Variation of Horizontal Arch Height of Granite Residual Soil Slope in Vertical Direction
-
摘要: 边坡抗滑桩土拱高度决定了桩及桩间措施的受力分配。本文研究土拱高度沿桩长方向的变化,为边坡抗滑桩及桩间措施的精细化设计提供理论基础。首先采用数值模拟技术,研究土拱高度沿桩深方向的变化规律;继而结合理论分析,建立桩间土拱的力学模型,并提出可考虑埋置深度的桩间土拱高度计算方法。研究结果表明,土拱高度在桩顶及以下不同深度处变化明显,滑面以上桩顶以下4.5m范围内有土拱,滑面以下可不考虑土拱影响。Abstract: Soil arch height of slope anti-slide pile determines the stress distribution of the pile and pile measures. The paper study the variation of soil arch height along the length of the pile, which could provide a theoretical basis for the precise design of slope anti-slide pile and measures between the pile and the pile. Firstly, the numerical simulation technology is adopted to explore the variation law of soil arch height along the direction of pile depth. Combined with theoretical analysis, the mechanical model of soil arch between piles was established. A method for calculating the height of soil arch between piles with embedded depth was proposed. The results show that the soil arch height varies significantly at different depths from the pile top. In the range of 4.5 m above sliding surface and under the pile top, the soil arch appears, while below the sliding surface, the effect of soil arch could be neglected.
-
Key words:
- side slope /
- soil arching /
- numerical simulation /
- soil arch height
-
赵晓彦,张京伍,梁瑶,等. 花岗岩类土质边坡主被动组合锚固设计方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(3): 633-639. ZHAO Xiaoyan, ZHANG Jingwu, LIANG Yao, et al. Design method for combined active/passive anchoring for granitoid soil slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(3): 633-639. 贾剑,周顺华,宫全美. 砂性土成拱应力释放特性的模型试验及数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学,2013,34(2): 395-403. JIA Jian, ZHOU Shunhua, GONG Quanmei. Stress release characteristics of sandy soil arching by laboratory tests and numerical simulation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(2): 395-403. 赵晓彦,吴兵,李登峰,等. 考虑桩间水平土拱效应的边坡桩间墙组合结构受力计算方法[J]. 岩土工程学报,2016,38(5): 811-817. ZHAO Xiaoyan, WU Bing, LI Dengfeng, et al. Load calculation method for retaining wall between piles considering horizontal soil arching effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(5): 811-817. 张海丰,马保松,王福芝. 被动土拱效应对土压力计匹配误差的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报,2016,38(2): 350-354. ZHANG Haifeng, MA Baosong, WANG Fuzhi. Influence of passive soil arching effect on matching error of earth pressure cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 350-354. 俞缙,周亦涛,蔡燕燕,等. 基于土拱效应的刚性挡墙墙后主动土压力[J]. 岩石工程学报,2013,35(12): 2306-2310. YU Jin, ZHOU Yitao, CAI Yanyan, et al. Active earth pressure against rigid retaining wall considering soil-arching effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Enginee, 2013, 35(12): 2306-2310. 黄治云,张永兴,董捷. 桩板墙土拱效应及土压力传递特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2013,34(7): 1887-1892. HUANG Zhiyun, ZHANG Yongxing, DONG Jie. Experimental study of soil arching and transfer behavior of earth pressure about sheet-pile walls[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(7): 1887-1892. 刘斌,杨敏. 疏排桩-土钉墙组合支护结构的疏排桩计算模型[J]. 土木工程学报,2012,45(11): 159-165. LIU Bin, YANG Min. Computational model for scattered row plies of composite retaining structure with scattered row plies and soil nailing wall[J]. Chana Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(11): 159-165. LI Changdong, WU Junjie, TANG Huiming, et al. A novel optimal plane arrangement of stabilizing piles based on soil arching effect and stability limit for 3D colluvial landslides[J]. Engineering Geology, 2015, 195: 236-247. PARDO G S, SEZ E. Experimental and numerical study of arching soil effect in coarse sand[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 57: 74-84. LI Jingpei, WANG Mei. Simplified method for calculating active earth pressure on rigid retaining walls considering the arching effect under translational mode[J]. International Journal of Gemechanics, 2014, 14(2): 283-292. 赵明华,陈耀浩,杨超炜. 考虑土拱作用抗滑桩合理桩间距确定方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2015,37(Sup.2): 16-21. ZHAO Minghua, CHEN Yaohao, YANG Chaowei. Methods for determining rational spacing between anti-slide piles considering soil arching effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Enginee, 2015, 37(Sup.2): 16-21. 蒋良潍,黄润秋,蒋忠信. 黏性土桩间土拱效应计算与桩间距分析[J]. 岩土力学,2006,27(3): 445-450. JIANG Liangwei, HUANG Runqiu, JIANG Zhongxin. Analysis of soil arching effect between adjacent piles and their spacing in cohesive soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(3): 445-450. 胡晓军,王建国. 边坡加固工程中抗滑桩间距的确定[J]. 河海大学学报:自然科学版,2007,35(3): 330-333. HU Xiaojun, WANG Jianguo. Determination of anti-slide pile spacing in side slope consolidation projects[J]. Journal of Hohai University: Natural Sciences, 2007, 35(3): 330-333. 铁道第二勘察设计院. TB100262006铁路路基支挡结构设计规范[S]. 北京:中国铁道出版社,2006. 可列因. 散粒体结构力学[M]. 陈万佳译.北京:人民交通出版社,1983: 39-46. 李长冬. 抗滑桩与滑坡体相互作用机理及其优化研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学,2009. 林治平,刘祚秋,商秋婷. 抗滑桩结构土拱的分拆与联合研究[J]. 岩土力学,2012,33(10): 3109-3114. LIN Zhiping, LIU Zuoqiu, SHANG Qiuting. Research on soil arch of anti-slide pile structure with methods of separation and combination[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(10): 3109-3114. 王成华,陈永波,林立相. 抗滑桩间土拱力学特性与最大桩间距分析[J]. 山地学报,2001,19(6): 556-559. WANG Chenghua, CHEN Yongbo, LINLixiang. Soil arch mechanical character and suitable space between one another anti-sliding pile[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2001, 19(6): 556-559. 吕庆,孙红月,尚岳全. 抗滑桩桩后土拱形状及影响因素[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报,2010,42(4): 629-633. L Qing, SUN Hongyue, SHANG Yuequan. Shape of soil arch behind anti-slide piles and its major influence factors[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2010, 42(4): 629-633. 魏作安,周永昆,万玲,等. 抗滑桩与滑体之间土拱效应的理论分析[J]. 力学与实践,2010,32(3): 57-61. WEI Zuoan, ZHOU Yongkun, WAN Ling et al. Theoretical analysis of the soil-arc mechanism between soils and reinforcing piles[J]. Journal of Mechanics and Practice, 2010, 32(3): 57-61. 李邵军,陈静,练操. 边坡桩-土相互作用的土拱力学模型与桩间距问题[J]. 岩土力学,2010,31(5): 1352-1358. LI Shaojun, CHEN Jing, LIAN Cao. Mechanical model of soil arch for interaction of piles and slope and problem of pile spacing[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(5): 1352-1358. 赵晓彦. 类土质边坡特性及其锚固设计理论研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2005. 杨明,姚令侃,王广军. 桩间土拱效应离心模型试验及数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学,2008,29(3): 817-822. YANG Ming, YAO Lingkan, WANG Guangjun. Study of centrifuge model tests and numerical simulation on soil arching in space of piles[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(3): 817-822.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 476
- HTML全文浏览量: 66
- PDF下载量: 228
- 被引次数: 0