• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

土工格栅对受污道砟直剪特性影响的试验研究

高睿 石知政 刘洋泽鹏 陈静 张荣隆

高睿, 石知政, 刘洋泽鹏, 陈静, 张荣隆. 土工格栅对受污道砟直剪特性影响的试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2021, 56(6): 1185-1191. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20191142
引用本文: 高睿, 石知政, 刘洋泽鹏, 陈静, 张荣隆. 土工格栅对受污道砟直剪特性影响的试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2021, 56(6): 1185-1191. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20191142
GAO Rui, SHI Zhizheng, LIU Yangzepeng, CHEN Jing, ZHANG Ronglong. Experimental Study on Effect of Geogrid on Direct Shear Behavior of Contaminated Ballast[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(6): 1185-1191. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20191142
Citation: GAO Rui, SHI Zhizheng, LIU Yangzepeng, CHEN Jing, ZHANG Ronglong. Experimental Study on Effect of Geogrid on Direct Shear Behavior of Contaminated Ballast[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(6): 1185-1191. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20191142

土工格栅对受污道砟直剪特性影响的试验研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20191142
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(51178358,51878521)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    高睿(1975—),男,教授,研究方向为岩土工程,E-mail:gaorui@whu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: U213.7

Experimental Study on Effect of Geogrid on Direct Shear Behavior of Contaminated Ballast

  • 摘要:

    为探究土工格栅对受黏土污染道砟力学特性的影响,通过对4种法向压力、3种黏土污染程度下土工格栅加固的道砟试样进行一系列直剪试验,对比分析土工格栅对道砟试样剪切强度和剪切变形的影响,研究了考虑黏土污染情况下土工格栅对道砟的加固效果. 研究结果表明:土工格栅增大了洁净及受黏土污染道砟试样的剪切强度,当污染指标VCI (void contamination index)为20%时提升峰值剪切强度最大达到24%;道砟剪切强度表现出典型的非线性特征,非线性强度准则拟合参数与道砟污染程度利用指数函数拟合,拟合结果可作为实际工程受污染道砟强度估计的依据;土工格栅可减小试样的最大剪胀量,同时可减小约0.7°~3.7° 的峰值剪胀角,并且在VCI为20%时土工格栅加固的效果最为明显.

     

  • 图 1  道砟试样级配

    Figure 1.  Particle size distribution of ballast samples

    图 2  试验土工格栅

    Figure 2.  Diagram of geogrid used in the experiment

    图 3  试验装置

    Figure 3.  Diagram of direct shear test apparatus

    图 4  剪切强度与水平位移关系曲线

    Figure 4.  Shear stress-shear displacement curves of ballast samples

    图 5  不同污染程度下道砟强度包络图

    Figure 5.  Strength envelops of ballast at different VCIs

    图 6  非线性强度准则参数拟合曲线

    Figure 6.  Fitting curves by nonlinear failure criterion

    图 7  法向位移与水平位移关系曲线

    Figure 7.  Vertical displacement versus horizontal displacement curves

    图 8  峰值剪胀角与污染程度关系

    Figure 8.  Relationship between the peak friction angle and VCI under various normal stress

    表  1  试验材料参数表

    Table  1.   Physical properties of test materials

    材料堆积密度ρ/(kg•m−3比重 d 孔隙比 e 含水率ω/%液限/%塑限/%
    道砟14322.660.858
    黏土11782.701.29222.242.122.4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  土工格栅参数表

    Table  2.   Physical and technical properties of geogrid

    材料 类型 孔径/mm 空隙率/% 极限抗拉强度/(kN•m−1
    聚丙烯 双向方形格栅 55 × 55 81 30
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  试验方案

    Table  3.   Experiment schemes

    试验组别试样编号VCI/%法向压力/kPa
    有格栅1 号015、35、55、75
    2 号20
    3 号40
    无格栅4 号015、35、55、75
    5 号20
    6 号40
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  峰值剪切强度数据

    Table  4.   Results of peak shear stress

    试样编号σn=15 kPaσn=35 kPaσn=55 kPaσn=75 kPa
    1 号80.28130.28155.44178.19
    2 号74.17115.28141.53169.03
    3 号58.1994.03128.89153.47
    4 号70.4294.10140.28164.93
    5 号54.4484.44136.04149.72
    6 号46.8167.64111.39141.94
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] HUDSON A, WATSSN G, PEN L L, et al. Remediation of mud pumping on a ballast railway track[C]//The 3rd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics. Guimarães: Procedia Engineering, 2016, 143: 1043-1050.
    [2] SELIG E T, WATERS J M. Track geotechnology and substructure management[M]. London: Thomas Telford, 1994: 8-9.
    [3] SWETA K, HUSSAINI S K K. Behavior evaluation of geogrid-reinforced ballast-subballast interface under shear condition[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2019, 47(1): 23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.09.002
    [4] AKBAR D, MASSOUD P, ASGHAR M A. Effect of sand and clay fouling on the shear strength of railway ballast for different ballast gradations[J]. Granular Matter, 2018, 20(51): 1-14.
    [5] KASHANI H F, HO C L, HYSLIP J P. Fouling and water content influence on the ballast deformation properties[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 190: 881-895. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.058
    [6] 徐旸,高亮,井国庆,等. 脏污对道床剪切性能影响及评估指标的离散元分析[J]. 工程力学,2015,32(8): 96-102. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2014.01.0051

    XU Yang, GAO Liang, JING Guoqing, et al. Shear behavior analysis of fouling railroad ballast by DEM and its evaluation index[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(8): 96-102. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2014.01.0051
    [7] 高亮,徐旸,殷浩. 脏污材质对散体道床剪切力学性能影响的试验研究[J]. 北京交通大学学报,2017,41(1): 1-6. doi: 10.11860/j.issn.1673-0291.2017.01.001

    GAO Liang, XU Yang, YIN Hao. Experiment research of shear behavior of railway ballast influenced by different fouling materials[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2017, 41(1): 1-6. doi: 10.11860/j.issn.1673-0291.2017.01.001
    [8] HUSSAINI S K K, INDRARATNA B, VINOD J S. A laboratory investigation to assess the functioning of railway ballast with and without geogrids[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2016, 6: 45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.02.001
    [9] FERNANDES G, PALMEIRA E M, GOMES R C. Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced alternative sub-ballast material in a railway track[J]. Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15(5): 311-321. doi: 10.1680/gein.2008.15.5.311
    [10] CHEN C, MCDOWELL G R, THOM N H. Discrete element modelling of cyclic loads of geogrid-reinforced ballast under confined and unconfined conditions[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2012, 35: 76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.07.004
    [11] BROWN S F, KWAN J, THOM N H. Identifying the key parameters that influence geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2007, 25(6): 326-335. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.06.003
    [12] SWETA K, HUSSAINI S K K. Effect of shearing rate on the behavior of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast under direct shear conditions[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2018, 46(3): 251-256. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.12.001
    [13] 井国庆,黄红梅,常锦秀,等. 清洗后的劣化道砟直剪力学特性分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2017,52(6): 1055-1060. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.003

    JING Guoqing, HUANG Hongmei, CHANG Jinxiu, et al. Analysis of mechanical characteristics of degradation railway ballast by direct shear test[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 52(6): 1055-1060. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.003
    [14] 王军, 胡惠丽, 刘飞禹, 等. 粒孔比对筋土界面直剪特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(增刊2): 115-122.

    WANG Jun, HU Huili, LIU Feiyu, et al. Effects of direct shear characteristics of sand-geogrid interface under different aperture ratios[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 115-122.
    [15] 井国庆,强伟乐,常锦秀,等. 针片状指数对道砟直剪力学特性的影响[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2020,55(4): 688-694.

    JING Guoqing, QIANG Weile, CHANG Jinxiu, et al. Effect of flakiness-elongation index on shear behavior of railway ballast[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 688-694.
    [16] INDRARATNA B, WIJEWARDENA L S S, BALASUBRAMANIAM A S. Large-scale triaxial testing of greywacke rockfill[J]. Geotechnique, 1993, 43(1): 37-51. doi: 10.1680/geot.1993.43.1.37
    [17] INDRARATNA B, NIMBALKAR S S, TENNAKOON N. The behaviour of ballasted track foundations: track drainage and geosynthetic reinforcement[C]//GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling & Design (GSP 199). West Palm Beach: ASCE, 2010: 2378-2387.
    [18] INDRARATNA B, NGO N T, RUJIKIATKAMJORN C. Behavior of geogrid-reinforced ballast under various levels of fouling[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2011, 29: 313-322. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.01.015
    [19] INDRARATNA B, IONESCU D, CHRISTIE H D. Shear behavior of railway ballast based on large-scale triaxial tests[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(5): 439-449. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:5(439)
    [20] 朱学敏,崔晓燕. 桩承式加筋路堤中土工格栅加筋效应的室内试验研究[J]. 河北工程大学学报(自然科学版),2020,37(1): 35-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9469.2020.01.007

    ZHU Xueming, CUI xiaoyan. Experimental study on the effect of geogrid reinforcement in pile-supported embankment[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Engineering (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 37(1): 35-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9469.2020.01.007
    [21] 苗晨曦. 格栅加筋粗粒料界面细观特性及性能优化研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2016.
    [22] 周跃峰,谭国焕,甄伟文. 原状黄土剪缩性测试与理论分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(6): 166-173.

    ZHOU Yuefeng, THAM L G, YAN W M. Testing and theoretical analysis on contractive behavior of undisturbed loess[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(6): 166-173.
  • 加载中
图(8) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  417
  • HTML全文浏览量:  239
  • PDF下载量:  14
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-11-28
  • 修回日期:  2020-05-08
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-07-21
  • 刊出日期:  2020-07-21

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回