考虑品牌忠诚度的追随品跨周期质量与定价决策

徐孝蕾; 周建亨

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200012

考虑品牌忠诚度的追随品跨周期质量与定价决策

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200012

徐孝蕾^1,2,,
周建亨^1, ,

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金面上项目（71872036）；国家自然科学基金重点项目（71832001）；教育部人文社会科学基金（18YJA630153）；上海市社会科学基金（2017BGL018）

详细信息

作者简介:
徐孝蕾（1987—），女，博士研究生，研究方向为顾客行为与供应链管理，E-mail：xxl_870121@126.com

通讯作者:
周建亨（1976—），女，教授，博士生导师，研究方向为供应链管理、运营管理， E-mail：Zjh001@dhu.edu.cn

中图分类号: V221.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 757
- HTML全文浏览量: 361
- PDF下载量: 13
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-01-19
- 修回日期: 2020-04-24
- 网络出版日期: 2020-05-20
- 刊出日期: 2020-10-01

Pricing and Quality Decisions of Follower Brands in Presence of Brand Loyalty

XU Xiaolei^{1,2
,},
ZHOU Jianheng^{1
, ,}

摘要

摘要: 国际知名时尚品牌通常以其较高的质量和独特的文化价值吸引和培育众多忠诚顾客，国内同类本土品牌在追随时面临顾客黏性以及策略性消费行为的影响，如何突破既有的壁垒，吸引策略型顾客购买性价比高的本土品牌产品成为了重要课题. 为此，基于时尚产品价值衰减的假设，构建了两周期竞争企业的策略性博弈模型，分析了追随企业该如何决策追随品的质量与价格. 研究表明：原品顾客忠诚度越高，对其需求越有利，但对其利润却不总是有利；给定原品贬值程度，若消费者策略性较弱，追随品的利润反而可能随原品忠诚度递增，这是因为追随品价格随顾客忠诚度递增的正效应大于市场需求随之递减的负效应，促使追随品利润递增；作为追随品，收益并不是随与原品的相似度单调递增，应当保留一定程度的品牌原创性才能实现利润最大化.
- 顾客忠诚度 /
- 顾客策略行为 /
- 产品相似度
Abstract: International famous fashion brands usually attract and cultivate many loyal customers with their high quality and unique cultural value. Thus, domestic follower brands have to be confronted with the effect of customer stickiness and strategic behavior. How to break through the existing barriers and attract strategic customers to buy cost-effective follower brands has become an important issue. On the basis of the assumption that fashion products have certain value depreciation, a strategic game model of competitive firms in two-period, is built to analyze how follower businesses decide their product quality and price. It is found that high brand loyalty is benefit to the leader demand, but may be adverse to its profit. Furthermore, given the value depreciation, if the strategic behavior is weak, the followers’ profit may increase with the brand loyalty. The reason is that the positive effect of follower price increasing with customer loyalty is greater than the negative effect of market demand decreasing with it, which promotes the increase of follower brand profit. In addition, a follower’s profit does not monotonically increase with its product similarity; thus it is essential for a follower to own a certain degree of brand originality in order to maximize profits.
- customer loyalty /
- customers strategic behavior /
- product similarity

HTML全文

图 1 企业决策时序

Figure 1. Sequence of enterprise decision events

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 产品B的市场区域

Figure 2. Regions of follower brand

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 最优相似度与忠诚顾客的关系

Figure 3. Relationship between optimal similarity of follower and customers’ loyalty to original one

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同区域的两种产品在第2期的利润

Figure 4. Profits of two products in different regions of second period

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 异质品竞争下原品折价对追随品定价与市场的影响

Figure 5. Effect of original brand discount on follower price and share in competition region

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 垄断分流和需求挤占区域内原品折价对追随品定价的影响

Figure 6. Effect of original brand discount on follower price in regions of monopoly diversion and demand cannibalizing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 异质品竞争区域中折价对原品价格和利润的影响

Figure 7. Effect of original brand discount on its price and profit in region of heterogeneous product competition

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 顾客策略行为对追随品利润的影响

Figure 8. Effect of customer strategic behavior on follower’s profit

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 符号说明

Table 1. Summary of notations

符号	含义
${p_i}$	即产品 $i$ 的售价，$i = {\rm{A}},{\rm{B}}$
$\gamma $	产品 A 在第 2 期的折价，$\gamma \in \left[ {0,1.00} \right]$
$\theta $	产品 B 与产品 A 的相似度，$\theta \in \left[ {0,1} \right]$
$v$	消费者对产品的估价，$v \sim U\left[ {0,1} \right]$
$\delta $	顾客策略程度，$\delta \in \left( {0,1.000} \right]$
$\alpha $	品牌忠诚度，$\alpha \in \left[ {0,1} \right]$
${Q_{ij}}$	产品 $i$ 在第 $j$ 期的需求，$i = {\rm{A}},{\rm{B}}$，$j = 1,2$
${\varPi _i}$	产品 $i$ 的利润，$i = {\rm{A}},{\rm{B}}$

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(18)

李春玲,李玲. 中国奢侈品行业分析[J]. 商业经济,2015(9): 29-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6043.2015.09.013

李朋. 中国发展本土奢侈品牌之路的思考[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2009: 5-14

张永凯. 企业技术创新模式演化分析:以苹果、三星和华为为例[J]. 广东财经大学学报,2018,33(2): 54-61.

ZHANG Yongkai. An evolutionary analysis of corporate technology innovation models:case studies on Apple,Samsung and Huawei[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, 2018, 33(2): 54-61.

冯琛,袁雯竹,孙绍光. 技术创新对企业竞争优势的推动作用——苹果与华为的对比分析[J]. 时代经贸,2017(9): 40-43.

SYAHLANI S P, RAHMADI P N, HARYADI F T. Brand evaluation and consumers' preference towards pioneer and follower brands:empirical study on dairy products[J]. Journal of Animal Production, 2011, 13(2): 108-114.

YOSHIDA O, NISHI T. Replacement of leader-follower relation in multi-period supply chain planning under demand uncertainty[C]//International Symposium on Flexible Automation. [S.l.]: IEEE, 2016: 192-197.

张新鑫,申成霖,侯文华. 考虑竞争者进入威胁的易逝品动态定价机制[J]. 管理科学学报,2016,19(10): 34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9807.2016.10.003

ZHANG Xinxin, SHEN Chenglin, HOU Wenhua. Dynamic pricing for perishable product considering the threat of entry and consumer behaviors[J]. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 2016, 19(10): 34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9807.2016.10.003

CHELLAPPA R K, SHIVENDU S. Managing piracy:pricing and sampling strategies for digital experience goods in vertically segmented markets[J]. Information Systems Research, 2005, 16(4): 400-417. doi: 10.1287/isre.1050.0069

WU S Y, CHEN P Y. Versioning and piracy control for digital information goods[J]. Operations Research, 2008, 56(1): 157-172. doi: 10.1287/opre.1070.0414

LAHIRI A, DEY D. Effects of piracy on quality of information goods[J]. Management Science, 2013, 59(1): 245-264. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1578

AKCAY Y, NATARAJAN H P, XU S H. Joint dynamic pricing of multiple perishable products under consumer choice[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(8): 1345-1361. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1178

AVIV Y, PAZGAL A. Optimal pricing of seasonal products in the presence of forward-looking consumers[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2008, 10(3): 339-359.

曹忠鹏,周庭锐,陈淑青. 关系质量对顾客忠诚及口碑影响效果的实证分析[J]. 预测,2009,28(2): 9-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5192.2009.02.002

CAO Zhongpeng, ZHOU Tingrui, CHEN Shuqing. Effect of relationship quality on customer loyalty and word of mouth[J]. Forecasting, 2009, 28(2): 9-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5192.2009.02.002

张新鑫,申成霖,侯文华. 考虑顾客行为和成员风险规避性的供应链收益共享契约的设计与协调[J]. 预测,2015,34(1): 70-75.

ZHANG Xinxin, SHEN Chenglin, HOU Wenhua. Decision models and coordination for supply chain under strategic[J]. Forecasting, 2015, 34(1): 70-75.

CACHON G P, SWINNEY R. The value of fast fashion:quick response,enhanced design,and strategic consumer behavior[J]. Management Science, 2011, 57(4): 778-795. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1303

LIANG C, CAKANYILDIRIM M, SETHI S P. Can strategic customer behavior speed up product innovation?[J]. Production & Operations Management, 2018, 27(8): 1516-1533.

ZHOU E, ZHANG J, GOU Q, et al. A two period pricing model for new fashion style launching strategy[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 160: 144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.008

HA A, TONG S, ZHANG H. Sharing demand information in competing supply chains with production diseconomies[J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2011, 57(3): 566-581.

施引文献

附加材料(0)

访问统计