重载铁路水泥改良膨胀土工程特性与路用性能

商拥辉; 徐林荣; 刘维正; 陈钊锋

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180871

重载铁路水泥改良膨胀土工程特性与路用性能

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180871

商拥辉^1,2,,
徐林荣^2,3, ,,
刘维正²,
陈钊锋²

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（51078358，U1134207，51778634）；河南省科技攻关计划（202102310264，192102310516）

详细信息

作者简介:
商拥辉（1985—），男，讲师，博士，研究方向为轨道交通类特殊土路基与隧道工程，E-mail：mlpeter@126.com

通讯作者:
徐林荣（1964—），男，教授，博士，研究方向为道路与铁道工程，E-mail：Irxu@csu.edu.cn

中图分类号: V221.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 668
- HTML全文浏览量: 360
- PDF下载量: 15
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-10-10
- 修回日期: 2019-03-22
- 网络出版日期: 2020-04-23
- 刊出日期: 2020-10-01

Engineering Characteristics and Road Performance of Cement-Stabilized Expansive Soil for Heavy Haul Railways

摘要

摘要: 为了探究重载铁路水泥改良膨胀土路基填料的工程特性及路用性能，采用室内动三轴试验、微观结构试验、路基原位动力试验相结合的方法，揭示了膨胀土掺入水泥3%～5%改良前后静态指标与动态指标的变化特征，分析了水泥掺量5%和3%改良膨胀土分别用作重载铁路基床底层及以下路堤填料建设期的工作性能，评估了服役期列车动载作用下路基的动力稳定性. 研究结果表明：膨胀土掺入3%～5%水泥改良后，强度提高同时胀缩性显著降低，水稳定性提高3～4倍；相比重塑素膨胀土，水泥掺量3%～5%改良膨胀土临界动应力提高5～6倍；检测路基压密程度与强度指标满足规范且有较大富裕，监测路基中线地基沉降在铺轨前处于稳定状态；原位动力测试表明列车动载作用下路基的动应力沿深度逐渐衰减，在基床表层与基床底层范围内最大衰减量分别可达40%和80%以上，动应力影响深度是基床设计厚度的1.4～1.8倍，动应力影响深度范围内路基的动应力值远小于同位置填料的临界动应力，运营期路基动力稳定性满足安全服役要求. 研究成果能够为重载铁路水泥改良膨胀土路基精细化建设养修提供理论参考.
- 水泥改良膨胀土 /
- 工程特性 /
- 路用性能 /
- 重载铁路
Abstract: In order to explore the engineering characteristics and road performance of cement-stabilized expansive soil filler when it used as the subgrade filler of heavy haul railways, the dynamic triaxial tests, micro-structure tests and in-situ dynamic tests of subgrade were combined to reveal the variation characteristics of static and dynamic indexes when 3%−5% cement was added into expansive soil. The 5% and 3% modified expansive soil was analyzed in terms of their working performances when used as filler of subgrade bottom and embankment of heavy haul railways, and the dynamic stability of the subgrade in service period was evaluated under dynamic train load. The results show that the mix of 3%−5% cement can increase the strength of expansive soil, significantly reduce the swelling and shrinkage, and increase the water stability by 3−4 times. Compared with remolded expansive soil, the critical dynamic stress of the improved expansive soil with 3%−5% cement is increased by 5−6 times. The compaction degree and strength index of the test subgrade meet the standard with moderate margin. The foundation settlement of the middle line for the test subgrade is in the stable state before rail laying. In-situ dynamic tests show that the dynamic stress of subgrade gradually decreases along with the depth under the action of dynamic train load. The maximum attenuation can reach 40% and 80% respectively in the range of the surface layer and the bottom layer of the subgrade. The influence depth of dynamic stress is 1.4−1.8 times the design thickness of the subgrade. The dynamic stress value of roadbed in the influence depth of dynamic stress is far less than the critical dynamic stress of the filler at the same position, demonstrating that the dynamic stability of the subgrade meets the requirements of safe service.
- cement-stabilized expansive soil /
- engineering characteristics /
- road performance /
- heavy-haul railway

HTML全文

图 1 扫描电镜照片

Figure 1. Scanning electron microscope photos

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 水泥改良膨胀土lg N ～ ε_p曲线

Figure 2. lg N ～ ε_p curves of cement modified expansive soil

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 路基填筑期检测照片

Figure 3. Photos of inspection during subgrade filling period

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 现场检测与监测数据

Figure 4. Field inspection and monitoring data

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 测试元件布置与埋设（DK948 + 275断面）

Figure 5. Test component placement and burial （DK948 + 275 section）

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 测试动应力沿路基深度变化及衰减曲线

Figure 6. Test dynamic stress along subgrade depth and its attenuation curve

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 膨胀土掺水泥改良前后指标对比

Table 1. Indicator comparison of expansive soil before and after being mixed with cement

土样	颗粒含量/%			胀缩特性						强度指标			水稳系数
土样	大于 0.075 mm 粒径	0.075～ 0.005 mm 粒径	小于 0.005 mm 粒径	自由膨胀率	有荷膨胀率（25 kPa）	有荷膨胀率（50 kPa）	膨胀力/kPa	收缩系数	缩限/ %	黏聚力/kPa	内摩擦角/ （°）	7 d 饱和无侧限抗压强度/kPa	压实度90%	压实度95%
天然土样	5.4	50.3	44.3	66	6.80	6.7	129	0.91	10.2	45	21.4	44	0.18	0.25
水泥掺量 3%	20.5	52.2	27.3	32	0.10	< 0	14	0.73	10.2	183	24.6	866	0.81	0.85
水泥掺量 4%	21.1	55.8	23.1	28	0.06	< 0	10	0.62	11.9	201	33.2	1 018	0.84	0.88
水泥掺量 5%	23.0	55.0	22.0	23	< 0	< 0	1	0.52	11.2	291	35.5	1 170	0.83	0.89

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 水泥与石灰改良部分指标结果对比

Table 2. Comparison of cement and lime improvement indicators

土样	自由膨胀率	有荷膨胀率（25 kPa）	有荷膨胀率（50 kPa）	膨胀力/kPa	7 d 饱和无侧限强度/kPa
天然土样	66	6.80	6.7	129	44
水泥掺量 3%	32	0.10	< 0	14	866
石灰掺量 3%	27	< 0	< 0	12	308
水泥掺量 4%	28	0.06	< 0	10	1 018
石灰掺量 4%	24	< 0	< 0	5	477
水泥掺量 5%	23	< 0	< 0	1	1 170
石灰掺量 5%	21	< 0	< 0	1	786

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 试验参数

Table 3. Test parameters

试验工况	频率/Hz	固结比	固结围压/kPa
重塑素膨胀土	1	1.0	15，30，60
	1	2.0	15，30，60
	5	1.0	15，30，60
	5	2.0	15，30，60
3% 水泥改良膨胀土	1	1.0	15，30，60
3% 水泥改良膨胀土	5	1.0	15，30，60
5% 水泥改良膨胀土	1	1.0	15，30，60
5% 水泥改良膨胀土	5	1.0	15，30，60

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 临界动应力

Table 4. Critical dynamic stress

土样类型	围压/kPa	频率/Hz	临界动应力/kPa		土样类型	围压/kPa	频率/Hz	临界动应力/kPa
土样类型	围压/kPa	频率/Hz	范围值	范围平均值	土样类型	围压/kPa	频率/Hz	范围值	范围平均值
重塑素膨胀土	30	1	22.30～31.50	26.90	重塑素膨胀土	30	5	21.60～30.80	26.20
重塑素膨胀土	60	1	28.60～34.90	31.75	重塑素膨胀土	60	5	27.20～33.70	30.45
3% 水泥改良膨胀土	15	1	151.20～185.70	168.45	5% 水泥改良膨胀土	15	1	142.50～208.10	175.30
	30	1	157.50～203.50	180.30		30	1	148.30～233.50	190.90
	60	1	182.30～233.10	207.70		60	1	202.50～249.70	226.10
	15	5	148.80～181.40	165.10		15	5	147.80～199.60	173.70
	30	5	152.30～200.10	176.20		30	5	145.60～231.70	188.65

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 路基不同深处动应力与静应力汇总

Table 5. Summary of dynamic stress and static stress at different subgrade depths

深度/m	静应力/kPa	轴重 21 t		轴重 25 t		轴重 30 t
深度/m	静应力/kPa	动应力/kPa	动、静应力比值	动应力/kPa	动、静应力比值	动应力/kPa	动、静应力比值
0	17.7	81.61	4.61	98.92	5.59	118.46	6.69
0.6	30.0	48.31	1.61	58.12	1.94	71.45	2.38
1.5	46.2	28.14	0.61	31.48	0.68	39.22	0.85
2.5	64.2	16.12	0.25	21.86	0.34	25.52	0.40
3.5	73.2	12.32	0.17	18.92	0.26	21.03	0.29
4.5	91.2	10.67	0.12	15.81	0.17	17.25	0.19

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 路基长期动力稳定性评估

Table 6. Long-term dynamic stability evaluation of subgrade

路基深度/m	路基动应力/kPa		临界动应力/kPa	评估结果
路基深度/m	轴重 25 t	轴重 30 t	临界动应力/kPa	评估结果
0～0.6	58.12～98.92	71.45～118.46	257.00～380.00	稳定
0.6～2.5	21.86～58.12	25.52～71.45	148.80～233.10	稳定
2.5～4.5	15.81～21.86	17.25～25.25	142.50～249.70	稳定

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(19)

LIU Jinglei, SONG Xuguo, DONG Jie, et al. Numerical analysis of reinforcing heavy haul railway subgrade by cement soil piles[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2014, 31(6): 18-23.

冯怀平, 王志鹏, 常建梅, 等.重载铁路基床动力湿化特性试验研究[J].土木工程学报, 2015, 48（增2）: 236-240.

FENG Huaiping, WANG Zhipeng, CHANG Jianmei, et al. Experimental study on dynamic slaking deformation characteristics of heavy haul railway subgrade soil[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48（S2）: 236-240.

铁道第三勘察设计院集团有限公司.重载铁路设计规范: TB 10625—2017[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2017

朱忠林,马伟斌,史存林. 合宁线试验段路堑基床地基动力特性试验研究[J]. 铁道建筑,2007(2): 55-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2007.02.020

ZHU Zhonglin, MA Weibin, SHI Cunlin. Experimental study on dynamic characteristics of foundation of roadbed in Hefei line test section[J]. Railway Construction, 2007(2): 55-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2007.02.020

QIU Mingming, YANG Guolin, SHEN quan. et al. Dynamic behavior of new cutting subgrade structure of expensive soil under train loads coupling with service environment[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(4): 875-890. doi: 10.1007/s11771-017-3490-0

PETRY T M, LITTLE D N. Review of stabilization of clays and expansive soils in pavements and lightly loaded structures history,practice,and future[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2002, 14(6): 447-460.

周葆春,孔令伟,郭爱国. 石灰改良膨胀土的应力-应变-强度特征与本构描述[J]. 岩土力学,2012,33(4): 999-1005. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2012.04.006

ZHOU Baochun, KONG Lingwei, GUO Aiguo. Stress-strain-strength behaviour and constitutive description of lime-treated expansive soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(4): 999-1005. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2012.04.006

边加敏,蒋玲,王保田. 石灰改良膨胀土强度试验[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版),2013,33(2): 38-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8879.2013.02.007

BIAN Jiamin, JIANG Ling, WANG Baotian. Expeteriment on the strength of lime-treated expansive soil[J]. Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 33(2): 38-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8879.2013.02.007

汪明武, 秦帅, 李健, 等.合肥石灰改良膨胀土的非饱和强度试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33（增2）: 4233-4238.

WANG Mingwu, QIN Shuai, LI Jian, et al. Strength of unsaturated lime-treated expansive clay in hefei[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33（S2）: 4233-4238.

刘泽俊,郭亚,蒋洋,等. 浸水条件下石灰改良膨胀土力学性质试验研究[J]. 人民长江,2014,45(19): 55-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2014.19.016

高建伟,余宏明,钱玉智,等. 水泥改良膨胀土强度特性试验研究[J]. 公路,2013,58(12): 165-168. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0451-0712.2013.12.038

GAO Jianwei, YU Hongming, QIAN Yuzhi, et al. Research on strength characteristics of cement modified expansive soil[J]. Highway, 2013, 58(12): 165-168. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0451-0712.2013.12.038

唐云伟,童磊,张国栋,等. 水泥改良膨胀土无侧限抗压强度试验研究[J]. 淮阴工学院学报,2013,22(3): 26-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7961.2013.03.006

TANG Yunwei, TONG Lei, ZHANG Guodong, et al. Test of the unconfined compressive strength of improved cement expansive soil[J]. Journal of Huaiyin Institute of Technology, 2013, 22(3): 26-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7961.2013.03.006

谭文超,陈平货. 水泥改性膨胀土干湿循环特性研究[J]. 湖南交通科技,2014,40(3): 34-35,97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-844X.2014.03.011

TAN Wenchao, CHEN Pinghuo. Study on characteristics of dry and wet cycle of cement modified expansive soil[J]. Hunan Transportation Technology, 2014, 40(3): 34-35,97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-844X.2014.03.011

李星,程谦恭,张金存,等. 干湿循环下高铁路基水泥改良膨胀土动力特性试验研究[J]. 铁道建筑,2016,56(6): 99-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2016.06.27

LI Xing, CHENG Qiangong, ZHANG Jincun, et al. Experimental study on dynamic performance of cement-improved expansive soil in high speed railway subgrade in wetting-drying cycles[J]. Railway Construction, 2016, 56(6): 99-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2016.06.27

刘鹏飞,王开云,翟婉明. 长大列车通过弹性曲线轨道仿真求解方法研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2018,53(1): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.01.001

LIU Pengfei, WANG Kaiyun, ZHAI Wanming. Simulation solution method for long and heavy-haul trains negotiating elastic curved tracks[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(1): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.01.001

杨果林,邱明明,何旭,等. 膨胀土路堑基床新型防水层振动荷载下服役性能试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2016,35(5): 1-7,20.

YANG Guolin, QIU Mingming, HE Xu, et al. Tests for working property of water-proof layer of cutting subgrade in expansive soil under vibrating load[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(5): 1-7,20.

中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司. 铁路工程土工试验规程: TB10102—2010[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2011.

南京水利科学研究院. 土工试验规程: SL237—1999[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 1999.

梅慧浩,冷伍明,刘文劼,等. 持续动荷载作用下基床粗粒土填料累积塑性应变试验研究[J]. 铁道学报,2017,39(2): 119-126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2017.02.017

MEI Huihao, LENG Wuming, LIU Wenjie, et al. Experimental study of on accumulated plastic strain of coarse grained soil filling in subgrade bed under persistent dynamic loading[J]. Railway Construction, 2017, 39(2): 119-126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2017.02.017

施引文献

附加材料(0)

访问统计