Processing math: 100%
  • ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

基于拟力法的框架结构静力推覆分析

郝润霞 王谋庭 贾硕 李钢

陈维荣, 胡斌彬, 李奇, 燕雨, 孟翔. 基于动态规划的混合动力有轨电车能量管理方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(5): 903-911. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180470
引用本文: 郝润霞, 王谋庭, 贾硕, 李钢. 基于拟力法的框架结构静力推覆分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(5): 1028-1035. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180100
CHEN Weirong, HU Binbin, LI Qi, YAN Yu, MENG Xiang. Energy Management Method for Hybrid Electric Tram Based on Dynamic Programming Algorithm[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(5): 903-911. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180470
Citation: HAO Runxia, WANG Mouting, JIA Shuo, LI Gang. Static Pushover Analysis of Frame Structure Based on Force Analogy Method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(5): 1028-1035. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180100

基于拟力法的框架结构静力推覆分析

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180100
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(51422802)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    郝润霞(1972—),女,副教授,研究方向为建筑结构抗震减震,电话:13604721753,E-mail:13604721753@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TU311.4

Static Pushover Analysis of Frame Structure Based on Force Analogy Method

  • 摘要: 传统静力推覆分析方法求解结构非线性变形需对结构整体刚度矩阵进行实时地合成与分解,该过程将占用大量计算资源.基于拟力法的纤维梁有限元分析方法进行静力推覆分析,在迭代求解结构非线性变形时,首先对弹性刚度矩阵进行分解,计算出侧向荷载作用下的弹性位移;然后通过反复调用弹性刚度矩阵的分解结果与弹性位移,减少回代计算量;最后采用算法时间复杂度理论定量对比了该方法与传统方法的计算效率,通过一榀八层钢筋混凝土框架结构数值算例,分析比较了两种方法的计算结果与算法时间复杂度. 结果表明:两种方法顶点位移-基底剪力曲线基本吻合,层间位移角与楼层之间的关系曲线也基本一致,两者的最大误差出现在第3层,为3.72%,与传统方法相比,基于拟力法的静力推覆分析方法算法时间复杂度降低了80%,计算效率至少是传统方法的5倍.

     

  • 图 1  基于拟力法的静力推覆分析流程

    Figure 1.  Flow chart for static pushover analysis based on force analogy method

    图 2  钢筋混凝土一榀框架几何尺寸

    Figure 2.  Size of reinforced concrete frame

    图 3  顶点位移-基底剪力

    Figure 3.  Relationship between roof displacement and base shear

    图 4  楼层数与层间位移角关系

    Figure 4.  Relationship between story drift ratio and floors

    图 5  塑性自由度数与顶点位移关系

    Figure 5.  Relationship between number of plastic degrees and roof displacement

    表  1  时间复杂度

    Table  1.   Time complexity

    计算步骤计算项目时间复杂度
    1 (ΔX1)(j)1=Δλ(j)1UF n
    2 Δu0=(KTpr)(j)1(ΔX1)(j) 2αdd
    3 (Kpl)(j)1=(Krr)(j)1(KTpr)(j)1K1e(Kpr)(j)1 βd/2
    4 Δu1=(K1pl)(j)1Δu0 m2dd+8mdd+d
    5 Δu2=(Kpr)(j)1Δu1 2αdd
    6 (ΔX2)(j)1=K1eΔu2 2mnnm2/2+1/2
    7 (ΔX)(j)1=(ΔX1)(j)1+(ΔX2)(j)1 n
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  截面配筋

    Table  2.   Parameters of sections

    楼层中柱边柱
    截面的宽,高/mm配筋/mm2截面的宽,高/mm配筋/mm2截面的宽,高/mm配筋/mm2
    1 300,600 6874 700,700 8758 700,700 11235
    2 300,600 6874 700,700 5024 700,700 5024
    3 300,600 6874 700,700 5024 700,700 5024
    4 300,600 6874 700,700 5024 700,700 5024
    5 300,600 4688 600,600 3786 600,600 3786
    6 300,600 4688 600,600 3786 600,600 3786
    7 300,600 4688 600,600 3786 600,600 3786
    8 300,600 4688 600,600 3786 600,600 3786
     注:配筋指截面中钢筋截面面积.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • FREEMAN S A, NICOLETTI J P, TYRELL J V. Evaluation of existing buildings for seismic risk—a case study of puget sound naval shipyard[C]//Proceedings of 1st U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Berkeley: Earth quake Engineering Research Institution, 1975: 113-122.
    陆新征, 蒋庆, 缪志伟, 等. 建筑抗震弹塑性分析[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015: 84-85.
    韩建平,吕西林,李慧. 基于性能的地震工程研究的新进展及对结构非线性分析的要求[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2007,27(4): 15-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1301.2007.04.003

    HAN Jianping, LÜ Xinlin, LI Hui. State of the art of performance based earthquake engineering and need for structural nonlinear analysis[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2007, 27(4): 15-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1301.2007.04.003
    SAIIDI M, SOZEN M A. Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures[J]. Journal of Structural Division (ASCE), 1981, 107(5): 937-951.
    FAIFAR P, GASPERSIC P. The N2 method for seismic damage analysis of RC buildings[J]. Earthquake Enginerring & Structure Dynamics, 1996, 25(1): 31-46.
    KRAWINKLER H, SENEVIRATNA G D P K. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation[J]. Engineering Structures, 1998, 20(4): 452-464.
    CHOPRA A K, GOEL R K. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structure Dynamics, 2002, 31(3): 561-582.
    GUPTA B, EERI M, KUNNATH S K. Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structres[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2000, 16(2): 367-391. doi: 10.1193/1.1586117
    欧进萍,侯钢领,吴斌. 概率Pushover分析方法及其在结构体系抗震可靠度评估中的应用[J]. 建筑结构学报,2001,22(6): 81-86. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6869.2001.06.013

    OU Jinping, HOU Gangling, WU Bin. Random pushover analysis method and its application in earthquake-resistant reliability evaluation of structural systems[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2001, 22(6): 81-86. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6869.2001.06.013
    朱杰江,吕西林,容柏生. 复杂体型高层结构的推覆分析方法和应用[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2003,23(2): 26-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1301.2003.02.005

    ZHU Jiejiang, LÜ Xilin, RONG Baisheng. Pushover analysis method and its application to RC tall building with complex structural type[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2003, 23(2): 26-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1301.2003.02.005
    黄羽立,陆新征,叶列平,等. 基于多点位移控制的推覆分析算法[J]. 工程力学,2011,28(2): 18-23.

    HUANG Yuli, LU Xinzheng, YE Lieping, et al. A pushover analysis algorithm based on multiple point constrains[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(2): 18-23.
    LIN T H. Theory of inelastic structures[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1968: 43-45.
    WONG K K F, YANG R. Inelastic dynamic response of structures using force analogy method[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1999, 125(10): 1190-1199. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:10(1190)
    李钢,刘啟凤,李宏男. 基于拟力法的MBC非线性控制[J]. 振动工程学报,2010,23(3): 324-332. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4523.2010.03.014

    LI Gang, LIU Qifeng, LI Hongnan. MBC nonlinear control strategy based on force analogy method[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2010, 23(3): 324-332. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4523.2010.03.014
    ZHANG Xin, WONG K K F, WANG Yi. Performance assessment of moment resisting frames during earthquake based on the force analogy method[J]. Engineering structures, 2007, 29(10): 2792-2802.
    李钢,李宏男,李瀛. 基于拟力法的消能减震结构地震反应分析[J]. 土木工程学报,2009,42(4): 55-63. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2009.04.008

    LI Gang, LI Hongnan, LI Ying. Analysis of seismic response of structures with dissipation devices by using fictitious force method[J]. Engineering Structures, 2009, 42(4): 55-63. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2009.04.008
    LI G, LI H. Seismic response analysis of structure with energy dissipation devices using force analogy method[J]. Structure Design of Tall & Special Buildings, 2011, 20(3): 291-313.
    李钢,余丁浩,李宏男. 基于拟力法的纤维梁有限元非线性分析方法[J]. 建筑结构学报,2016,37(9): 61-68.

    LI Gang, YU Dinghao, LI Hongnan. Nonlinear fiber beam element analysis based on force analogy method[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2016, 37(9): 61-68.
    HAGER W W. Updating the inverse of a matrix[J]. Siam Review, 1989, 31(31): 221-239.
    何政, 欧进萍. 钢筋混凝土结构非线性分析[M]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学出版社, 2006: 188-194
    王晓东. 计算机算法设计与分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2007: 1-5.
    李钢,贾硕,李宏男. 基于算法复杂度理论的拟力法计算效率评价[J]. 计算力学学报,2018,35(2): 129-137. doi: 10.7511/jslx20170124001

    LI Gang, JIA Shuo, LI Hongnan. The efficiency evaluation of force analogy method based on the algorithm complexity theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2018, 35(2): 129-137. doi: 10.7511/jslx20170124001
    KIRSCH U. Reanalysis of structures: a unified approach for linear, nonlinear, static and dynamic systems[M]. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2008: 266-269.
    GOLUBG H, VAN LOAN C F. Matrix computations[M]. Forth Edition. Beijing: Posts & Telecom Press, 2014: 12-13.
    KENT D C. Inelastic behaviour of reinforced concrete members with cyclic loading[D]. Christchurch: University of Canterbury, 1969.
    YASSIN M H M. Nonlinear analysis of prestressed concrete structures under monotonic and cyclic loads[D]. California: University of California, Berkeley, 1994.
    侯爽,欧进萍. 结构Pushover分析的侧向力分布及高阶振型影响[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(3): 89-97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1301.2004.03.012

    HOU Shuang, OU Jinping. A study of load pattern selection of pushover analysis and influence of higher modes[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2004, 24(3): 89-97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1301.2004.03.012
    门进杰,史庆轩,周琦. 框架结构基于性能的抗震设防目标和性能指标的量化[J]. 土木工程学报,2008,41(9): 76-82. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2008.09.012

    MEN Jinjie, SHI Qingxuan, ZHOU Qi. Performance-based seismic fortification criterion and quantified performance index for reinforced concrete frame structures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2008, 41(9): 76-82. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2008.09.012
  • 期刊类型引用(3)

    1. 雷鸣,尹思阳,王德玲,张继承,路世伟. 基于静力推覆分析算法的高层建筑混凝土核心筒抗震性能模拟. 吉林大学学报(工学版). 2023(09): 2573-2580 . 百度学术
    2. 谢开仲,梁栋,祝通华,覃悦. 基于静力修正的钢管混凝土拱桥Pushover法. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2023(10): 3896-3907 . 百度学术
    3. 汤根春,朱恺楠. 带坡道结构的计算及设计相关问题研究. 建筑结构. 2022(S2): 241-246 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(10)

  • 加载中
图(5) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  725
  • HTML全文浏览量:  480
  • PDF下载量:  26
  • 被引次数: 13
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-02-14
  • 修回日期:  2020-05-25
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-06-19
  • 刊出日期:  2020-10-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回