• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

Forchheimer方程参数量化及达西—非达西转变临界点

刘建 杨巧艳 白雪 宋凯 骆成杰 洒永芳

刘建, 杨巧艳, 白雪, 宋凯, 骆成杰, 洒永芳. Forchheimer方程参数量化及达西—非达西转变临界点[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(1): 218-224. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180756
引用本文: 刘建, 杨巧艳, 白雪, 宋凯, 骆成杰, 洒永芳. Forchheimer方程参数量化及达西—非达西转变临界点[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(1): 218-224. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180756
LIU Jian, YANG Qiaoyan, BAI Xue, SONG Kai, LUO Chengjie, SA Yongfang. Parameters Quantification of Forchheimer Equation and Critical Point of Transition from Darcian to Non-Darcian Flow[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(1): 218-224. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180756
Citation: LIU Jian, YANG Qiaoyan, BAI Xue, SONG Kai, LUO Chengjie, SA Yongfang. Parameters Quantification of Forchheimer Equation and Critical Point of Transition from Darcian to Non-Darcian Flow[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(1): 218-224. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180756

Forchheimer方程参数量化及达西—非达西转变临界点

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180756
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(41602241,U1734205)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘建(1982—),男,副研究员,研究方向为工程水环境效应及其控制,E-mail:liukai-102@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TU458

Parameters Quantification of Forchheimer Equation and Critical Point of Transition from Darcian to Non-Darcian Flow

  • 摘要: 为探究岩体裂隙中水流的运动规律,基于真实岩体材料建立裂隙渗流模型,对裂隙中的渗流状态及渗流参数进行了研究. 区别于水泥、玻璃、亚克力、钢材等常见非石材类材质,选用天然大理石岩块为基材构建单裂隙渗流模型,开展不同隙宽(0.77、1.18、1.97、2.73 mm)的渗流试验,考察压力损失与流量的关系,探讨达西—非达西流转变的临界点及Forchheimer方程的参数量化问题. 研究结果表明:隙宽为0.77 mm时压力梯度与流量基本呈线性达西关系,随着隙宽和流量的增大,二者呈现出明显的非达西特征,可用Forchheimer方程描述;Forchheimer方程的粘滞项和惯性系数均可表达为隙宽的幂函数,引入雷诺数对惯性项系数进行修正可以减少误差;提出以压力梯度-流量曲线的斜率变化特征来判断达西—非达西流临界点的方法,并在本试验中得到了验证.

     

  • 图 1  试验装置

    Figure 1.  Experimental configurations

    图 2  压力梯度随流量的变化曲线

    Figure 2.  Variation of pressure gradient with flow rate

    图 3  实验值与计算值($- \nabla {P_{1i}} $)比较

    Figure 3.  Comparison between experimental value and calculated value ($ - \nabla {P_{1i}} $)

    图 4  $ - \nabla {P_{1i}} $相对误差分布

    Figure 4.  Relative error distribution of model $ - \nabla {P_{1i}} $

    图 5  试验值与计算值($ - \nabla {P_{2i}}$)比较

    Figure 5.  Comparison between experimental value and calculated value ($- \nabla {P_{2i}} $)

    图 6  $- \nabla {P_{2i}} $相对误差分布

    Figure 6.  Relative error distribution of model $- \nabla {P_{2i}} $

    图 7  不同隙宽K-Q曲线

    Figure 7.  Curves of K-Q for different fracture widths

    表  1  压力梯度与流量的拟合关系式

    Table  1.   Fitted formulas between pressure gradient and flow rate

    类别隙宽/mm拟合方程R2
    线性方程0.77$ { {\rm{ - } }\nabla P_1 = 22.539\;6Q}$0.997 3
    1.18$ { {\rm{ - } }\nabla P_2 = 8.793\;7Q}$0.879 3
    1.97$ { {\rm{ - } }\nabla P_3 = 2.918\;2Q}$0.864 9
    2.73$ { {\rm{ - } }\nabla P_4 = 1.079\;3Q}$0.887 1
    Forchheimer方程0.77$ { {\rm{ - } }\nabla P_1 = 20.722\;7Q + 0.090\;8{Q^2} }$0.999 1
    1.18$ { {\rm{ - } }\nabla P_2 = 1.739\;6Q + 0.176\;1{Q^2} }$0.995 6
    1.97$ { {\rm{ - } }\nabla P_3 = 0.477\;7Q + 0.032\;9{Q^2} }$0.999 6
    2.73$ { {\rm{ - } }\nabla P_4 = 0.310\;9Q + 0.009\;8{Q^2} }$0.997 3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  $ - \nabla {P_{{\rm{1}}i}}$模型参数计算结果

    Table  2.   Calculated parameters of model $ - \nabla {P_{{\rm{1}}i}}$

    c1n1c2n2
    6.848 4−3.091 10.177 1−2.718 7
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  $ - \nabla {P_{{\rm{2}}i}}$模型参数计算结果

    Table  3.   Calculated parameters of model $ - \nabla {P_{{{\rm{2}}i}}}$

    c3n3c4n4
    9.112 2−2.819 10.000 12−3.452 6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  不同隙宽的临界流量及雷诺数

    Table  4.   Values of critical flux and critical Reynolds number for different fracture widths

    隙宽/mm${E_{P{_ {i} } } }$/%临界流量/(ml•s−1临界雷诺数
    0.771823.07614.55
    1.182028.44741.30
    1.972842.111 054.30
    2.733354.091 304.72
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 闻德荪. 工程流体力学: 水力学[M]. 3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010: 225-228.
    赵延林. 裂隙岩体流固耦合响应与工程应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 14-21.
    LOMIZE G M. Flow in fractured rocks[M]. Moscow: Gosenergoizdat, 1951: 27.
    王媛,速宝玉. 单裂隙面渗流特性及等效水力隙宽[J]. 水科学进展,2002,13(1): 61-68. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6791.2002.01.011

    WANG Yuan, SU Baoyu. Research on the behavior of fluid flow in a single fracture and its equivalent hydraulic apecture[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2002, 13(1): 61-68. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6791.2002.01.011
    ZHANG Zhenyu, NEMCIK J, QIAO Qiuqiu, et al. A model for water flow through rock fractures based on friction factor[J]. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 2015, 48(2): 559-571.
    QIAN Jiazhong, CHEN Zhou, ZHAN Hongbin, et al. Experimental study of the effect of roughness and Reynolds number on fluid flow in rough-walled single fractures:a check of local cubic law[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2011, 25(4): 614-622.
    CHERUBINI C, GIASI C I, PASTORE N. Bench scale laboratory tests to analyze non-linear flow in fractured media[J]. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences, 2012, 9(4): 2511-2522.
    SIDIROPOULOU M G, MOUTSOPOULOS K N, TSIHRINTZIS V A. Determination of Forchheimer equation coefficients a and b[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2007, 21(4): 534-554. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6264
    JOHNSON J, BROWN S, STECKMAN H. Fluid flow and mixing in rough-walled fracture intersections[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 2006, 111: 1-16.
    QIAN Jiazhong, ZHAN Hongbin, LUO Shaohe, et al. Experimental evidence of scale-dependent hydraulic conductivity for fully developed turbulent flow in a single fracture[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2007, 339(3): 206-215.
    ZHANG Zhenyu, NEMCIK J. Fluid flow regimes and nonlinear flow characteristics in deformable rock fractures[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 477(1): 139-151.
    ZOU Liangchao, JING Lanru, CVETKOVIC V. Roughness decomposition and nonlinear fluid flow in a single rock fracture[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2015, 75: 102-118.
    QIAN Jiazhong, WANG Mu, ZHANG Yong, et al. Experimental study of the transition from non-Darcian to Darcy behavior for flow through a single fracture[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2015, 27(5): 679-688. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(15)60530-3
    QUINN P M, CHERRY J A, PARKER B L. Quantification of non-Darcian flow observed during packer testing in fractured sedimentary rock[J]. Water Resources Research, 2011, 47(9): 1-15.
    刘日成,李博,蒋宇静,等. 等效水力隙宽和水力梯度对岩体裂隙网络非线性渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学,2016,37(11): 3165-3174.

    LIU Richeng, LI Bo, JIANG Yujing, et al. Effects of equivalent hydraulic aperture and hydraulic gradient on nonlinear seepage properties of rock mass fracture networks[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(11): 3165-3174.
    CHEN Yifeng, ZHOU Jiaqing, HU Shaohua, et al. Evaluation of Forchheimer equation coefficients for non-Darcy flow in deformable rough-walled fractures[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 529: 993-1006. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.021
    刘咏, 钱家忠, 赵卫东. 窄缝裂隙水流雷诺数的实验研究[C]//第七届全国水动力学学术会议暨第十九届全国水动力学研讨会文集(上册). 上海: 海洋出版社, 2005: 475-480
    刘丽红,吴潇潇,颜冰. 岩块尺度达西流非达西流流态转化研究[J]. 科技通报,2017,33(1): 32-38.

    LIU Lihong, WU Xiaoxiao, YAN Bing. Research of transition between the Darcian and non-Darcian flow of rock block scale[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2017, 33(1): 32-38.
    郭建春,庄园,刘超. 考虑非达西效应的酸蚀裂缝流场数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学,2015,36(11): 3315-3321.

    GUO Jianchun, ZHUANG Yuan, LIU Chao. Numerical simulation of flow field of acid etched fractures considering non-Darcy effect[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(11): 3315-3321.
    ZIMMERMAN R W, AL-YAARUBI A, PAIN C C, et al. Non-linear regimes of fluid flow in rock fractures[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2004, 41(3): 384-384.
    FORCHHEIMER P H. FORCHHEIMER P H. Wasserbewegung durch Boden[J]. Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingeneieure, 1901, 45: 1782-1788.
    李加武,崔欣,张宏杰,等. 粗糙度对雷诺数效应的影响[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版),2009,29(2): 56-59.

    LI Jiawu, CUI Xin, ZHANG Hongjie, et al. Influence of surface roughness on Reynolds number effects[J]. Journal of Chang ’an University ( Natural Science Edition), 2009, 29(2): 56-59.
    SCHRAUF T W, EVANS D D. Laboratory studies of gas flow through a single natural fracture[J]. Water Resour. Res., 1986, 22(7): 1038-1050. doi: 10.1029/WR022i007p01038
    ZIMMERMAN R W, BODVARSSON G S. Hydraulic conductivity of rock fractures[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 1996, 23(1): 1-30.
    NOWAMOOZ A, RADILLA G, FOURAR M. Non-Darcian two-phase flow in a transparent replica of a rough-walled rock fracture[J]. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45(7): W07406.
    TZELEPIS V, MOUTSOPOULOS K N, PAPASPYROS J N E, et al. Experimental investigation of flow behavior in smooth and rough artificialfractures[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 521: 108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.054
    王潇. 单裂隙中粗糙元及其疏密度对水流特性影响模拟研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2014.
    ZENG Zhengwen, GRIGG R. A criterion for non-Darcy flow in porous media[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2006, 63(1): 57-69. doi: 10.1007/s11242-005-2720-3
    MACINI P, MESINI E, VIOLA R. Laboratory measurements of non-Darcy flow coefficients in natural and artificial unconsolidated porous media[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2011, 77(3): 365-374.
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  544
  • HTML全文浏览量:  702
  • PDF下载量:  73
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-09-04
  • 修回日期:  2018-10-08
  • 网络出版日期:  2018-12-21
  • 刊出日期:  2020-02-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回