Instability Properties and Deformation Control Methods of Rocks Surrounding Xigeda Strata
-
摘要: 昔格达地层是一种分布于我国西南地区的河湖相沉积半成岩，具有水稳性差，遇水易泥化、崩解等特点，在隧道开挖中易出现坍塌、围岩大变形等灾害，对隧道安全施工产生不利影响. 基于此，依托攀西地区昔格达地层桐梓林、垭口以及盐边隧道工程，现场取样并进行围岩室内物理力学试验，同时建立不同含水率深浅埋昔格达地层隧道有限元模型，探究不同含水率下昔格达地层隧道围岩的失稳特征，并提出针对昔格达地层隧道施工变形控制工法. 研究结果表明：昔格达地层对水较为敏感，其中浅灰色页岩夹砂岩的物理力学性质受含水率影响最大；当围岩含水率在0～20%之间时，昔格达地层隧道围岩变形呈现递增，但变形较小，自稳性较好，当含水率在20%～25%时，隧道围岩变形增大明显，失稳潜力巨大；在大埋深、高含水率的条件下，隧道仰拱隆起累计变形和掌子面挤出累计变形急剧增大，在拱顶部位，掌子面挤出变形主要发生在上中台阶交界处；针对昔格达地层隧道围岩失稳变形特征，提出在无水和有水状态下的昔格达地层页岩夹砂岩、砂岩夹页岩隧道围岩施工工法.Abstract: Xigeda strata are a type of fluvio-lacustrine deposit with half-diagenesis in southwest China, characterized by bad water stability; the deposits become mud and collapse when they come into contact with water; therefore, disasters are possible during the process of tunnel excavation. Large deformations of the surrounding rocks and collapse are the ill effects during constructions of traffic tunnels. Thus, relying on the Tong Zilin, Ya Kou, and Yan Bian tunnel engineering in the Xigeda formation in the Pan-xi region, and based on the field sampling and indoor laboratory tests of the mechanical properties of the surrounding rocks, finite element models of the shallow and deep Xigeda strata tunnels under different water content were established simultaneously to study the instability properties of the surrounding rocks of Xigeda strata for different water content and to explore the deformation control methods accordingly. The results show that Xigeda formation is sensitive to water, and the light-gray shale embedded with sandstone is most affected by water in its physical and mechanical properties. The deformation of the surrounding rocks increases when the water content ranges from 0% to 25%, but the deformation degree is small. When the water content ranges from 20% to 25%, the degree of deformation increases significantly, and there is increased possibility of instability. Under the conditions of large buried depth and high water content, accumulated deformation of the tunnel invert uplifting and tunnel face extruding increase sharply, followed by accumulated deformation of the vault. The tunnel face extruding deformation mainly occurs in the junction between the upper step and middle step. According to the instability properties of the surrounding rocks of Xigeda strata, construction methods of the surrounding rock with the rock either being shale embedded with sandstone or sandstone embedded with shale are examined for conditions where water is either present or absent.
-
图 2 不同含水率和各级垂直压力下试件的压缩模量
Figure 2. Compressive moduli of specimens with different moisture contents and levels of vertical pressure
图 3 原状围岩试样在不同含水率下的抗剪强度指标
Figure 3. Shear strength index value of the remolded soil samples under different moisture contents
图 6 不同隧道埋深中断面拱顶沉降变形曲线
Figure 6. Settlement deformation curve of the tunnel crown under different burial depths
图 7 隧道拱顶沉降累计变形曲线
Figure 7. Settlement cumulative deformation curve of the tunnel crown
图 8 不同隧道埋深中断面水平收敛变形曲线
Figure 8. Horizontal convergence curve of the tunnel under different burial depths
图 10 不同埋深条件下，隧道仰拱隆起变形曲线
Figure 10. Uplift deformation curve of the inverted arch of tunnel under different burial depths
图 12 不同埋深下的隧道掌子面挤出变形曲线
Figure 12. Extrusion deformation curve of the tunnel face under different burial depths
图 13 昔格达地层隧道围岩变形控制施工工法
Figure 13. Construction control of the surrounding rock deformation for tunnel in Xigeda strata
表 1 5种原状围岩试样最大压缩模量
Table 1. Maximum approximate compression modulus of five kinds of undisturbed soil
围岩种类 最大压缩模量/MPa 最大含水率压缩模量/MPa 占最大压缩模量比例/% 1号 64.60 7.80 12.1 2号 64.17 39.07 60.9 3号 49.48 25.58 51.7 4号 38.56 16.34 42.4 5号 70.59 29.17 41.3 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同含水率条件下的围岩物理力学参数
Table 2. Physical and mechanical parameters of surrounding rocks under different moisture contents
含水率/% 密度/（g•cm–3） 弹性模量/MPa 泊松比 粘聚力/kPa 内摩擦角/（°） 0 1.95 193.89 0.4 343.4 44.5 5 1.95 189.54 0.4 322.8 40.7 10 1.95 184.80 0.4 302.1 36.8 15 1.95 180.06 0.4 281.4 33.0 20 1.95 175.35 0.4 260.7 29.1 25 1.95 121.65 0.4 196.3 24.8 30 1.95 23.43 0.4 75.5 22.8 注：密度对数值模拟结果影响较小，因此，围岩密度均
取室内物理力试验得到的密度平均值1.95 g/cm3.
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 材料物理力学参数
Table 3. Physical and mechanical parameters
名称 弹性模
量/MPa泊松比 粘聚
力/kPa内摩擦角/(°) 密度/
(kg•m–3)初期支护 27.57 0.2 — — 2 500 二次衬砌 32.64 0.2 — — 2 500 仰拱回填区 28.00 0.2 — — 2 300
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 不同埋深隧道掌子面挤出变形最大值
Table 4. Maximum values of extrusion deformation of the tunnel face under different burial depths
隧道埋
深/m挤出变形
最大值/mm位置 增大比率 20 9.04 上中台阶交界处 2.21 50 29.07 上台阶距中台阶较近处 80 68.99 上中台阶交界处 1.37 110 138.06 上中台阶交界处 1.01
下载: 导出CSV
-
巫锡勇,朱宝龙. 重力侵蚀作用下昔格达地层滑坡特征分析[J]. 工程地质学报,2008,16(4): 450-458. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2008.04.003WU Xiyong, ZHU Baolong. Analysis of landslide characteristics in Xigeda strata due to gravitational erosion[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2008, 16(4): 450-458. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2008.04.003 徐则民,刘文连. 昔格达组地层研究中需要注意的若干关键问题[J]. 地学前缘,2011,18(5): 256-270.XU Zemin, LIU Wenlian. Some problems in the study of the genesis of Xigeda formation[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2011, 18(5): 256-270. 向贵府,任光明,聂德新,等. 含水量对昔格达土填料工程地质性质的影响研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2004,12(2): 136-140. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2004.02.004XIANG Guifu, REN Guangning, NIE Dexin, et al. Influence of moisture content on the engineering geological properties of Xigeda soil[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2004, 12(2): 136-140. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2004.02.004 吴兴序,庄卫林,吉随旺,等. 昔格达软岩中灌注桩单桩竖向承载力试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2006,41(6): 669-674. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2006.06.001WU Xingxu, ZHUANG Weilin, JI Suiwang, et al. Field experiment research on bearing capacity of cast in situ piles in Xigeda rock[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006, 41(6): 669-674. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2006.06.001 左永振,张伟,张晓川,等. 昔格达组粉砂岩作为筑坝土料的工程特性研究[J]. 长江科学院院报,2016,33(3): 84-88.ZUO Yongzhen, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Xiaochuan, et al. Engineering properties of Xigeda strata siltstone as the filling material of earth-rock dam[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2016, 33(3): 84-88. 陈林,朱剑. 昔格达滑坡破坏模式及稳定性评价[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护,2015,26(3): 11-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2015.03.003CHEN Lin, ZHU Jian. Deformation mechanism and stability assessment of Xigeda landslide[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2015, 26(3): 11-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2015.03.003 文丽娜,符文熹,程谦恭. 昔格达地层路堤地基稳定性分析[J]. 公路工程,2014,39(6): 103-106,137. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0610.2014.06.024WEN Lina, FU Wenxi, CHENG Qiangong. The foundation stability anslysis of embankment in Xigeda strata[J]. Highway Engineering, 2014, 39(6): 103-106,137. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0610.2014.06.024 周罕,曹平,张科. 昔格达组黏土岩和粉砂岩现场直剪试验研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(10): 3544-3550.ZHOU Han, CAO Ping, ZHANG Ke. In-situ direct shear test on Xigeda formation clay stone and siltstone[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2014, 45(10): 3544-3550. LING S, WU X, LIAO X, et al. Study on the water-rock interaction behavior of Xigeda strata in lamaxi gully, Sichuan Province, China[M]. [S.l.]: Springer International Publishing, 2015: 2107-2111 张家明,徐则民,刘文连. 西昌昔格达粉砂岩动力特性研究[J]. 实验力学,2012,27(6): 741-749.ZHANG Jiaming, XU Zemin, LIU Wenlian. Research of Xichang Xigeda silty sandstone dynamic characteristic[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2012, 27(6): 741-749. 罗运利,刘东升. 昔格达沉积环境演化与回旋地层学研究[J]. 地质学报,2007,73(1): 1-6. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2007.01.001LUO Yunli, LIU Dongsheng. Research of Xigeda formation sedimentary environmental evolution and stratigraphy of the cyclotron[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 73(1): 1-6. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2007.01.001 丁文富,张广泽,宋章. 成昆铁路昔格达地层工程地质特性及对策研究[J]. 铁道工程学报,2017,34(4): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2017.04.001DING Wenfu, ZHANG Guangze, SONG Zhang. Research on the engineering geological characteristics and engineering countermeasures of Xigeda strata of Chengdu-Kunming railway[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2017, 34(4): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2017.04.001 周平,王志杰,徐海岩,等. 考虑含水率的昔格达地层隧道围岩稳定及亚级分级研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2017,50(12): 97-110.ZHOU Ping, WANG Zhijie, XU Haiyan, et al. Stability and sub-classification study on the tunnel surrounding rock of Xigeda strata considering the influence of moisture content[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50(12): 97-110. 王志杰,许瑞宁,何能方. 昔格达组地层大断面隧道变形特征分析[J]. 隧道建设,2016,36(12): 1412-1420. doi: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2016.12.002WANG Zhijie, XU Ruining, HE Nengfang. Study on the deformation regularity of large section tunnels in Xigeda formation strata[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2016, 36(12): 1412-1420. doi: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2016.12.002 王志杰,杨跃. 含水率对昔格达地层大断面隧道初期支护安全性影响研究[J]. 铁道标准设计,2017,61(11): 100-105.WANG Zhijie, YANG Yue. Research on effect of moisture content on initial support safety of large cross-section tunnel in Xigeda formation strata[J]. Railway standard Design, 2017, 61(11): 100-105. 许瑞宁,王志杰. 昔格达组地层大断面隧道施工工法比选分析[J]. 公路,2017,62(1): 231-236.XU Ruining, WANG Zhijie. Comparative analysis on construction methods of large section tunnels in Xigeda formation strata[J]. Highway, 2017, 62(1): 231-236. -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 499
- HTML全文浏览量: 244
- PDF下载量: 32
- 被引次数: 0