粉煤灰基地聚物混凝土的耐久性研究新进展

赵人达; 杨世玉; 贾文涛; 曾宪帅; 靳贺松; 李福海

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20190993

粉煤灰基地聚物混凝土的耐久性研究新进展

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20190993

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目（51778531）；四川省科技计划资助（2019YJ0219）

详细信息

作者简介:
赵人达（1961—），男，教授，博士，研究方向为新型混凝土材料和混凝土结构长期性能，E-mail：rendazhao@163.com

中图分类号: TU52
计量
- 文章访问数: 489
- HTML全文浏览量: 339
- PDF下载量: 41
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-10-16
- 修回日期: 2020-03-16
- 网络出版日期: 2020-03-20
- 刊出日期: 2021-10-15

Review of Recent Progress in Durability of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete

摘要

摘要: 地聚物是近10余年来国际上研究非常活跃的一种新型化学激发胶凝材料，可能成为大量取代水泥的绿色胶凝材料. 针对碱激发粉煤灰（AAFA）地聚物的耐久性问题，分别从抗碳化性能、抗冻融性能、抗氯离子渗透性能、抗酸和抗硫酸盐侵蚀能力及抗风化性能等方面对AAFA地聚物混凝土的国内外研究现状进行了系统的整理与分析. 结果表明：1） AAFA混凝土的抗碳化能力不如水泥混凝土（OPC）的，碳化后的地聚物的孔隙率增加，力学性能下降，热固化、添加Ca（OH）₂、OPC、矿渣粉和纳米TiO₂等可以改善AAFA混凝土的抗碳化性；2） AAFA混凝土的抗冻融性能较OPC的低，添加矿渣、偏高岭土等可以提高AAFA混凝土的抗冻融性能；3） AAFA混凝土的氯离子渗透率较高，掺入矿渣粉、降低液固比、高温固化及延长固化时间可以增强AAFA混凝土的抗渗透性；4） AAFA混凝土的抗硫酸、盐酸、硝酸、乙酸及硫酸盐的能力较强，吸水率较低；5） AAFA混凝土的抗风化能力较差. 延长热固化时间，掺入富铝添加剂、降低目标钠与铝的摩尔比、减少地聚物的含水量、添加纳米SiO₂和硅烷表面改性都可以增强AAFA混凝土的抗风化性能.
- 地聚物 /
- 抗碳化 /
- 抗氯离子渗透 /
- 抗冻融性 /
- 抗酸性 /
- 吸水性 /
- 风化
Abstract: Geopolymer is a new type of chemically activited cementitious material which has been actively investigated across the world for more than 10 years. It may become a green cementitious material to replace cement. In view of the relatively weak durability of alkali activated fly ash (AAFA) geopolymer, recent research progress in AAFA geopolymer based concrete worldwide is systematically reviewed in terms of carbonation resistance, freeze-thaw resistance, chloride ion penetration resistance, acid and sulfate resistance, and weathering resistance. Literature survey results can be summarized as follows: 1) Compared with ordinary Portland concrete (OPC), the anti-carbonization ability of AAFA concrete is weaker, so the carbonized AAFA concrete has an increased porosity and decreased mechanical properties. High temperature curing and addition of Ca(OH)₂, OPC cement, ground granulated blast furnace slag (BFS) and nano-TiO₂ can improve the carbonation resistance of the AAFA concrete. 2) The freeze-thaw resistance of AAFA concrete is generally low. Adding BFS and metakaolin can improve the freeze-thaw resistance of AAFA concrete. 3) Compared with OPC, AAFA concrete has higher Cl^- permeability, and the addition of BFS, lower liquid-solid ratio, high temperature curing, and prolonging curing time can improve the Cl permeability performance of AAFA concrete. 4) AAFA concrete has strong resistance to sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, acetic acid and sulfate, and has low water absorption. 5) The efflorescence resistance of AAFA is relatively weak. This is closely related to porosity. Extending the heat curing time, adding aluminum-rich additives, lowering the target sodium to aluminum molar ratio, reducing the water content of the geopolymer, adding nano-SiO₂ and silane surface modification can improve the efflorescence resistance of the AAFA concrete.
- geopolymer /
- carbonation resistance /
- chloride-permeation resistance /
- freeze-thaw resistance /
- acid resistance /
- water absorption /
- efflorescence

HTML全文

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 1 氧化物相对含量对AAFA混凝土碳化和加强筋锈蚀的影响^[9]

Figure 1. Influence of relative oxide content on carbonization and reinforcement corrosion of AAFA concrete^[9]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 在自然环境和加速风化条件下老化28 d后的AAFA的扫描电子显微镜照片^[79]

Figure 2. Scanning electron micrograph of AAFA after 28 days of ageing under ambient air and accelerating efflorescence conditions^[79]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 AAFA的吸水率和孔隙率结果^[63]

Table 1. Results of water absorption and porosity of geopolymer paste^[63] %

龄期/d 吸水率孔隙率

7 4.60 11.95
14 4.27 11.02
28 4.16 7.65
90 3.81 3.77

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(82)

LAW D W, ADAM A A, MOLYNEAUX T K, et al. Long term durability properties of class F fly ash geopolymer concrete[J]. Materials and Structures, 2015, 48(3): 721-31. doi: 10.1617/s11527-014-0268-9

DAVIDOVIT S J. Green chemistry and sustainable development solutions[C]//Geopolymer, Green Chemistry and Sustainable Development Solutions: Proceedings of the World Congress Geopolymer 2005. Perancis: Geopolymer Institute, 2005: 9-15.

BADAR M S, KUPWADE-PATIL K, BERNAL S A, et al. Corrosion of steel bars induced by accelerated carbonation in low and high calcium fly ash geopolymer concretes[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 61: 79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.015

BERNAL S A, PROVIS J L, WALKLEY B, et al. Gel nanostructure in alkali-activated binders based on slag and fly ash,and effects of accelerated carbonation[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2013, 53: 127-144. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.06.007

PASUPATHY K, BERNDT M, SANJAYAN J, et al. Durability of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete culvert in a saline environment[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2017, 100: 297-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.07.010

CRIADO M, PALOMO A, FERNÁNDEZ-JIMÉNEZ A. Alkali activation of fly ashes. part 1:effect of curing conditions on the carbonation of the reaction products[J]. Fuel Guildford, 2005, 84(16): 2048-2054. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.03.030

PASUPATHY K, BERNDT M, CASTEL A, et al. Carbonation of a blended slag-fly ash geopolymer concrete in field conditions after 8 years[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 125: 661-669. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.078

KHAN M S H, CASTEL A, NOUSHINI A. Carbonation of a low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete[J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2017, 69(1): 24-34. doi: 10.1680/jmacr.15.00486

WANG Q, DA J, ZHANG C B, et al. Influence of composition on the corrosion of steel bar of reinforced geopolymer concrete[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2012, 1620: 536-541. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.152-154.536

HUANG G, JI Y, LI J, et al. Use of slaked lime and Portland cement to improve the resistance of MSWI bottom ash-GBFS geopolymer concrete against carbonation[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 166: 290-300. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.089

DUAN P, YAN C, LUO W, et al. Effects of adding nano-TiO₂ on compressive strength,drying shrinkage,carbonation and microstructure of fluidized bed fly ash based geopolymer paste[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 106: 115-125. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.095

ADAM A, MOLYNEAUX T, PATNAIKUNI I, et al. Chloride penetration and carbonation in blended OPC-GGBS, alkali activated slag, and fly ash based geopolymer concrete[C]//Proceedings of the Concrete 09, 24th Biennial Conference of Concrete Institute of Australia. Sydney: Concrete Institute of Australia, 2009: 17-19.

ADAM A, MOLYNEAUX T, PATNAIKUNI I, et al. Challenges, opportunities and solutions in structural engineering and construction[M]. Las Vegas: CRC Press, 2010: 563-568.

LI Z G, LI S. Carbonation resistance of fly ash and blast furnace slag based geopolymer concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 163: 668-680. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.127

ZHAO R, YUAN Y, CHENG Z, et al. Freeze-thaw resistance of class F fly ash-based geopolymer concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 222: 474-483. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.166

VÁCHAL T, ŠULC R, SVOBODA P. Freeze-thaw resistance with sodium chloride solution of fly-ash concrete mixtures[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2015, 1124: 137-144. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1124.137

SUN P, WU H C. Chemical and freeze-thaw resistance of fly ash-based inorganic mortars[J]. Fuel, 2013, 111: 740-745. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.070

CAI L, WANG H, FU Y. Freeze–thaw resistance of alkali-slag concrete based on response surface methodology[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 49: 70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.045

SHAHRAJABIAN F, BEHFARNIA K. The effects of nano particles on freeze and thaw resistance of alkali-activated slag concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 176: 172-178. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.033

LI Q, CAI L, FU Y, et al. Fracture properties and response surface methodology model of alkali-slag concrete under freeze–thaw cycles[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 93: 620-626. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.037

LI Q. Fracture theory under freeze-thaw cycles and freeze-thaw resistance of alkali-slag concrete[M]. New York: IntechOpen, 2016: 43-62.

FU Y, CAI L, WU Y. Freeze-thaw cycle test and damage mechanics models of alkali-activated slag concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25(7): 3144-3148. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.006

GIFFORD P M, GILLOTT J E. Freeze-thaw durability of activated blast furnace slag cement concrete[J]. ACI Materials Journal, 1996, 93(3): 242-245.

ALLAHVERDI A, ABADI M, HOSSAIN K, et al. Resistance of chemically-activated high phosphorous slag content cement against freeze–thaw cycles[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2014, 103: 107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.03.012

ZHAO M, ZHANG G, HTET K W, et al. Freeze-thaw durability of red mud slurry-class F fly ash-based geopolymer:Effect of curing conditions[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 215: 381-390. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.235

ZHU H, ZHANG Z, ZHU Y, et al. Durability of alkali-activated fly ash concrete:chloride penetration in pastes and mortars[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 65: 51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.110

HALIM L N, EKAPUTRI J J. The influence of salt water on chloride penetration in geopolymer concrete[J]. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2017: 01002.1-01002.5.

PARTHASARATHY P, HANIF A, SHAO H, et al. microstructural and morphological studies of ordinary portland cement paste and fly ash based geopolymer in the presence of chloride ions[C]//71st RILEM Week and ICACMS 2017-International Conference on Advances in Construction Materials and Systems. Chennai: ACM, 2017: 623-630.

MONTICELLI C, NATALI M, BALBO A, et al. A study on the corrosion of reinforcing bars in alkali-activated fly ash mortars under wet and dry exposures to chloride solutions[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2016, 87: 53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.05.010

CHINDAPRASIRT P, CHALEE W. Effect of sodium hydroxide concentration on chloride penetration and steel corrosion of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete under marine site[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 63: 303-310. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.010

NOUSHINI A, CASTEL A, ALDRED J, et al. Chloride diffusion resistance and chloride binding capacity of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2020, 105: 103290.1-103290.6.

THOMAS R, ARIYACHANDRA E, LEZAMA D, et al. Comparison of chloride permeability methods for alkali-activated concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 165: 104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.016

TENNAKOON C, SHAYAN A, SANJAYAN J G, et al. Chloride ingress and steel corrosion in geopolymer concrete based on long term tests[J]. Materials & Design, 2017, 116: 287-299.

RAJAMANE N, NATARAJA M, LAKSHMANAN N, et al. Rapid chloride permeability test on geopolymer and Portland cement concretes[J]. The Indian Concrete Journal, 2011, 85(10): 21-26.

LEE N, LEE H K. Influence of the slag content on the chloride and sulfuric acid resistances of alkali-activated fly ash/slag paste[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2016, 72: 168-179. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.06.004

YANG T, YAO X, ZHANG Z. Quantification of chloride diffusion in fly ash-slag-based geopolymers by X-ray fluorescence (XRF)[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 69: 109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.031

ISMAIL I, BERNAL S A, PROVIS J L, et al. Influence of fly ash on the water and chloride permeability of alkali-activated slag mortars and concretes[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 48: 1187-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.106

JUN Y, YOON S, OH J. A comparison study for chloride-binding capacity between alkali-activated fly ash and slag in the use of seawater[J]. Applied Sciences, 2017, 7(10): 971-984. doi: 10.3390/app7100971

WALLAH S E, HARDJITO D, SUMAJOUW D M, et al. Performance of fly ash based geopolymer concrete under sulfate and acid exposure[C]//Geopolymer, Green Chemistry and Sustainable Development Solutions: Proceedings of the World Congress Geopolymer 2005. Saint Quentin: Geopolymer Institute, 2005: 153-156.

WALLAH S E, HARDJITO D, SUMAJOUW D M J, et al. Sulfate and acid resistance of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete[C]//Australian Structural Engineering Conference 2005. Sydney: Engineers Australia, 2005: 733-742.

SATA V, SATHONSAOWAPHAK A, CHINDAPRASIRT P. Resistance of lignite bottom ash geopolymer mortar to sulfate and sulfuric acid attack[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2012, 34(5): 700-708. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.010

ARIFFIN M, BHUTTA M, HUSSIN M, et al. Sulfuric acid resistance of blended ash geopolymer concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 43: 80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.018

IZZAT A M, AL BAKRI A M M, KAMARUDIN H, et al. Microstructural analysis of geopolymer and ordinary Portland cement mortar exposed to sulfuric acid[J]. Materiale Plastice, 2013, 50(3): 171-174.

SONG X J, MAROSSZEKY M, BRUNGS M, et al. Durability of fly ash based geopolymer concrete against sulphuric acid attack[C]//International Conference On Durability of Building Materials and Components. Lyon: Panini, 2005: 17-20.

KANNAPIRAN K, SUJATHA T, NAGAN S. Resistance of reinforced geopolymer concrete beams to acid and chloride migration[J]. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013, 14(2): 225-238.

AIKEN T A, KWASNY J, SHA W, et al. Effect of slag content and activator dosage on the resistance of fly ash geopolymer binders to sulfuric acid attack[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 111: 23-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.011

MEHTA A, SIDDIQUE R. Sulfuric acid resistance of fly ash based geopolymer concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 146: 136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.077

DEB P S, SARKER P K, BARBHUIYA S. Sorptivity and acid resistance of ambient-cured geopolymer mortars containing nano-silica[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2016, 72: 235-245. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.06.017

WALLAH S E, HARDJITO D, SUMAJOUW D M J, et al. Geopolymer concrete: a key for better long-term performance and durability[C]//Proc. ICFRC Inter. Conf. on Fiber Composites, High performance Concrete and Smart Materials. Chenni: IOP Publishing, 2004: 527-539.

CHINDAPRASIRT P, RATTANASAK U, TAEBUANHUAD S. Resistance to acid and sulfate solutions of microwave-assisted high calcium fly ash geopolymer[J]. Materials and Structures, 2013, 46(3): 375-381. doi: 10.1617/s11527-012-9907-1

NGUYEN K T, LEE Y H, LEE J, et al. Acid resistance and curing properties for green fly ash-geopolymer concrete[J]. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 2013, 12(2): 317-322. doi: 10.3130/jaabe.12.317

SREEVIDYA V, ANURADHA R, DINAKAR D, et al. Acid resistance of flyash based geopolymer mortar under ambient curing and heat curing[J]. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2012, 4(2): 681-684.

SONG X. Development and performance of class F fly ash based geopolymer concretes against sulphuric acid attack[D]. Sydney: The University of New South Wales, 2007.

TEMUUJIN J, MINJIGMAA A, LEE M, et al. Characterisation of class F fly ash geopolymer pastes immersed in acid and alkaline solutions[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2011, 33(10): 1086-1091. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.08.008

THOKCHOM S, GHOSH P, GHOSH S. Durability of fly ash geopolymer mortars in nitric acid-effect of alkali (Na₂O) content[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2011, 17(3): 393-399. doi: 10.3846/13923730.2011.594225

THOKCHOM S. International Journal of Engineering Innovations and Research[J]. International Journal of Engineering Innovations and Research, 2014, 3(6): 943-947.

THOKCHOM S, GHOSH P, GHOSH S. Resistance of fly ash based geopolymer mortars in sulfuric acid[J]. Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN), 2009, 4(1): 36-40.

THOKCHOM S, GHOSH P, GHOSH S. Effect of Na₂O content on durability of geopolymer mortars in sulphuric acid[J]. World Academy of Science,Engineering and Technology, 2009, 3: 508-513.

BAKHAREV T. Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(4): 658-670. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.005

DUAN P, YAN C, ZHOU W, et al. An investigation of the microstructure and durability of a fluidized bed fly ash-metakaolin geopolymer after heat and acid exposure[J]. Materials & Design, 2015, 74: 125-137.

CHINDAPRASIRT P, PAISITSRISAWAT P, RATTANASAK U. Strength and resistance to sulfate and sulfuric acid of ground fluidized bed combustion fly ash-silica fume alkali-activated composite[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2014, 25(3): 1087-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2014.02.007

LUHAR S, KHANDELWAL U. A study on water absorption and sorptivity of geopolymer concrete[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2015, 2(8): 1-10.

FARHANA Z F, KAMARUDIN H, RAHMAT A, et al. The relationship between water absorption and porosity for geopolymer paste[J]. Materials Science Forum, 2014, 803: 166-172. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.803.166

MISHRA A, CHOUDHARY D, JAIN N, et al. Effect of concentration of alkaline liquid and curing time on strength and water absorption of geopolymer concrete[J]. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2008, 3(1): 14-18.

NAZARI A, SANJAYAN J G. Hybrid effects of alumina and silica nanoparticles on water absorption of geopolymers:application of taguchi approach[J]. Measurement, 2015, 60: 240-246. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.10.004

HUSEIEN G F, MIRZA J, ISMAIL M, et al. The effect of sodium hydroxide molarity and other parameters on water absorption of geopolymer mortars[J]. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2016, 9(48): 1-7.

KUMAR E M, RAMAMURTHY K. Influence of production on the strength,density and water absorption of aerated geopolymer paste and mortar using class F fly ash[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 156: 1137-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.153

NAZARI A, RIAHI S. Experimental investigations and ANFIS prediction of water absorption of geopolymers produced by waste ashes[J]. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2012, 358(1): 40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.08.022

NAZARI A. Experimental study and computer-aided prediction of percentage of water absorption of geopolymers produced by waste fly ash and rice husk bark ash[J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2012, 110: 74-81.

NAZARI A. Artificial neural networks for prediction of percentage of water absorption of geopolymers produced by waste ashes[J]. Bulletin of Materials Science, 2012, 35(6): 1019-1029. doi: 10.1007/s12034-012-0380-9

ZHANG Z, PROVIS J L, MA X, et al. Efflorescence and subflorescence induced microstructural and mechanical evolution in fly ash-based geopolymers[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2018, 92: 165-177. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.06.010

ZHANG Z, PROVIS J L, REID A, et al. Fly ash-based geopolymers:the relationship between composition,pore structure and efflorescence[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2014, 64: 30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.004

GHOSH R, GUPTA S K, KUMAR A, et al. Leaching and efflorescence effects in geopolymer concrete[J]. Journal of Metallurgy and Materials Science, 2018, 60(2): 79-88.

YAO X, YANG T, ZHANG Z. Compressive strength development and shrinkage of alkali-activated fly ash-slag blends associated with efflorescence[J]. Materials and Structures, 2016, 49(7): 2907-2918. doi: 10.1617/s11527-015-0694-3

YAO X, YANG T, ZHANG Z. Fly ash-based geopolymers:effect of slag addition on efflorescence[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Mater. Sci. Ed), 2016, 31(3): 689-694. doi: 10.1007/s11595-016-1430-8

ZHANG Z, WANG H, PROVIS J L, et al. Efflorescence: a critical challenge for geopolymer applications[C]//Concrete Institute of Australia’s Biennial National Conference 2013. Queensland: Concrete Institute of Australia, 2013: 1-10.

ŠKVÁRA F, KOPECKÝ L, MYŠKOVÁ L, et al. Aluminosilicate polymers-influence of elevated temperatures,efflorescence[J]. Ceramics-Silikáty, 2009, 53(4): 276-282.

KIM B, HEO Y E, CHON C M, et al. Influence of Na/Al ratio and curing temperature of geopolymers on efflorescence reduction[J]. Journal of the Korean Institute of Resources Recycling, 2018, 27(6): 59-67.

ZHANG Z, PROVIS J L, WANG H. Critical thinking on efflorescence in alkali activated cement (AAC)[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Performance-based and Life-cycle Structural Engineering. Sydney: Atlantis Press, 2015: 147-153.

LEE S, CHON C M, KIM B. Effect of geopolymer composition and curing conditions on efflorescence in lightweight porous geopolymers[C]//International Conference on Alkali Activated Materials and Geopolymers: Versatile Materials Offering High Performance and Low Emissions. Tomar: Australian Academic Press, 2018: 76-82.

WANG J, ZHOU T, XU D, et al. Effect of nano-silica on the efflorescence of waste based alkali-activated inorganic binder[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 167: 381-390. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.006

XUE X, LIU Y L, DAI J G, et al. Inhibiting efflorescence formation on fly ash-based geopolymer via silane surface modification[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2018, 94: 43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.08.013

施引文献

附加材料(0)

访问统计