• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

不同变位模式黏土非极限被动土压力试验研究

夏军武 窦国涛 苏琼 白维刚 袁方

夏军武, 窦国涛, 苏琼, 白维刚, 袁方. 不同变位模式黏土非极限被动土压力试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2019, 54(4): 769-777. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170343
引用本文: 夏军武, 窦国涛, 苏琼, 白维刚, 袁方. 不同变位模式黏土非极限被动土压力试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2019, 54(4): 769-777. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170343
XIA Junwu, DOU Guotao, SU Qiong, BAI Weigang, YUAN Fang. Experiment Study on Non-limit Passive Earth Pressure of Clay under Different Displacement Modes[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4): 769-777. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170343
Citation: XIA Junwu, DOU Guotao, SU Qiong, BAI Weigang, YUAN Fang. Experiment Study on Non-limit Passive Earth Pressure of Clay under Different Displacement Modes[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4): 769-777. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170343

不同变位模式黏土非极限被动土压力试验研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170343
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51274192);河南省科技攻关项目(182102310721);江苏省土木工程环境灾变与结构可靠性重点实验室开放基金项目(JSKY2018YB04)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    夏军武(1967—),女,教授,研究方向为采动区地表变形与建(构)筑物协同作用、采动区建(构)筑物保护及特种结构,E-mail:Xiajunwu100@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TU411

Experiment Study on Non-limit Passive Earth Pressure of Clay under Different Displacement Modes

  • 摘要: 为了揭示墙体平动和转动模式下黏土非极限被动土压力分布规律,采用自制模型箱,进行了墙体平动和转动模式下黏土非极限土压力试验,研究了墙体变位模式以及墙体位移大小对侧土压力的影响规律细化方法,首先进行了室内试验,得到了黏土的基本物理参数,其次进行了模型箱和测试仪器的固定安装,最后进行了挡土墙平移模式(T模式)、绕墙顶转动模式(RT模式)以及绕墙底转动模式(RB模式)3种模式下的土压力试验. 试验结果表明:T模式下,非极限侧土压力沿墙体深度的增加总体趋势增大,局部会有减小趋势,总体接近线性分布,当土体达到极限破坏时,靠近加载墙体处土体表面形成阶梯状错层;RT模式下,侧土压力随墙体的深度总体接近凹曲线分布,上部侧土压力随深度增加较慢,下部侧土压力随深度增加较快,当土体达到极限破坏时,靠近加载墙体处土体表面产生裂纹,模型箱中部土体表面鼓起;RB模式下,侧土压力随墙体的深度的增加先增大后减小,总体接近凸曲线分布,当土体达到极限破坏时,靠近加载墙体处土体表面形成阶梯状错层,其阶梯状错层范围要小于平动模式工况;三者非极限侧土压力合力随着压缩位移的增大而增大,当压缩位移相同时,RT模式下土压力合力与T模式下土压力合力比值在0.53~0.97之间,RB模式下土压力合力与T模式下土压力合力比值在0.65~0.83之间. 结论中是否有可以量化的数据,参考附件模板修改.

     

  • 图 1  模型箱试验装置详图(单位:m)

    Figure 1.  Details of the model box test device (unit:m)

    图 2  加载模式

    Figure 2.  Schematic diagram of loading mode

    图 3  非极限土压力随深度分布(T模式)

    Figure 3.  Non-limit earth pressure with depth distribution (T-mode)

    图 4  非极限土压力随压缩位移分布(T模式)

    Figure 4.  Non-limit earth pressure with compression displacement (T-mode)

    图 5  非极限土压力随深度分布(RT模式)

    Figure 5.  Non-limit earth pressure with depth distribution (RT-mode)

    图 6  非极限土压力随压缩位移分布(RT模式)

    Figure 6.  Non-limit earth pressure with compression displacement (RT-mode)

    图 7  非极限土压力随深度分布(RB模式)

    Figure 7.  Non-limit earth pressure with depth distribution (RB-mode)

    图 8  非极限土压力随压缩位移分布(RB模式)

    Figure 8.  Non-limit earth pressure with compression displacement (RB-mode)

    图 9  3种变位模式下非极限土压力对比

    Figure 9.  Contrast diagram of non-limit earth pressure in three types of translocation modes

    图 10  3种变位模式下非极限土压力三维曲面图

    Figure 10.  3D surface diagram of non-limit earth pressure in three types of translocation modes

    图 11  非极限土压力合力随压缩位移变化

    Figure 11.  Variation of the non-limit soil pressure resultant force with compression displacement

    图 12  黏土非极限土压力合力作用点

    Figure 12.  The action point of the non-limit soil pressure resultant force of clay

    图 13  黏土破坏形态

    Figure 13.  Failure modes of clay

    表  1  土体物理参数

    Table  1.   Physical parameters of soil

    参数数值
    φ/(°)34
    c/kPa5
    γ/(kN•m–3)15.73
    w/%7.97
    ${\rho _{{\rm{d}}\max }}$/(kg•m–3)1 920
    wp/%22.7
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  非极限侧土压力合力比值

    Table  2.   Ratio of non-limit soil pressure resultant force

    压缩位移/mPRT/PTPRB/PT
    0.010.830.75
    0.020.970.83
    0.030.800.73
    0.040.820.69
    0.050.720.68
    0.060.640.66
    0.070.600.66
    0.080.530.65
    0.090.540.68
    下载: 导出CSV
  • BANG S. Active earth pressure behind retaining walls[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(3): 407-412. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:3(407)
    TERZAGHI K. Large retaining wall test[J]. Enginnering News Record, 1934, 112: 58-69.
    TERZAGHI K, PECK R B. Soil mechanics in engineering practice[J]. Soil Science, 2014, 68(5): 149-150
    ROSCOE K H. The influence of strains in soil mechanics[J]. Geotechnique, 1970, 20(2): 129-170. doi: 10.1680/geot.1970.20.2.129
    SHERIF M A, FANG Y, SHERIF R I. Ka and K0 behind rotating and non-yielding walls[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1984, 110(1): 41-56. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:1(41)
    FANG Y, ISHIBASHI I. Static earth pressures with various wall movements[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1986, 120(8): 317-333.
    FANG Y S, CHEN T J, WU B F. Passive earth pressures with various wall movements[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(8): 1307-1323. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:8(1307)
    NAKAI T. Finite element computations for active and passive earth pressure problems of retaining wall[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics & Foundation Engineering, 1985, 25(3): 98-112.
    MATSUZAWA H, HAZARIKA H. Analyses of active earth pressure against rigid retaining wall subjected to different modes of movement[J]. Journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society, 1996, 36(3): 51-65.
    周应英,任美龙. 刚性挡土墙主动土压力的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,1990,12(2): 19-26. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.1990.02.003

    ZHOU Yingying, REN Meilong. An experimental study on active earth pressure behind rigid retaining wall[J]. Chinese Jounal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 12(2): 19-26. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.1990.02.003
    尹紫红,赵丰年,高雪,等. 多量程土压力盒标定工装及试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2018,53(6): 121-129.

    YIN Zihong, ZHAO Fengnian, GAO Xue, et al. Research on calibration equipment for multi-range earth pressure cell and calibration experimentation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(6): 121-129.
    周应英. 桥用刚性挡土墙的土压力模型试验研究[J]. 中外公路,1988,4(1): 48-56.

    ZHOU Yingying. Studies on the earth pressure on a rigid wall of bridge[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 1988, 4(1): 48-56.
    罗强,蔡英,邵启豪. 成都粘土重力式挡土墙的工程试验[J]. 西南交通大学学报,1995,30(3): 270-274.

    LUO Qiang, CAI Ying, SHAO Qihao. Experiment study on gravity retaining wall filled with chengdu clay[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1995, 30(3): 270-274.
    徐日庆,陈页开,杨仲轩. 刚性挡墙被动土压力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2002,24(5): 569-575. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2002.05.006

    XU Riqing, CHEN Yekai, YANG Zhongxuan, et al. Experimental research on the passive earth pressure acting on a rigid wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(5): 569-575. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2002.05.006
    徐日庆,龚慈,魏纲,等. 考虑平动位移效应的刚性挡土墙土压力理论[J]. 浙江大学学报,2005,39(1): 119-122. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2005.01.022

    XU Riqing, GONG Ci, WEI Gang, et al. Theory of earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering translational movement effect[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University, 2005, 39(1): 119-122. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2005.01.022
    陈页开,汪益敏,徐日庆,等. 刚性挡土墙主动土压力数值分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(6): 989-995. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.06.019

    CHEN Yekai, WANG Yimin, XU Riqing, et al. Numerical analyses of active earth pressure on rigid retaining wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(6): 989-995. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.06.019
    龚慈,魏纲,徐日庆. RT模式下刚性挡墙土压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学,2006,27(9): 1588-1592. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2006.09.033

    GONG Ci, WEI Gang, XU Riqing. Earth pressure against rigid retaining wall rotating about top[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(9): 1588-1592. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2006.09.033
    杨庆光, 刘杰, 何杰, 等. 平移模式下挡墙非极限土压力计算方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(增刊1): 3399-3406

    YANG Qingguang, LIU Jie, HE Jie, et al. A method for calculating unlimited earth pressure of retaining wall with translation mode[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(S1): 3399-3406
    许雷挺,张治成,张戎泽,等. 砂土中挡墙不同变位模式主动土压力模型试验[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2017,13(5): 1296-1302.

    XU Leiting, ZHANG Zhicheng, ZHANG Rongze, et al. Model test on active earth pressure in sand induced by the movement of retaining wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2017, 13(5): 1296-1302.
    张刚,孔亮,马良荣,等. 考虑平动位移效应的黏性填土挡土墙土压力计算[J]. 宁夏大学学报,2008,29(4): 325-328. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2328.2008.04.011

    ZHANG Gang, KONG Liang, MA Liangrong, et al. Computational of earth pressure of retaining wall with cohesive backfill considering translational movement effect[J]. Journal of Ningxia University, 2008, 29(4): 325-328. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2328.2008.04.011
    娄培杰. 黏性土填料下考虑土拱效应的非极限主动土压力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学,2015,36(4): 988-994.

    LOU Peijie. A method to calculate the active earth pressure with considering soil arching effect under the nonlimit state of clayey soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(4): 988-994.
    徐日庆,廖斌,吴渐,等. 黏性土的非极限主动土压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学,2013,34(1): 148-154.

    XU Riqing, LIAO Bin, WU Jian, et al. Computational method for active earth pressure of cohesive soil under nonlimit state[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(1): 148-154.
  • 加载中
图(13) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  529
  • HTML全文浏览量:  284
  • PDF下载量:  25
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-05-24
  • 修回日期:  2018-08-10
  • 网络出版日期:  2018-09-05
  • 刊出日期:  2019-08-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回