Random Search Method of Fracture Surface for Seismic Stability of Reinforced Retaining Wall
-
摘要: 为确定加筋土挡墙破裂面的位置，基于水平条分法提出了一种多线段破裂面表现形式. 将加筋土挡墙破裂面视为由多条线段组成，各条线段在一个平面内以不同的长度和角度相互连接；根据地震作用下水平土条的力学平衡条件，推导出与破裂面参数相关的筋材拉力计算式；将筋材总拉力作为目标函数，采用两层循环方式进行求解计算，外层为墙后填土水平表面破裂点位置循环，内层为随机角度循环；对比每次外层循环计算所得筋材总拉力，取最大值所对应的破裂面为所求加筋土挡墙临界破裂面. 通过算例对比验证了多线段破裂面计算方法的合理性，并对加筋土挡墙稳定性影响因素进行分析. 研究结果表明：以角度随机方式产生多线段破裂面的计算方法无需进行数学优化可得到合理结果，加筋土挡墙破裂面位置比对数螺旋破裂面更接近临空面；填土内摩擦角的增大使得筋材总拉力与筋材长度减小，能够增强加筋土挡墙的内部稳定性.Abstract: In order to determine the fracture surface location of the reinforced retaining wall, a polyline fracture surfaceform was proposed based on the horizontal slice method. The fracture surface of the reinforced retaining wall is viewed to be composed of several line segments, one connected with another in a plane at different lengths and angles. According to the mechanical equilibrium of horizontal soil strip under seismic action, the calculation formula of reinforcement forces related to fracture surface parameters is derived. The total force of the reinforcement is taken as the objective function, and the calculation is run in a way of a two-layer cycle. The outer layer is a cycle of the fracture point position of the horizontal filling behind the wall, and the inner layer is a random angular cycle. By comparing the total forces of reinforcement calculated in each outer cycle, the fracture surface corresponding to the maximum value is the critical fracture surface of the reinforced retaining wall. A calculation example is used to verify the calculation method of the polyline fracture surface, and the influential factors on the stability of the reinforced retaining wall are analyzed. The results show that the calculation method in which the polyline fracture surface is generated by the random angular method can obtain reasonable results without mathematical optimization, and the fracture surface location of the reinforced retaining wall is closer to the free face than the logarithmic spiral fracture surface. The increase in the internal friction angle of the fill reduces the total tensile force and the length of the reinforcement, which can enhance the internal stability of the reinforced retaining wall.
-
图 5
${{{L_{\rm{c}}}} / H}$ 与$\varphi $ 关系的比较Figure 5. Comparison of relationship between
${{{L_{\rm{c}}}} / H}$ and$\varphi $ 
图 7 多线段破裂面与对数螺旋破裂面位置的比较
Figure 7. Position comparison of polyline fracture surfaces and logarithmic spiral fracture surfaces
图 8
$\alpha $ 不同时K随$\varphi $ 的变化规律Figure 8. Trend of K changing with
$\varphi $ under different$\alpha $ 
图 9
$\alpha $ 不同时${{{L_{\rm{c}}}} / H}$ 随$\varphi $ 的变化规律Figure 9. Trend of
${{{L_c}} / H}$ changing with$\varphi $ under different$\alpha $ -
周小平,季璇,钱七虎. 强地震荷载作用下临水挡土墙的拟动力法稳定性分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(10): 2071-2081. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.10.012ZHOU Xiaoping, JI Xuan, QIAN Qihu. Stability analysis of water front retaining wall subjected to seismic loads using pseudo-dynamic method[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(10): 2071-2081. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.10.012 LO S C R, XU D W. A strain-based design method for the collapse limit state of reinforced soil walls or slopes[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1992, 29(5): 832-842. doi: 10.1139/t92-090 SHAHGHOLI M, FAKHER A, JONES C J F P. Horizontal slice method of analysis[J]. Géotechnique, 2001, 51(10): 881-885. NOURI H, FAKHER A, JONES C J F P. Development of horizontal slice method for seismic stability analysis of reinforced slopes and walls[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2006, 24(3): 175-187. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.11.004 SHEKARIAN S, GHANBARI A, FARHADI A. New seismic parameters in the analysis of retaining walls with reinforced backfill[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2008, 26(4): 350-356. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.01.003 CHOUDHURY D, NIMBALKAR S S, MANDAL J N. External stability of reinforced soil walls under seismic conditions[J]. Geosynthetics International, 2007, 14(4): 211-218. doi: 10.1680/gein.2007.14.4.211 BELLEZZA I. Seismic active earth pressure on walls using a new pseudo-dynamic approach[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2015, 33(4): 795-812. doi: 10.1007/s10706-015-9860-1 徐鹏,蒋关鲁,王宁,等. 地基对加筋土挡墙影响的对比分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2020,55(4): 752-757. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180765XU Peng, JIANG Guanlu, WANG Ning, et al. Comparative analysis of influence of foundation on reinforced soil retaining walls[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 752-757. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180765 SIL A, DEY A K. Dynamic performance of cohesive slope under seismic loading[J]. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering, 2014, 5(1): 1-14. PRATER E G. Yield acceleration for seismic stability of slopes[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1979, 105(5): 682-687. doi: 10.1061/AJGEB6.0000804 蒋薇,苏谦,张晓曦,等. 地震作用下加筋土边坡滑裂面的确定方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2015,50(1): 156-160. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.01.023JIANG Wei, SU Qian, ZHANG Xiaoxi, et al. Determination method of slip surface of reinforced soil slope subjected to seismic load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 50(1): 156-160. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.01.023 林永亮,李新星. 地震作用下加筋土坡临界高度研究[J]. 岩土力学,2008,29(增刊1): 394-398.LIN Yongliang, LI Xinxing. Research on critical height of reinforced slopes under seismic load[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(S1): 394-398. 邓东平,李亮,赵炼恒. 基于Janbu法的边坡整体稳定性滑动面搜索新方法[J]. 岩土力学,2011,32(3): 891-898. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.03.042DENG Dongping, LI Liang, ZHAO Lianheng. A new method of sliding surface searching for general stability of slope based on Janbu method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(3): 891-898. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.03.042 HU C, JIMENEZ R, LI S C, et al. Determination of critical slip surfaces using mutative scale chaos optimization[J]. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2015, 29(5): 04014067.1-04014067.9. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000373 MALKAWI A I H, HASSAN W F, SARMA S K. Global search method for locating general slip surface using Monte Carlo techniques[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(8): 688-698. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:8(688) SARMA S K, TAN D. Determination of critical slip surface in slope analysis[J]. Géotechnique, 2006, 56(8): 539-550. 万文,曹平,冯涛. 加速混合遗传算法在搜索边坡最危险滑动面中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(增刊1): 2770-2776.WAN Wen, CAO Ping, FENG Tao. Application of accelerating hybrid genetic algorithm to searching for the most dangerous slip surface of slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(S1): 2770-2776. AUSILIO E, CONTE E, DENTE G. Seismic stability analysis of reinforced slopes[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2000, 19(3): 159-172. doi: 10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00005-1 NIMBALKAR S S, CHOUDHURY D, MANDAL J N. Seismic stability of reinforced-soil wall by pseudo-dynamic method[J]. Geosynthetics International, 2006, 13(3): 111-119. doi: 10.1680/gein.2006.13.3.111 BASHA B M, BABU G L S. Reliability assessment of internal stability of reinforced soil structures:a pseudo-dynamic approach[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(5): 336-353. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.12.007 BELLEZZA I. A new pseudo-dynamic approach for seismic active soil thrust[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2014, 32(2): 561-576. doi: 10.1007/s10706-014-9734-y MURALI KRISHNA A, BHATTACHARJEE A. Behavior of rigid-faced reinforced soil-retaining walls subjected to different earthquake ground motions[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(1): 06016007.1-06016007.14. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000668 GHAYESH M H. Nonlinear dynamic response of a simply-supported Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic beam,additionally supported by a nonlinear spring[J]. Nonlinear Analysis:Real World Applications, 2012, 13(3): 1319-1333. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.10.009 -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(9) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 378
- HTML全文浏览量: 196
- PDF下载量: 32
- 被引次数: 0