 杨果 罗旭 唐颜东 徐利华 蒲云

杨达, 杨果, 罗旭, 唐颜东, 徐利华, 蒲云. 考虑前车状态的智能网联车交叉口行为决策[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2022, 57(2): 410-417, 433. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200553
引用本文: 杨达, 杨果, 罗旭, 唐颜东, 徐利华, 蒲云. 考虑前车状态的智能网联车交叉口行为决策[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2022, 57(2): 410-417, 433. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200553
YANG Da, YANG Guo, LUO Xu, TANG Yandong, XU Lihua, PU Yun. Behavior Decision of Intelligent Connected Vehicles Considering Status of Preceding Vehicles at Intersections[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(2): 410-417, 433. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200553
Citation: YANG Da, YANG Guo, LUO Xu, TANG Yandong, XU Lihua, PU Yun. Behavior Decision of Intelligent Connected Vehicles Considering Status of Preceding Vehicles at Intersections[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(2): 410-417, 433. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200553

考虑前车状态的智能网联车交叉口行为决策

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200553
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(52172333);四川省重点研发项目(19ZDYF2068);成都市软科学项目(2019RK0000054ZF);公安部技术研究计划(2020JSYJA05);山东省重大科技创新工程项目(2019TSLH0203);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2682021ZTPY010)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    杨达(1985—),男,副教授,博士,研究方向为智能交通,E-mail:yangd8@swjtu.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    唐颜东(1992—),男,高级工程师,研究方向为车路协同和自动驾驶,E-mail:yandongtang0505@hotmail.com

  • 中图分类号: U491.2

Behavior Decision of Intelligent Connected Vehicles Considering Status of Preceding Vehicles at Intersections

  • 摘要:

    为使智能网联汽车(intelligent connected vehicle, ICV)在复杂交通环境下高效、安全地通过信号交叉口,在车联网实时获取信号灯和前车状态信息的基础上,建立了智能网联汽车通过信号交叉口的驾驶行为决策框架. 通过跟驰模型推导智能网联汽车和前方车辆在未来的行驶状态,预测得到前方车辆是否要通过交叉口的行为,进一步分别对智能网联汽车是领头车和跟随车时通过交叉口停止线的条件进行判断;将换道加入到驾驶方式中来寻求更高的通行效率,用基于换道时间模型的方法判断智能网联汽车换道后的通过条件;仿真对比分析了所提出模型和现有模型的决策能力,讨论了影响决策过程的关键因素. 研究结果表明:相比于现有模型,综合信号灯和前车行驶意图的决策方法能够提高智能网联汽车对通行条件判断的准确性,从而进行更合理的行为选择,随着单位绿灯剩余时间的增加,车辆决策通过交叉口的概率可提高20%,当前车道的车辆位置对决策结果影响显著.

     

  • 图 1  信号交叉口行为决策流程

    Figure 1.  Behavior decision process at signalized intersection

    图 2  车辆位置

    Figure 2.  Position of vehicles

    图 3  换道过程示意

    Figure 3.  Schematic of lane changing process

    图 4  场景1决策过程对比

    Figure 4.  Comparison of decision-making process for scenario 1

    图 5  场景2决策过程对比

    Figure 5.  Comparison of decision-making process for scenario 2

    图 6  不同绿灯剩余时间的决策过程和速度变化

    Figure 6.  Decision-making process and speed change of different remaining time of green light

    图 7  不同当前车道车辆位置的决策过程和速度变化

    Figure 7.  Decision process and speed change of different vehicle positions in current lane

    表  1  不同绿灯剩余时间的场景输入

    Table  1.   Scene input information for different green light countdown time

    输入信息数值输入信息数值
    停止线位置/m 300 SV当前位置/m 171
    道路最大限速值/(km•h−1 60 SV当前速度/(km•h−1 29
    最大舒适加速度/(m•s−2 2 当前车道头车位置/m 200
    最大制动减速度/(m•s−2 3 相邻车道头车位置/m 290
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  不同当前车道车辆位置的场景输入

    Table  2.   Scene input information for different vehicle positions in current lane

    输入信息数值输入信息数值
    当前绿灯剩余时间/s11最大制动减速度/
    (m•s−2
    3
    停止线位置/m300SV当前速度/(km•h−129
    道路最大限速值/(km•h−160当前车道头车位置
    最大舒适加速度/(m•s−22相邻车道头车位置/m290
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] GALCERAN E, CUNNINGHAM A G, EUSTICE R M, et al. Multipolicy decision-making for autonomous driving via changepoint-based behavior prediction:Theory and experiment[J]. Autonomous Robots, 2017, 41(6): 1367-1382. doi: 10.1007/s10514-017-9619-z
    [2] GOODALL N J. Ethical decision making during automated vehicle crashes[J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014, 2424(1): 58-65. doi: 10.3141/2424-07
    [3] GAO H B, SHI G Y, XIE G T, et al. Car-following method based on inverse reinforcement learning for autonomous vehicle decision-making[J]. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2018, 15(6): 1729881418817162.1-1729881418817162.11.
    [4] YE Y J, ZHANG X H, SUN J. Automated vehicle’s behavior decision making using deep reinforcement learning and high-fidelity simulation environment[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2019, 107: 155-170. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.08.011
    [5] GALCERAN E, OLSON E, EUSTICE R M. Augmented vehicle tracking under occlusions for decision-making in autonomous driving[C]//2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Hamburg: IEEE, 2015: 3559-3565.
    [6] TIAN R, LI S S, LI N, et al. Adaptive game-theoretic decision making for autonomous vehicle control at roundabouts[C]//2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). Miami: IEEE, 2018: 321-326.
    [7] CHEN Z, ZHANG Y L, LV J, et al. Model for optimization of ecodriving at signalized intersections[J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014, 2427(1): 54-62. doi: 10.3141/2427-06
    [8] RAKHA H, ZOHDY I. Optimizing driverless vehicles at intersections[C]//19th ITS World Congress. Vienna: [s.n.], 2012: 1-12.
    [9] 高祥. 车联网环境下信号交叉口通行方法研究[D]. 烟台: 烟台大学, 2016.
    [10] ASADI B, VAHIDI A. Predictive cruise control:utilizing upcoming traffic signal information for improving fuel economy and reducing trip time[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2011, 19(3): 707-714. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2010.2047860
    [11] LI Z F, ELEFTERIADOU L, RANKA S. Signal control optimization for automated vehicles at isolated signalized intersections[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2014, 49: 1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.10.001
    [12] HE X Z, LIU H X, LIU X B. Optimal vehicle speed trajectory on a signalized arterial with consideration of queue[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2015, 61: 106-120. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.11.001
    [13] MAHLER G, VAHIDI A. An optimal velocity-planning scheme for vehicle energy efficiency through probabilistic prediction of traffic-signal timing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014, 15(6): 2516-2523. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2319306
    [14] 刘欢,杨雷,邵社刚,等. 车路协同环境下信号交叉口速度引导策略[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2019,38(12): 8-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2019.12.02

    LIU Huan, YANG Lei, SHAO Shegang, et al. Speed guidance strategies at signalized intersections in a vehicle infrastructure cooperative environment[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2019, 38(12): 8-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2019.12.02
    [15] WU G Y, BORIBOONSOMSIN K, XIA H T, et al. Supplementary benefits from partial vehicle automation in an ecoapproach and departure application at signalized intersections[J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014, 2424(1): 66-75. doi: 10.3141/2424-08
    [16] DE NUNZIO G, DE WIT C C, MOULIN P, et al. Eco-driving in urban traffic networks using traffic signals information[J]. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2016, 26(6): 1307-1324. doi: 10.1002/rnc.3469
    [17] PARK C, KEE S C. Implementation of autonomous driving vehicle at an intersection with traffic light recognition and vehicle controls[J]. Transactions of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, 2019: 542-549.
    [18] ZHOU Mofan, YU Yang, QU Xiaobo. Development of an efficient driving strategy for connected and automated vehicles at signalized intersections:a reinforcement learning approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020, 21(1): 433-443. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2019.2942014
    [19] LIU Y T, OZGUNER U. Human driver model and driver decision making for intersection driving[C]//2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. Istanbul: IEEE, 2007: 642-647.
    [20] 苏冲,孟祥雨,张成阳. 无人驾驶车辆路口行驶决策研究[J]. 汽车实用技术,2019(15): 29-31.

    SU Chong, MENG Xiangyu, ZHANG Chengyang. Research on decision making of intersection of autonomous vehicle[J]. Automobile Applied Technology, 2019(15): 29-31.
    [21] GADEPALLY V, KRISHNAMURTHY A, OZGUNER U. A framework for estimating driver decisions near intersections[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014, 15(2): 637-646. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2013.2285159
    [22] DE BEAUCORPS P, STREUBEL T, VERROUST-BLONDET A, et al. Decision-making for automated vehicles at intersections adapting human-like behavior[C]//2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). Los Angeles: IEEE, 2017: 212-217.
    [23] 杜明博. 基于人类驾驶行为的无人驾驶车辆行为决策与运动规划方法研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2016.
    [24] DE CAMPOS G R, FALCONE P, SJÖBERG J. Autonomous cooperative driving: a velocity-based negotiation approach for intersection crossing[C]//16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013). The Hague: IEEE, 2013: 1456-1461.
    [25] ALONSO J, MILANÉS V, PÉREZ J, et al. Autonomous vehicle control systems for safe crossroads[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2011, 19(6): 1095-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2011.06.002
    [26] 宋威龙,熊光明,王诗源,等. 基于驾驶员类型分析的智能车辆交叉口行为决策[J]. 北京理工大学学报,2016,36(9): 917-922.

    SONG Weilong, XIONG Guangming, WANG Shiyuan, et al. Decision making for intelligent vehicles based on driver type analyzing in an intersection[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016, 36(9): 917-922.
    [27] MAKAREM L, GILLET D. Model predictive coordination of autonomous vehicles crossing intersections[C]//16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013). Hague: IEEE, 2013: 1799-1804.
    [28] BEST A, NARANG S, BARBER D, et al. AutonoVi: Autonomous vehicle planning with dynamic maneuvers and traffic constraints[C]//2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Vancouver: IEEE, 2017: 2629-2636.
    [29] LIU C, LEE S, VARNHAGEN S, et al. Path planning for autonomous vehicles using model predictive control[C]//2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). Los Angeles: IEEE, 2017: 174-179.
    [30] YANG D, JIN P, PU Y, et al. Safe distance car-following model including backward-looking and its stability analysis[J]. The European Physical Journal B, 2013, 86(3): 92. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2012-30688-6
    [31] YANG D, ZHENG S Y, WEN C, et al. A dynamic lane-changing trajectory planning model for automated vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2018, 95: 228-247. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.06.007
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  191
  • HTML全文浏览量:  184
  • PDF下载量:  21
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-08-18
  • 修回日期:  2020-12-30
  • 刊出日期:  2021-03-03

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回