• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

使用超强材料的高恢复混凝土柱的抗震试验研究

邵家邦 赵华 赵世春 孙玉平

邵家邦, 赵华, 赵世春, 孙玉平. 使用超强材料的高恢复混凝土柱的抗震试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(2): 323-331. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180453
引用本文: 邵家邦, 赵华, 赵世春, 孙玉平. 使用超强材料的高恢复混凝土柱的抗震试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(2): 323-331. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180453
SHAO Jiabang, ZHAO Hua, ZHAO Shichun, SUN Yuping. Experimental Study on Seismic Performance of RC Columns Made of Ultra-High-Strength Materials[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(2): 323-331. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180453
Citation: SHAO Jiabang, ZHAO Hua, ZHAO Shichun, SUN Yuping. Experimental Study on Seismic Performance of RC Columns Made of Ultra-High-Strength Materials[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(2): 323-331. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180453

使用超强材料的高恢复混凝土柱的抗震试验研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180453
基金项目: 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金博导类(20130184110009)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    邵家邦(1982—),男,讲师,博士研究生,研究方向为结构工程,E-mail:jiabang_shao@163.com

    通讯作者:

    孙玉平(1961—),男,教授,研究方向为结构工程与防灾减灾工程,E-mail:sun@person.kobe-u.ac.jp

  • 中图分类号: TU375.3

Experimental Study on Seismic Performance of RC Columns Made of Ultra-High-Strength Materials

  • 摘要: 最近发生的强震表明,传统的延性结构在超过设计水准强震作用下会产生过大的残余变形而导致结构难以修复. 为保证结构在大变形阶段具有正刚性和较小残余变形,采用低黏结高强度的钢绞线用来代替混凝土柱中的纵向普通钢筋. 为了验证方法的有效性,以钢绞线的布置数量和混凝土的约束方式作为试验变量,对5根缩尺比例为1/3、横截面为250 mm × 250 mm、净高为1 000 mm、剪跨比为2.0和轴压比为0.25的高强混凝土方柱进行拟静力试验. 试验结果表明:低黏高强的钢绞线作为柱纵筋可使混凝土柱的水平承载力在层间位移角达3.5%之前持续保持上升趋势,同时可以有效减少柱的残余变形,并使残余层间位移角控制在相应峰值层间位移角的1/5以下;碳纤维布外包混凝土柱可防止保护层混凝土剥落,进一步减小柱在经历大变形后的残余变形.

     

  • 图 1  试验柱详情

    Figure 1.  Reinforcement details of specimens

    图 2  加载装置

    Figure 2.  Loading condition and apparatus

    图 3  R = 2.00%后试件裂缝开展

    Figure 3.  Crack pattern along unfolded surface after drift ratio of 2.00%

    图 4  柱端最终形态

    Figure 4.  Final mode of end columns

    图 5  水平力-层间位移角滞回曲线

    Figure 5.  Hysteretic curves of lateral force-drift ratio

    图 6  割线刚度对比曲线

    Figure 6.  Comparison of secant stiffness

    图 7  测得的骨架曲线对比

    Figure 7.  Comparison of measured skeleton curves

    图 8  测得的残余层间位移角

    Figure 8.  Measured residual drift ratio of specimens

    图 9  等效黏滞阻尼系数和Rres/(2R)的对比

    Figure 9.  Comparison of equivalent viscous damping coefficient and Rres/(2R)

    图 10  纵筋应变

    Figure 10.  Measured steel strain of longitudinal reinforcement

    表  1  试件参数和变量

    Table  1.   Parameters and variables of test specimens

    试件纵筋类型(和根数)ρ/%箍筋类型箍筋约束方式ρν/%λnVu/kNVu*/Vuεs/%εs*/εs
    1# HRB400(12) 2.10 HRB335 普通箍筋,$ \phi $6@30 2.20 2 0.25 295.8 1.08 0.22 1.16
    2# UHS(4),HRB400(8) 2.05 HRB335 普通箍筋,$ \phi $6@30 2.20 2 0.25 308.8 1.02 0.31 1.21
    3# UHS(8),HRB400(4) 2.00 HRB335 普通箍筋,$ \phi $6@30 2.20 2 0.25 313.4 1.01 0.30 0.95
    4# UHS(8),HRB400(4) 2.00 HRB335 复合箍筋,$ \phi $6@45 2.90 2 0.25 313.4 1.04 0.30 1.32
    5# UHS(8),HRB400(4) 2.00 HRB335 普通箍筋,$ \phi $6@30,CFRP 2.20 2 0.25 333.2 1.06 0.37 1.32
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  混凝土物理力学性质指标

    Table  2.   Physical and mechanical properties of concrete

    fcu,k/
    (N•mm–2
    fck/
    (N•mm–2
    Ec/
    (N•mm–2
    ν/%ρS/
    (kg•m–3
    εP/
    ( × 10–6
    96.8 80.3 4.09 × 104 21.9 2 406 2 4211
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  钢筋物理力学指标

    Table  3.   Physical and mechanical properties of the used steels

    钢筋d/
    mm
    fyk/
    (N•mm–2
    εs/
    %
    ftk/
    (N•mm–2
    Es/
    (N•mm–2
    ξt/
    %
    UHS 12.80 1 760 0.96 1 910 199 610 4.8
    HRB400 11.80 418 0.21 592 204 592 14.0
    HRB335 6.30 316 0.16 501 206 474 11.0
    下载: 导出CSV
  • PRIESTLEY M J N, TAO J R. Seismic response of precast prestressed concrete frames with partially debonded tendons[J]. Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute Journal, 1993, 38(1): 58-69.
    PRIESTLEY M J N, MACRAE G A. Seismic tests of precast beam-to-column joint subassemblages with unbonded tendons[J]. Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute Journal, 1996, 41(1): 64-81.
    ZATAR W A, MUTSUYOSHI H. Residual displacements of concrete bridge piers subjected to near field earthquakes[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2002, 99(6): 740-749.
    汪训流. 配置高强钢绞线无粘结筋混凝土柱复位性能的研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2007.
    高婧,葛继平,林铁良. 干接缝节段拼装桥墩拟静力试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2011,30(4): 211-216. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2011.04.043

    GAO Jing, GE Jiping, LIN Tieliang. Pseudo static test for pre-cast segmental bridge columns with dry joints[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(4): 211-216. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2011.04.043
    郭佳, 辛克贵, 何铭华, 等. 自复位桥梁墩柱结构抗震性能试验研究与分析[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(增刊1): 29-35.

    GUO Jia, XIN Kegui, HE Minghua, et al. Experimental study and analysis on the seismic performance of a self-centering bridge pier[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(S1): 29-35.
    SONG L L, GU O T, GU Y, et al. Experimental study of a self-centering prestressed concrete frame subassembly[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 88: 176-188. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.040
    CUI Y, LU X L, JIANG C. Experimental investigation of tri-axial self-centering reinforced concrete frame structures through shaking table tests[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 132: 684-694. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.066
    WHITE S, PALERMO A. Quasi-static testing of posttensioned nonemulative column-footing connections for bridge piers[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21(6): 04016025-1. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000872
    SHIM C, KOEM C, SONGH H, et al. Seismic performance of repaired severely damaged precast columns with high-fiber reinforced cementitious composites[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(2): 736-746. doi: 10.1007/s12205-017-1414-z
    SUN Y P, TAKEUCHI T, FUNATO Y, et al. Earthquake-resisting properties and evaluation of high performance concrete columns with low residual deformation[C]//Proceedings of the 15th WCEE. [S.l.]: IAEE, 2012: 0282.
    孙玉平,赵世春,赵华. 节能型高恢复性钢筋混凝土柱的抗震性能与评估方法[J]. 土木工程学报,2013,46(5): 105-110.

    SUN Yuping, ZHAO Shichun, ZHAO Hua. Seismic behavior and evaluation of sustainable and resilient concrete columns[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2013, 46(5): 105-110.
    张鑫,韦合,叶列平. 高强钢筋配筋混凝土框架结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2009,42(5): 74-78.

    ZHANG Xin, WEI He, YE Lieping. Experimental study on seismic performance of RC framesreinforced with high-strength steel[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2009, 42(5): 74-78.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. JGJ/T 101—2015建筑抗震试验规程(备案号J 1988—2015)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
    FEMA. Seismic performance assessment of buildings[S]. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington District of Columbia: 2-12-2-13, 2012.
    徐有邻. 各类钢筋粘结锚固性能的分析比较[J]. 福州大学学报(自然科学版), 1996(增刊1): 69-75.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB 50010—2010混凝土结构设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  526
  • HTML全文浏览量:  273
  • PDF下载量:  9
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-05-30
  • 修回日期:  2018-09-20
  • 网络出版日期:  2019-12-03
  • 刊出日期:  2020-04-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回