Seismic Fragility Analysis of Nepalese Brick-Timber Heritage Structures under Near-Fault Pulse-Like Ground Motions
-
摘要: 为研究近断层脉冲型地震对尼泊尔砖木结构遗产建筑抗震性能的影响,以一栋2层的砖木结构遗产建筑为例,采用等效框架方法,以地面峰值加速度作为地震动强度指标和层间位移角作为结构损伤指标对其进行动力增量分析,确定了结构极限破坏状态,并分别对结构在脉冲型和非脉冲型地震作用下的易损性曲线进行了比较.研究结果表明:砖木遗产建筑在正常使用、生命安全和防止倒塌3种不同极限状态下对应的层间位移角分别为0.06%、0.32%和0.44%;该类建筑在遭遇地震时有较高的概率达到正常使用极限状态,但其超越生命安全和防止倒塌极限状态的概率相对较低;当达到或超过生命安全状态之后,较小的地面峰值加速度增量就可能导致砖木遗产建筑达到防止倒塌状态;与非脉冲型地震动下的结构响应相比,脉冲型地震动下达到正常使用、生命安全和防止倒塌3个极限状态的概率分别高出18.9%、14.3%和12.6%,在震后修复和加固中应对近断层脉冲型地震动的激励特征予以充分考虑.Abstract: To study the influence of near-fault pulse-like ground motions on the seismic performance of masonry-timber heritage structures in Nepal, a two-storey Nepalese masonry-timber structure was selected as a prototype according to the typical seismic damage mode in the Gorkha earthquake. A numerical simulation was established by means of the equivalent-frame model. The peak ground accelerations and inter-storey drift were used as indexes for ground motion intensity and the structural damage, respectively; subsequently, the IDA (incremental dynamic analysis) method was used to determine the ultimate states. Additionally, the seismic fragility curves of the structure subjected to pulse-like and non-pulse-like ground motions were compared. The results indicate that the inter-storey drift corresponding to the immediate occupancy state, life safety state, and collapse prevention state are 0.06%, 0.32%, and 0.44%, respectively. Although it is prone to the immediate occupancy state of the structures according to the damage probability curves, the probability of reaching the life safety state or collapse prevention state is relatively low.However, as the limit of life safety state is reached or exceeded, a slight PGA increment could lead to structural collapse. Further, with respect to the case experiencing non-pulse-like ground motions, the damage probabilities for immediate occupancy state, life safety state, and collapse prevention are to 18.9%, 14.3%, and 12.6% higher than the pulse-like ground motion case, respectively. In addition, due to the sensitivity of Nepalese masonry-timber heritage structures, the effect of pulse-like ground motions should be considered in practical reconstruction and retrofitting projects.
-
SUJAN S, LORENZO C, DOMENICO L, et al. Seismic fragility analysis of existing URM buildings:a study on Kathmandu valley[C]//5th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering COMPDYN. Greece:[s.n.], 2015:4182-4195. 古川愛子,清野純史,谷口仁士,等. ネパール丒カトマンズにお歷史的組積造建造物群の構造分類と地震リスク評価[C]//歷史都市防災論文集.京都:立命館大学,2013:145-152. PARAJULI H R, MASKEY P N, TANIGUCHI H. Vulnerability assessment of the old brick masonry buildings[J]. Disaster Mitigation of Cultural Heritage and Historic Cities, 2012, 6(1):61-66. SHAKYA M, VARUM H, VICENTE R, et al. Seismic sensitivity analysis of the common structural components of Nepalese Pagoda temples[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 12(4):1679-1703. GODA K, KIYOTA T, POKHREL R M, et al. The 2015 Gorkha Nepal earthquake:insights from earthquake damage survey[J]. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2015, 1(8):1-15. 常志旺,翟长海,李爽,等. 近场地震动速度脉冲周期的确定[J]. 土木工程学报,2013(S2):130-134. CHANG Zhiwang, ZHAI Changhai, LI Shuang, et al. Determination of the pulse period for near-fault pulse-like ground motions[J]. China Cival Engineering Journal, 2013(Sup.2):130-134. 易伟建,孙雯. 近场地震下框架剪力墙高层结构地震易损性分析[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报,2015, 32(5):17-24. YI Weijian, SUN Wen. Seismic fragility analysis of frame-wall high-rise structures under near fault ground motions[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2015, 32(5):17-24. 易伟建,茹文恺. 近场地震作用下考虑二阶效应的混凝土框架抗震分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2012, 32(2):106-113. YI Weijian, RU Wenkai. Seismic analysis of concrete frame structures including second order effect subjected to near-field earthquake ground motions[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2012, 32(2):106-113. LIOSSATOU E, FARDIS M N. Near-fault effects on residual displacements of RC structures[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2016, 45:1391-1409. 清华大学、西南交通大学、北京交通大学土木工程结构专家组. 汶川地震建筑震害分析[J]. 建筑结构学报,2008,29(4):1-9. Civil and Structural Groups of Tsinghua University, Southwest Jiaotong University and Beijing Jiaotong University. Analysis on seismic damage of buildings in the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2008, 29(4):1-9. 赵统,张新培,田志鹏. 汶川地震中小学砖木结构教学楼震害特征分析[J]. 建筑技术,2009,40(9):819-821. ZHAO Tong, ZHANG Xinpei, TIAN Zhipeng. Analysis on seismic damage of masonry-timber school building in Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Architecture Technology, 2009, 40(9):819-821. 潘毅,谢丹,袁双,等. 尼泊尔8.1级地震文化遗产建筑震害调查与分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2015,50(6):1039-1046. PAN Yi, XIE Dan, YUAN Shuang, et al. Investigation and analysis of seismic damage to cultural heritage buildings induced by Gorkha Ms 8.1 earthquake[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 50(6):1039-1046. 潘毅,谢丹,袁双,等. 尼泊尔文化遗产建筑震害特征及加固对策——以尼泊尔Ms 8.1级地震中三个杜巴广场为例[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报,2016,48(12):172-182. PAN Yi, XIE Dan, YUAN Shuang, et al. Seismic damages of Nepalese cultural heritage buildings and strengthening measures-case studies on three Durbar Squares in Ms 8.1 Gorkha Earthquake[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016, 48(12):172-182. PARAJULI H R. Determination of mechanical properties of the Kathmandu World Heritage brick masonry buildings[C]//15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE). Lisboa:WCEE, 2012:401-410. PARAJULI H R, KIYONO J, TATSUMI M, et al. Dynamic characteristic investigation of a historical masonry building and surrounding ground in kathmandu[J]. Journal of Disaster Research, 2006, 6(1):26-35. 杨卫忠. 砌体受压本构关系模型[J]. 建筑结构,2008,38(10):80-82. YANG Weizhong. Constitutive relationship model for masonry materials in compression[J]. Building Structure, 2008, 38(10):80-82. 殷圆圆. 芯柱式构造柱约束砌体结构抗震性能评价[D]. 重庆:重庆大学土木工程学院,2011. 陈志勇,祝恩淳,潘景龙. 复杂应力状态下木材力学性能的数值模拟[J]. 计算力学学报,2011,28(4):629-635. CHEN Zhiyong, ZHU Enchun, PAN Jinglong. Numerical simulation of mechanical behaviour of wood under complex stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2011, 28(4):629-635. Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[S]. Washington D. C.:Adobe Press, 2000. The European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 8 design of structures for earthquake resistance part 3:assessment and retrofitting of buildings[S]. Heidelberg:Springer Press, 2014. PASTICIER L, AMADIO C, FRAGIACOMO M. Non-linear seismic analysis and vulnerability evaluation of a masonry building by means of the SAP2000 V.10 code[J]. Earthquake Engineering And Structural Dynamics, 2008, 37(3):467-485. MAGENES G, CALVI G M. In-plane seismic response of brick masonry walls[J]. Earthquake Engineering And Structural Dynamics, 2015, 26(11):1091-1112. PARAJULI H R, KIYONO J, MASKEY P N, et al. Investigations of material properties on old brick masonry buildings of Kathmandu[J]. Disaster Mitigation of Cultural Heritage and Historic Cities, 2011, 5:163-170. CHAMLAGAIN D,DIPENDRA G. Seismic hazard in the himalayan intermontane basins:an example from Kathmandu valley, nepal[C]//Mountain Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction. Kathmandu:Nepal Engineering College, 2015:73-103. CHANG Z W, SUN X D, ZHAI C H, et al. An improved energy-based approach for selecting pulse-like ground motions[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2016, 45(14):2405-2424.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 515
- HTML全文浏览量: 76
- PDF下载量: 64
- 被引次数: 0