Numerical Experiments of Dynamic Response of Buried Gas Pipeline under the Action of Seismic Waves Induced by Tunnel Blasting
-
摘要: 为合理确定爆破地震作用下埋地输气管道安全振动控制标准,明确管道运行参数对其动力响应的影响规律。以下穿既有输气管道的隧道爆破工程为背景,基于非线性动力有限元模拟方法和正交试验原理进行输气管道动力响应数值试验,按照极差分析方法确定埋地管道直径、厚度、管道埋深、管道与隧道净距、运行内压等5个因素对管道应力与振速响应特征的影响次序。研究结果表明:管道最大主应力峰值主要受管道内压、壁厚影响,并与管道内压呈明显的线性关系;爆破地震作用下运行内压为7 MPa管道的最大主应力峰值为290.73 MPa,其最大拉应变为0.001 4,小于管材的极限弹性应变0.002 3;输气管道的动力响应特征主要与管道的结构有关,爆破地震引起的管道动应力小于管道容许应力的6%;输气管道的最大动应力可采用空管的动态最大主应力峰值与其有压时的静态主应力的叠加值估算。Abstract: In order to reasonably determine the vibration control standard of buried gas transmission pipeline under the action of seismic waves from blasting,it is important to clarify how the operating parameters of pipeline affect its dynamic response. Taking Xiannvyan tunnel blasting project as example (the tunnel passes beneath a buried gas pipeline),and based on the non-linear dynamic finite element method and the principle of the orthogonal experiment,the numerical experiments on the dynamic response of a buried gas pipeline were carried out. Using the range analysis method, five parameters of pipeline including the outside diameter, wall thickness, buried depth, clear distance between pipeline center and tunnel top as well as operating internal pressure were sorted according to their effects on the response characteristics of pipe stress and vibration velocity. The results show that the peak of the maximum principal stress is mainly affected by the operating internal pipeline pressure and wall thickness, which has obviously linear relationship with the operating internal pressure. Under the action of blasting-induced seismic waves, when the operating internal pressure is 7 MPa, the peak of maximum principal stress is 290.73 MPa and the maximum tensile strain is 0.001 4, which is less than the elastic strain limit of gas pipeline 0.002 3. The characteristics of the pipeline dynamic response mainly depend on its structure,and the pipeline dynamic stress caused by blasting vibration is less than 6% of pipeline allowable stress. The maximum dynamic stress of the gas pipeline can be estimated by the superposing the dynamic maximum principal stress of the pipeline without operating pressure and its static principal stress with operating pressure.
-
KOURETZIS G, BOUCKOVALAS G, GANTES C J. Analytical calculation of blast-induced strains to buried pipelines[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 34(10): 1683-1704. NOURZADEH D, TAKADA S, BARGI K. Response of buried pipelines to underground blast loading[C]//5th Civil Engineering Conference in the Asian Region and Australasian Structural Engineering Conference. Sydney: [s.n.], 2010: 233-238. ROBERT B F, WILLIAM N B. Blasting and construction vibrations near existing pipelines: what are appropriate levels[C]//Proceedings of 7th International Pipeline Conference. Calgary: [s.n.], 2008: 519-531. GANSTER M. Controlled hard rock trench blasting close to a buried gas pipeline under pressure[J]. Journal of Explosives Engineering, 2011, 28(1): 8-20. 梁向前,谢明利,冯启,等. 地下管线的爆破振动安全试验与监测[J]. 工程爆破,2009,15(4): 66-68. LIANG Xiangqian, XIE Mingli, FENG Qi, et al. Safety testing and monitoring of blasting vibration on underground pipeline[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2009,15(4): 66-68. 张文虎,魏束强. 天然气管线附近石方爆破的工程实践[J]. 工程爆破,2009,15(3): 46-47. ZHANG Wenhu, WEI Shuqiang. Engineering blasting application in the vicinity of gas pipeline[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2009, 15(3): 46-47. 唐润婷,李鹏飞,苏华友. 桥梁桩基爆破施工对邻近埋地天然气管线的影响[J]. 工程爆破,2011,17(1): 78-81. TANG Runting, LI Pengfei, SU Huayou. Influence of blasting construction of the bridge pile foundation adjacent buried gas pipeline[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2011, 17(1): 78-81. JONG H W, MOON K K, GUN K, et al. Blast-induced dynamic response on the interface of a multilayered pipeline[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2014, 10(1): 80-92. 王飞,王连来,刘广初. 爆炸荷载对天然气管道(空管)的破坏作用研究[J]. 爆破,2006,23(4): 20-24. WANG Fei, WANG Lianlai, LIU Guangchu. Numerical simulation on damage of pipeline(empty) for natural gas under blast loading[J]. Blasting, 2006, 23(4): 20-24. 纪冲,汤晓勇,汤建平,等. 地面爆炸荷载作用下土埋管道的动力响应研究[J]. 天然气与石油,2014,32(6): 1-4. JI Chong, TANG Xiaoyong, TANG Jianping, et al. Dynamic response characters of buried pipeline caused by surface blasting load[J]. Oil and Gas Transportation and Storage, 2014, 32(6): 1-4. 赵长啸,龙源,纪冲,等. 土中爆炸冲击作用下埋地管道动力响应数值模拟研究[C]//中国爆破新技术Ⅲ. 北京:冶金工业出版社,2012: 80-86. 李又绿,姚安林,赵师平,等. 爆炸载荷对埋地输气管道的动力响应和极限载荷分析[J]. 焊管,2009,32(11): 63-69. LI Youl, YAO Anlin, ZHAO Shiping, et al. Analysis on dynamic response and extreme loads if buried gas pipeline under blast loading[J]. Welded Pipe and Tube, 2009, 32(11): 63-69. 刘建民,陈文涛. 爆炸荷载下埋地管道动力响应分析研究[J]. 工程爆破,2008,14(2): 20-24. LIU Jianmin, CHEN Wentao. Dynamic response study of buried pipeline subjected to blast loads[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2008, 14(2): 20-24. 郑爽英,杨立中. 下穿隧道爆破地震作用下埋地输气管道的动力响应规律研究[J]. 爆破,2015,32(4): 69-76. ZHENG Shuangying, YANG Lizhong. Safety evaluation of blasting vibration effect undercrossing tunneling on buried oil pipeline[J]. Blasting, 2015, 32(4): 69-76. 方开泰,马长兴. 正交设计与均匀设计[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2001: 1-17. 董金玉,杨继红,杨国香,等. 基于正交设计的模型试验相似材料的配比试验研究 [J]. 煤炭学报,2012,37(1): 44-49. DONG Jinyu, YANG Jihong, YANG Guoxiang, et al. Research on similar material proportioning test of model test based on orthogonal design[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(1): 44-79. 中华人民共和国行业标准. SY/T 0450-2004 输油(气)钢质管道抗震设计规范[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2004.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 549
- HTML全文浏览量: 83
- PDF下载量: 120
- 被引次数: 0