G318林芝波密段斜坡地震动力响应及失稳机理

武小菲; 王鹰; 叶唐进; 杨忠; 江宇

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.03.018

G318林芝波密段斜坡地震动力响应及失稳机理

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.03.018

武小菲¹,
王鹰^2,3, ,,
叶唐进^2,3,
杨忠⁴,
江宇²

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（41462012）

陕西省引汉济渭工程科技资助项目（YHJW-KY-007）

详细信息

作者简介:
武小菲(1974—),女,讲师,硕士,研究方向为边坡工程及地质灾害等,E-mail:13658045426@139.com

通讯作者:
王鹰(1969—),男,教授,博士,研究方向为地质工程、地质灾害防治等,E-mail:ywang69@swjtu.edu.cn:

计量
- 文章访问数: 524
- HTML全文浏览量: 63
- PDF下载量: 226
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-12-05
- 刊出日期: 2017-06-25

Seismic Dynamic Response and Instability Mechanism of Slopes in Nyingchi-Bome Section of G318 Highway, Tibet

WU Xiaofei¹,
WANG Ying^{2,3
, ,},
YE Tangjin^2,3,
YANG Zhong⁴,
JIANG Yu²

摘要

摘要: 斜坡地层结构及地震动力响应是斜坡失稳破坏的重要因素.为进一步研究斜坡地震动力响应的差异性及地震动力响应规律，以G318林芝波密段典型斜坡中的四类地层结构斜坡为原型，利用FLAC3D建立斜坡数值分析模型，通过在坡面及坡体设置监测点，输入Kobe地震波，对监测点的应变、水平位移及加速度等动力响应进行分析研究.结果表明：土层-岩层斜坡的坡面PGA（peak ground acceleration，PGA）放大系数随高度增加而增大，且在一定高度存在极值；坡体PGA放大系数与坡高呈线性增加，且千枚岩斜坡PGA放大系数更大，最大可达10.7；岩土接触带两侧，土层与岩层的水平位移差异明显，两者至少相差一个数量级，导致岩土接触带两侧介质变形不协调，这是土层-岩层斜坡在岩土接触带发生滑动的主要原因；不同土层斜坡的水平位移及PGA放大系数也有很大不同，且土层-岩层地层结构斜坡的失稳破坏程度主要受土层类型的控制.
- 斜坡 /
- 地震动力响应 /
- 地层结构 /
- 数值模拟
Abstract: Strata structures and dynamic responses of slopes are significant factors in slope failures. In order to elucidate the dynamic response differences and dynamic response patterns of slopes with different stratum structures, a numerical simulation model of slope with Kobe seismic wave is established in FLAC3D to analyze typical slopes of four types of strata structures in the Nyingchi-Bome section of G318 highway, Tibet. Through this model, dynamic responses of strain, horizontal displacement and acceleration at the monitoring points located in different parts of slopes (on slope surface and in slope body) are calculated and analyzed under the Kobe seismic wave. Results show that in the soil-rock slopes, the amplification factor of peak ground acceleration (PGA) on the slope surface increases with slope height and reaches a maximum at a certain height. The PGA amplification factor of the slope body increases linearly with slope height, with a maximum value of 10.7, and is bigger in phyllitic slopes than other type of slopes. The horizontal displacements of slopes on both sides of the rock-soil contact zone show great differences between soil and rock, even to nearly one order of magnitude. The deformation inconsistency caused by horizontal displacement is the primary reason for sliding in the rock-soil contact zone. Moreover, the horizontal displacement and PGA amplification factors for different soil slopes are obviously different, and the instability of soil-rock slopes is chiefly controlled by soil textures.
- slopes /
- seismic dynamic responses /
- stratum structure /
- numerical simulation

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

汤明高,傅涛,张维科,等. 西藏G318典型地质灾害成因机制及防治对策[J]. 公路交通科技,2012,29(5): 30-36. TANG Minggao, FU Tao, ZHANG Weike, et al. Genetic mechanism of geohazard along national highway 318 in tibet and prevention countermeasure[J]. Journal of Highway and tansportation Research and Development, 2012, 29(5): 30-36.

蒋建平,闫泽丰. 地层结构对地表地震响应的影响研究[J]. 上海国土资源,2013,34(1): 23-26. JIANG Jianping, YAN Zefeng. Influence of stratigraphy on surface seismic response[J]. Shanghai Land Resources, 2013, 34(1): 23-26.

段书苏,姚令侃,郭沉稳. 芦山地震触发崩塌滑坡的优势方向与机理[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2015,50(3): 428-434. DUAN Shusu, YAO Lingkan, GUO Chenwen. Predominant direction and mechanism of landslides triggered by lushan earthquake[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 50(3): 428-434.

STRASSER O F, BOMMER J J. Large-amplitude ground-motion recordings and their interpretations[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 29(10): 1305-1329.

YANG J, YAN X R. Factors affecting site response to multi-directional earthquake loading[J]. Engineering Geology, 2009, 107(3/4): 77-87.

张铎,吴海忠,李家存,等. 国内外地震滑坡研究综述[J]. 地质力学学报,2013,19(3): 225-241. ZHANG Duo, WU Zhonghai, LI Jiacun, et al. An overview on earthquake-induced landslide research[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2013, 19(3): 225-241.

CELEBI M. Topographical and geological amplification determined from strong motion and aftershock records of 3 March 1985 Chile earthquake[J]. Fresenius Zeitschrift Fr Analytische Chemie, 1987, 171(5): 362.

周洪燕. 边坡地震响应及动力稳定性分析[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2013.

许强,刘汉香,邹威,等. 斜坡加速度动力响应特性的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(12): 2420-2428. XU Qiang, LIU Hanxiang, ZOU Wei, et al. Large-scale shaking table test study of acceleration dynamic responses characteristics of slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(12): 2420-2428.

刘汉香,许强,范宣梅. 地震动强度参数对斜坡加速度动力响应规律的影响[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2012,32(2): 41-47. LIU Hanxiang, XU Qiang, FAN Xuanmei. Effects of seismic parameters on acceleration responses of slopes[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2012,32(2): 41-47.

刘汉香,许强,王龙,等. 地震波频率对岩质斜坡加速度动力响应规律的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(1): 125-133. LIU Hanxiang, XU Qiang, WANG Long, et al. Effect of frequency of seismic wave on acceleration response of rock slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(1): 125-133.

刘汉香,许强,侯红娟,等. 岩性及岩体结构对斜坡地震加速度响应的影响[J]. 岩土力学,2013,34(9): 2483-2488. LIU Hanxiang, XU Qiang, HOU Hongjuan. Influence of lithology and rock structure on slope seismic acceleration responses[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(9): 2482-2488.

李祥龙,唐明辉,王立朝. 顺层岩体边坡地震动力破坏离心机试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(4): 729-736. LI Xianglong, TANG Huiming, WANG Lichao. Centrifuge modelling tests on dynamic failure of bedding rock slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(4): 729-736.

祁生文,伍法权,孙进忠. 边坡动力响应规律研究[J]. 中国科学E辑,2003,33(增刊): 28-40.

徐光兴,姚令侃,李朝红,等.边坡地震动力响应规律及地震动参数影响研究.岩土工程学报,2008,30(6): 918-923. XU Guangxing, YAO Lingkan, LI Zhaohong, et al. Dynamic response of slopes under earthquakes and influence of ground motion parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(6): 918-923.

李同录,赵剑丽,李萍. 川藏公路102滑坡群2#滑坡发育特征及稳定性分析[J]. 灾害学,2003,18(4): 41-45. LI Tonglu, ZHAO Jianli, LI Ping. Analysis on the characteristics and stability of the No. 2 landslide of 102 landslide group on Sichuan-Tibet highway[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2003, 18(4): 40-45.

施引文献

附加材料(0)

访问统计