• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

厚边U肋正交异性钢桥面的疲劳性能

郑凯锋 衡俊霖 何小军 张宇

郑凯锋, 衡俊霖, 何小军, 张宇. 厚边U肋正交异性钢桥面的疲劳性能[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2019, 54(4): 694-700. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170555
引用本文: 郑凯锋, 衡俊霖, 何小军, 张宇. 厚边U肋正交异性钢桥面的疲劳性能[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2019, 54(4): 694-700. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170555
ZHENG Kaifeng, HENG Junlin, HE Xiaojun, ZHANG Yu. Fatigue Performance of Orthotropic Steel Decks with Thickened Edge U-Ribs[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4): 694-700. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170555
Citation: ZHENG Kaifeng, HENG Junlin, HE Xiaojun, ZHANG Yu. Fatigue Performance of Orthotropic Steel Decks with Thickened Edge U-Ribs[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4): 694-700. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170555

厚边U肋正交异性钢桥面的疲劳性能

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170555
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(51778536)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    郑凯锋(1963—),男,教授,研究方向为钢结构桥梁,E-mail:kfzheng@swjtu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: U441.5;O342

Fatigue Performance of Orthotropic Steel Decks with Thickened Edge U-Ribs

  • 摘要: 新型厚边U肋正交异性钢桥面的应用有望提高顶板与U肋连接焊缝的抗疲劳寿命. 为研究其实际疲劳性能和具体提升机理,对该类钢桥面中顶板与U肋连接焊缝开展了疲劳试验和数值分析. 通过足尺模型疲劳试验,采用名义应力法和热点应力法对常规等厚U肋钢桥面和新型厚边U肋钢桥面进行了对比;在疲劳试验的基础上,建立了精细化有限元模型并通过试验数据验证了其有效性;通过该模型对厚边U肋钢桥面顶板与U肋焊缝的疲劳性能提升机理进行了分析. 结果表明:厚边U肋的使用有效地提高了顶板与U肋连接焊缝的疲劳强度;在焊接负公差存在的情况下,厚边U肋试件对未熔透厚度的变化相对不敏感,从而保障了顶板与U肋连接焊缝疲劳性能的稳定性. 厚边U肋正交异性钢桥面在北京三元桥新桥和成都凤凰山高架桥等工程项目中的应用验证了其抗疲劳的有效性.

     

  • 图 1  试件截面及焊缝处细部构造

    Figure 1.  Illustration of rib-to-deck specimens

    图 2  模型试验方案

    Figure 2.  Test setup

    图 3  应变测点布置

    Figure 3.  Location of strain gauges

    图 4  典型疲劳裂纹(试件TEU-1)

    Figure 4.  Typical fatigue cracks (specimen TEU-1)

    图 5  试件疲劳强度

    Figure 5.  Fatigue strength of the specimens

    图 6  顶板与纵肋焊缝试件有限元模型

    Figure 6.  The FE Model of rib-to-deck specimens

    图 7  不同未熔透厚度下等厚U肋试件等效切口应力云图

    Figure 7.  Contours of effective notch stress of CU specimens with different unpenetrated thickness

    图 8  不同未熔透厚度下厚边U肋等效切口应力云图

    Figure 8.  Contours of effective notch stress of TEU specimens with different unpenetrated thickness

    图 9  不同未熔透厚度下两类试件最大等效切口应力

    Figure 9.  Maximum effective notch stress for CU and TEU specimens with different unpenetrated thickness

    表  1  实际施加荷载

    Table  1.   Applied loads on the specimens

    试件
    编号
    施加
    最小 (Fmin)最大 (Fmax)荷载幅 (FmaxFmin)
    CU-113.039.026.0
    CU-216.549.533.0
    CU-320.060.040.0
    TEU-118.054.536.5
    TEU-219.057.038.0
    TEU-320.060.040.0
    TEU-420.562.041.5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  试验结果汇总

    Table  2.   Summary of the testing results

    试件
    编号
    顶板测点
    应力/MPa
    U肋测点
    应力/MPa
    裂纹贯穿次数
    Ntest/ (× 104次)
    等效疲劳
    强度/MPa
    名义热点名义热点名义热点
    CU-181989910126989108
    CU-2103121109117255112131
    CU-31231491301459195115
    TEU-1114144150126147103130
    TEU-2119146145123162111136
    TEU-3125154140115234132162
    TEU-4129153138122193127157
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  静载作用下试件部分测点静载应力实测值与计算值对比

    Table  3.   Comparison between measured and computed stress under static load

    截面
    位置
    测点
    编号
    CU-3TEU-3
    计算值实测值偏差
    /%
    计算值实测值偏差
    /%
    前端D24L1251232124125–1
    U12L14113081481406
    UB–43–45–4–45–47–4
    中部D24L100105–5100105–5
    U12L145153–51551494
    UB–45–47–4–47–48–2
    下载: 导出CSV
  • CONNOR R, FISHER J, GATTI W, et al. Manual for design, construction, and maintenance of orthotropic steel deck bridges FHWA Report No. FHWA-IF-12-027[R]. New Jersey: Federal Highway Administration, 2012
    FISHER J W, ROY S. Fatigue of steel bridge infrastructure[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering:Maintenance,Management,Life-Cycle Design and Performance, 2011, 7(7): 457-475.
    曾志斌. 正交异性钢桥面板典型疲劳裂纹分类及其原因分析[J]. 钢结构,2011(2): 9-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9963.2011.02.003

    ZENG Zhibin. Classification and reasons of typical fatigue cracks in orthotropic steel deck[J]. Steel Construction, 2011(2): 9-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9963.2011.02.003
    XIAO Z G, YAMADA K, YA S, et al. Stress analyses and fatigue evaluation of rib-to-deck joints in steel orthotropic decks[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2008, 30(8): 1387-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.10.008
    SAMOL Y, YAMADA K, ISHIKAWA T. Fatigue durability of trough rib to deck plate welded detail of some orthotropic steel decks[J]. Kozo Kogaku Ronbunshu A, 2010, 56: 77-90.
    SIM H B, UANG C M, SIKORSKY C. Effects of fabrication procedures on fatigue resistance of welded joints in steel orthotropic decks[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2009, 14(5): 366-373. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:5(366)
    YA S, YAMADA K, SHIKAWA T. Fatigue evaluation of rib-to-deck welded joints of orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18(5): 492-499.
    丁楠,邵旭东. 轻型组合桥面板的疲劳性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2015,48(1): 74-81.

    DING Nan, SHAO Xudong. Study on fatigue performance of light-weighted composite bridge deck[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(1): 74-81.
    郭萍萍, 黄峰. 沌口长江公路大桥主桥顶板U肋内焊工艺及验收规则[R]. 武汉: 武船重工工程股份有限公司, 2016
    郑凯锋, 范文理, 苟超, 等. 700 m跨度钢箱梁厚边U肋正交异性钢桥面足尺模型疲劳试验研究报告[R]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2013
    全国钢标准化技术委员会. 桥梁结构用钢: GB/T 714—2015[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015
    中华人民共和国工业和信息化部. 桥梁钢结构用U形肋冷弯型钢: YB/T 4624—2017 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017
    HOBBACHER A. Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components[M]. [S.l.]: Springer International Publishing, 2016: 24-30
    蒲黔辉,高立强,刘振标,等. 基于热点应力法的正交异性钢桥面板疲劳验算[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2013,48(3): 395-401. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.001

    PU Qianhui, GAO Liqiang, LIU Zhengbiao, et al. Fatigue assessment of orthotropic steel bridge deck based on hot spot stress method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48(3): 395-401. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.001
    卫星,姜苏. 基于断裂力学的钢桥面肋-板接头疲劳寿命预测[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2017,52(1): 16-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.04.006

    WEI Xing, JIANG Su. Fatigue life prediction on rib-to-deck welded joints of steel bridge deck based on LEFM[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 52(1): 16-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.04.006
    中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路钢结构桥梁设计规范: JTG D64—2015[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2015
    CEN. Eurocode 3—design of steel structures—part 2: steel bridges EN 1993-2[S]. Brussels: [s.n.], 2006
    ANSYS Inc. ANSYS mechanical APDL finite element system [CP/OL]. (2015-04-08)[2017-05-01]. http://www.ansys.com
    RADAJ D, SONSINO C M, FRICKE W. Fatigue assessment of welded joints by local approaches[M].2nd edition. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd., 2006: 579-634
    FRICKE W. IIW recommendations for the fatigue assessment of welded structures by notch stress analysis[M]. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd., 2012: 2-41
    崔闯,刘益铭,廖贵星,等. 正交异性钢桥面板焊接接头疲劳评估方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2015,50(6): 1011-1017. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.06.006

    CUI Chuang, LIU Yiming, LIAO Guixing, et al. Fatigue evaluation approaches of welded joint on orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 50(6): 1011-1017. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.06.006
    FISHER J W, BARSOM J M. Evaluation of cracking in the rib-to-deck welds of the Bronx-Whitestone bridge[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2015, 21(3): 04015065-1-04015065-10.
  • 加载中
图(9) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  597
  • HTML全文浏览量:  278
  • PDF下载量:  20
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-07-18
  • 修回日期:  2018-03-20
  • 网络出版日期:  2019-06-12
  • 刊出日期:  2019-08-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回