Wheel-Rail Profile Matching for High Speed Railway with Different Rail Profiles
-
摘要: 为了分析不同钢轨廓形对我国高速铁路轮轨型面匹配的影响,针对高速铁路线路上使用的CHN60、60N和60D钢轨廓形,基于经典迹线法、三维非赫兹滚动接触理论及车辆-轨道耦合动力学,分别研究了不同钢轨廓形与高速车轮LMA型面匹配时的轮轨接触特性和车辆动力学性能。研究结果表明:不同钢轨廓形下,轮轨接触几何关系有较明显的差异;在不同轮对横移量下,CHN60钢轨的轮轨接触应力比另外两种钢轨廓形小;当轮对横移量为6 mm时,CHN60钢轨对应的轮轨接触状态最优,其接触斑面积最大,且接触应力分布较为均匀;不同钢轨廓形对车辆的临界速度及曲线通过能力影响较大,60D钢轨与LMA型面匹配时车辆的临界速度约为763 km/h,为三者中最高,但CHN60钢轨与LMa型面匹配时车辆的曲线通过性能最好,相应的轮轨横向力最大值3.584 kN,轮对横移量最大值3.35 mm,是三者中最小。Abstract: In order to analyze the influence of different rail profiles on the wheel-rail profile matching of high-speed railway in China, the classic track line method, the 3D non-Hertz rolling contact theory and the vehicle-track coupling dynamics are used to address the profile matching issue between the LMA wheel tread and rails with different profiles, such as types CHN60, 60N and 60D, by analyzing the wheel-rail contact characteristics and the vehicle dynamic performance. The results show that the wheel-rail contact geometry relationship differs with different rail profiles. In whatever cases of wheelset lateral displacements, the wheel-rail contact stress in the CHN60 rail will be smaller than that with the other two rail profiles. When the wheelset lateral displacement is 6 mm, an optimal wheel-rail contact state is achieved in the CHN60 rail, in which the contact spot area is the largest and the contact stress distribution is uniform. In addition, rail profile has a big influence on the critical speed and curve passing performance of a vehicle. The critical speed of the vehicle is about 763 km/h when the 60D rail is matched with the LMA wheel tread, which is the highest of the three. The maximum wheelset lateral force and displacement with the CHN60 rail are 3.584 kN and 3.35 mm, respectively, the smallest of the three, implying that the CHN60 rail owns the best curving passing performance.
-
Key words:
- dynamics performance /
- contact geometry /
- rolling contact /
- profile matching
-
徐井芒,王平,曾晓辉,等. 地铁道岔轨顶坡对尖轨磨耗的影响[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版,2014,45(8): 2899-2904. XU Jingmang, WANG Ping, ZENG Xiaohui, et al. Effect of rail top slope on subway switch rail wear[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2014, 45(8): 2899-2904. 曹洋,王平,赵卫华. 基于轮轨接触参数的固定辙叉设计方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2012,47(4): 605-610. CAO Yang, WANG Ping, ZHAO Weihua. Design method for rigid frog based on wheel/rail contact parameters[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 47( 4) : 605-610. 张剑,肖新标,王玉艳,等. 3种高速轮对型面的性能比较[J].铁道学报,2009,31(2): 23-31. ZHANG Jian, XIAO Xinbiao, WANG Yuyan, et al. Comparison of characteristics of three high-speed wheelset profiles[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2009, 31(2): 23-31. 肖广文,肖新标,温泽峰,等. 高速客车车轮轮对动力学性能的比较[J]. 铁道学报,2008,30(6): 29-35. XIAO Guangwen, XIAO Xinbiao, WEN Zefeng, et al. Comparison of dynamic behaviors of wheelsets of high-speed passenger car[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2008, 30(6): 29-35. 米小珍,樊令举,朴明伟,等. 轮轨匹配对高速动车组动力学性能的影响[J]. 大连交通大学学报,2009,30(4): 7-12. MI Xiaozhen, FAN Lingj, PIAO Mingwei, et al. Influences of wheel-rail matching on high-speed EMU dynamical performances[J]. Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University, 2009, 30(4): 7-12. 王开文. 车轮接触点迹线及车轮接触几何参数的计算[J]. 西南交通大学学报,1984(1): 89-98. WANG Kaiwen. The track of wheel contact points and the calculation of wheel/rail geometric contact parameters[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1984(1): 89-98. POLACH O. Characteristic parameters of nonlinear wheel/rail contact geometry[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2010, 48(Sup.): 19-36. 王开云,翟婉明,蔡成标. 轮轨型面及系统参数对轮轨空间接触几何关系的影响[J]. 铁道车辆,2002,40(2): 14-18. WANG Kaiyun, ZHAI Wanming, CAI Chengbiao.Effect of the wheel/rail profile and system parameters on the wheel/rail space contact geometry relation[J]. Rolling Stock, 2002, 40(2): 14-18. British Standards Institution. BS EN 14363: 2005 Railway applications-testing for the acceptance of running characteristic of railway vehicles-testing of running behavior and stationary tests[S]. London: British Standards Institution, 2005. International Union of Railways. UIC code 518 Testing and approval of railway vehicles-safety-track fatigue-ride quality[S]. 3rd ed. Paris: International Union of Railways, 2005. 干锋,戴焕云,高浩,等. 铁道车辆不同踏面等效锥度和轮轨接触关系计算[J]. 铁道学报,2013,35(9): 19-24. GAN Feng, DAI Huanyun, GAO Hao, et al. Calculation of equivalent conicity and wheel-rail contact relationship of different railway vehicle treads[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2013, 35(9): 19-24. GAN Feng, DAI Huanyun, GAO Gao, et al. Wheel-rail wear progression of high speed train with type S1002CN wheel treads[J]. Wear, 2015, 328/329: 569-581. POLACH O, NICKLISCH D. Wheel/rail contact geometry parameters in regard to vehicle behaviourand their alteration with wear[J]. Wear, 2016, 366/367: 200-208. 李霞,温泽峰,金学松. 钢轨轨底坡对LM和LMA两种轮对接触行为的影响[J]. 机械工程学报,2008,44(3): 64-69. LI Xia, WEN Zefeng, JIN Xuesong. Effect of rail cant on the rolling contact behavior of LM and LMA wheelsets[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2008, 44(3): 64-69. 熊嘉阳,邓永权,曹亚博,等. 重载铁路轮轨磨耗及其对安全运行的影响[J].西南交通大学学报,2014,49(2): 302-309. XIONG Jiayang,DENG Yongquan,GAO Yabo,et al. Wheel-rail wear on heavy haul lines and its influences on running stability of trains[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 49(2): 302-309. 王文健,陈明韬,郭俊,等. 高速铁路钢轨打磨技术及其应用[J].西南交通大学学报,2007,42(5): 574-577. WANG Wenjian, CHEN Mingtao, GUO Jun,et al. Rail grinding technique and its application in high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 42(5): 574-577. XU Jingmang, WANG Ping, WANG Li, et al. Effects of profile wear on wheel-rail contact conditions and dynamic interaction of vehicle and turnout[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 8(1): 1-14. 张卫华,李艳,宋冬利. 高速列车运动稳定性设计方法研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2013,48(1): 1-9. ZHANG Weihua, LI Yan, SONG Dongli. Design methods for motion stability of high-speed trains[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48(1): 1-9.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 749
- HTML全文浏览量: 79
- PDF下载量: 261
- 被引次数: 0