• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

宽幅分体箱梁涡振性能及其抑振措施

马存明 王俊鑫 罗楠 李泓玖 廖海黎

马存明, 王俊鑫, 罗楠, 李泓玖, 廖海黎. 宽幅分体箱梁涡振性能及其抑振措施[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2019, 54(4): 724-730. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20161029
引用本文: 马存明, 王俊鑫, 罗楠, 李泓玖, 廖海黎. 宽幅分体箱梁涡振性能及其抑振措施[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2019, 54(4): 724-730. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20161029
MA Cunming, WANG Junxin, LUO Nan, LI Hongjiu, LIAO Haili. Vortex-Induced Vibration Performance and Control Measures of Wide Twin-Box Girder[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4): 724-730. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20161029
Citation: MA Cunming, WANG Junxin, LUO Nan, LI Hongjiu, LIAO Haili. Vortex-Induced Vibration Performance and Control Measures of Wide Twin-Box Girder[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4): 724-730. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20161029

宽幅分体箱梁涡振性能及其抑振措施

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20161029
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51778545,51278435)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    马存明(1976—),男,副教授,博士,研究方向为桥梁风工程,E-mail:mcm@swjtu.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    罗楠(1982—),男,副教授,博士,研究方向为桥梁风工程,E-mail:nanluo@swjtu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: U448.25

Vortex-Induced Vibration Performance and Control Measures of Wide Twin-Box Girder

  • 摘要: 为研究宽幅分体箱梁桥梁涡激振动特性及其相应振动抑制方法,以某主梁总宽度为64.1 m的分体箱梁大跨悬索桥为工程背景,在均匀流场下对1∶70缩尺比节段模型进行了风洞试验. 首先研究了主梁成桥态在0°、± 3°和± 5°五种不同来流攻角下的涡激振动特性;其次,考察了单一气动措施(包括设置水平气动翼板、封闭中央开槽、隔涡网以及检修车轨道导流板),以及各种组合措施对主梁涡激振动的影响,检验了这些措施对主梁颤振性能的影响. 研究结果表明:宽幅分体式双箱梁在5个风攻角下均发生了竖向自由度涡激共振,其中最不利攻角为–3°,竖向振幅最大值为0.69 m,超过《公路桥梁抗风设计规范》限值的70%;设置隔涡网和采用组合气动措施后,较原始主梁,涡振振幅下降50.7%~98.6%;尽管抑振措施使主梁颤振临界风速降低6%~15%,但仍满足抗风设计要求.

     

  • 图 1  宽幅分体箱梁断面(单位:m)

    Figure 1.  Wide twin-box girder section (unit:m)

    图 2  节段模型试验示意

    Figure 2.  Schematic diagram of model test

    图 3  设置水平气动翼板的涡振响应

    Figure 3.  VIV response with the horizontal pneumatic winglet section

    图 4  设置检修车轨道导流板的涡振响应

    Figure 4.  VIV response with guide plate on maintenance rail

    图 5  封槽后的涡振响应

    Figure 5.  VIV with closed central slot

    图 6  设置隔涡网后的涡振试验

    Figure 6.  VIV tests with grids

    图 7  不同气动措施组合下加劲梁的竖向涡振响应

    Figure 7.  Vertical VIV responses with different measure combinations

    表  1  节段模型试验主要参数

    Table  1.   Primary parameters for section model in wind tunnel tests

    振型频率/Hz等效质量/(kg•m–1等效质量惯性矩/(kg•m)阻尼比/%
    实桥模型实桥模型实桥模型
    一阶对称竖弯0.098 92.2549 07320.9810.30~0.40
    一阶对称扭转0.218 24.7329 298 1002.5560.36~0.42
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  原始断面各风攻角下涡振响应

    Table  2.   VIV response of original section at different wind attack angles

    风攻角/(°)最大振幅/m锁定风速/(m•s–1)斯托洛哈数
    +50.32/0.594.16/5.810.106 9
    +30.304.160.106 9
    00.28/0.574.16/5.940.106 9
    –30.33/0.694.26/5.940.104 5
    –50.33/0.644.36/6.160.102 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  气动措施汇总表

    Table  3.   Aerodynamic measures

    方案名称气动措施断面示意
    FA1设置水平气动翼板
    FA2检修车轨道内侧设置导流板
    FA3检修车轨道双侧设置导流板
    FA4封闭中央开槽(上表面)
    FA5封闭中央开槽(下表面)
    FA6封闭中央开槽(上、下表面)
    FA7~AF10设置隔涡网(透风系数分别为 0.25、0.5、0.75、0.83)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  气动措施组合

    Table  4.   Aerodynamic measure combinations

    名称气动措施组合
    ZH1水平气动翼板+中央开槽上表面封闭(FA1+FA4)
    ZH2内侧导流板+中央开槽上表面封闭(FA2+FA4)
    ZH3双侧导流板+中央开槽上表面封闭(FA2+FA4)
    ZH4水平气动翼板+内侧导流板+中央开槽
    上表面封闭(FA1+FA2+FA4)
    ZH5水平气动翼板+双侧导流板+中央开槽
    上表面封闭(FA1+FA3+FA4)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  涡振和颤振试验结果

    Table  5.   Test results of VIV and flutter

    工况涡振振幅/m改变幅度/%是否符合《英规》是否符合《公规》颤振临界风速/(m•s–1
    M00.69NN99.0
    FA10.66–4.3NN97.3
    FA20.71+2.9NN99.5
    FA30.70+1.4NN99.5
    FA40.46–33.3YN83.4
    FA50.55–20.3NN86.7
    FA60.58–15.9NN76.5
    FA70.27–60.9YY93.0
    FA80.01–98.6YY90.2
    FA90.23–66.7YY86.3
    FA100.34–50.7YY84.2
    ZH10.07–89.6YY86.4
    ZH20.17–75.4YY85.7
    ZH30.20–71.1YY85.6
    ZH40.01–98.6YY86.6
    ZH50.01–98.6YY87.0
      注:表中给出的颤振临界风速均为最不利攻角下主梁断面的颤振临界风速.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 杨詠昕. 大跨度桥梁二维颤振机理及其应用研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2002
    曹丰产. 桥梁断面中间开槽对颤振稳定性的影响[J]. 同济大学学报,2002,30(5): 551-556. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2002.05.005

    CAO Fengchan. Influence of central slot on bridge box girder’s flutter instability[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2002, 30(5): 551-556. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2002.05.005
    SATO H, KUSUHARA S, OGI K, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of super long-span bridges with slotted box girder[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2000, 88(2): 297-306.
    艾国柱,夏华日希. 悬索桥的加劲桁架——明石海峡大桥加劲桁架和加劲箱梁的比选[J]. 国外桥梁,2000,4: 15-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7767.2000.04.004
    LAROSE G L, LARSEN S V, LARSEN A, et al Sectional model experiments at high reynolds number for the deck of a 1 018 m span cable-stayed bridge[C]. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Wind Engineering. Lubbock: [s. n.], 2003: 373-380
    张伟,魏志刚,杨詠昕,等. 基于高低雷诺数试验的分离双箱涡振性能对比[J]. 同济大学学报,2008,36(1): 6-11. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2008.01.002

    ZHANG Wei, WEI Zhigang, YANG Yongxin, et al. Comparison and analysis of vortex induced vibration for twin-box bridge section based on experiments in different reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2008, 36(1): 6-11. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2008.01.002
    刘君,廖海黎,万嘉伟,等. 检修车轨道导流板对流线型箱梁涡振的影响[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2015,50(5): 1-7.

    LIU Jun, LIAO Haili, WAN Jiawei, et al. Effect of guide vane beside maintenance rail on vortex-induced vibration of streamlined box girder[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 50(5): 1-7.
    李翠娟,李永乐,强士中. 分离式双箱主梁断面气动优化措施研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2015,48(11): 55-60.

    LI Cuijuan, LI Yongle, QIANG Shizhong. Measures of aerodynamic optimization for separated twin-girder decks[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(11): 55-60.
    廖海黎,王昌将. 西堠门大桥成桥及施工状态下的空气动力特性研究[J]. 公路,2009,1: 24-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3897.2009.17.001
    KWOK K C S, QIN X R, FOK C H, et al. Wind-induced pressures around a sectional twin-deck bridge model:effects of gap-width on the aerodynamic forces and vortex shedding mechanisms[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2012, 110: 50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2012.07.010
    杨婷,周志勇. 中央开槽箱梁涡激共振特性及抑振措施机理研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2015,34(10): 76-83.

    YANG Ting, ZHOU Zhiyong. Vortex-induced resonance characteristics and anti-vibration measures’ mechanism of central-slotted box girders[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(10): 76-83.
    何晗欣,李加武,周建龙. 中央开槽箱形断面斜拉桥的涡激振动试验与分析[J]. 桥梁建设,2012,42(2): 34-40.

    HE Hanxin, LI Jiawu, ZHOU Jianlong. Testing and analysis of vortex-excited vibration of central slotted box section cable-stayed bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2012, 42(2): 34-40.
    王骑,林道锦,廖海黎,等. 分体式钢箱梁涡激振动特性及制振措施风洞试验研究[J]. 公路,2013(7): 294-299. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0451-0712.2013.07.067

    WANG Qi, LIN Daojin, LIAO Haili, et al. Investigation on the vortex-induced vibration and aerodynamic countermeasures of twin box bridge by wind tunnel tests[J]. Highway, 2013(7): 294-299. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0451-0712.2013.07.067
    LAIMA Shujin, LI hui, CHEN Wenli, et al. Investigation and control of vortex-induced vibration of twin box girders[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2013, 39: 205-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.10.009
    杨詠昕,周锐,葛耀君. 大跨度分体箱梁桥梁涡振性能及其控制[J]. 土木工程学报,2015,47(12): 107-114.

    YANG Yongxin, ZHOU Rui, GE Yaojun. Vortex-induced vibration and its control for long-span bridges with twin-box girder[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 47(12): 107-114.
    中华人民共和国交通部. 公路桥梁抗风设计规范: JTG D60-01—2004[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2004
    Transport Research Laboratory. Design manual for roads and bridges, part 3: Design rules for aerodynamic effects on bridge: BD 49/01[S]. Wokingharm: Crowthorne House, 2001
    李志国,王骑,伍波,等. 不同攻角下扁平箱梁颤振机理[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2018,53(4): 687-695. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.04.004

    LI Zhiguo, WANG Qi, WU Bo, et al. Flutter mechanism of flat box girder under different attack angles[J]. Journal of Southest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(4): 687-695. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.04.004
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  553
  • HTML全文浏览量:  230
  • PDF下载量:  29
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-10-29
  • 修回日期:  2018-09-07
  • 网络出版日期:  2018-10-15
  • 刊出日期:  2019-08-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回