我国抗震规范时程分析中地震动的输入数量

冀昆; 温瑞智; 任叶飞; 尹建华

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180604

我国抗震规范时程分析中地震动的输入数量

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180604

冀昆^1,2,,
温瑞智^1,2, ,,
任叶飞^1,2,
尹建华^1,2

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划（2017YFC1500801）；国家自然科学基金（51908518，51778589）；重点研发项目省级资金资助项目（GX18C011）；山东省高校土木结构防灾减灾协同创新中心基金（XTZ201901）

详细信息

作者简介:
冀昆（1990—），男，助理研究员，研究方向为工程地震，E-mail：jkingn@163.com

通讯作者:
温瑞智（1968—），男，研究员，博士，博士生导师，研究方向为工程地震与地震工程，E-mail：ruizhi@iem.ac.cn

中图分类号: P315.9
计量
- 文章访问数: 645
- HTML全文浏览量: 282
- PDF下载量: 20
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-07-16
- 修回日期: 2019-01-08
- 网络出版日期: 2019-02-25
- 刊出日期: 2020-08-01

Number of Earthquake Ground Motion Inputs for Time-History Analysis of Seismic Design Code in China

JI Kun^{1,2
,},
WEN Ruizhi^{1,2
, ,},
REN Yefei^1,2,
YIN Jianhua^1,2

摘要

摘要: 针对我国现行建筑抗震规范时程分析中地震动输入数量这一问题开展研究. 首先基于结构响应参数服从对数正态分布的理论假设，通过 500次/组蒙特卡罗抽样，模拟了两种不同输入地震动数量方案下的结构响应参数的累积概率分布曲线，表明了3条记录下选择响应最大值和七条记录下选择响应平均值两种输入方案的累积概率分布曲线存在较大差异：前者计算结果期望值要高于理论均值，且结果受响应离散性影响较大；后者计算结果的期望值就是响应理论均值本身，受响应离散性影响较小. 同时对我国某10层平面RC框架进行弹塑性时程分析，结果表明：3条记录选取最大值的输入方案下结构响应预测均值要显著高于增加记录选取数量和控制记录间离散性的其他输入方案；建议在7条及以上强震动记录下的响应均值的基础上，以记录数量与响应离散性作为参数，通过经验修正公式来计算0.84分位值，以得到满足规范要求的84%以上保证率的计算结果，并对该经验修正公式在我国抗震规范下的适用性做了结构数值模拟验证.
- 地震动记录输入 /
- 记录间离散性 /
- 抗震规范 /
- 时程分析
Abstract: This study aims to determine a proper input number of strong motion recordings for structural time-history analysis in China seismic design code. The cumulative probability curves of structural response under different number of records were simulated using 500 times of Monte Carlo samplings based on the assumption that the seismic demand can be represented by a lognormal distribution. Consequently, significant difference was observed in cumulative probability curves between using the maximum response of three ground motions and using the average response of seven or more ground motions: in the former, the expectation of results is much higher than the theoretical mean structural response and is significantly affected by the structural response variation; while in the latter, the expectation of results is close to the theoretical mean structural response. In addition, nonlinear time-history analysis was carried out of a 10-story typical reinforced concrete (RC) frame according to Chinese seismic code. It turns out that using three records has a significantly higher mean M_IDR (maximum inter-story displacement angle) and C_OV (coefficients of variation) compared with other schemes using more records as input and controlling the record-to-record variation. Finally, on the basis of the response mean values of seven or more strong vibration records, an empirical correction formula using record number and structural response variation as parameters was proposed to calculate the 0.84 quantile value to guarantee the assurance rate of 84% required by seismic design code. The applicability of the empirical correction formula under the seismic code of China is verified by numerical simulation of the 10-story RC frame.
- ground motion inputs /
- record-to-record variation /
- seismic design codes /
- time history analysis

HTML全文

图 1 比例系数R的累积概率分布

Figure 1. Cumulative probability distribution curve for R

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同选波数量方案下保证率Q

Figure 2. Q for different ground motion number selection scheme

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 10层平面框架立面尺寸示意

Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the 10 floor RC frame

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 最大层间位移角均值及离散性

Figure 4. The mean and variance of M_IDR

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 3条记录选取最大值方案约束单条记录离散性前后比例系数概率分布曲线对比

Figure 5. Cumulative probability distribution curve for R before and after apply constraint of variation of single record

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 R_χ_，0.84分位值计算原理示意

Figure 6. The R_χ_，0.84 computation scheme diagram

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 我国抗规框架下的满足84%保证率的设计值计算流程

Figure 7. The 84% assurance rate results computation procedure according to Chinese seismic design

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 采用R_χ,084 经验公式修正前后M_DR累积分布曲线对比

Figure 8. The M_DR cumulative curve comparation results using R_χ,084 empirical equation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 梁、柱截面尺寸

Table 1. The section size for column and beam

楼层/层	边、中柱/mm	边跨梁/mm	中跨梁/mm
1～2	600、600	650、250	400、250
3～4	550、550	650、250	400、250
5～8	500、500	650、250	400、250
9～10	450、450	650、250	400、250

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

KWON O S, ELNASHAI A. The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure[J]. Engineering Structures, 2006, 28(2): 289-303. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.010

PADGETT J E, ROCHES D. Sensitivity of seismic response and fragility to parameter uncertainty[J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(12): 1710-1718. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:12(1710)

杨溥,李英民,赖明. 结构时程分析法输入地震波的选择控制指标[J]. 土木工程学报,2000,33(6): 33-37. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2000.06.005

YANG Pu, LI Yingmin, LAI Ming. A new method for selecting input waves for time-history analysis[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2000, 33(6): 33-37. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2000.06.005

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震设计规范: GB 50011—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.

European Committee for Standardization (ECS). Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings[S]. Brussels: [s.n.], 2004.

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings: ASCE/SEI-7—10[S]. Virginia: [s.n.], 2010.

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Minimum design loads for buildings: ASCE/SEI-7—16[S]. Virginia: [s.n.], 2016.

New Zealand Standard (NZS). Structural design actions—part 5: earthquake actions: NZS 1170.5—2004[S]. Wellington: [s.n.], 2004.

BOMMER J J, ACEVEDO A B. The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 8: 43-91.

HANCOCK J, BOMMER J J, STAFFORD P J. Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2008, 37: 1585-1607. doi: 10.1002/eqe.827

REYES J C, KALKAN E. How many records should be used in an ASCE/SEI—7 ground motion scaling procedure?[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2012, 28: 1223-1242. doi: 10.1193/1.4000066

BRADLEY B A. Design seismic demands from seismic response analyses:a probability-based approach[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2011, 27: 213-224. doi: 10.1193/1.3533035

SHOME N, CORNELL C A. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures[D]. San Francisco: Stanford University, 1999.

ASLANI H, MIRANDA E. Probability-based seismic response analysis[J]. Engineering Structures, 2005, 27: 1151-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.015

MANDER J B, DHAKAL R P, MASHIKO N, et al. Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges[J]. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29: 2662-2672. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.015

冀昆,温瑞智,任叶飞. 中国抗震规范强震记录选取的初选条件研究[J]. 防灾减灾与工程学报,2016,36(1): 44-49.

JI Kun, WEN Ruizhi, REN Yefei. Study on the initial strong motion record selection criteria for Chinese seismic code[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2016, 36(1): 44-49.

冀昆,温瑞智,任叶飞. 适用于我国抗震设计规范的天然强震记录选取[J]. 建筑结构学报,2017,38(12): 57-67.

JI Kun, WEN Ruizhi, REN Yefei. Ground motion recordings selection for seismic design code[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2017, 38(12): 57-67.

REINHORN A M, KUNNATH S K, VALLES R E, et al. IDARC2D version 6.1: a computer program for the inelastic damage analysis of buildings[R]. New York: US National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research（NCEER）, 2006: 1-62.

ARAUJO M, MACEDO L, MARQUES M, et al. Code-based record selection methods for seismic performance assessment of buildings[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2016, 45: 129-148. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2620

郑史雄, 陈志强, 陈志伟, 等. 近场多脉冲地震作用下高墩桥梁地震响应分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2019, 54(5): 897-907.

ZHENG Shixiong, CHEN Zhiqiang, CHEN Zhiwei, et al. Seismic response analysis of high-pier bridge under near-fault multiple pulse record excitation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(5): 897-907.

方登甲, 杜永峰, 刘成清, 等. 复杂多层隔震结构近场地震动位移响应特征分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(1): 158-166.

FANG Dengjia, DU Yongfeng, LIU Chengqing, et al. Analysis for displacement response characteristics of complex multi-layer base-Isolated structure under near-field ground motion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(1): 158-166.

施引文献

附加材料(0)

访问统计