长屿硐天钟形采空硐室结构特点及工程意义

杨丹; 胡卸文; 宋大各; 章璇

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.03.011

长屿硐天钟形采空硐室结构特点及工程意义

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.03.011

杨丹¹,
胡卸文^1, ,,
宋大各¹,
章璇²

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（41372293）

四川省国土资源厅科学研究计划资助项目（KJ-2014-10）

长江学者和创新团队发展计划资助项目（PCSIRT）

详细信息

作者简介:
杨丹(1983—),女,工程师,博士研究生,研究方向为工程地质、地球物理探测,E-mail:happytime827@163.com

通讯作者:
胡卸文(1963—),男,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向为工程地质、环境地质,E-mail:huxiewen@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 535
- HTML全文浏览量: 57
- PDF下载量: 113
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-11-08
- 刊出日期: 2017-06-25

Structural Features and Engineering Application of Bell-Shaped Mining Caverns in Changyu

摘要

摘要: 硐室形状及围岩结构是影响硐室稳定的重要因素.以浙江温岭长屿废弃矿山钟形采空、无支护硐室为研究对象，在勘明采空硐室形状其围岩结构类型和岩石强度的基础上，采用FLAC有限差分方法对不同形状、不同跨高比、不同硐壁倾角的硐室围岩进行了稳定性计算与分析，结果表明：钟形硐室优于矩形、圆形和直墙拱硐室结构，其围岩受拉区面积最小，更能发挥岩体抗压能力强的优点；跨高比越小，围岩受拉区面积越小，硐室越稳定，跨高比1.33时，硐室顶部围岩不出现受拉区，对围岩稳定性比较有利；硐壁倾角对围岩受拉区面积的影响呈先减小后增大的规律，当侧墙倾角70~80之间时，硐室围岩受拉区面积较小，对硐室稳定性最为有利；实际勘查中发现，75%的硐室跨高比小于1.33，60%的侧墙倾角集中在70~80之间.
- 钟型硐室 /
- 硐室结构 /
- 应力分布
Abstract: Cavern shape and surrounding rock structure are the important factors to cavern stability. In this work, the shape, surrounding rock structure, and rock strength of the deserted bell-shaped caverns without support in Changyu, Wenlin, Zhejiang province were investigated. Then the cavern stability with different shapes, span-depth ratios, inclination angles of sidewall was calculated and analyzed utilizing FLAC. It is shown that the bell-shaped cavern is better than other shaped caverns, such as rectangular cavern, circular cavern and a type of cavern with straight wall and top arch, because the tensile stress area of surrounding rock is smallest and the surrounding rock is more stable with high compressive strength. The smaller the span-depth radio, the smaller tensile stress area of surrounding rock and the more stable the cavern chamber. When the span-depth radio is less than 1.33, there is no tensile stress area on the top of the surrounding rock, which is favorable to the surrounding rock stability. With the decreasing of the inclination angle of sidewall, the tensile stress areas first decrease and then increase. When the inclination angle of sidewall ranges between 70 and 80, the tensile stress area of surrounding rock is small, which is favorable to the surrounding rock stability. In site investigation, 75% of the caverns has the span-depth ratio less than 1.33, while 60% of sidewall angles are between 70and 80.
- bell-shaped caverns /
- cavern structure /
- stress distribution

HTML全文

参考文献(22)

蔡美峰,何满朝,刘东燕. 岩石力学与工程[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2002: 55-57.

张飞,郑德超. 非圆形巷道的粘弹性解析解[J]. 包头钢铁学院学报,1994,13(1): 21-25. ZHANG Fei, ZHENG Dechao.The analytic solution of non-circle opening on viscoelastic theories[J]. Journal of Baotou Univerairy of Iron and Steel Technology, 1994, 13(1): 21-25.

朱大勇,钱七虎. 复杂形状洞室围岩应力弹性解析分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(4): 34-36. ZHU Dayong, QIAN Qihu. Elastic solution to stresses of rock masses around openings with complex shape[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1999, 18(4): 34-36.

冯海英,刘德乾,赵鹏燕. 不同断面形式深埋巷道围岩破坏数值模拟分析[J]. 河北工程大学学报:自然科学版,2011,28(3): 26-30. FENG Haiying, LIU Deqian, ZHAO Pengyan. Simulation analysis of surrounding rock damage for deep-buried roadway with different cross-sections[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Engineering: Natural Science Edition, 2011, 28(3): 26-30.

李浩,朱向阳,徐永福,等. 断面形状对隧洞围岩位移和应力的影响分析[J]. 隧道建设,2009,29(1): 38-44. LI Hao, ZHU Xiangyang, XU Yongfu, et al. Influence of tunnel cross-section shape on stress and displacement of surrounding rock[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2009, 29(1): 38-44.

薛玺成,杨万斌. 地下洞室断面形状的优化计算方法[J]. 岩土工程学报,1999,21(2): 144-147. XUE Xicheng, YANG Wanbin. A calculation method for optimizing the shape of section of a tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21(2): 144-147.

杨志法,岳中琦,李丽慧. 龙游石窟大型古地下工程洞室群科学技术问题研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2010:1-324.

李丽慧,杨志法,岳中琦,等. 龙游大型古洞室群变形破坏方式及加固方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(12): 2018-2028. LI Lihuil, YANG Zhifal, YUE Zhongqi, et al. Deformation and failure modes and reinforcement methods of ancient cavern group in Longyou county[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(12): 2018-2028.

李丽慧,杨志法,张路青,等. 关于龙游石窟斜顶设计中工程科学问题的探讨[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(2): 336-343. LI Lihui, YANG Zhifa, ZHANG Luqing, et al. On the engineering scientific problems about the inclined roof design of Longyou grottoes[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(2): 336-343.

杨志法,胡维东,张路青,等. 锦绣黄岩蟠龙洞古地下洞室群的科学发现及初步分析[J]. 工程地质学报,2007,15(3): 322-327. YANG Zhifa, HU Weidong, ZHANG Luqing, et al. Scientific discoveries of Jinxiu-Huangyan Panlongdong ancient underground cave group and prelminary analyses[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2007, 15(3): 322-327.

郭改梅,杨志法,陶波. 龙游牛场古地下洞室群岩柱的长期抗拉强度反演[J]. 工程地质学报,2006,14(4): 449-453. GUO Gaimei, YANG Zhifa, TAO Bo. Back analysis of the long-term tensile strength of a rock pillar in Niuchang ancient underground caverns in Longyou county[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2006, 14(4): 449-453.

杨志法,王思敬,许兵,等. 龙游石窟群工程地质条件分析及保护对策初步研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2000,8(3): 291-295. YANG Zhifa, WANG Sijing, XU Bing, et al. Analysis of the engineering geological conditions of Longyou stone caverns and primary study on the protection strategies[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2000, 8(3): 292-295.

李丽慧,牟会宠,杨志法,等. 龙游大型古地下洞室群 1~5号洞水文地质与工程地质条件研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2005,13(2): 206-211. LI Lihui, MU Huichong, YANG Zhifa, et al. Engineering geological and hydrogeological conditions of No.l-No.5 shallow caverns in Longyou[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2005, 13(2): 206-211.

杨志法,李丽慧,张路青,等. 关于龙游石窟4号洞 4-2号岩柱长期抗剪强度反分析问题的讨论[J]. 工程地质学报,2005,13(1): 62-67. YANG Zhifa, LI Lihui, ZHANG Luqing, et al. On back analysis of long-term shear strength of No.4-2 rock pillar in the No.4 cavern of Longyou caverns[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2005, 13(1): 62-67.

杨志法,李丽慧,潘炜,等. 关于大型古地下工程若干问题的讨论[J]. 科学技术与工程,2003,3(5): 464-466. YANG Zhifa, LI Lihui, PAN Wei, et al. Discussions aboutlarge-scale ancient underground engineerings[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2003, 3(5): 464-466.

HATZOR Y H, TALESNICK M, TSESARSKY M. Continuous and discontinuous stability analysis of the bell-shaped caverns at Bet Guvrin, Israe[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2002, 39(7): 867-886.

中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB5021894工程岩体分级标准[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,1995.

ABOLFAZL A, REZA R. Investigating the effects of lateral stress to vertical stress ratios and caverns shape on the cavern stability and sidewall displacements[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2013, 6: 4811-4819.

TALESNICK M L, HATZOR Y H, TSESARSKY M. The elastic deformability and strength of a high porosity, anisotropic chalk[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2001, 38: 543-555.

MICHAEL T, EREZ G, ELI M. 3-D global-local finite element analysis of shallow underground caverns in soft sedimentary rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics Mining Sciences, 2013, 57: 89-99.

中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. TB 100032005 铁路隧道设计规范[S]. 北京:中国铁道出版社,2005.

中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. JTG D702004 公路隧道设计规范[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2004.

施引文献

附加材料(0)

访问统计